Sex differences in conditioned nicotine reward are age-specific
Introduction
Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States and approximately 20% of American adults are current cigarette smokers, with males (23%) having a slightly higher rate than females (18%) (CDC, 2010). The rate of cigarette smoking in high school students in the United States is only slightly less (17%) than that of American adults, with boys having a slightly higher rate than girls (20% vs. 15%, respectively) (NSDUH, 2010). These statistics are concerning because it is well known that approximately 80% people who start smoking before the age of 18 go on to become regular smokers as adults (CDC, 2003). In fact, children and adolescents may be especially susceptible to nicotine addiction as symptoms of dependence can emerge as early as the first time or first few times tobacco is used (DiFranza et al., 2000) and can even develop in adolescents not classified as daily smokers (i.e., weekly or monthly smokers) (Panday et al., 2007).
Although more males than females smoke cigarettes in both age groups, there is some evidence that female cigarette smokers may be more susceptible to the negative health consequences of tobacco use. For example, females metabolize nicotine faster (and, thus, must dose themselves accordingly), may be more likely to develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), and have more difficulty with tobacco cessation (reviewed in Rahmanian et al., 2011) than male cigarette smokers. Further, nicotine craving may be more severe in adolescent females than in adolescent males (Panday et al., 2007). Therefore, it is important to understand sex and age differences in behaviors related to nicotine and tobacco, as well as nicotine reward.
Preclinical animal models are useful to examine whether biological sex differences and age differences have considerable effects on behaviors related to nicotine use and dependence (Carroll and Anker, 2010, Carroll et al., 2009, Lynch et al., 2002, O'Dell and Khroyan, 2009). During adolescence, subjects exhibit a unique pattern of behavioral and neurochemical responses to nicotine that are different in males and females. Examples of these age- and sex-specific behaviors and responses are described below.
Female adult rats acquire nicotine self-administration faster than males at the lowest training doses (Chaudhri et al., 2005, Donny et al., 2000, Lanza et al., 2004), and self-administer more intravenous infusions of nicotine per session than males (Rezvani et al., 2008). Although these sex differences seem to be diminished at the end of acquisition and during maintenance (Chaudhri et al., 2005, Donny et al., 2000, Lanza et al., 2004), females are more motivated to initially obtain nicotine as compared to males (Donny et al., 2000). If these findings extrapolate to humans, then perhaps women are more sensitive to lower doses of nicotine, and are more likely to continue tobacco use after fewer “tries” than are men. In adolescence, males administer more nicotine than during adulthood, after which rates decline to adult rates (Levin et al., 2007). In females, adolescents also administer more nicotine than adults; however, this difference is maintained into adulthood (Levin et al., 2003). Thus, starting nicotine during adolescence leads to different use patterns in adults compared to initiating administration in adulthood, and this is sex-dependent.
As sex differences in nicotine self-administration occur in adults, there also are sex differences in behavioral actions of nicotine in adolescents. Data from our laboratory have shown that adolescent females rapidly become sensitized to the locomotor-activating effects of nicotine, with significant effects seen on day 2 of treatment (Collins and Izenwasser, 2004). This finding is in contrast to adult female and male rats that exhibited significant sensitization beginning on day 5 of treatment. Further, adolescent male rats did not become sensitized to the locomotor-activating effects of nicotine within a 7-day treatment period, a finding that has been shown in our laboratory (Collins and Izenwasser, 2004, Collins et al., 2004a) and others (Schochet et al., 2004). Although the adolescent male and female rats were tested during the periadolescent period (postnatal days 28–40; Spear and Brake, 1983) in these studies, males and females have different rates of maturation (Ojeda et al., 1980, Ojeda et al., 1983) that could contribute to sex differences in nicotine self-administration and sensitization during adolescence. Similar to adults, adolescent female rats more easily acquire nicotine self-administration and express greater motivation to earn nicotine than adolescent male rats (Lynch, 2009).
In previous research, it has been shown that a moderate dose of nicotine (i.e., 0.6 mg/kg) produces CPP in adolescent rats but not adult rats when male and female data were combined (Vastola et al., 2002). However, the dose used in this study was based on the weight of the salt rather than nicotine as a free base, so the amount of nicotine actually received by these animals was somewhat lower. Others found similar results, in which adolescents developed CPP to the highest tested doses (0.5–0.8 mg/kg nicotine base), but older adolescents and adults did not (Belluzzi et al., 2004, Brielmaier et al., 2008, Shram et al., 2006). Torres et al. (2008) described the same results as mentioned above, but also found that both adolescents and adults developed CPP to 0.2 mg/kg nicotine. These results were specific to males, as females were not tested. In females, adolescents developed maximal CPP to 0.6 mg/kg, whereas adults developed CPP to 1.2 mg/kg nicotine (Torres et al., 2009).
Sex differences in nicotine CPP have been examined in adult animals by several groups. It has been reported that adult male rats developed CPP in response to 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg nicotine base (but not any higher doses), whereas adult females did not develop CPP to any of the doses tested (0.1–0.6 mg/kg base) (Yararbas et al., 2010). Results reported by Torres et al. (2009) were similar, in which male rats had maximal CPP to 0.2 mg/kg nicotine and females had maximal CPP to 1.2 mg/kg nicotine; males and females developed conditioned place aversion to 1.8 mg/kg. However, Wistar rats were used in the study by Torres, whereas Sprague–Dawley rats were used in the study by Yararbas. Comparisons between the two studies are somewhat limited because of potential strain differences. Further, sex differences in nicotine CPP are not species-dependent; as male and female differences also have been reported in mice. For example, both male and female mice developed significant CPP to 0.32 mg/kg nicotine, but CPP was greater in females than males at this dose (Isiegas et al., 2009). These results give credence to the idea that sex differences in nicotine reward are not specific to rats and that this likely is a general phenomenon. However, the current literature lacks reports in which effects of age and sex on nicotine reward have been addressed by directly comparing male and female adults and adolescents using nicotine conditioned place preference.
In light of this previous literature, it is clear that the rewarding effects of nicotine are different in male and female rats and that these differential responses likely will be age-specific. While males and females and adolescents and adults have been studied, full dose–response curves for nicotine CPP in all four groups have not yet been reported in a single study. In the present study, the rewarding effects of nicotine were measured using CPP to several doses of nicotine, such that full dose–response curves were attained in male and female adult and adolescent rats. In addition, the responsiveness of brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) to stimulation by nicotine was measured in each group to explore possible neurobiological correlates underlying any age and sex differences.
Section snippets
Subjects
Naïve periadolescent male (n = 110), periadolescent female (n = 52), adult male (n = 72), and adult female (n = 68) Sprague–Dawley rats were used (Charles River, Wilmington, MA). All rats were housed in a light- (12 h light/dark cycle with lights on at 7 a.m. and off at 7 p.m.), temperature- (21 ± 2 ºC) and humidity-controlled vivarium (53 ± 13%). At the start of the experiment, male and female periadolescent rats (postnatal day (PND) 34) weighed an average of 126.1 ± 1.9 g and 117.3 ± 1.5 g respectively, and the
Nicotine-induced conditioned place preference
In periadolescent male rats (PAM), 3 days of conditioning induced a significant conditioned place preference (CPP) to low doses of nicotine. Specifically, the 0.05 [t(11) = 3.989, p ≤ 0.002], 0.1 [t(11) = 3.352, p ≤ 0.001], and 0.2 [t(13) = 3.967, p ≤ 0.002] mg/kg nicotine doses induced significant place preference in the PAM group whereas the higher doses of nicotine (0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 mg/kg) and the lowest dose of nicotine (0.01 mg/kg) did not (Fig. 1A). In contrast, moderate doses of nicotine such as
Discussion
The purpose of these studies was to examine effects of sex and age on conditioned place preference (CPP) to multiple doses of nicotine and on the density of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) in the caudate putamen and nucleus accumbens of adolescent and adult male and female rats. The present data show that adolescent and adult males (PAM and ADM, respectively) develop place preferences to lower doses of nicotine than age-matched females. Further, there were age-specific responses
Acknowledgments
The animals used in this study were maintained and the studies were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Research Council, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, NIH Publication 85-23, revised 1985. This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the NIH Office of Research on Women's Health (grant DA 024584-0002).
References (56)
- et al.
Adolescent and adult responsiveness to the incentive value of cocaine reward in mice: role of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) gene
Neuropharmacology
(2006) - et al.
Nicotine place preference in a biased conditioned place preference design
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
(2008) - et al.
Sex differences and ovarian hormones in animal models of drug dependence
Horm Behav
(2010) - et al.
Modeling risk factors for nicotine and other drug abuse in the preclinical laboratory
Drug Alcohol Depend
(2009) - et al.
Chronic nicotine differentially alters cocaine-induced locomotor activity in adolescent vs. adult male and female rats
Neuropharmacology
(2004) - et al.
Nicotine treatment produces persistent increases in amphetamine-stimulated locomotor activity in periadolescent male but not female or adult male rats
Dev Brain Res
(2004) - et al.
Neurochemical alterations produced by daily nicotine exposure in periadolescent vs. adult male rats
Eur J Pharmacol
(2004) - et al.
