Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:44:11.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics of fertility in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

R.J. Esslemont ,
M.A. Kossaibati  and
J. Allcock
R.J. Esslemont
Affiliation:
The University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Earley Gate, POBox 236, Reading, RG6 6AT
M.A. Kossaibati
Affiliation:
The University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Earley Gate, POBox 236, Reading, RG6 6AT
J. Allcock
Affiliation:
Intervet UK Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 4FP
Get access

Abstract

The financial implications of delays in conception at different stages of lactation in the average and the high yielding dairy cows were investigated. Variables included in the calculations were net loss in annual yield, lost income from a calf, cost of extended dry period, cost of slipping in calving pattern, cost of extra veterinary treatments and AI services, benefit of a delay in calving for reduced risk of production diseases, potential benefit of delay in conception on milk yield from the current lactation, and the value of quota leasing. For the average yielding cow, the net cost of one day of delay in conception was calculated at £2.41 when conception is delayed from 85 to 100 days post-calving, increasing to £5.02 per day if conception occurred at 146 to 175 days post-calving. After taking value of quota leasing into account, the net cost of a lost day was calculated at £1.73 and £3.55 per day for the two delay intervals respectively. For the high yielding cow, the net cost of one day of delay in conception was calculated at £2.48 when conception is delayed from 85 to 115 days post-calving, increasing to £6.52 per day if conception occurred between 206 and 235 days post-calving. The net costs after quota leasing being considered were calculated at £1.68 and £4.08 per day for the two delay intervals respectively. On the basis of the above estimations, and after considering the cost of culling for poor fertility, it was concluded that it is a cost-effective option to keep trying to get the typical average cow in calf until 266 days post-calving, whereas the breakeven point for the high yielding cow is at 290 days post-calving.

Type
Invited Papers
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 26 , Issue 1: Fertility in the High Producing Dairy Cow , January 2001 , pp. 19 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agriculture Budgeting and Costing Book (ABC). 1999. No. 48. Twyford, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, LE14 2HW.Google Scholar
Beynon, V.H. 1978. The disposal of dairy cows in England and Wales (1976-1977). Report No. 204. Agriculture Economics Unit, University of Exeter, UK.Google Scholar
British Dairying. 1998. December, Milk Prices League Table. p35.Google Scholar
Britt, J.H. 1985. Enhanced reproduction and its economic implications. Journal of Dairy Science 68:1585–1592 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulman, D.C. and Wood, P.D.P. 1980. Abnormal pattern of ovarian activity in dairy cows and their relationships with reproductive performance. Animal Production 30(2): 177–188 Google Scholar
Chadwick, A. 1999. Managing high yielding cows. Paper to Annual Conference, Royal Association of Dairy Farmers, Malvern, Worcestershire, UK.Google Scholar
Collins, J.D. 1995. Cow welfare in dairy farms. Irish Veterinary Journal 48:145–147 Google Scholar
Darwash, A.O., Lamming, G.E. and Woolliams, J.A. 1999. The potential for identifying heritable endocrine parameters associated with fertility in post-calving dairy cows. Animal Science 68:333–347 Google Scholar
Domecq, J.J., Nebei, R.L., McGilliard, M.L. and Pasquino, A.T. 1991. Expert system for evaluation of reproductive performance and management. Journal of Dairy Science 73:3446–3453 Google Scholar
Drew, B. 1999. Practical nutrition and management of heifers and high yielding dairy cows for optimal fertility. Cattle Practice 7(3):243–248 Google Scholar
Esslemont, R.J. 1992. Measuring dairy herd fertility. Veterinary Record 131:209–212 Google Scholar
Esslemont, R.J. 1993. Relationship between herd calving to conception interval and culling rate for failure to conceive. Veterinary Record 133:163–164 Google Scholar
Esslemont, R.J. and Peeler, E.J. 1993. The scope for raising margins in dairy herds by improving fertility and health. British Veterinary Journal, 149:537–547 Google Scholar
Esslemont, R.J. and Wassell, T.R. 1993. Herd health schemes: their scope and use by dairy farmers. Journal of Farm Management 8(4): 194–200 Google Scholar
Esslemont, R.J. and Kossaibati, M.A. 1996. Incidence of production diseases and other health problems in a group of dairy herds in England. Veterinary Record 139:486–490 Google Scholar
Esslemont, R.J. and Kossaibati, M.A. 1997. Culling in 50 dairy herds in England. Veterinary Record 140:36–39 Google Scholar
Farmers Weekly. 1999. Volume 130, No. 10 (March 5th). p38.Google Scholar
Forbes, D. 1999. Survey of Culling in Dairy Herds. British Cattle Breeders Club, Cambridge. No. 54 (in press).Google Scholar
Gartner, J.A. and Herbert, W.A. 1979. A preliminary model to investigate culling and replacement policy in dairy herds. Agricultural Systems 4(3): 189–215 Google Scholar
Goodall, E.A. and McMurray, C.H. 1984. An integration of mathematical models for feeding and lactation with reproductive performance of the dairy cow. Animal Production 38:341–349 Google Scholar
Hady, P.J., Lloyd, J.W., Kaneene, J.B. and Skidmore, A.L. 1994. Partial budget model of reproductive programs of dairy farm businesses. Journal of Dairy Science 77:482–491 Google Scholar
James, A.D. and Esslemont, R.J. 1979. The economics of calving intervals. Animal Production 29:467–472 Google Scholar
Kossaibati, M.A. and Esslemont, R.J. 1995. Wastage in Dairy Herds. DAISY Report No 4. Department of Agriculture. The University of Reading, UK.Google Scholar
Kossaibati, M.A. and Esslemont, R.J. 1997. The costs of production diseases in dairy herds in England. The Veterinary Journal 154:41–51 Google Scholar
Kossaibati, M.A. and Esslemont, R.J. 1998. Understanding The Rearing of Dairy Heifers. Booklet (A Stockman's Guide). The University of Reading and National Milk Records (NMR PLC, Chippenham, Wiltshire, SN15 1BN).Google Scholar
Langhill Report 1998. Report from the Langhill Dairy Cattle Research Centre. (June, 1998). University of Edinburgh and Scotish Agriculture College. ISBN 1854826107. p25.Google Scholar
Mclnerney, J.P. 1996. Old economics for new problems - Livestock Disease. Presidential Address. Journal of Agricultural Economics 47:295–314 Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF). 1994. Dairy herd fertility: reproductive terms and definitions. Booklet no. 2476. MAFF Publications. Lion House, Willowburn Estate, Alnwick, Northumberland, NE66 2PF.Google Scholar
Pasman, E.J. 1994. The Development of control prediction systems for milk yield and mastitis from field data. PhD thesis. Department of Agriculture, The University of Reading, UK.Google Scholar
Peters, A.D. and Ball, P.J.H. 1994. Reproduction in Cattle. Blackwell Science. p229.Google Scholar
Plaizier, J.C.B., King, G.J., Dekkers, J.C.M. and Lissemore, K. 1997. Estimation of economic values of indices for reproductive performance in dairy herds using computer simulation. Journal of Dairy Science 80:2775–2783 Google Scholar
Poole, A.H. and Mabey, S.J. 1984. Results from Farm using Checkmate. Milk Marketing Board (MMB). Information Unit. Report No 47. Thames, Ditton, Surrey.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G.H. 1989. Effect of length of calving intervals on income over feed and variable costs. Journal of Dairy Science 72:1605–1611 Google Scholar
Schutte, R. 1996. The Development of a Decision Support System for the Evaluation of Reproductive Performance of Dairy Herds. Ph.D thesis. Department of Agriculture, The University of Reading, UK.Google Scholar
Spalding, R.W., Everett, R.W. and Foote, R.E. 1975. Fertility in New York artificially inseminated Holstein herds in Dairy Herd Improvement. Journal of Dairy Science 58(5):718–723 Google Scholar
Stott, A., Veerkamp, R.F. and Wassell, T.R. 1999. The economics of fertility in the dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 49–57 Google Scholar
Van Arendonk, J.A.M. and Dykhuisen, A.A. 1985. Studies on the replacement policies in dairy herds. Influences of variation in reproduction and production. Livestock Production Science 13:333–349 Google Scholar
Warren, M.E. 1984. Biological targets for fertility and their effects on herd economics. Proceedings of a joint British Veterinary Association and British Society of Cow Production conference on “Dairy Cow Fertility”. Bristol University (28-29 June, 1994). pp.1–14.Google Scholar
Webb, R., Royal, M.D., Gong, J.G. and Garnsworthy, P.C. 1999. The influence of nutrition on fertility. Cattle Practice 7(3):227–234 Google Scholar
Weller, J.I., Bar-Anan, R. and Osterkorn, K. 1985. Effects of days open on annualized milk yields in current and following lactations. Journal of Dairy Science 68:1241–1249 Google Scholar
Wilmink, J.B.M. 1987. Adjustment of test-day milk, fat and protein yield for age, season and stage of lactation. Livestock Production Science, 16:335–348 Google Scholar