Editorial

Inappropriate Drug Prescribing and Polypharmacy Are Major Causes of Poor Outcomes in Long-Term Care

Polypharmacy and multimorbidity is a threat to older people; hence, listing approaches should support physicians to optimize medication. The FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) classification of drug appropriateness for older people provides positive or negative labels: A (A-bsolutely), B (B-eneficial), C (C-areful), and D (D-on't). Based on these categories, FORTA-labeled drug lists were developed in 7 European countries or regions; the same approach was used to develop a U.S.-FORTA List reflecting the country-specific availability and usage of drugs.

A 2-step Delphi-type approach was employed to add, remove, or relabel drugs from the listing proposal and to add or remove new indications. The proposal utilized the European (EURO)-FORTA list as template.

Eight US-based geriatricians/pharmacists served as raters. Measurements: Raters gave recommendations and comments on the list items.

The first U.S.-FORTA List contains 273 items aligned to 27 main indication groups; 30 drugs and drug groups were added, and 23 removed as being unavailable in the United States. The highest percentage of changes in FORTA labels as compared to the EURO-FORTA List occurred for sleep disorders associated with dementia (40%). In 8 indications, the labels for 11 items were different from the proposal. Thus, for the majority of the items (n = 232, 95.5%), the proposals were accepted by the US raters. Only 16 (6.6%) of the proposed items (n = 243) had to be re-evaluated in the second round as a result of inconsistent rating in the first round.

The U.S.-FORTA List addresses the appropriateness of drugs for older people in the United States reflecting country-specific availability, usage, and expert rating. As shown for the FORTA list in Europe, this listing approach is among the few that are clinically validated and improve well-being and geriatric outcomes. The U.S.-FORTA List now largely enhances the global availability of this approach.

Our aim was to describe the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) in Belgian nursing homes and to identify characteristics of residents, general practitioners (GPs), and nursing homes (NHs) that are associated with the number of PIMs and PPOs.

A cross-sectional study.

and Participants: Nursing home residents (NHRs), aged ≥65 years, not in palliative care were included in 54 Belgian NHs participating in the COME-ON study.

Instances of PIMs were detected using a combination of the STOPP v2 and AGS 2015 Beers criteria. Instances of PPOs were detected using START v2. To assess factors associated with the number of PIMs and PPOs, a multivariate binomial negative regression analysis was performed.

A total of 1410 residents, with a median age of 87 years, was included. The median number of medications taken was 9. PIMs were detected in 88.3% of NHRs and PPOs in 85.0%. Use of benzodiazepines (46.7%) and omission of vitamin D (51.5%) were the most common PIM and PPO, respectively. The factor most strongly associated with increased PIMs was the use of 5 to 9 drugs or ≥10 drugs [relative risk (RR) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.27 (1.89, 2.76) and 4.04 (3.37, 4.89), respectively]. The resident's age was associated with both decreased PIMs and increased PPOs. PIMs and PPOs were also associated with some NH characteristics, but not with GP characteristics.

Implications: The high prevalence of PIMs and PPOs remains a major challenge for the NH setting. Future interventions should target in priority residents taking at least 10 medications and/or those taking psychotropic drugs. Future studies should explore factors related to organizational and prescribing culture. Moreover, special attention must be paid to the criteria used to measure inappropriate prescribing, including criteria relative to underuse.

Institutionalization is generally a consequence of functional decline driven by physical limitations, cognitive impairments, and/or loss of social supports. At this stage, intervention to reverse functional losses is often too late. To be more effective, geriatric medicine must evolve to intervene at an earlier stage of the disability process. Could nursing homes (NHs) transform from settings in which many residents dwell to settings in which the NH residents and those living in neighboring communities benefit from staff expertise to enhance quality of life and maintain or slow functional decline? A task force of clinical researchers met in Toulouse on December 2, 2015, to address some of these challenges: how to prevent or slow functional decline and disabilities for NH residents and how NHs may promote the prevention of functional decline in community-dwelling frail elderly. The present article reports the main results of the Task Force discussions to generate a new paradigm.