Characterization of the efficiency and uncertainty of skimmed milk flocculation for the simultaneous concentration and quantification of water-borne viruses, bacteria and protozoa

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2017.01.006Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Skimmed milk flocculation simultaneously concentrate viruses, bacteria and protozoa.

  • q(RT)PCR and infectivity assay were evaluated to quantify microorganisms in water.

  • Uncertainty have been defined for the quantification of microorganisms.

Abstract

In this study, the use of skimmed milk flocculation (SMF) to simultaneously concentrate viruses, bacteria and protozoa was evaluated. We selected strains of faecal indicator bacteria and pathogens, such as Escherichia coli and Helicobacter pylori. The viruses selected were adenovirus (HAdV 35), rotavirus (RoV SA-11), the bacteriophage MS2 and bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV). The protozoa tested were Acanthamoeba, Giardia and Cryptosporidium. The mean recoveries with q(RT)PCR were 66% (HAdV 35), 24% (MS2), 28% (RoV SA-11), 15% (BVDV), 60% (E. coli), 30% (H. pylori) and 21% (Acanthamoeba castellanii). When testing the infectivity, the mean recoveries were 59% (HAdV 35), 12% (MS2), 26% (RoV SA-11) and 0.7% (BVDV). The protozoa Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum were studied by immunofluorescence with recoveries of 18% and 13%, respectively. Although q(RT)PCR consistently showed higher quantification values (as expected), q(RT)PCR and the infectivity assays showed similar recoveries for HAdV 35 and RoV SA-11. Additionally, we investigated modelling the variability and uncertainty of the recovery with this method to extrapolate the quantification obtained by q(RT)PCR and estimate the real concentration. The 95% prediction intervals of the real concentration of the microorganisms inoculated were calculated using a general non-parametric bootstrap procedure adapted in our context to estimate the technical error of the measurements. SMF shows recoveries with a low variability that permits the use of a mathematical approximation to predict the concentration of the pathogen and indicator with acceptable low intervals. The values of uncertainty may be used for a quantitative microbial risk analysis or diagnostic purposes.

Abbreviations

BVDV
Bovine viral diarrhoea virus
HAdV
Human adenovirus
IFA
Immunofluorescence assays
JCPyV
JC polyomavirus
NoV
Norovirus
PI
Prediction intervals
QMRA
Quantitative microbial risk assessment
q(RT)PCR
Quantitative (reverse transcriptase) PCR
RoV
Rotavirus
SMF
Skimmed milk flocculation
TCID50
50% Tissue culture infective dose

Keywords

Skimmed milk flocculation
Water contamination
Microorganisms
q(RT)PCR
Recovery
Real concentration

Cited by (0)