skip to main content
10.1145/2382636.2382693acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Video quality subjective assessment considering cognitive criteria and user preferences on video content

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

There are several subjective test methodologies for assessing video quality, being that each of these methods was developed by considering specific degradation factors in video quality. Therefore, for video streaming services that use TCP as transport protocol different evaluation criteria should be considered as compared to current methods, because the impairment are only pauses. In this paper, the concepts of the mechanisms that integrate perceptual and cognitive processes are studied, relating them to a test environment for subjective evaluation of video, which is limited to streaming video service transmitted via HTTP / TCP. For this reason, some recommendations to perform subjective assessment of streaming video service are proposed, taking into account perceptual and cognitive criteria. In this work, subjective tests are conducted, evaluators with different content preferences assess 3 different video content. Results show that the assessors' QoE depends strongly on video content preferences. Thus, assessors who are interested in the video content are more drastic in the ratings. In the case of sport videos, the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) value of assesors with explicit preference in sports reachs only 54% of the MOS obtained by assessors without interest in sports. Furthermore, the roll of the instructor during the test is also evaluated.

References

  1. Cisco System, Visual Networking Index, White Paper. Jun. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. G. Nyman, J. Radun, T. Leisti, J. Oja, H. Ojanen, J. Olives, T. Vuori and J. Hikkinen, What do users really perceive - probing the subjective image quality experience. Proceedings of the IS-T/SPIE's: Imaging Quality and System Performance III, Vol. 6059, 2006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. G. Nyman, J. Radun, T. Leisti, and T. Vouri, From image fidelity to subjective quality: a hybrid qualitative/quantitative methodology for measuring subjective image quality for different image contents, in Proc. of the International Display Workshops, Vol. 12, 1817--1820, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. Sheikh, Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, No. 4, Apr 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Pinson and S. Wolf, A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality, IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 312--322, Sep. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. You, A. Perkis, M. Gabbouj, and M. M. Hannuksela, Perceptual quality assessment based on visual attention analysis, in Proc. ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia, pp. 561--564, Mar. 2009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. K. Noorthy and A. C. Bovik, Visual importance pooling for image quality assessment, IEEE J. Select. Topics Signal Process., Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 193--201, Apr. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. ITU, Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures, ITU-R Recommendation BT.500--11, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ITU, Subjective Video Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications, ITU-T Recommendation-P.910, Geneva, Abr. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Redi, H. Liu, H. Alers, R. Zunino and I. Heynderickx. Comparing Subjective Image Quality Measurement Methods for the Creation of Public Databases, Electronic Imaging, SPIE Vol. 7529, pp 1--11, Apr. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. L. Blin, New quality evaluation method suited to multimedia context: Samviq, in Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics, VPQM'06, Scottsdale, January 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Video quality subjective assessment considering cognitive criteria and user preferences on video content

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WebMedia '12: Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian symposium on Multimedia and the web
      October 2012
      426 pages
      ISBN:9781450317061
      DOI:10.1145/2382636

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader