Diet of sardine (Sardinops sagax) in the northern Humboldt Current system and comparison with the diets of clupeoids in this and other eastern boundary upwelling systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.045Get rights and content

Abstract

Sardines are one of the main small pelagic fish resources in eastern boundary upwelling systems (EBUS) where they play an important ecological role both as a predator of plankton and as prey of top predators. Sardine trophodynamics have been relatively well studied in three of the EBUS (the Benguela, California and Canary upwelling systems) but not in the Humboldt Current system. In this paper we describe the diet of sardine Sardinops sagax in the northern Humboldt Current system (NHCS) off Peru, using an analytical method which assesses relative dietary importance in terms of estimated prey carbon content. We assessed sardine diet by examining a total of 555 stomachs collected during six surveys conducted off Peru during the period 1996–1998, and compare our results with the diet of anchoveta Engraulis ringens off Peru and with the diets of sardines from the southern Benguela (also S. sagax) and the northern Canary (Sardina pilchardus) upwelling systems. The diet of sardine off Peru is based primarily on zooplankton, similar to that observed for anchoveta but with several important differences. Firstly, sardine feed on smaller zooplankton than do anchoveta, with sardine diet consisting of smaller copepods and fewer euphausiids than anchoveta diet. Secondly, whilst phytoplankton represents <2% of sardine dietary carbon, this fraction is dominated by dinoflagellates, whereas diatoms are the dominant phytoplankton consumed by anchoveta. Hence, trophic competition between sardine and anchovy in the northern Humboldt Current system is minimized by their partitioning of the zooplankton food resource based on prey size, as has been reported in other systems. Whereas sardine in the NHCS feed on smaller zooplankton than do anchovy in that system, sardine in the NHCS forage on larger prey and obtain a substantial portion of their dietary carbon from euphausiids compared to sardine from the northern Canary and southern Benguela Current systems.

Introduction

Sardines (the genera Sardinops and Sardina) and anchovy (the genus Engraulis) are the most important commercially-exploited small pelagic fish species worldwide, and are particularly abundant in the eastern boundary current systems (EBUS; including the Benguela, California, Canary and Humboldt Current systems). These fish feed on plankton and are the dominant forage of a variety of fish, marine mammal and seabird predators, and hence are also ecologically important.

A recent synthesis on the trophic dynamics of small pelagic fish from a variety of upwelling and other systems (van der Lingen et al., 2009) has shown that sardine and anchovy derive the bulk of their dietary carbon from zooplankton, a finding that contradicts many previous descriptions of exclusive or near-total phytophagy by these species. For example, Peruvian anchoveta (Engraulis ringens) was considered to feed directly on primary producers, which led to the belief that the large populations of anchoveta were supported by an unusually short and efficient food chain (Ryther, 1969, Walsh, 1981). This assumption was recently refuted by Espinoza and Bertrand (2008), who estimated the carbon content of prey items, as opposed to using the numerical method of stomach content analysis which is considered to be subjective (James, 1987), and showed that anchoveta forage mainly on zooplankton. Such findings improve our knowledge of the functioning of the northern Humboldt Current system (NHCS) off Peru, and illustrate the need for accurate and appropriate methods. Dietary information derived using carbon content is available for sardine and anchovy from the main EBUS (see van der Lingen et al., 2009) but not for sardine (Sardinops sagax) in the Humboldt Current system. To date, sardine in the Humboldt Current system was generally considered as feeding mainly on phytoplankton (Rojas de Mendiola, 1966, Sanchez de Benites et al., 1985, Alamo and Bouchon, 1987). This differs from recent studies on this and similar species’ diet in other ecosystems, that demonstrated that sardine derive the majority of their dietary carbon from zooplankton (van der Lingen, 2002, Garrido et al., 2008, van der Lingen et al., 2009). A single study on sardine diet in the NHCS (Konchina, 1991) mentioned that sardine consumed mainly small copepods and tunicates, but this study has seldom been considered.

In this paper we describe the diet of sardine in the NHCS based on a method which assesses relative dietary importance according to estimated prey carbon content (James, 1987, van der Lingen, 2002). We compare our results on sardine diet and prey-size spectrum with those of the anchoveta in the NHCS. We also compare the diet of sardine from the NHCS with data on the diet of sardines in other systems, including Sardinops sagax from the southern Benguela (SBCS) off South Africa, Sardina pilchardus from the northern Canary system off Portugal (NCCS), and with published work describing clupeid diets in the California Current system (CalCS). We discuss how new insights into the functioning of these systems may be extracted from such a comparative approach. In particular, we re-examine the hypothesis (Ryther, 1969) that upwelling regions are so efficient in terms of fish production because of the direct link between phytoplankton and filter-feeding fishes.

Section snippets

Sardine diet in the northern Humboldt Current system (NHCS)

Sardines were collected during six acoustic surveys conducted by IMARPE research vessels between 1996 and 1998 with the aim of estimating pelagic fish abundance in the Peruvian EEZ (Table 1). This period encompasses the El Niño of 1997–98, one of the two strongest of the last century (Wolter and Timlin, 1998). Fish were captured using a midwater trawl net (‘Engel 124/1800’, 12 mm codend mesh) and a sample of 5–20 sardines was randomly collected from each trawl. Individual sardine were measured

Sardine diet in the NHCS

A total of 555 sardine from the NHCS ranging from 10 to 30 cm total length were analysed (Table 1). Ninety-one prey taxa were identified, including 24 diatom genera, 10 dinoflagellates, 1 silicoflagellate, 1 phytoflagellate, 4 tintinnids, 1 radiolarian, 32 copepods, and 18 other genera (Table 2).

Numerical analysis of the diet when data from all the surveys were combined indicated that phytoplankton strongly dominated sardine diet and comprised 99.2% on average of all ingested prey, with copepods

Sardine diet in the NHCS

Our analysis of the composition of stomach contents of sardine in the NHCS illustrates its capability for foraging on a large variety of prey and over several trophic levels. When considering only prey numbers, sardine diet is dominated by phytoplankton and the zooplankton fraction is negligible (Fig. 1a). However, when the carbon content of prey items is considered, zooplankton becomes by far the most important component of dietary carbon. The zooplankton carbon fraction was dominated by

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank the ‘laboratorio de ecología trófica’ staff from Instituto del Mar del Perú (IMARPE) for having facilitated the use of the data. We warmly thank Patricia Ayón and Jorge Tam for very helpful discussions. We also warmly thank the three Referees their helpful insights and comments. This work is a contribution of the Research Unit ‘Upwelling Ecosystems’ UR 097 from IRD.

References (40)

  • D.H. Cushing

    Upper trophic levels in upwelling areas

  • D. Deibel

    Feeding mechanism and house of the appendicularian Oikopleura vanhoeffeni

    Marine Biology

    (1986)
  • R.L. Emmett et al.

    Pacific sardine (Sardinops sagax) abundance, distribution, and ecological relationships in the Pacific Northwest

    California Cooperative Fisheries Report

    (2005)
  • P. Fréon et al.

    Sustainable exploitation of small pelagic fish stocks challenged by environmental and ecosystem changes: a review

    Bulletin of Marine Science

    (2005)
  • S. Garrido et al.

    Diet and feeding intensity of sardine Sardina pilchardus: correlation with satellite-derived chlorophyll data

    Marine Ecology Progress Series

    (2008)
  • S. Garrido et al.

    Laboratory investigations on the effect of prey size and concentration on the feeding behaviour of Sardina pilchardus

    Marine Ecology Progress Series

    (2007)
  • M. Gutiérrez et al.

    Anchovy (Engraulis ringens) and sardine (Sardinops sagax) spatial dynamics and aggregation patterns in the Humboldt Current ecosystem, Peru, from 1983–2003

    Fisheries Oceanography

    (2007)
  • L. Hutchings

    Fish harvesting in a variable, productive environment – searching for rules or searching for exceptions?

    South African Journal of Marine Science

    (1992)
  • J.L. Iriarte et al.

    Phytoplankton size structure during and after the 1997/98 El Niño in a coastal upwelling area of the northern Humboldt Current system

    Marine Ecology Progress Series

    (2004)
  • James, A.G., 1987. Feeding ecology, diet and field-based studies on feeding selectivity of the Cape anchovy Engraulis...
  • Cited by (61)

    • Zooplankton ecological traits maximize the trophic transfer efficiency of the Humboldt Current upwelling system

      2021, Progress in Oceanography
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, in both systems foraging of anchovies and sardines is restricted to the layer above the OMZ with a clear preference for zooplankton contributing >90% of their dietary carbon (van der Lingen et al., 2006, Espinoza and Bertrand, 2008). Major prey items of anchovies are euphausiids and calanoid copepods, while sardines prefer smaller zooplankton consisting of cyclopoid and small calanoid copepods, fish and crustacean eggs and nauplii (van der Lingen et al., 2006, Espinoza et al., 2009, Espinoza and Bertrand, 2014). The Peruvian anchovy relies on different prey spectra depending on region and ontogenetic stage (Espinoza and Bertrand, 2014).

    • Small pelagic fish in the new millennium: A bottom-up view of global research effort

      2021, Progress in Oceanography
      Citation Excerpt :

      Between the two time periods compared in the present literature review, many long-held beliefs changed. This included diet studies suggesting that Peruvian anchoveta and Pacific sardine do not mainly feed on phytoplankton but on zooplankton (Espinoza and Bertrand 2008, 2014; Espinoza et al., 2009, 2017) in agreement with observations in the Benguela system, (van der Lingen et al., 2006b). Moreover, anchovy and sardine in the HCS forage on larger prey items such as euphausiids to a greater degree than in other systems (Espinoza et al., 2009).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text