Original ContributionsMedication List Assessment in Spanish Hospital Emergency Departments
Introduction
Patient safety strategies are essential to ensure quality of care (1). The World Alliance for Patient Safety recommends ensuring the accuracy of information about medication during transitions in care (1). Half of medication errors occur in the processes of transition of care (2). The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations stresses that medication reconciliation at the various points in the health care process when attending staff change is the key to reducing the number of adverse drug effects (3).
Medication reconciliation is a formal process to obtain a complete current list of a patient's medications at points where patient care is transferred to ensure correct prescription after transfer. Errors in medication reconciliation result in unintentional discrepancies between medication prior to and after the transfer of care (4). The main step in the medication reconciliation process is to draw up a complete, reliable list of the patient's home medications to prevent medication errors.
Studies in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom report rates of medication reconciliation errors ranging from 26.9% to 65% 5, 6, 7. In a systematic review of 22 studies involving a total of 3755 patients, Tam et al. found that 27–54% of patients had at least one medication history error and that 19–75% of the discrepancies were unintentional (8). A previous study in Spain reported 167 medical reconciliation errors in 76 patients (45.5%); 69% of these errors occurred at admission (9). Other studies show that clinical histories taken in different areas of the hospital do not thoroughly record information about patients' medications 10, 11, 12. Incomplete information can lead to ineffective or unsafe drug treatment.
Obtaining a complete medication history in the emergency department (ED) would help avoid medication errors. However, the urgent nature of ED treatment and the need to make decisions quickly make it difficult to obtain a thorough medication history. Nevertheless, the unavailability of a complete medication history increases the risk of medication errors (e.g., omissions, duplications) both in the ED and after transfer of care.
In a Spanish study, Gutierrez et al. reviewed ED prescriptions for 177 patients and found 141 prescribing errors in 50 patients (13). Assessing physicians considered the potential impact of the errors very significant in 12% of cases and significant in 52% of cases. Iniesta Navalón et al. found 2928 discrepancies involving 95.1% of patients over 65 years of age who were assessed on admission (24–48 h) to their ED (14).
In the present study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of patients with discrepancies between the medications they were actually taking prior to admission to the ED and the information about these medications recorded in the clinical history taken on admission to the ED at 11 hospitals in Spain, characterize the discrepancies found, and explore the factors associated with discrepancies.
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive, observational, multicenter study with an analytic component in the EDs of 11 hospitals in Spain. Each hospital conducted the study during a 1-month period between November 2009 and February 2010. All the participating hospitals were General Hospitals, which are hospitals where patients with many different ailments are given care, and which offer medical, surgical, obstetric, gynecological, and pediatric services (15). Hospitals are also considered to
Results
The sample size calculated for all hospitals was 387 patients. The patient sample size range in all ED observation areas was 21–49. The sample size was stratified by the number of patients in each ED observation area for the participating hospital, range 50.665–118.329. The sample size included 50.1% women; mean age 67 years; age range 18–101 years; the average age was 67.2 ± 19.48 years and 62.5% of the patients were older than 65 years. Nearly 70% were responsible for taking their medication
Discussion
This multicenter study found discrepancies between the EDML and the PML in all 11 participating hospitals. Although all these hospitals volunteered to participate in the study, the patients included in the study are a representative sample of the patients who presented to the EDs of these hospitals. The study was carried out using the same methods, design, and definitions in all participating centers, and the homogeneous training and use of a structured interview minimized interviewer bias. Our
Conclusion
The high prevalence of discrepancies in the 11 hospitals participating in our study, which were located in different areas in Spain, underlines the need for medication reconciliation in busy departments like the ED. The most frequent discrepancies detected were errors of omission and incomplete medication lists, and these are easy to avoid through the active participation of the patient. This study shows that medication lists are not recorded correctly in Spanish EDs, and this could affect
References (26)
- et al.
Conciliation in medication [Spanish]
Med Clin (Barc)
(2007) - et al.
Prescription errors in patients admitted to an internal medicine department from the emergency room [Spanish]
Farm Hosp
(2006) - et al.
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation
J Chronic Dis
(1987) - et al.
Medication reconciliation on hospital admission in patients with multiple chronic diseases using a standardised methodology [Spanish]
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol
(2013) - et al.
Medicines reconciliation in critically ill patients
Med Intensiva
(2014) - et al.
Medication reconciliation in a rural trauma population
Ann Emerg Med
(2008) - World Health Organization, Joint Commission International. Patient safety solutions preamble – May 2007. Available at:...
- et al.
Medication safety: one organization's approach to the challenge
J Clin Outcomes Manage
(2001) JCAHO views medication reconciliation as adverse-event prevention
Am J Health Syst Pharm
(2005)- et al.
Unintended medication discrepancies at the time of hospital admission
Arch Intern Med
(2005)
Reconciliation of discrepancies in medication histories and admission orders of newly hospitalized patients
Am J Health Syst Pharm
Medication discrepancies affecting senior patients at hospital admission
Am J Health Syst Pharm
Frequency, type and clinical importance of medication history errors at admission to hospital: a systematic review
CMAJ
Cited by (17)
Accuracy of patient self-administered medication history forms in the emergency department
2020, American Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :The results highlight that while a self-administered form may be feasible in this setting, the accuracy must be verified via a BPMH to mitigate the risk of patient harm. Previous studies have shown that the medication history process in the ED is error prone, and even lists obtained by ED professionals may be inaccurate when compared to a BPMH by a pharmacist [11]. There may be also discordance between patient reported medications and those from pharmacy dispensing records [12].
Medication reconciliation: A shared responsibility
2015, Medicina ClinicaImpact of Partnered Pharmacist Medication Charting (PPMC) on Medication Discrepancies and Errors: A Pragmatic Evaluation of an Emergency Department-Based Process Redesign
2023, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health