Dopamine and nicotinic receptor binding and the levels of dopamine and homovanillic acid in human brain related to tobacco use
Neuroscience
(1998) - et al.
Analyzing the acquisition of drug self-administration using growth curve models
Drug Alcohol Depend
(2004) - et al.
Adolescent vs. adult-onset nicotine self-administration in male rats: duration of effect and differential nicotinic receptor correlates
Neurotoxicol Teratol
(2007)
Sex and ovarian hormones influence vulnerability and motivation for nicotine during adolescence in rats
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
Rewarding effects of the optical isomers of 3,4-methylenedioxy–methylamphetamine (‘ecstasy’) and 3,4-methylenedioxy–ethylamphetamine (‘eve’) measured by conditioned place preference in rats
Neurosci Lett
Rodent models of nicotine reward: what do they tell us about tobacco abuse in humans?
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
Nicotine dependence and withdrawal symptoms among occasional smokers
J Adolesc Health
Neonatal 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the frontal cortex in rats: persisting effects on locomotor activity, learning and nicotine self-administration
Neuroscience
Increased anxiety-like behavior in adult rats exposed to nicotine as adolescents
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
Prenatal nicotine exposure is associated with an increase in [125 I]epibatidine binding in discrete cortical regions in rats
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
Enhanced vulnerability to the rewarding effects of nicotine during the adolescent period of development
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
Adolescent nicotine exposure causes persistent upregulation of nicotinic cholinergic receptors in rat brain regions
Brain Res
Nicotine-induced conditioned place preference in rats: sex differences and the role of mGluR5 receptors
Neuropharmacology
Differential effects of methamphetamine and cocaine on conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in adult and adolescent rats
Behav Brain Res
Social and physical environment alter cocaine conditioned place preference and dopaminergic markers in adolescent male rats
Neuroscience
Sensitivity to cocaine conditioned reward depends on sex and age
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
Short-term adolescent nicotine exposure has immediate and persistent effects on cholinergic systems: critical periods, patterns of exposure, dose thresholds
Neuropsychopharmacology
Nicotine administration significantly alters accumbal dopamine in the adult but not in the adolescent rat
Ann N Y Acad Sci
The influence of stress on psychopharmacological responses to nicotine
Br J Addict
Age-dependent effects of nicotine on locomotor activity and conditioned place preference in rats
Psychopharmacology (Berl)
Delayed extinction and stronger reinstatement of cocaine conditioned place preference in adolescent rats, compared to adults
Behav Neurosci
Cited by (33)
Nicotine on the developing brain
2023, Pharmacological ResearchAge-dependent effects of tobacco smoke and nicotine on cognition and the brain: A systematic review of the human and animal literature comparing adolescents and adults
2023, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsChronic risperidone administration leads to greater amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference
2020, NeuropharmacologyCitation Excerpt :Most previous work assessing age effects on CPP has compared conditioning between periadolescent rats (28–45 days of age) and young adult rats (65–80 days of age). Among these studies, Mathews et al. (2010) found no difference in amphetamine CPP between male Long-Evans rats at 45 and 69 days of age, whereas methamphetamine and nicotine CPP appear to weaken with age (Lenoir et al., 2015; Zakharova et al., 2009). Perhaps work is merited to compare CPP across a broader range of adult ages in order to determine whether the age effect observed in the present study is typical, and to more confidently assess the impact of chronic risperidone administration on later CPP.
Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain
2020, Pharmacology Biochemistry and BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Age differences have also been seen in the aversive effects of nicotine. Whereas adults of both sexes experience aversive effects of high doses of nicotine, adolescents tolerate the drug well (Adriani et al., 2002; Shram et al., 2006; Torres et al., 2008, 2009; Lenoir et al., 2015). This may reflect late maturation of the medial habenula to lateral dorsal tegmental pathway that underlies nicotine aversion (Wolfman et al., 2018).
Adolescent and adult nicotine exposure differentially impacts oral nicotine and oral saccharin self-administration in mice
2019, Behavioural Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :This observation supports the results of a previous study that reported higher nicotine intake in adult female rats that initiated nicotine self-administration during adolescence as compared to those female rats that initiated self-administration in adulthood [16]. In another study, sex differences on the effects of adolescent nicotine exposure on conditioned nicotine reward were noted; the magnitude of nicotine reward in adolescent female rats was higher than adult female rats while this age-specific effect was not observed in male rats [46]. This further supports our observation that adolescent nicotine impacted the reward system differentially between male and female mice.
Nicotine effects in adolescents
2019, Neuroscience of Nicotine: Mechanisms and Treatment