Short communicationSeroprevalence of canine dirofilariosis in South Korea
Introduction
Dirofilariosis is a disease of world-wide distribution, but the most endemic areas are those with temperate, tropical and subtropical countries (Kume, 1970). In recent years, many epidemiological surveys of this disease have been performed in many countries (Hatsushika et al., 1992 in Japan; Matola, 1991 in Tanzania; Montoya et al., 1998 in Canary Islands of Spain; Rosa et al., 2002 in Argentina). South Korea is one of the enzootic regions of Dirofilaria immitis, and the prevalence of heartworm infection in dogs appears to have increased in recent years. This is due to lack of administration of the preventive medication (Lee, 1993) and education for owners since heartworm disease is relative new problem in veterinary clinics of South Korea. This study was performed to investigate the prevalence of canine dirofilariosis and also to compare the prevalence of this disease in four areas with different environmental conditions such as shoreline areas, two urban areas and mountain areas in South Korea.
Section snippets
Sampling and detection of D. immitis antigen
The study was carried out in four different areas (one shoreline area, two urban areas and one mountain area) in South Korea (Fig. 1). Environmental conditions of these areas, such as altitude, climate, temperature, relative humidity in the summer season was summarized in Table 1.
Eight-hundred and forty eight dogs (480 females and 368 males) were examined for D. immitis infection from 2001 to 2002. A blood sample was collected from the dogs brought to the private veterinary clinics for routine
Results and discussion
In South Korea, Pak and Lee (1962) first reported that microfilaremic rate of canine heartworm was 21% in the Chinju area. Lee et al. (1996) reported that the mean positive rate of canine heartworm was 28.3% in the two rural areas (Hoengsung-gun and Chungwon-gun) and the three urban areas (Yechon city, Gimhae city and Gwangju city) using antigen-detecting ELISA kit. Three-hundred and thirty nine (40.0%) of 848 samples tested with antigen detecting ELISA kits showed positive reaction for D.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Korea Research Foundation Grant (KRF-2001-041-G00091).
References (13)
- et al.
The prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain (1994–1996)
Vet. Parasitol.
(1998) - et al.
Prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in the City of Buenos Aires and its outskirts (Argentina)
Vet. Parasitol.
(2002) - et al.
The prevalence of dog heartworm [Dirofilaria immitis] infection in stray dogs in Okayama, Japan
Kawasaki Med. J.
(1992) - et al.
Further study on the potential vectors of Dirofilaria in Macon County, Alabama
J. Parasitol.
(1986) - Kume, S., 1970. In: Bradley, R.E. (Ed.), Canine Heartworm Disease: The Current Knowledge. University of Florida Press,...
Survey of canine heartworm disease in Taegu area
J. Kor. Vet. Med. Assoc.
(1993)
Cited by (59)
Prevalence and risk factors for Dirofilaria immitis in dogs from Laguna, Santa Catarina, Brazil
2022, Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and ReportsDirofilariosis caused by Dirofilaria immitis in the south of Kerman province, Iran
2021, Microbial PathogenesisEpidemiological aspects of Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs from Assam of Northeast India
2014, Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease