Diagnosis of Schmallenberg virus infection in malformed lambs and calves and first indications for virus clearance in the fetus

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.11.029Get rights and content

Abstract

Since mid-December 2011, samples from malformed lambs and calves are sent to CODA-CERVA in Belgium for diagnosis of Schmallenberg virus (SBV), a novel Orthobunyavirus that was first detected by researchers of the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI, Germany) in German cattle in autumn 2011 and was later shown to be involved in congenital malformations in lambs, goat kids and calves. Surprisingly, by making use of real time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays developed by the FLI, presence of SBV RNA could only be confirmed in part of the SBV suspected newborns examined. To investigate possible causes for non-confirmation by rRT-PCR, a comparative analysis between different organs and tissues (cerebrum, cerebellum, brain stem, spinal cord, thymus, spleen, lymph nodes, meconium) originating from respectively 90 and 81 malformed lambs and calves was undertaken. Furthermore, thoracic fluids of respectively 55 malformed lambs and calves were examined by a virus neutralization test (VNT) to evaluate the presence of neutralizing anti-SBV antibodies in these animals. Our results show that among the different organs tested by rRT-PCR, brain stem material is the most appropriate tissue for SBV detection while it could also be detected in all other tissues but to a more variable degree. The VNT test showed that 95% of the malformed lambs were positive for anti-SBV neutralizing antibodies while this was only the case for 44% of malformed calves. These immunological data suggest that a humoral immune response could assist in the clearance of SBV from the fetus during gestation and that SBV specific antibody testing should be considered together with rRT-PCR analysis for confirmation of SBV infection.

Introduction

In November 2011, a new virus was detected by metagenomic analysis at the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI, Germany) that had caused milk drop, diarrhea and fever in adult cattle during the summer of 2011 in Germany and the Netherlands (Hoffmann et al., 2012) and later was shown to be involved in congenital malformations in lambs, calves and goat kids (Herder et al., 2012, Van den Brom et al., 2012). The virus was named Schmallenberg virus (SBV) and belongs to the Simbu serogroup of Orthobunyaviruses (Goller et al., 2012, Hoffmann et al., 2012). Malformations that are observed in aborted, stillborn or neonatal lambs and calves tend from arthrogryposis to torticollis, scoliosis, kyphosis and brachygnathia inferior. At necropsy, deformities of the central nervous system like hydranencephaly and hypoplasia of the cerebrum, cerebellum and/or spinal cord are commonly observed (Garigliany et al., 2012a, Garigliany et al., 2012b, Herder et al., 2012, Van den Brom et al., 2012).

Since the emergence of SBV, real time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays suitable to detect the L and S segment of the SBV genome have been developed and distributed by the FLI (Germany) and it has been described that using these PCRs, SBV can be found in multiple tissues and organs (spleen, cerebrum, spinal cord, rib cartilage, placental fluid, umbilical cord and meconium) of aborted lambs and calves (Bilk et al., 2012). CODA-CERVA, the Belgian reference laboratory responsible for SBV diagnosis since the first suspected cases appeared from mid-December 2011 in Belgium, has used these PCRs for the diagnosis of SBV in samples of suspected aborted lambs and calves. Because of practical and budgetary constraints, only one sample of each SBV suspected animal was tested. The overall results of this rRT-PCR diagnosis have been published by the Belgian government (www.afsca.be/diergezondheid/schmallenberg) and show that despite viral detection in a part of the SBV suspected lambs and calves (report of July 3, 2012: respectively 66% and 35% of SBV suspected lambs and calves were confirmed by rRT-PCR since the emergence of SBV in Belgium), a considerable number of suspected cases could not be confirmed by rRT-PCR. A similar discrepancy between SBV suspected and rRT-PCR confirmed lambs and calves has been reported by the Dutch authorities (www.vwa.nl/onderwerpen/dierziekten/dossier/schmallenbergvirus). The reason for these unconfirmed cases is still unclear. It has been hypothesized that maybe insufficient amounts of virus were present in these organs at the time of rRT-PCR analysis or that the virus had been cleared from the fetus during the considerable time gap between the moment of SBV infection of the fetus and the moment the symptoms are observed at parturition. The longer gestation period in cattle in comparison to sheep might explain the lower percentage of SBV confirmed calves than lambs (ProMED-Mail, 2012, Garigliany et al., 2012a).

