skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557095acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The implicit fan cursor: a velocity dependent area cursor

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the Implicit Fan Cursor (IFC) - a novel target pointing technique using a cursor with a fan-shape activation area. The IFC couples the cursor's activation area with its velocity, i.e., the speed and direction of the mouse motion, behaving like a 2D spotlight cursor at low speed and a circular area cursor at high speed. Thus, it enables the user to precisely acquire distant targets at low speed and easily acquire nearest targets at high speed, without explicit mode switching. This technique minimizes cursor movement, while taking into consideration of the precision of cursor movement at different speeds. It also ensures that only one target is captured at any time. The results of our controlled experiments show that the IFC outperforms the point cursor and the area cursor techniques, particularly in terms of cursor moving distance, and that its performance can be accurately modeled using the Fitts' law.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn0755-file3.mp4

mp4

8.2 MB

p753-sidebyside.mp4

mp4

193.8 MB

References

  1. Asano, T., Sharlin, E., Kitamura, Y., Takashima, K., and Kishino, F. Predictive interaction using the delphian desktop. In Proc. ACM UIST (2005), 133--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Robbins, D., Czerwinski, M., Tandler, P., Bederson, B., and Zierlinger, A. Drag-and-pop and drag-and-pick: Techniques for accessing remote screen content on touch-and pen-operated systems. In Proc. INTERACT (2003), 57--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baudisch, P., Zotov, A., Cutrell, E., and Hinckley, K. Starburst: a target expansion algorithm for non-uniform target distributions. In Proc. AVI (2008), 129--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bezerianos, A., and Balakrishnan, R. The vacuum: facilitating the manipulation of distant objects. In Proc. ACM CHI (2005), 361--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Blanch, R., Guiard, Y., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Semantic pointing: improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation. In Proc. ACM CHI (2004), 519--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Blanch, R., and Ortega, M. Rake cursor: improving pointing performance with concurrent input channels. In Proc. ACM CHI (2009), 1415--1418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Blanch, R., and Ortega, M. Benchmarking pointing techniques with distractors: Adding a density factor to fitts' pointing paradigm. In Proc. ACM CHI (2011), 1629--1638. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chapuis, O., Labrune, J.-B., and Pietriga, E. Dynaspot: speed-dependent area cursor. In Proc. ACM CHI (2009), 1391--1400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cockburn, A., and Brock, P. Human on-line response to visual and motor target expansion. In Proc. GI (2006), 81--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cockburn, A., and Firth, A. Improving the acquisition of small targets. In Proc. People and Computers XVII: BCS Conf. on Human Computer Interaction (2003), 181--196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Grossman, T., and Balakrishnan, R. The bubble cursor: enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor's activation area. In Proc. ACM CHI (2005), 281--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Guiard, Y., Blanch, R., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Object pointing: a complement to bitmap pointing in guis. In Proc. GI (2004), 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gutwin, C. Improving focus targeting in interactive fisheye views. In Proc. ACM CHI (2002), 267--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hertzum, M., and Hornbaek, K. Input techniques that dynamically change their cursor activation area: A comparison of bubble and cell cursors. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 10 (2007), 833--851. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Igarashi, T., and Hinckley, K. Speed-dependent automatic zooming for browsing large documents. In Proc. ACM UIST (2000), 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kabbash, P., and Buxton, W. The "prince" technique: Fitts' law and selection using area cursors. In Proc. CHI (1995), 273--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kobayashi, M., and Igarashi, T. Ninja cursors: using multiple cursors to assist target acquisition on large screens. In Proc. ACM CHI (2008), 949--958. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lank, E., Cheng, Y., and Ruiz, J. Endpoint prediction using motion kinematics. In Proc. ACM CHI (2007), 637--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Laukkanen, J., Isokoski, P., and Räihä, K. The cone and the lazy bubble: two efficient alternatives between the point cursor and the bubble cursor. In Proc. ACM CHI (2008), 309--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. MacKenzie, I. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction 7, 1 (1992), 91--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. McGuffin, M., and Balakrishnan, R. Fitts' law and expanding targets: Experimental studies and designs for user interfaces. ACM Trans. on Computer Human Interaction 12, 4 (Dec. 2005), 388--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Moscovich, T., and Hughes, J. Multi-finger cursor techniques. In Proc. GI (2006), 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pietriga, E., and Appert, C. Sigma lenses: focus-context transitions combining space, time and translucence. In Proc. ACM CHI (2008), 1343--1352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Soukoreff, R., and MacKenzie, I. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of fitts' law research in hci. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 6 (Dec. 2004), 751--789. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Worden, A., Walker, N., Bharat, K., and Hudson, S. Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons. In Proc. ACM CHI (1997), 266--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yin, J., and Ren, X. The beam cursor: A pen-based technique for enhancing target acquisition. In Proc. HCI (2006), 119--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The implicit fan cursor: a velocity dependent area cursor

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2014
        4206 pages
        ISBN:9781450324731
        DOI:10.1145/2556288

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 April 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader