skip to main content
10.1145/3384382.3384529acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi3dConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Role of the Field Dependence-independence Construct on the Flow-performance Link in Virtual Reality

Published:05 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The flow experience-performance link is commonly found weak in virtual environments (VEs). The weak association model (WAM) suggests that distraction caused by disjointed features may be associated with the weak association. People characterized by field independent (FI) or field dependent (FD) cognitive style have different abilities in handling sustained attention, thus they may perform differently in the flow-performance link. To explore the role of the field dependence-independence (FDI) construct on the flow-performance link in virtual reality (VR), we developed a VR experimental environment, based on which two empirical studies were performed. Study 1 revealed FD individuals have higher dispersion degree of fixations and showed a weaker flow-performance link. Next, we provide visual cues that utilize distractors to achieve more task-oriented attention. Study 2 found it helps strengthen the task performance, as well as the flow-performance link of FD individuals without increasing distraction. This paper helps draw conclusions on the effects of human diversity on the flow-performance link in VEs and found ways to design a VR system according to individual characteristics.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a17-bian-supplement2.mp4

mp4

119.5 MB

References

  1. Bruce J Avolio, Ralph A Alexander, Gerald V Barrett, and Harvey L Sterns. 1981. Designing a measure of visual selective attention to assess individual differences in information processing. Applied Psychological Measurement 5, 1 (1981), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168100500105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Melanie Baran and Mark Chignell. 2006. Differences in cognitive ability and preference mediate effects of interruptions on simulated driving performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 50. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2008–2011. https://doi.org/10.1037/e577712012-063Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Yulong Bian, Chenglei Yang, Fengqiang Gao, Huiyu Li, Shisheng Zhou, Hanchao Li, Xiaowen Sun, and Xiangxu Meng. 2016. A framework for physiological indicators of flow in VR games: construction and preliminary evaluation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 20, 5 (2016), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0953-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Yulong Bian, Chenglei Yang, Chao Zhou, Juan Liu, Wei Gai, Xiangxu Meng, Feng Tian, and Chia Shen. 2018. Exploring the weak association between flow experience and performance in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173975Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Yulong Bian, Chao Zhou, Yeqing Chen, Yanshuai Zhao, Juan Liu, Chenglei Yang, and Xiangxu Meng. 2019. Explore the Weak Association between Flow and Performance Based on a Visual Search Task Paradigm in Virtual Reality. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 852–853.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. John K Burton, D Michael Moore, and Glen A Holmes. 1995. Hypermedia concepts and research: An overview. Computers in human behavior 11, 3-4 (1995), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(95)80004-rGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Robert L Cardy and Jerard F Kehoe. 1984. Rater selective attention ability and appraisal effectiveness: The effect of a cognitive style on the accuracy of differentiation among ratees.Journal of Applied Psychology 69, 4 (1984), 589. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.69.4.589Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Wesley C Clapp and Adam Gazzaley. 2012. Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging. Neurobiology of aging 33, 1 (2012), 134–148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Henry T Clark III and Kreig D Roof. 1988. Field dependence and strategy use. Perceptual and Motor Skills 66, 1 (1988), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1988.66.1.303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mihaly Czikszentmihalyi. 1990. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Engeser and Stefan. 2012. Advances in Flow Research ||. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Stefan Engeser and Falko Rheinberg. 2008. Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation & Emotion 32, 3 (2008), p.158–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Elizabeth Allan Flynn, Kenneth N. Barker, J. Tyrone Gibson, Robert E. Pearson, Bruce A. Berger, and Leo A. Smith. 1999. Impact of interruptions and distractions on dispensing errors in an ambulatory care pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm 56, 13 (1999), 1319–1325. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/56.13.1319Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Wei Gai, Chenglei Yang, Yulong Bian, Chia Shen, Xiangxu Meng, Lu Wang, Juan Liu, Mingda Dong, Chengjie Niu, and Cheng Lin. 2017. Supporting easy physical-to-virtual creation of mobile vr maze games: a new genre. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5016–5028. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025494Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kenneth M Goldstein. 1978. Cognitive style: Five approaches and relevant research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Anthony A Greco and Chris McClung. 1979. Interaction between attention directing and cogntiive style. ECTJ 27, 2 (1979), 97–102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M Adelina Guisande, M Fernanda Páramo, Carolina Tinajero, and Leandro S Almeida. 2007. Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema 19, 4 (2007), 572–577.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. David Hecht and Miriam Reiner. [n.d.]. Field Dependency and the Sense of Object-Presence in Haptic Virtual Environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10, 2 ([n. d.]), 243–251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Shiwei Jia, Qian Zhan, and Shouxin Li. 2014. Field dependence–independence modulates the efficiency of filtering out irrelevant information in a visual working memory task. Neuroscience 278(2014), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.075Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Eric J Jolly and Richard Reardon. 1985. Cognitive differentiation, automaticity, and interruptions of automatized behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 11, 3 (1985), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167285113006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Maria Kozhevnikov. 2007. Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style.Psychological bulletin 133, 3 (2007), 464. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Marc Lambooij, Marten Fortuin, Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, Bruce JW Evans, and Ingrid Heynderickx. 2011. Susceptibility to visual discomfort of 3-D displays by visual performance measures. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 21, 12(2011), 1913–1923. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcsvt.2011.2157193Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Marc Lambooij, MJ Murdoch, