Skip to main content
Log in

Concentrations of Radionuclides (226Ra, 232Th, 40K, and 137Cs) in Chernozems of Volgograd Oblast Sampled in Different Years

  • Soil Chemistry
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data on the concentrations of natural (226Ra, 232Th and 40K) and artificial (137Cs) radionuclides and on the physicochemical properties of chernozems sampled in different years are presented. In 1952, upon the creation of the Penza-Kamensk state shelterbelt, three deep (up to 3 m) soil pits were examined within the former arable field under two-year-old plantations of ash and maple along the transect crossing the territory of the Beloprudskaya Experimental Station of the USSR Academy of Sciences in Volgograd oblast. The samples from these pits were included into the collection of dated soil samples of the Dokuchaev Central Soil Science Museum. Five pits were examined along the same transect in 2009: three pits under shelterbelts (analogues of the pits studied in 1952) and two pits on arable fields between the shelterbelts. In the past 57 years, certain changes took place in the soil structure, bulk density, and the content and composition of humus. The salt profile of soils changed significantly under the forests. The comparison of distribution patterns of natural soil radionuclides in 1952 and 2009 demonstrated their higher contents at the depth of 10–20 cm in 2009 (except for the western shelterbelt). Background concentrations of natural radionuclides in parent materials and relationships between their distributions and the salt profiles of soils have been determined; they are most clearly observed is the soils under shelterbelts. Insignificant contamination with 137Cs (up to 34 Bq/kg) has been found in the samples of 2009 from the upper (0–20 cm) horizon. The activity of 137Cs regularly decreases from the east to the west; the highest concentrations of this radionuclide are found in the topmost 10 cm. This allows us to suppose that 137Cs was brought with aerial dust by eastern winds, and the shelterbelts served as barriers to the wind flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Activity of Radionuclides in Countable Samples. Methodology of Measurements on Gamma Spectrometers Using the SpectraLine Software (Mendeleevo, 2014) [in Russian].

  2. R. M. Aleksakhin, N. I. Sanzharova, S. I. Spiridonov, and S. V. Fesenko, “Chernobyl and the environment,” Radiats. Biol., Radioekol. 47 (2), 196–203 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. P. Arkhipov, V. P. Mamedov, L. A. Grishina, and T. A. Fedorova, “Behavior of natural technogenic radionuclides in soils,” Ekologiya, No. 1, 31–38 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. A. Afanas’eva, Water-Salt Regime of Ordinary and Southern Chernozems in the Southeast of the European Part of the Soviet Union (Nauka, Moscow, 1980) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. O. Barsukov and D. V. Yazykeev, “Horizontal and vertical migration of 40K, 137Cs, 226Ra, 232Th, and 241Am in agrolandscapes on cultivated slopes of different steepness in Penza oblast,” Izv. Penz. Gos. Pedagog. Univ. im. V.G. Belinskogo, No. 29, 369–374 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. K. Bogatova, A. I. Shcheglov, and O. B. Tsvetnova, “Spatial heterogeneity of radioactive pollution of soils in forest phytocenoses of Tula oblast,” Aktual. Probl. Lesn. Kompl., No. 10, 78–81 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. A. Buraeva, V. S. Malyshevskii, T. V. Varduni, E. I. Shimanskii, A. N. Tribolina, A. A. Goncharenko, L. Yu. Goncharova, V. S. Totskaya, and V. S. Nefedov, “Content and distribution of natural radionuclides in different soils types in Rostov oblast,” Sovrem. Probl. Nauki Obraz., No. 4, 1–9 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. A. Vorob’eva, Theory and Practice of the Chemical Analysis of Soils (GEOS, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. D. Gurin, B. F. Aparin, and E. Yu. Sukhacheva, “Influence of forest plantations and long-term agricultural use on the properties of southern chernozems,” Vestn. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ. 3 (2), 109–119 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. A. Dmitriev, Mathematical Statistics in Soil Science (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1995) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. V. Konoplev, V. N. Golosov, V. I. Yoschenko, K. Nanba, Y. Onda, T. Takase, and Y. Wakiyama, “Vertical distribution of radiocesium in soils of the area affected by the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 49, 570–580 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. V. Lukin and A. F. Greber, “Distribution pattern of radionuclides in soil profiles of Belgorod oblast,” Dostizh. Nauki Tekh. APK, No. 1, 19–20 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. V. Mingareeva, “Use of a collection of monoliths to study the natural radiation background of Russian soils, Proceedings of International Scientific Conference (XVI Dokuchaev Conference of Young Scientists) “The Laws of Soil Science: New Challenges” (Moscow, 2013), pp. 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. S. Orlov and L. A. Grishina, Practical Manual on Humus Chemistry (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. I. Pavlotskaya, Migration of Radioactive Products of Global Emissions in Soils (Atomizdat, Moscow, 1974) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. I. Popov, V. M. Igamberdiev, and Yu. V. Alekseev, Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data (St. Petersburg State Univ., St. Petersburg, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. Natural Radiation Background: Origin and Evolution (Southern Federal Univ., Rostov-on-Don, 2007) [in Russian]

  18. Radiation Situation in Russia and Adjacent Countries in 2013: Yearbook (Obninsk, 2014) [in Russian].

  19. O. G. Rastvorova, Soil Physics (Leningrad State Univ., Leningrad, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. G. Rachkova, I. I. Shuktomova, and A. I. Taskaev, “The state of natural radionuclides of uranium, radium, and thorium in soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 43, 651–658 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. N. I. Sanzharova, A. A. Sysoeva, N. N. Isamov Jr., R. M. Aleksakhin, V. K. Kuznetsov, and T. L. Zhigareva, “Role of chemistry in rehabilitation of agricultural resources affected by radioactive pollution,” Ross. Khim. Zh. 49 (3), 26–34 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. N. Silant’ev, I. G. Shkuratova, and Ts. I. Bobovnikova, “Vertical migration of Chernobul-derived radionuclides in soils,” At. Energiya 66 (3), 194–197 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. A. Titaeva, Nuclear Geochemistry (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. A. Titlyanova, “Cesium sorption by layered soil minerals,” Pochvovedenie, No. 12, 88–94 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. D. Fokin, A. A. Lur’e, and S. P. Torshin, Agricultural Radiology (Lan’, St. Petersburg, 2011) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chemical Analysis of Soils (St. Petersburg State Univ., St. Petersburg, 1995) [in Russian].

  27. O. B. Tsvetnova and A. S. Novikova, “Radioecological situation in the forest and agricultural ecosystems of Tula oblast,” Aktual. Probl. Lesn. Kompl., No. 13, 253–257 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  28. “Environmental consequences of the Chernobyl accident and their remediation: twenty years of experience,” Report of the Chernobyl Forum Expert Group “Environment” (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2006), p. 166.

  29. S. Forsberg, A. Rosen, V. Fernandez, and H. Juhan, “Migration of 137Cs and 90Sr in undisturbed soil profiles under controlled and close-to-real conditions,” J. Environ. Radioact. 50, 235–252 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. E. P. Gomes, L. M. O. Martins, L. J. P. F. Neves, and A. J. C. S. Pereira, “Natural radiation and geochemical data for rocks and soils, in the North International Duoro Cliffs (NE Portugal),” J. Geochem. Explor. 130, 60–64 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Koarashi, M. Atarashi-Andoh, T. Matsunaga, and T. Sato, “Factors affecting vertical distribution of Fukushima accident-derived radiocesium in soil under different land-use conditions,” J. Sci. Total Environ. 431, 393–401 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. H. Koch-Steindl and G. Prohl, “Considerations on the behavior of long-live radionuclides in the soil,” J. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 40, 93–104 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. E. Mingareeva and M. Lasareva, “Using a collection of soil monoliths for the study of natural radiation of soils in Russia,” Proceedings of the 20th World Congress of Soil Science (Jeju, 2014), pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. F. Aparin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © B.F. Aparin, E.V. Mingareeva, N.I. Sanzharova, E.Yu. Sukhacheva, 2017, published in Pochvovedenie, 2017, No. 12, pp. 1457–1467.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aparin, B.F., Mingareeva, E.V., Sanzharova, N.I. et al. Concentrations of Radionuclides (226Ra, 232Th, 40K, and 137Cs) in Chernozems of Volgograd Oblast Sampled in Different Years. Eurasian Soil Sc. 50, 1395–1405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931712002X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931712002X

Keywords

Navigation