A room for living: Private and public aspects in the experience of the living room
Introduction
According to previous research, the living room is mostly used to communicate self and social identity to guests (e.g., Amaturo et al., 1987, Cooper, 1974, Goffman, 1959, Korosec-Serfaty, 1984, Laumann and House, 1970). Thus, the communication of identity was highlighted, while researchers paid less attention to more personal and private meanings.
A more recent study that investigated the dwelling experiences of inhabitants of studios and shared apartments in New York City (Rechavi, 1996) found that participants created spaces in their rooms that included a large seating item, in front of which was a coffee-table, or beside which was an end table. These wall-less “living rooms” were used for hosting guests, as well as for the leisure activities of the dwellers. The fact that dwellers of such small spaces set aside an area resembling a living room suggested that living rooms were central to the experience of home, and that the living room may afford a richness of experience that had not yet been explored. The current paper presents some findings from a study that attempted to more fully understand dwellers' experiences of their living rooms, as reflected in their own descriptions.
Section snippets
Literature review
The present study was guided by the grounded theory approach (Strauss & Corbin, 1990), and did not test hypotheses deducted from existing literature. However, the findings of the present study did bring up hypotheses of relevance to previous literature and, thus, open up new debates and avenues of research. Therefore, before describing the present study, it is worthwhile to review the general research context in which it can be situated. More specific comments regarding past studies will be
Research design and methods
Based on the grounded theory approach (Strauss & Corbin, 1990), this study was guided by the data collected, rather than by a-priori hypotheses. Analysis of the data led to formulations of hypotheses that will be presented in the discussion.
Sketches of the living room and the floor/apartment where the living room was located, still-photographs of the living rooms, and observations of the living rooms supplemented the interviews. Interviews yielded the bulk of the data. The sketches (see Fig. 1)
A description of the living rooms
Despite the fact that different types of dwellings were included in this study, ranging from apartments to brownstones, rented to owned, small one bedrooms to two-floor houses, and despite the fact that the dwellers represented people of both genders, of different age groups, and of different economic abilities, the living rooms of all the participants shared several common themes. For one, all included a couch. In addition, fourteen out of the sixteen participants (87%) had an additional seat
Discussion and hypotheses generated
All participants, but one, spent a great deal of time in the living room by themselves. They used the living room to watch television, write, read, look out the window and frequently to contemplate. Architectural features alone, such as numbers of rooms, could not account for this use. All participants in this study used their living rooms to host guests. Hosting ranged from infrequent big parties with tens of people attending to smaller gatherings with close friends and family. Most
Limitations and future research
Previously in this paper, factors leading to the multifunctional middle-class living room that emerged during the early 20th century were described. However, beginning in 1950s, many middle-class homes were constructed with family rooms in addition to living rooms, especially in the suburbs. Most of the homes included in the present study were constructed before the Second World War, and none of the homes chosen for this study, other than one, had a family room. Future studies might compare the
Acknowledgments
The author is most grateful to the participants who welcomed her into their homes, and shared their life-stories with her. Without their help this study would never have taken place. This manuscript owes a great deal to Professor Maxine Wolfe for her very generous and invaluable ongoing counsel. The author also wishes to express her gratitude for the excellent guidance of Professor Leanne Rivlin and Dr. David Chapin. Special thanks to Drs. Dalit and Marc Robinson-Rechavi for their crucial piece
References (67)
The meaning of objects in environmental transitions: experience of Chinese students in the United States
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(1992)The home from attic to cellar
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(1984)For better or worse: exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(2005)Placing home in context
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(2000)Spatial organization of activities of Japanese families
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(1992)- et al.
The evaluation of space in homes: a facet study
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(1993) - et al.
Older women's attachments to their home and possessions
Journal of Aging Studies
(2004) The meaning of a home: an exploratory study of environmental experience
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(1986)- et al.
A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction
(1977) The environment and social behavior
(1975)
Culture and environment
A cross-cultural and dialectic analysis of homes
Furnishing and status attributes: a sociological study of the living room
Environment and Behavior
Centuries of childhood: A social history of the family
The poetics of space
Group homes: A study of community residential environments
Reflections on home: implications for housing design for elderly persons
Housing and Society
Staying in place: farm homes and family heritage
Housing and Society
Outline of a theory of practice
Neighbors, households and front porches: new urbanist community toll or mere nostalgia?
Environment and Behavior
Geography of home: Writings on where we live
The house as symbol of the self
The house as a mirror of self: Exploring the deeper meaning of home
Alone together: A history of New York early apartments
Sleeping around: a history of American beds and bedrooms: the second Banham memorial lecture
Journal of Design History
The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self
Feeling at home in nursing homes
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Technology and dishwashers: are users still wasting water?
Canadian Home Economics Journal
Homes and social change: A cross-cultural analysis
Naming the rooms: implications of a change in the home model
Environment and Behavior
The presentation of self in everyday life
Cited by (22)
Linking crowding, housing inadequacy, and perceived housing stress
2016, Journal of Environmental PsychologyCitation Excerpt :At the level of the built environment, basic standards of safety and habitability are essential for physical and emotional well-being (Burdette et al., 2011; Clark & Kearns, 2012; Evans, Wells, Chan, & Saltzman, 2000; Marsh, Gordon, Heslop, & Pantazis, 2000; Newman & Garboden, 2013). A dwelling is also a social space, so a gathering zone for residents as well as visitors should be of sufficient size, comfort, and attractiveness (Rechavi, 2009; Wells & Harris, 2007). Each inhabitant needs a private space into which to retreat, whether for care of the self or for interaction with certain other inhabitants (Pedersen, 1999).
Experiences of home and institution in a secured nursing home ward in the Netherlands: A participatory intervention study
2015, Journal of Aging StudiesCitation Excerpt :When an individual has control over a place, it becomes ‘defensible space’, while lack of control undermines such a sense of ‘ownership’ (Barnes, 2002; Cooney, 2012). Personalisation of a private room marks a sense of territory and control, and is a visual expression of the resident's identity and lifestyle (Cutchin, Owen, & Chang, 2003; Hauge & Heggen, 2007; Higgins, 1989; Rechavi, 2009; Shin, 2014). Cooney (2012) suggested that people ‘who “created” their own space usually considered the facility their home’ (p. 192).
The impact of a refurbishment of two communal spaces in a care home on residents' subjective well-being
2010, Journal of Environmental PsychologyCitation Excerpt :This arrangement allowed interaction among small parties, with a possibility to pull more chairs to each table, or even join tables in case a larger group wanted to gather, which essentially allowed control over the number of people interacting. The second major change of the lobby was the creation of two semi-separated areas at the back of the lobby, each with a living-room prototype appearance (cf. Rechavi, 2009) with a couch, coffee table and easy chairs, limiting contact to 6 persons at the most, proper for small group socializing. Observation data showed that the lobby was mostly occupied during afternoons by a group of 6–8 residents, usually consisting of the same people.
Home-making of older Antillean migrants in the Netherlands
2014, Ageing and SocietyThe engagement of Polish residents with their home space in single-family houses and flats in multi-family blocks of flats
2024, Journal of Housing and the Built EnvironmentMaterialities of Home in Migration
2024, IMISCOE Research Series