Elsevier

Journal of Geriatric Oncology

Volume 11, Issue 8, November 2020, Pages 1263-1267
Journal of Geriatric Oncology

First-line panitumumab plus capecitabine for the treatment of older patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. The phase II, PANEL study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.06.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Panitumumab has a low rate of immunogenicity compared with other antibodies against EGFR because of its fully human nature.

  • The combination of panitumumab and capecitabine was suggested to be effective in older patients with WT RAS mCRC.

  • The good tolerability and safety profile of the combination were in line to previous studies in older patients.

  • Panitumumab with capecitabine may provide an alternative to other anti-EGFR regimens in older patients with WT RAS mCRC.

Abstract

Background

Despite the high morbidity and mortality of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in older patients, they have been underrepresented in clinical trials and their optimal treatment is yet to be determined. This open-label phase II study evaluated the benefits of panitumumab and capecitabine as a first-line chemotherapy regimen in older patients with wild-type [WT] RAS mCRC.

Patients and Methods

Patients (≥70 years; ECOG≤2) received 3-week cycles of panitumumab (9 mg/kg on day 1) plus capecitabine (850 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was evaluated every 9 weeks according to RECIST_1.1. Outcome measures were: objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), progression (TTP) and treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (11 women; median age: 78 years; ECOG: 0 [26%], 1 [67%], 2 [7%]) were evaluated. Median follow-up was 17.7 months. Confirmed ORR (95%CI) was 44.4% (25.7–63.2), with 25.9% of patients achieving at least stable disease. Median (95%CI) DoR was 8.7 (5.5–10.4) months, and median TTR was 2.2 (1.9–2.8) months. Median TTP was 9.6 (4.8–11.5) months, with a median TTF of 5.2 (2.8–7.2) months. The median PFS was 7.5 (4.4–10.4) months, and the median OS was 23.7 (7.4–27.5) months. Seventeen (63%) patients reported panitumumab and/or capecitabine-related adverse events grade 3–4, with skin toxicity (18.5%) being the most common. Two (7.4%) deaths were treatment-related.

Conclusion

This study suggests that panitumumab plus capecitabine is a safe and effective regimen in older patients with WT RAS mCRC.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in Western countries and remains the second and third-most common cancer in women and men, respectively [1]. Patients with CRC are usually older, with 67% of patients aged 65 years or older at the time of diagnosis. The number of older population diagnosed with this malignancy is expected to increase markedly in the near future [2,3].

Generally, cutting-edge research on new treatment strategies does not include older populations; in fact, many clinical trials exclude older patients. If included, this age group is often underrepresented, precluding meaningful conclusions on safety and efficacy [4]. Therefore, healthcare professionals face an information gap when treating this population with an often poor functional status, important comorbidities and fragility.

In the treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC), the development of new biological molecules targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as panitumumab and cetuximab, has been a key factor in major advances in mCRC treatment [5]. In particular, these two agents have been shown to significantly improve patient outcomes, either used alone or in combination with chemotherapy [6].

In 2012, the Spanish Digestive Tumour Treatment Group (TTD) investigated the effect of the combination of capecitabine and anti-EGFR cetuximab in older patients. In our study, patients receiving cetuximab (loading dose of 400 mg/m2 and 250 mg/m2 weekly) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2/12h, days 1–14, every 3 weeks [Q3W]) presented a response rate of 48.3% (95% CI: 29.4–67.5%) with a median progression free survival (PFS) of 8.6 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 19 months, respectively, in patients with wild-type (WT) KRAS [7]. Panitumumab, a fully human anti-EGFR mAb, has been shown to be active in monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy in patients with WT RAS mCRC. Panitumumab does not show the immunogenic activity of cetuximab, despite having the same mode of action and spectrum of activity [8]. Furthermore, due to its pharmacokinetic profile, panitumumab can be administered Q2W or Q3W, allowing to synchronize with chemotherapy schemes administered in the same way.

In older patients, capecitabine, a prodrug of fluorouracil, has shown to be effective and well tolerated as first-line monotherapy and has become a consolidated alternative to the 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combination [9].

Therefore, the addition of panitumumab to capecitabine is expected to improve its efficacy while maintaining a favourable toxicity profile and, thanks to its Q3W administration schedule, to become an attractive option for older patients with WT RAS mCRC. In this phase II study we aimed to investigate the response rate in older patients with WT RAS mCRC treated with panitumumab and capecitabine as a first-line chemotherapy regimen.

Section snippets

Study Design

This was a phase II, open label, single-arm study conducted in eight centres in Spain. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

Participants

The main inclusion criteria were: written informed consent; aged ≥70 years; histologically confirmed mCRC not eligible for surgical resection; WT RAS (primary tumour and/or metastases); measurable disease as defined in the Revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours

Baseline Characteristics

Between February 2013 and November 2016, 39 patients were enrolled to treatment, 12 of whom were withdrawal mainly for not fulfilling the selection criteria (n = 8). In total 27 patients began study treatment in eight centres in Spain. The cut-off date of this analysis was August 2019, 24 months after the inclusion of the last patient. There was no protocol deviation in terms of inclusion or exclusion criteria. All patients had histologically documented metastases at the start of the study and

Discussion

This study was designed to assess the benefits of panitumumab and capecitabine as a first-line regimen in older patients with WT RAS mCRC. We obtained an ORR of 44%, and most patients (41%) presented PR as the best response during the study.

Asimakopoulou et al. conducted a retrospective study in 110 older patients with WT KRAS mCRC who were treated with chemotherapy and panitumumab. Information was extracted from the Hellenic Oncology Research Group database. The ORR obtained for the overall

Conclusion

Our conclusions are limited by the non-randomized nature of the study and the population included, which may be biased towards a poorer prognosis. However, in the current scenario of lack of therapeutic choices and poor outcomes in older patients with WT RAS mCRC, we believe the ORR observed in our study is relevant, and that, coupled with a safety profile similar to that of capecitabine alone, suggest that capecitabine plus panitumumab may be a well-tolerated and effective regimen in this

Disclosure

This work was supported by Amgen S.A. Amgen did not have any role in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data and writing the report.

Declaration of Competing Interests

All authors declare no potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank patients and their families for their enthusiasm and participation in this project as well as to the members of the GITuD group for their effort and dedication.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (4)

  • Reduced-dose of doublet chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR antibodies in vulnerable older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Data from the REVOLT study

    2022, Journal of Geriatric Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, the safety profile of the Sastre et al. trial was poor, with a high incidence of severe paronychia (29.6%) that declined after dose adjustment of capecitabine (7.7%) [25]. Seventeen (63%) patients reported panitumumab and/or capecitabine-related adverse events G3–4, with skin toxicity (18.5%) being the most common with two (7.4%) treatment-related deaths in the PANEL study [26]. And again, older patients suffered from a significantly longer duration of toxicities compared to younger patients in a third study reporting two deaths due to infections with cetuximab and capecitabine combination [27].

  • Elderly Rectal Cancer: An Updated Review

    2024, Current Oncology Reports
View full text