skip to main content
research-article

SAfeDJ: A Crowd-Cloud Codesign Approach to Situation-Aware Music Delivery for Drivers

Published:21 October 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Driving is an integral part of our everyday lives, but it is also a time when people are uniquely vulnerable. Previous research has demonstrated that not only does listening to suitable music while driving not impair driving performance, but it could lead to an improved mood and a more relaxed body state, which could improve driving performance and promote safe driving significantly. In this article, we propose SAfeDJ, a smartphone-based situation-aware music recommendation system, which is designed to turn driving into a safe and enjoyable experience. SAfeDJ aims at helping drivers to diminish fatigue and negative emotion. Its design is based on novel interactive methods, which enable in-car smartphones to orchestrate multiple sources of sensing data and the drivers' social context, in collaboration with cloud computing to form a seamless crowdsensing solution. This solution enables different smartphones to collaboratively recommend preferable music to drivers according to each driver's specific situations in an automated and intelligent manner. Practical experiments of SAfeDJ have proved its effectiveness in music-mood analysis, and mood-fatigue detections of drivers with reasonable computation and communication overheads on smartphones. Also, our user studies have demonstrated that SAfeDJ helps to decrease fatigue degree and negative mood degree of drivers by 49.09% and 36.35%, respectively, compared to traditional smartphone-based music player under similar driving situations.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. 2005. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the State-of-the-Art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17, 6, 734--749. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. H. Ahmadi, N. Pham, R. Ganti, T. Abdelzaher, S. Nath, and J. Han. 2010. Privacy-aware regression modeling of participatory sensing data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, New York, 99--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Ahmed, A. Gani, M. Sookhak, S. H. A. Hamid, and F. Xia. 2015. Application optimization in mobile cloud computing: Motivation, taxonomies, and open challenges. J. Netw. Computer Appl. 52, 52--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Ahmed, A. Gani, M. K. Khan, R. Buyya, and S. U. Khan. 2015. Seamless application execution in mobile cloud computing: Motivation, taxonomy, and open challenges. J. Netw. Computer Appl. 52, 154--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Araniti, C. Campolo, M. Condoluci, A. Iera, and A. Molinaro. 2013. LTE for Vehicular Networking: A Survey, IEEE Commun. Mag. 51, 5, 148--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. Ayaki, K. Kadowaki, T. Koita, and K. Sato. 2009. A proposal of distributed music delivery system with Adaptive Jini. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems. IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. L. Baltrunas, B. Ludwig, S. Peer, and F. Ricci. 2012. Context relevance assessment and exploitation in mobile recommender systems. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 16, 5, 507--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Battle and D. Kolas. 2012. Enabling the geospatial semantic web with Parliament and GeoSPARQL. Semantic Web 3, 4, 355--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. Brickley and L. Miller. 2012. FOAF vocabulary specification 0.98. Namespace Document, 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. G. G. Cassidy and R. A. R. MacDonald. 2009. The effects of music choice on task performance: A study of the impact of self-selected and experimenter-selected music on driving game performance and experience. Musicae Scientiae 13, 2, 357--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Driving context-music choice survey. 2014. http://contextmusictest.tangkk.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Fernandes, and A. Karmouch. 2012. Vertical mobility management architectures in wireless networks: A comprehensive survey and future directions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 14, 1, 45--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. T. Fujishima. 1999. Realtime chord recognition of musical sound: A system using common lisp music. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. 464--467.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. K. Ganti, F. Ye, and H. Lei. 2011. Mobile crowdsensing: Current state and future challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 49, 11, 32--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. E. Gómez. 2006. Tonal description of music audio signals. PhD thesis, UPF Barcelona.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Helmholz, E. Ziesmann, and S. Bissantz. 2013 Context-awareness in the car: Prediction, evaluation and usage of route trajectories. In Design Science at the Intersection of Physical and Virtual Design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7939, Springer, 412--419. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. P. Helmholz, S. Vetter, and S. Bissantz. 2014. AmbiTune: Bringing context-awareness to music playlists while driving. In Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8463, Springer, 393--397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. X. Hu. 2010. Music and mood: where theory and reality meet. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14956.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. X. Hu, T. H. S. Chu, H. C. B. Chan, and V. C. M. Leung. 2013. Vita: A crowdsensing-oriented mobile cyber physical system. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Topics Computing 1, 1, 148--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. X. Hu, V. C. M. Leung, K. Li, E. Kong, H. Zhang, N. Surendrakumar, and P. TalebiFard. 2013. Social Drive: A crowdsourcing-based vehicular social networking system for green transportation. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Symposium on Development and Analysis of Intelligent Vehicular Networks and Applications. ACM, New York, 85--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. X. Hu, X. Li, E. C.-H. Ngai, V. C. M. Leung, and P. Kruchten. 2014. Multi-dimensional context-aware social network architecture for mobile crowdsensing. IEEE Commun. Mag. 52, 6, 78--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. X. Hu, T. H. S. Chu, V. C. M. Leung, E. C.-H. Ngai, P. Kruchten, and H. C. B. Chan. 2015. A survey on mobile social networks: Applications, platforms, system architectures, and future research directions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. X. Hu. 2015. Context-aware mobile crowdsensing in mobile social networks. http://mobilesoa.appspot.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Howe. 2006. The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired Mag. 14, 6, 1--4. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. P. G. Hunter, E. G. Schellenberg, and A. T. Griffith. 2011. Misery loves company: Mood-congruent emotional responding to music. Emotion. 11, 5, 1068--1072.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Last.fm. 2014. http://cn.last.fm/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. B. Lee, and W. Chung. 2012. A smartphone-based driver safety monitoring system using data fusion. Sensors 12, 12, 17536--17552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Music mood mapping survey. 2014. Retrieved from http://musicmoodtest.tangkk.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. S. R. Ness, A. Theocharis, G. Tzanetakis, and L. G. Martins. 2009. Improving automatic music tag annotation using stacked generalization of probabilistic svm outputs. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM'09). ACM, New York, 705--708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. OpenCV. 2014. http://opencv.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. S. Pauws. 2004. Musical key extraction from audio. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. T. Pedersen, S. Patwardhan, and J. Michelizzi, J. 2004. WordNet: Similarity: measuring the relatedness of concepts. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, 38--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. F. Sardis, G. Mapp, J. Loo, M. Aiash, and A. Vinel. 2013. On the investigation of cloud-based mobile media environments with service-populating and QoS-aware mechanisms. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 15, 4, 769--777. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Stata 13. 2014. http://www.stata.com/stata13/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. M. Suk, and B. Prabhakaran. 2014. Real-time mobile facial expression recognition syste: A case study. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 132--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. J. H. Su, H. H. Yeh, P. S. Yu, and V. S. Tseng. 2010. Music recommendation using content and context information mining. IEEE Intell. Syst. 25, 1, 16--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. G. Tzanetakis, and P. Cook. 2002. Musical genre classification of audio signals. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Processing. 10, 5, 293--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. K. Vu, R. Zheng, and J. Gao. 2012. Efficient algorithms for K-anonymous location privacy in participatory sensing. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. IEEE, 2399--2407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. X. Wang, D. Rosenblum, and Y. Wang. 2012. Context-aware mobile music recommendation for daily activities. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM'12). ACM, New York, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. World Health Organization (WHO). 2014. World report on road traffic injury prevention. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/road_traffic/world_report/en/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. D. Zhang, S. Chen, and Z. Zhou. 2005. A new face recognition method based on SVD perturbation for single example image per person. Applied Math. Comput. 163, 2, 895. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. M. Zwaag, C. Dijksterhuis, D. de Waard, B. L. Mulder, J. H. Westerink, and K. A. Brookhuis. 2012. The influence of music on mood and performance while driving. Ergonomics. 55, 1, 12--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. SAfeDJ: A Crowd-Cloud Codesign Approach to Situation-Aware Music Delivery for Drivers

