Seeing the Forest Before the Trees Depends on Individual Field-Dependency Characteristics
Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated that the well-known global precedence effect, characterized by a visual bias toward global information, is highly dependent on stimulus characteristics (Kimchi, 1992). Despite the extensive global-local literature, few studies have investigated how interindividual characteristics could affect the global precedence effect. In this framework, we studied the relationship between global-local visual biases and the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT), a standardized measure of field dependency. Data from 34 participants were consistent with the idea that an individual’s bias toward the global level is linearly related to his or her degree of field dependence. Given the important role that global-local visual skills play during visuospatial tasks, these results have important implications for future research in this area.
References
(2006). Effect of short and long exposure duration and dual-tasking on a global-local task. Acta Psychologica, 122, 247–266.
(2004). Global-local visual biases correspond with visual-spatial orientation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 24–30.
(1950). A source book of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
(1979). La psychologie de la forme [
The psychology of form ]. Paris, France: Flammarion.(2007). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2002). Hemispheric asymmetry in global/local processing: Effects of stimulus position and spatial frequency. Neuroimage, 17, 1290–1299.
(1998). Neural mechanisms of global and local processing. A combined PET and ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 485–498.
(2004). Dictionary of cognitive science. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
(2006). The field dependence/independence cognitive style does not control the spatial perception of elevation. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 377–392.
(1999). Evaluer l’intelligence: Psychométrie cognitive [
Evaluating intelligence: Cognitive psychometrics ]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.(1992). Primacy of holistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24–38.
(2003). Relative dominance of holistic and component properties in the perceptual organization of visual objects. In , Perception of faces, objects, and scenes. Analytic and holistic processes (pp. 235–268). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1935). Principles of gestalt psychology (pp. 1–720). New York: Harcourt.
(1995). Cerebral lateralization for the processing of spatial coordinates and categories in left-and right-handers. Neuropsychologia, 33, 421–439.
(1990). The effect of visual angle on global and local reaction times depends on the set of visual angles presented. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 489–496.
(1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory and Cognition, 7, 476–484.
(2005). Attending to local form while ignoring global aspects depends on handedness: Evidence from TMS. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 276–277.
(2007). Local-global interference is modulated by age, sex, and anterior corpus callosum size. Brain Research, 1142, 189–205.
(1977). Forest before the trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.
(1983). How many trees does it take to make a forest? Perception, 12, 239–254.
(2003). What does a compound letter tell the psychologist’s mind? Acta Psychologica, 114, 273–309.
(2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 11163–11170.
(1985). Manuel du test des figures encastrées [
Manual for embedded figures test ]. Paris: ECPA.(2008). First came the trees, then the forest: Developmental changes during childhood in the processing of visual local-global patterns according to the meaningfulness of the stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 44, 245–253.
(2006). Implicit identification of irrelevant local objects interacts with global/local processing of hierarchical stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 122, 321–336.
(2008). What does the nature of the stimuli tell us about the Global Precedence Effect? Acta Psychologica, 127, 1–11.
(2005). Relative weight of local and global properties depends on both the position of local elements and the saliency of global form. Experimental Psychology, 52, 272–280.
(2001). A variable mapping task produces symmetrical interference between global information and local information. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 241–252.
(2003). The holistic representation of faces. In , Perception of faces, objects, and scenes. Analytic and holistic processes (pp. 53–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2005). The role of local and global processing in the recognition of living and nonliving things. Neuropsychologia, 44, 982–986.
(1989). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1165–1178.
(2007). Deconfounding the effects of congruency and task difficulty on hemispheric differences in global/local processing. Experimental Psychology, 54, 83–88.
(1950). Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 19, 1–15.
(1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence. Psychological issues. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
(1971). Manual for embedded figures test, children’s embedded figure test, and group embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
(2005). Who sees trees before forest? The obsessive-compulsive style of visual attention. Psychological Science, 16, 123–129.
(1970). Visual perception of form. New York and London: Academic Press.
