Synthesis, characterization and binding affinities of rhenium(I) thiosemicarbazone complexes for the estrogen receptor (α/β)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2014.06.012Get rights and content

Abstract

The binding affinities towards estrogen receptors (ERs) α and β of a set of thiosemicarbazone ligands (HLn) and their rhenium(I) carbonyl complexes [ReX(HLn)(CO)3] (X = Cl, Br) were determined by a competitive standard radiometric assay with [3H]-estradiol. The ability of the coordinated thiosemicarbazone ligands to undergo deprotonation and the lability of the Resingle bondX bond were used as a synthetic strategy to obtain [Re(hpy)(Ln)(CO)3] (hpy = 3- or 4-hydroxypyridine). The inclusion of the additional hpy ligand endows the new thiosemicarbazonate complexes with an improved affinity towards the estrogen receptors and, consequently, the values of the inhibition constant (Ki) could be determined for some of them. In general, the values of Ki for both ER subtypes suggest an appreciable selectivity towards ERα.

Graphical abstract

The binding affinity towards estrogen receptors α and β of several thiosemicarbazone ligands (HLn) and their complexes [ReX(HLn)(CO)3] was determined. These complexes can be transformed in the hydroxypyridine derivatives [Re(hpy)(Ln)(CO)3]. The affinity of these thiosemicarbazonato complexes is substantially improved and the values of Ki suggest selectivity towards the ERα.

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

The estrogen receptors (ERs) are members of the steroid/thyroid hormone nuclear receptor superfamily and they bind estrogens with high affinity [1], [2]. Their function is the transcription of factors to modulate gene expression in a ligand-dependent manner. The two subtypes, ERα and ERβ (of which there are five isoforms), are products of different genes and differ in their tissue distribution, although the DNA-binding and ligand bond domains are highly conserved (97% and 61% amino acid identity, respectively) [2]. Both receptors play an important role in the growth of hormone-dependent breast cancer [3], [4]. Immunohistochemical analyses suggest that ERβ may have a dominant role in the healthy mammary gland, and its expression decreases in cancer and metastatic lymph node tissues [5], [6]. Overexpression of ERα is frequently observed in the early stage of breast cancer and this is accompanied by increased cell proliferation [7], [8], [9]. On the other hand, the discovery of the relationship between a high concentration of ERα and the sensitivity of the breast cancer to antiestrogenic molecules led to the possibility of designing drugs to predict the response to antihormonal therapy [3]. This regulation in cancer is the main reason why ER has become an active target for molecular imaging: noninvasive imaging technology offers great promise for the in vivo characterization of estrogen-dependent tumors [9]. Thus, the search for ER-targeted radiopharmaceuticals is an active research area because to date ER radiopharmaceuticals are not in routine clinical use [10], [11], [12].

Fortunately, the crystal structures of the ligand binding domain (LBD) of ERα and different agonist and antagonist ligands have been determined [13], [14], [15] and, although the analogous structure of ERβ is not known, the similar structural behavior of both LBDs against the partial agonist genistein [15] allows one to consider a similar ligand binding pocket with an accessible volume of approximately 450 Å in ERα and 390 Å in ERβ. Details of the interaction between 17β-estradiol [13] and 4-hydroxytamoxifen [14] (a metabolite of the prodrug tamoxifen) are shown in Fig. 1. These findings are the structural basis for the design of the selective ER modulators (SERMs). In short, the presence of a phenol group seems to be essential for the relevant binding affinity of a molecule as this group is able to form a strong hydrogen-bonding network involving Glu353, Arg394 and an ordered water molecule, while the side-chains of 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen and raloxifene [13] are responsible for the antiestrogenic properties.

The same hypothesis has been used for the design of radiopharmaceuticals based on 99mTc, usually by obtaining its rhenium surrogate in the first stages [16], [17], [18]. Thus, two main approaches have been developed in research aimed at obtaining radiopharmaceuticals: (i) the bifunctional approach, in which a chelating group is joined by a spacer to a receptor-binding organic molecule (typically 17β-estradiol) [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29] and (ii) the integrated approach, in which the metal complex behaves as a receptor-specific molecule. In the first approach, although receptor binding assays indicated reasonably high ER affinity for this kind of compound, little or no ER-specific target tissue uptake ‘in vivo’ has been observed and this is attributed to the large size and/or the very high lipophilicity of these systems [19]. In the latter approach, the metal chelate is an essential part of the receptor binding motif because individual parts should not be active against the receptor and, ideally, the metal coordination arranges the different parts of the molecule to optimize binding to the receptor [13]. This means that the whole coordination sphere around the metal must be designed and its nature and topology must be compatible with biological media. From this point of view, the fragment fac-{M(CO)3}+ (M = Tc, Re) has always been an ideal candidate due to its robustness and kinetic stability and, since the development by Alberto et al. [30] of synthetic pathways to obtain the organometallic precursor [99mTc(H2O)3(CO)3] in saline media, this research has continued to grow [31], [32].

In previous papers, we reported the synthesis and characterization of S,N-bidentate ligands derived from thiosemicarbazones (TSCs), which form stable six-coordinated rhenium(I) complexes [33], [34], [35], [36], and the resorcinol group, which is included in the TSC ligand as 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde or 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenone. These systems show an interesting supramolecular association supported by hydrogen bonding through the 4-hydroxy group [37]. In the work reported here, we studied the relative binding affinities of related TSC Re(I) complexes and carried out modifications of the complexes to improve the ERα affinity.

Section snippets

Results and discussion

In previous work we found that TSCs are a very versatile ligands to explore the coordination of rhenium(I) [33], [35], [38], [39] and technetium(I) [40] centers. The stability of the S,N-chelate that links the TSC to the {M(CO)3}+ center, besides the easy insertion of different groups at the azomethine carbon atom, allows the design of different molecules and the exploration of their potential properties as radiopharmaceuticals. The substituents at the azomethine carbon can be chosen to include

Conclusions

A group of rhenium(I) thiosemicarbazone derivatives were prepared and the values for the displacement of [3H]-17β-estradiol from the estrogen receptor subtypes (ERα and ERβ) were determined. The ability of a group of thiosemicarbazone ligands (whose affinity for the ER is negligible) to undergo deprotonation once coordinated to the fac-{ReX(CO)3} fragment, along with the inherent lability of the Resingle bondX bond, allowed the isolation of new complexes [Re(Ln)(hpy)(CO)3] in which the halogen is replaced

Materials and methods

All solvents used for synthesis were dried over appropriate drying agents, degassed using a vacuum line and distilled under an Ar atmosphere [52]. Ligands HL5–7 were synthesized by condensation of the appropriate aldehyde with the corresponding thiosemicarbazide (Aldrich) following published procedures [37], [41], [42], [43]. Adducts [ReX(CO)3(CH3CN)2] (X = Cl, Br) were synthesized following Farona and Kraus' published methods [53] from the corresponding [ReX(CO)5](X = Cl, Br) [54]. Elemental

Abbreviations

    BHA

    butylated hydroxyanisole

    ER

    estrogen receptor

    ERα

    estrogen receptor α subtype

    ERβ

    estrogen receptor β subtype

    FBS

    fetal bovine serum

    3-hpy

    3-hydroxypyridine

    4-hpy

    4-hydroxypyridine

    LBD

    ligand binding domain, in ER

    MTT

    ([3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide])

    NaOMe

    sodium methoxide

    PBS

    phosphate buffered saline

    SERMs

    selective estrogen receptor modulators

    TSC

    thiosemicarbazone

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the European Rural Development Fund and Spanish Ministry of Education and Science both through project CTQ2010-19386/BQU.

References (60)

  • G.M. Anstead et al.

    Steroids

    (1997)
  • L. Huang et al.

    Steroids

    (2010)
  • A.K. Shiau et al.

    Cell

    (1998)
  • L.G. Luyt et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (2003)
  • M.B. Skaddan et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2000)
  • T.W. Spradau et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (1998)
  • R. Carballo et al.

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (2002)
  • A. Núñez-Montenegro et al.

    Polyhedron

    (2013)
  • A. Núñez-Montenegro et al.

    Polyhedron

    (2009)
  • A. Núñez-Montenegro et al.

    Polyhedron

    (2011)
  • A. Núñez-Montenegro et al.

    Polyhedron

    (2008)
  • R. Alberto et al.

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (1999)
  • E.S. Mull et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (2002)
  • R.N. Hanson et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (2012)
  • E.A. Ariazi et al.

    Nuclear Receptors as Drug Targets

  • M. Robinson-Rechavi et al.

    J. Cell Sci.

    (2003)
  • E.V. Jensen et al.

    Clinical

    Cancer Res.

    (2003)
  • B.S. Katzenellenbogen et al.

    Breast Cancer Res.

    (2000)
  • S.I. Hayashi et al.

    Endocr. Relat. Cancer

    (2003)
  • R.B. Clarke et al.

    Cancer Res.

    (1997)
  • J.A. Shaw et al.

    J. Pathol.

    (2002)
  • B.S. Katzenellenbogen et al.

    Breast Cancer Res. Treat.

    (1997)
  • P.W. Causey et al.

    J. Med. Chem.

    (2008)
  • S. Top et al.

    ChemBioChem

    (2004)
  • A.M. Brzozowski et al.

    Nature

    (1997)
  • A.C. Pike et al.

    EMBO J.

    (1999)
  • S. Liu

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2004)
  • U. Abram et al.

    J. Braz. Chem. Soc.

    (2006)
  • M.D. Bartholomä et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2010)
  • J.B. Arterburn et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Coordination modes of hydrazone and acyl-hydrazone ligands containing a pyridine group with the {Re(CO)<inf>3</inf>}<sup>+</sup> fragment

      2022, Polyhedron
      Citation Excerpt :

      When designing ligands HL11–HL14 (Scheme 2), we decided to include a 5-hydroxypyridine ring so that it may play a role in coordination to the metal together with the hydrazone chain. The substituents on C2 were chosen because they are susceptible to derivatization and/or able to interact with biomolecules [17]. HL14 is an exception as it contains another pyridine group.

    • Chemical and biological studies of Re(I)/Tc(I) thiosemicarbazonate complexes relevant for the design of radiopharmaceuticals

      2020, Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      X-ray diffraction studies confirmed the spectroscopic results: the thiosemicarbazonate ligands are deprotonated at the N(2) and O(1) atoms and are coordinated to the fac-[Re(CO)3]+ core through the S(1), N(3) and O(1) atoms (Table 2). The ReS bond distances in complexes 2 and 4 are close to those found in other rhenium complexes with κ3-S,N,O tridentate ligands, such as the functionalized cysteine observed in NAQRII [21], NAZJUU [22], or slightly shorter than those observed in thiophosphoryl functionalized enaminoketones such as GIVZIW [23] and MOXX00 [24] and the pyridyl-cystamine derivative QAQJEY [25]. In the latter compound the functional group including the coordinating sulfur atom cannot undergo deprotonation.

    • Tricarbonylrhenium(I) complexes with the N-methylpyridine-2-carbothioamide ligand – Synthesis, characterization and cytotoxicity studies

      2018, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some of them has been described recently [30,49–51]. An analogous core with a chlorine atom instead of a bromine atom has been reported earlier for a few complexes [50,52–57]. In turn, there are only two other crystal structures for rhenium(I) complexes in which the Re(CO)3INS core can be distinguished [58].

    • Synthesis, characterization, photophysical and electrochemical properties of rhenium(I) tricarbonyl diimine complexes with triphenylphosphine ligand

      2017, Polyhedron
      Citation Excerpt :

      Coordination compounds with tunable redox potentials, absorption and emission spectra, have attracted the worldwide attention due to their potential use in molecular devices [1–4]. Since the initial work of Wrigthon and Morse [5] on the luminescence properties of fac-[Re(CO)3(NN)Cl] compounds, NN = diimine ligands, much effort has been made to the derivatization of coordinated ligands for a wide range of applications such as photosensitization [6–8], luminescent sensors [9–13], photocatalysts [14–17], and light emitting devices [18–22]. Typically, the luminescence properties of the rhenium(I) complexes are associated with the metal-to-ligand charge-transfer excited state, MLCT, which can be tailored by changing the polypyridine ligands [23].

    • Crystal structure of N-(4-hydroxybenzyl)acetone thiosemicarbazone

      2017, Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text