Phylogeny of Neotropical Sicarius sand spiders suggests frequent transitions from deserts to dry forests despite antique, broad-scale niche conservatism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106569Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Sand spiders are mostly restricted to African and Neotropical dry forests and xeric scrublands.

  • Divergence between African and Neotropical forms occurred during the Cretaceous.

  • Speciation events of taxa from Neotropical dry biomes took place in the Miocene.

  • Lineages from deserts invaded dry forest habitats 2–3 times in their history.

  • Niches are conserved in broad scale (dry vs. mesic) but labile in small scale (dry vs. dry).

Abstract

Phylogenetic niche conservatism (PNC) shapes the distribution of organisms by constraining lineages to particular climatic conditions. Conversely, if areas with similar climates are geographically isolated, diversification may also be limited by dispersal. Neotropical xeric habitats provide an ideal system to test the relative roles of climate and geography on diversification, as they occur in disjunct areas with similar biotas. Sicariinae sand spiders are intimately associated with these xeric environments, particularly seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs) and subtropical deserts/scrublands in Africa (Hexophthalma) and the Neotropics (Sicarius). We explore the role of PNC, geography and biome shifts in their evolution and timing of diversification. We estimated a time-calibrated, total-evidence phylogeny of Sicariinae, and used published distribution records to estimate climatic niche and biome occupancy. Topologies were used for estimating ancestral niches and biome shifts. We used variation partitioning methods to test the relative importance of climate and spatially autocorrelated factors in explaining the spatial variation in phylogenetic structure of Sicarius across the Neotropics. Neotropical Sicarius are ancient and split from their African sister-group around 90 (57–131) million years ago. Most speciation events took place in the Miocene. Sicariinae records can be separated in two groups corresponding to temperate/dry and tropical/seasonally dry climates. The ancestral climatic niche of Sicariinae are temperate/dry areas, with 2–3 shifts to tropical/seasonally dry areas in Sicarius. Similarly, ancestral biomes occupied by the group are temperate and dry (deserts, Mediterranean scrub, temperate grasslands), with 2–3 shifts to tropical, seasonally dry forests and grasslands. Most of the variation in phylogenetic structure is explained by long-distance dispersal limitation that is independent of the measured climatic conditions. Sicariinae have an ancient association to arid lands, suggesting that PNC prevented them from colonizing mesic habitats. However, niches are labile at a smaller scale, with several shifts from deserts to SDTFs. This suggests that PNC and long-distance dispersal limitation played major roles in confining lineages to isolated areas of SDTF/desert over evolutionary history, although shifts between xeric biomes occurred whenever geographical opportunities were presented.

Introduction

Patterns of variation in species diversity, from communities to biomes, have long intrigued biogeographers. Different biomes have different biotic composition, and to understand how such diversity was attained it is crucial to assess the relative importance of biome conservatism vs. biome switching (Crisp et al., 2009). The biome conservatism hypothesis predicts that lineages tend to retain their ancestral ecological traits, and that colonization of novel biomes over evolutionary history is rare. This is mainly due to phylogenetic niche conservatism (PNC), which has been defined as an evolutionary process in which related species are more similar in the ecological niche they occupy than would be expected by chance (Losos, 2008). Empirical evidence for the biome conservatism hypothesis, however, is controversial and largely focused on testing biome conservatism vs. switching in plant lineages (but see Antonelli et al., 2018). Studies addressing the potential contribution of conservatism in Neotropical biomes are relatively scant (see Donoghue and Edwards, 2014 for a review). One of such few studies showed, for instance, an unexpected high degree of biome switching between wet forests and savannas in South American plant lineages (Simon et al., 2009). This indicates that biome conservatism might not be as common as suggested in the literature. On the other hand, niches are always conserved to some extent, and it is expected that related species occupy similar biomes (Wiens and Graham, 2005). Thus, to better understand the distribution of organisms we should not only investigate if the niches are conserved or not, but also identify at what level niche shifts happened.

