Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:15:35.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variations in the rate of milk secretion in milking intervals of 2–24 hours

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Gillian M. Elliott
Affiliation:
Ruakura Animal Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand and National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
F. H. Dodd
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
P. J. Brumby
Affiliation:
Ruakura Animal Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand

Summary

The rates of secretion of milk, fat and solids-not-fat have been measured over milking intervals of 2–24 h in a series of experiments using thirty cows at various stages of lactation. To ensure that the results were not biased by a carryover of residual milk and fat the residual milk was removed after intravenous injections of ‘Pitocin’. The biases that can be caused by previous interval effects and lactation trends were eliminated by the balanced Latin square design used.

Milk and solids-not-fat secretion appeared to be linear with duration of milking interval up to 16 h, but with longer intervals there was, in some experiments, a decline in the rate of secretion. There was considerable variation between cows in the decline in secretion rate with increasing milking interval and part of this variation was associated with differences in milk yield. In all experiments fat secretion appeared to be almost linear with time over a 24 h period.

After milking intervals of 20 and 24 h the rate of secretion of milk and solids-not-fat, but not of fat, was depressed for at least 16 h.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, G. L., Clough, P. A. & Dodd, F. H. (1954). Nature, Lond., 173, 404.Google Scholar
Bailey, G. L., Clough, P. A. & Dodd, F. H. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, S. (1929). J. agric. Sci. 29, 36.Google Scholar
Claesson, O., Hansson, A., Gustafsson, N. & Brannang, E. (1959). Acta agric. scand. 9, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. (1950). J. agric. Sci. 40, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenreich, L. & Mennicke, U. (1950). Milchwissenschaft, 5, 140.Google Scholar
Elliott, G. M. (1959 a). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading, England.Google Scholar
Elliott, G. M. (1959 b). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 21, 481.Google Scholar
Elliott, G. M. & Brumby, P. J. (1955). Nature, Lond., 176, 305.Google Scholar
Gasnier, M., Leroy, A. M. & Maitrejean, M. (1945). Ann. Agron. Paris, 15, 434.Google Scholar
Hansson, A. & Bonnier, G. (1947). Acta agric. suec. 2, 311.Google Scholar
Hansson, A., Claesson, O. & Brannang, E. (1956). Proc. IXth. Int. Dairy Congr. 1, 194.Google Scholar
Hansson, A., Claesson, O., Brannang, E. & Gustafsson, N. (1958). Acta agric. scand. 8, 296.Google Scholar
Hansson, A., Dassat, P. & Claesson, O. (1954). Riv. Zootec., Milano, 27, 316.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. (1940).Copy of a paper prepared for the International Dairy Congress to have been he'd in Vienna, 1940.Google Scholar
Koshi, J. H. & Petersen, W. E. (1954). J. Dairy Sci. 27, 673.Google Scholar
Krull, F. (1905). Quoted by Johansson (1940).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1956). Proc. Ruakura Fmrs' Conf. Hamilton, N.Z., p. 199.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. & Brumby, P. J. (1956). Nature, Lond., 178, 799.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C., Turner, C. W. & Brody, S. (1924). J. Dairy Sci. 7, 239.Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. (1953). Aust. J. agric. Res. 4, 118.Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. (1955 a). Aust. J. agric. Res. 6, 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, H. G. (1955 b). Aust. J. agric. Res. 6, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, H. G. (1955 c). Aust. J. agric. Res. 6, 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. J. (1949). Aust. J. Sci. Res. A2, 149.Google Scholar