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      RuayShiung Chang

      Hu et al. describe a music recommendation system for drivers based on the driver's social condition and fatigue level and the road condition. It uses a smartphone for local calculation and the cloud for heavy recommendation computation. After listening to the music recommended by the system, the fatigue level and the degree of negative moods will be lower compared to the drivers who do not use the system. Thus, the road will hopefully be safer. The system is called SAfeDJ (short for "safe disc jockey"). First of all, the fatigue level is both an input and a measure of the system output, so there should be a continuous feedback system; the authors didn't consider this. Second, fatigue level and moods, though related, do not entirely equate to driving safety. The test of this paper is under a controlled environment. If put to a real road situation, the results may be very different due to the many variables in a real driving situation. It will be hard to tell which factors are more important in improving driving safety. If we have sensors to detect the fatigue level, why not keep warning and reminding the drivers to take a rest instead of using suitable music to improve road safety__?__ Playing music that the driver likes will not help much. In the system, the most difficult part is to install and connect all those sensors. Calculation is relatively easy after we have data, but this part is left out of the paper completely. Also, Figures 1 and 2 are the most important and should be explained in detail. Figure 3 is not necessary, and the personal data is obtained from the user profiles of Facebook, a very unreliable and inaccurate source. Finally, a driver's personal traits and habits are the most vital to driving safety. How to detect these bad behaviors is much more important than listening to suitable music. Online Computing Reviews Service

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
        ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 12, Issue 1s
        Special Issue on Smartphone-Based Interactive Technologies, Systems, and Applications and Special Issue on Extended Best Papers from ACM Multimedia 2014
        October 2015
        317 pages
        ISSN:1551-6857
        EISSN:1551-6865
        DOI:10.1145/2837676
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 October 2015
        • Accepted: 1 July 2015
        • Revised: 1 April 2015
        • Received: 1 January 2015
        Published in tomm Volume 12, Issue 1s

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader