Monotone and maximal monotone affine subspaces

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2009.10.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Affine monotone and maximal monotone subspaces are characterized.

Introduction

Variational inequality problems and equilibrium problems occur in a large field of applications arising from various domains such as physics, mechanics, economics and operations research. They encompass optimization problems and related problems such as complementarity problems and saddle-point problems.

With a subset G of Rn×Rn we associate the multivalued maps Γ:RnRn and Γ1:RnRn such that G={(x,x):xΓ(x)}={(x,x):xΓ1(x)}. The set G and the maps Γ and Γ1 are said to be monotone if xy,xy0for all (x,x),(y,y)G.

They are said to be maximal monotone if they are monotone and for all monotone subsets SG of Rn×Rn one has S=G.

(Maximal) Monotone maps play in variational inequality problems the role of (lower semicontinuous) convex functions in optimization problems. We say that a multivalued map Γ is affine if its graph G is an affine subspace, i.e., G={(x,x)Rn×Rn:Ax+Bx=c}, where A and B are two p×n matrices and cRp. Affine (monotone) maps play in variational inequality problems the role of quadratic (convex) functions in optimization problems. An important class of affine variational inequality problems is the class of linear complementarity problems. A slightly more general form of these problems is as follows: Find x0,x0 such that x,x=0 and Ax+Bx=c. Linear (monotone) complementarity problems encompass quadratic (convex) optimization problems and Nash bimatrix equilibrium problems. They can be solved in a finite number of steps by an algorithm due to Lemke [6] which uses, as the simplex algorithm, pivotal rules. For linear complementarity problems see the text book by Cottle, Pang and Stone [3] and for quadratic programming see the seminal paper [5] of Frank and Wolfe.

The purpose of this paper is the analysis of monotone affine maps. In Section 2 we characterize monotone and maximal monotone affine subsets of Rn×Rn. Section 3 analyses affine monotone subspaces under linear transformations. Such transformations occur along the completion of Lemke’s algorithm. In Section 4 we provide an algorithm that builds a maximal monotone affine extension of a monotone affine subspace.

Section snippets

Characterization of affine monotone subsets

Without loss of generality, we assume that the representation given in (2) is not redundant. In other terms, the p×2n matrix (A,B) has rank p. Also, we assume that G is nonempty and not reduced to a singleton. Thus 1p<2n.

We start with a characterization of affine monotone (maps) sets in terms of matrices A and B.

Theorem 2.1

G is monotone if and only if pn and the p×p matrix ABt+BAt has exactly pn positive eigenvalues.

Proof

Let us introduce the p×2n matrix C and the 2n×2n matrix Pn defined as follows C=(A,B)and

Monotonicity under linear transformations

We consider the case where G is an affine subspace and Ĝ is the image of G under a linear transformation, i.e., there exists a 2m×2n matrix M such that Ĝ=M(G). Thus, G={(x,x)Rn×Rn:Ax+Bx=c},Ĝ={(y,y)Rm×Rm:Ây+B̂y=c} where C=(A,B)=ĈM=(Â,B̂)M. If G is monotone, Ĝ is not necessarily monotone as seen below.

Example 3.1

Let us consider the four matrices: A=(1100),B=(0011),R=(1001/2)andM=(R00R). Then Â=(1200)andB̂=(0012). From Theorem 2.2 one deduces that G is maximal monotone. Set y=(1,1/2) and y=(

Affine maximal extension of a monotone affine subspace

A classical result (see for instance [7]) states that given any monotone but not maximal monotone set G, there is a (not uniquely defined) maximal set S such that GS. The classical proof uses Zorn’s lemma and thereby is not constructive. Recently, we have proposed in [4] a direct and constructive proof. The problem is that in the particular case where G is an affine set, the maximal extension which is obtained is not necessarily affine.

Example 4.1

Let us consider G={(x,x)R2×R2:Ax+Bx=0}, where A and B

References (7)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text