In this manuscript we describe our research efforts to identify the most appropriate tissue or organ(part) for SBV detection in aborted lambs and calves by rRT-PCR. This study was performed to maximize the likelihood of SBV detection if only one sample for each SBV suspected animal can be tested. We also present the results of serological testing carried out in aborted lambs and calves to find indications of an SBV infection in animals that were SBV negative by rRT-PCR at birth or abortion.

Section snippets

Material from suspected lambs and calves

All samples tested in this study originated from aborted or stillborn lambs and calves between December 26, 2011 and February 29, 2012 that showed typical malformations described for SBV infection, being arthrogryposis, hydranencephaly or hypoplasia of cerebrum and/or cerebellum, and were therefore considered as SBV suspected. None of them had received colostrum. Some or all of the following organs and body fluids were collected from these animals and stored at −80 °C till the moment of

SBV detection by rRT-PCR in different organs of aborted or stillborn lambs and calves

To determine the most appropriate tissue for SBV detection in aborted or stillborn malformed lambs and calves via rRT-PCR, different neurological and immunological tissues of affected animals were examined. In total, samples from 90 lambs and 81 calves were tested, although not all different materials were available for all animals and could therefore not be analyzed. The results of the comparison are presented in cross tables.

For lambs, brain material turned out to be the best matrix to detect

Discussion

CODA-CERVA received the first samples of SBV suspected lambs around mid-December 2011, and from the beginning of January 2012 also samples from SBV suspected calves were received. Despite the fact that the observed neurological malformations suggested a neurotropic behavior of SBV, a plethora of different organs were sent in for rRT-PCR diagnosis of SBV. Because of the steep rise in the number of suspected animals, and the associated workload and costs for analyses, only a limited number of

Conclusions

Our results indicate that among the different organs of aborted lambs and calves that were tested in this study, brain stem material is the most suitable matrix for SBV detection by rRT-PCR. Despite the optimization of SBV diagnosis by rRT-PCR, only a part of the SBV suspected animals is confirmed by this virological test, indicating that SBV is probably cleared from the fetus in a part of the suspect cases. Examination of thoracic fluids of aborted lambs and calves by a VNT showed that most of

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank Martin Beer and Bernd Hoffmann from the FLI for the provision of primer/probe sequences for SBV detection by rRT-PCR.

We thank the Belgian regional Animal Health Care centers (ARSIA and DGZ) for the collection of different samples from aborted lambs and calves.

We thank all the technicians of the Unit ‘Enzootic and (re)emerging Diseases’ for their excellent technical assistance during the SBV outbreak.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (74)

  • Akabane, Aino and Schmallenberg virus — where do we stand and what do we know about the role of domestic ruminant hosts and Culicoides vectors in virus transmission and overwintering?

    2017, Current Opinion in Virology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Together with the finding that also SBV RNA was often no longer detectable by real time PCR in malformed progeny at birth [61,71,72], this largely explains why this group is not considered as a potential source of virus for newly emerging adult Culicoides during next spring. The cumbersome virus detection at birth is probably the result of the long gestational period during which virus can be gradually eliminated from the fetus and the presence of neutralizing antibodies that mask infectious virus or contribute to virus elimination during gestation [2,71,98–100]. A second group are the neonatal lambs and calves born without severe gross malformations that are mostly observed during the beginning and end of the outbreak seasons of AKAV and SBV.

  • Updating an Overview of Teratology

    2024, Methods in Molecular Biology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text