Abstract
Cognitive control has been extensively studied using the auditory and visual modalities. In the current study, a tactile version of the Simon task was created in order to test control mechanisms in a modality that was less studied, to provide comparative and new information. A significant Simon effect – reaction time gap between congruent (i.e., stimulus and response in the same relative location) and incongruent (i.e., stimulus and response in opposite locations) stimuli – provided grounds to further examine both general and tactile-specific aspects of cognitive control in three experiments. By implementing a neutral condition and conducting sequential and distributional analysis, the present study: (a) supports two different independent mechanisms of cognitive control – reactive control and proactive control; (b) reveals facilitation and interference within the tactile Simon effect; and (c) proposes modality differences in activation and processing of the spatially driven stimulus-response association.
References
2012). Stop being neutral: Simon takes control!. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 295–304. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.507819
(2006). Effect of bilingualism and computer video game experience on the Simon task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 68–79. doi: 10.1037/cjep2006008
(2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290–303. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290
(2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
(2010). Unconscious inhibition separates two forms of cognitive control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 11134–11139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001925107
(2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
(2007). A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 37–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.005
(2011). Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 844–859. doi: 10.1037/a0019957
(2001). Effect of an initiating action on the up-right/down-left advantage for vertically arrayed stimuli and horizontally arrayed responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 472–484. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.472
(2008). Influences of response position and hand posture on the orthogonal Simon effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1020–1035. doi: 10.1080/17470210701467979
(1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
(2006). A model of dual control mechanisms through anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex interactions. Neurocomputing, 69, 1322–1326. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.100
(2012). Conflict adaptation: It is not what you expect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1993–2007. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.676655
(2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 380–390. doi: 10.3758/CABN.7.4.380
(2010). Going, going, gone: characterizing the time-course of congruency sequence effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00154
(2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784–1790. doi: 10.1038/nn1594
(1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
(2010). Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: Evidence from a Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 57, 89–97. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000012
(2008). The cognitive and neural correlates of “tactile consciousness”: A multisensory perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 370–407. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.005
(2009). The cognitive and neural correlates of tactile memory. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 380–406. doi: 10.1037/a0015325
(2008). Notes on self awareness development in early infancy. Cognition. Brain & Behavior, 12, 103–113.
(2007). Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1170–1176.
(1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
(1992). The effects of intensity and irrelevant location of a tactile stimulation in a choice reaction time task. Neuropsychologia, 30, 91–94. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90017-G
(2010). Stroop interference and facilitation effects in kinesthetic and haptic tasks. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2010, 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2010/852420
(1993). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 55, 208–222. doi: 10.1007/BF00419608
(1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261–268. doi: 10.1007/BF00419656
(2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
(2010). A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychological Review, 117, 759–784. doi: 10.1037/a0019471
(2009). Co-occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection. Memory & Cognition, 37, 358–367. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.3.358
(2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023–1026. doi: 10.1126/science.1089910
(1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
(2011). Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1056–1081. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.523792
(2007). The size of the Simon effect depends on the nature of the relevant task. Experimental Psychology, 54, 202–214. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.3.202
(1985). Executive control of thought and action. Acta Psychologica, 60, 193–210. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(85)90055-1
(1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166–174. doi: 10.3758/BF03197535
(1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207. doi: 10.3758/BF03210959
(2010). The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching. Acta Psychologica, 134, 318–322. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.004
(2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450–452. doi: 10.1038/nn1051
(2006). Somatosensory frames of reference. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
(2010). Modulations in low-frequency EEG oscillations in the processing of tactile surfaces. In , EuroHaptics (pp. 37–43). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14075-4_6
(2006). Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 112–117. doi: 10.3758/BF03193821
(2007). Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: A multiple regression approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1256–1260. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1256
(2006). Neural coding of tactile decisions in the human prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 12596–12601. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4275-06.2006
(1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
(2002a). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312–323. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7
(2002b). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In , Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention and performance, Vol. 19, (pp. 494–519). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2011). Vibrotactile “on-thigh” alerting system in the cockpit. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53, 118–131. doi: 10.1177/0018720811403139
(2011). Now you see it, now you don’t: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. Acta Psychologica, 138, 176–186. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.002
(1998). Dopamine and the mechanisms of cognition: Part I. A neural network model predicting dopamine effects on selective attention. Biological Psychiatry, 43, 713–722. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(97)00448-4
(1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrlevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433–435. doi: 10.1037/h0028034
(2010). Practice-induced and sequential modulations of the Simon effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 895–911. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.895
(2010). Congruency reversals in an accessory signal Simon task with auditory and visual stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 134, 391–397. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.001
(2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 63, 330–336. doi: 10.3758/BF03194473
(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651
(2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1345
(1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 727–735.
(1999). Facilitation and interference components in the Simon effect. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 137, 139–149.
(2005). Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: Different underlying mechanisms?. Cognition, 96, B33–B43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.009
(2002). Sense of body and sense of action both contribute to self-recognition. Cognition, 85, 177–187. Retrieved from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12127698
(2010). To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1–13. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00222
(2005). Presenting directions with a vibrotactile torso display. Ergonomics, 48, 302–313. doi: 10.1080/0014013042000327670
(1985). Stroop interference based on the multimodal correlates of haptic size and auditory pitch. Perception, 14, 729–736.
(1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360. doi: 10.1037/h0030892
(1990). Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 355–366. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.119.4.355
(2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453–464. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.453
(2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 705–731. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000269
(2008). Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: Is there regulation of expected response conflict?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 872–883. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.872
(