Besides wet forests and savannas, the Neotropical region also houses a considerable extent of drought-associated biomes (henceforth dry biomes). These biomes harbour unique species and lineage diversity (Pennington et al., 2009, DRYFLOR, 2016), but are often overlooked in studies aiming at understanding the assembly of the Neotropical biota. Studying dry biomes is no easy task because they occur in several disjunct areas, or nuclei, scattered along the Neotropical region (Pennington et al., 2000, Werneck, 2011; see also Fig. 1). Despite their current geographical isolation, a significant part of the biota of these nuclei is shared among them, at least at the generic or family levels (Prado and Gibbs, 1993, Pennington et al., 2000, Werneck, 2011, Magalhaes et al., 2017). Some authors have argued that such fragmented distribution has persisted over long enough evolutionary timescales to have influenced the evolution and biogeography of dry biomes (Pennington et al., 2009). This led to the prediction that, due to historical dispersal limitation associated with island biogeographic rules, there is high geographical structure in phylogenetic relatedness in dry biomes (Pennington et al., 2009). This pattern holds for plant lineages (Lavin, 2006), with closely-related taxa tending to occupy the same nuclei. This suggests that dispersal limitation plays a prominent role in the assembly of the biota of Neotropical dry biomes. However, dry biomes are a heterogeneous assemblage, ranging from warmer, seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs) to subtropical deserts, where climatic conditions are more unpredictable. This finer-scale variation in climatic conditions could also have shaped the diversification of organisms associated with dry biomes, especially if these are evolving under strong phylogenetic niche conservatism. Nonetheless, this question remains unexplored.

The evolutionary timing is a third factor that should be taken in to account to understand processes of biome shift or conservatism. Older lineages likely have had more opportunities to either shift between biomes or to colonize distant areas with similar conditions. The timing of assembly of Neotropical dry biomes is still a matter of discussion. It has been hypothesized that these dry biomes share a significant portion of their biota because they have been connected in the past. Influential studies have suggested that these connections may have taken place in the drier, colder periods of the Pleistocene – the Pleistocene arc hypothesis (PAH) (Prado and Gibbs, 1993, Pennington et al., 2000). This hypothesis predict that lineages from different SDTF nuclei should have diverged recently, no later than the Pleistocene. However, many phylogenetic studies of taxa associated to SDTFs have found divergence times that are much deeper than the ones expected by the PAH, mostly in the Miocene (Pennington et al., 2004, Werneck et al., 2012, Beati et al., 2013, Magalhaes et al., 2014, Côrtes et al., 2015). While it seems likely that Neotropical dry biomes have been connected in the past, the timing and causes of such events remain unclear. Dated phylogenies would not only shed light on this question, but also put niche conservatism in a time scale and allow quantifying the number of niche shifts in a given period of evolutionary time.

A sound phylogenetic basis is fundamental to addressing these biogeographical questions. There are several dated, large-scale phylogenetic studies of plants associated with dry environments, particularly SDTFs (e.g. Pennington et al., 2004, Côrtes et al., 2015). However, there is only a handful of phylogenies focusing on animals from Neotropical dry biomes, (e.g. Werneck et al., 2012, Beati et al., 2013, Palma et al., 2014, Lanna et al., 2018, Fonseca et al., 2018). The majority of these studies included only a few focal species, are geographically restricted, and do not cover the wide range of climatic conditions within the dry biomes. The focal group of this study, the sand spiders (subfamily Sicariinae), are a particularly interesting model to study the evolution dry biomes. These spiders are widespread and restricted to several SDTF nuclei, deserts and xeric scrublands in America and Africa. These medium to large spiders have special setae that adhere to soil particles, so they are able to camouflage on the ground to ambush their prey. The subfamily includes two genera: the 21 species of Sicarius Walckenaer, 1867 occur in South and Central America, while the eight species of Hexophthalma Karsch, 1879, are restricted to southern Africa (Magalhaes et al., 2017, Lotz, 2018). Sicariids seem to be very poor dispersers: their diversity is highly structured geographically (Binford et al., 2008, Magalhaes et al., 2014, Magalhaes et al., 2017) and they do not disperse by ballooning (rafting in the wind using silk strands, often over long distances) (see Binford et al., 2008). The divergence between the Sicarius and Hexophthalma has been estimated to have occurred before the separation of South America and Africa (Binford et al., 2008). Thus, these genera have long evolutionary history spanning most of the major geological events that could have shaped current Neotropical and southern African biodiversity. Their ancient association with a wide array of dry environments suggests that niche conservatism might play an important role in their evolution. All of this suggests they would be excellent models to test the relative roles of niche conservatism and dispersal limitation in the diversification of a dry-associated group of organisms.

To increase our understanding of the biogeographic history of Neotropical dry biomes, we examined the timing of diversification of Sicariinae lineages and explored the relative importance of historical dispersal limitation and phylogenetic niche conservatism in explaining their current distribution. We focused particularly on Sicarius because this genus is more diverse, occupies a wider range of climatic conditions and biomes, and has a more disjunct distribution, and thus is an ideal model to explore these questions. We gathered a comprehensive, specialist-based dataset on the distribution of Sicariinae species, characterized the climatic space occupied by these spiders, and generated a robust, dated phylogeny for the subfamily based on multiple gene regions and morphological data. Specifically, we established three hypotheses to test whether patterns of phylogenetic niche conservatism and dispersal limitation shaped the evolutionary history of Sicarius: (H1) phylogenetic niche conservatism was a major force shaping the distribution of Sicarius, and lineages inhabiting SDTFs and deserts are reciprocally monophyletic; (H2) due to historical dispersal limitation within each of these two groups closely related species occur in geographically close areas; and (H3) divergence among Sicarius species pre-date the Pleistocene, suggesting that phylogenetic niche conservatism has persisted over long evolutionary timescales.

Section snippets

Sicariinae distribution, biome occupancy and characterization of climatic niche

Georeferenced records of Sicarius and Hexophthalma were obtained from Magalhaes et al., 2017, Lotz, 2012, representing virtually all the published records of the subfamily to date (available as online Supp. file S8). We took two complementary approaches to investigate the biomes and climatic niches occupied by Sicariinae spiders. To characterize biome occupancy, we sorted Sicariinae records using the biome classification of Olson et al. (2001), with two modifications following

Characterization of climatic space and biome occupancy

All variables indicative of higher temperatures and precipitation correlate positively with PC1, while those indicative of higher daily/annual variation in temperatures and precipitation correlate negatively (Supp. Fig. S1). Biologically, we interpret higher values of PC1 as representing areas with hotter, wetter, and more stable climates. A visual inspection of the frequency histogram of PC1 values associated with Sicariinae records indicates a clear bimodal distribution allowing us to define

Discussion

Estimated divergence between species of spider groups that occur in different continents are frequently much younger than the break-up of ancient landmasses, and their present distribution is best explained by recent long-distance dispersal (e.g., euophryine salticids, Zhang and Maddison, 2013; nephiline araneids, Kuntner et al., 2013; lycosids, Piacentini and Ramírez, 2019; but see Chousou-Polydouri et al., 2019 for evidence of continental vicariance in orsolobids). In contrast, our results

Author contributions

AJS and ILFM designed the study. ADB, AJS and ILFM performed fieldwork. ADB, AJS, THDAV and FRS provided reagents and equipment for molecular work. ILFM identified specimens, gathered sequences and specimen records, gathered climatic niche and biome data, and performed phylogenetic analyses. DMN designed and performed variation partitioning analyses. ILFM, DMN and AJS led the writing of the first version of the manuscript. All authors worked on the final version of the text.

Acknowledgements

A. Dippenaar and P. Marais (AcAT, South Africa), L. Esposito and D. Ubick (CAS, USA), L. Carvalho (CHNUFPI, Brazil), P. Motta (DZUB, Brazil), M. Ramírez (MACN, Argentina), A. Kury (MNRJ, Brazil), R. Pinto da Rocha (MZSP, Brazil) and R. Orellana (UNSAAC, Peru) kindly lent specimens from the collections under their care. We thank A.O. Porta, A. Taucare Ríos, B.T. Faleiro, C. Calitra, C. Veloso, E. Florez-Daza, F. Cala-Riquelme, F.M. Hughes, G.F.B. Pereira, H.A. Iuri, J. Ochoa, J. Cabra García,

Funding

This study was supported by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina (doctoral fellowship to ILFM and grants PIP 2012-0943 and iBOL Argentina 2012), Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, Argentina (PICT 2015-0283), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brazil (301776/2004-0 to ADB; 308613/2016-3 to FRS; 407288/2013-9, 405795/2016-5, 306222/2015-9 to AJS), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, Brazil (

References (72)

  • J.X. Zhang et al.

    Molecular phylogeny, divergence times and biogeography of spiders of the subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae)

    Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.

    (2013)
  • A. Antonelli et al.

    Amazonia is the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2018)
  • G. Baele et al.

    Improving the accuracy of demographic and molecular clock model comparison while accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty

    Mol. Biol. Evol.

    (2012)
  • L.F. de M. Bartoleti et al.

    Phylogeography of the dry vegetation endemic species Nephila sexpunctata (Araneae: Araneidae) suggests recent expansion of the Neotropical Dry Diagonal

    J. Biogeogr.

    (2017)
  • L. Beati et al.

    Amblyomma cajennense (Fabricius, 1787) (Acari: Ixodidae), the Cayenne tick: phylogeography and evidence for allopatric speciation

    BMC Evol. Biol.

    (2013)
  • M.J. Benton et al.

    Paleontological evidence to date the Tree of Life

    Mol. Biol. Evol.

    (2007)
  • L. Bidegaray-Batista et al.

    Gone with the plate: the opening of the Western Mediterranean basin drove the diversification of ground-dweller spiders

    BMC Evol. Biol.

    (2011)
  • F.G. Blanchet et al.

    Forward selection of explanatory variables

    Ecology

    (2008)
  • D. Borcard et al.

    Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales

    Ecology

    (2004)
  • D. Borcard et al.

    Numerical Ecology with R

    (2011)
  • R. Bouckaert et al.

    Beast 2: a software platform for Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis

    PLoS Comput. Biol.

    (2014)
  • M. Cardillo et al.

    The phylogeny and biogeography of Hakea (Proteaceae) reveals the role of biome shifts in a continental plant radiation

    Evolution

    (2017)
  • N. Chousou-Polydouri et al.

    Giant goblins above the waves at the southern end of the world: the biogeography of the spider family Orsolobidae (Araneae, Dysderoidea)

    J. Biogeogr.

    (2019)
  • M.T.P. Coelho et al.

    Biogeographical history constrains climatic niche diversification without adaptive forces driving evolution

    J. Biogeogr.

    (2019)
  • A.L.A. Côrtes et al.

    The Tetramerium lineage (Acanthaceae: Justicieae) does not support the Pleistocene Arc hypothesis for South American seasonally dry forests

    Am. J. Bot.

    (2015)
  • M.D. Crisp et al.

    Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale

    Nature

    (2009)
  • D. Darriba et al.

    jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing

    Nat. Methods

    (2012)
  • Y. Desdevises et al.

    Quantifying phylogenetically structured environmental variation

    Evolution

    (2003)
  • M.J. Donoghue et al.

    Biome shifts and niche evolution in plants

    Ann. Rev. Ecol., Evol. Syst.

    (2014)
  • DRYFLOR

    Plant diversity patterns in Neotropical dry forests and their conservation implications

    Science

    (2016)
  • S. Echeverría-Londoño et al.

    Plant functional diversity and the biogeography of biomes in North and South America

    Frontiers Ecol. Evol.

    (2018)
  • R.C. Edgar

    MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2004)
  • E.M. Fonseca et al.

    Diversification with gene flow and niche divergence in a lizard species along the South American “diagonal of open formations”

    J. Biogeogr.

    (2018)
  • A. Iturralde-Vinent et al.

    Age and paleogeographical origin of Dominican amber

    Science

    (1996)
  • Ø. Hammer et al.

    PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis

    Palaeontol. Electronica

    (2001)
  • C. Heibl et al.

    Distribution models and a dated phylogeny for Chilean Oxalis species reveal occupation of new habitats by different lineages, not rapid adaptive radiation

    Syst. Biol.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text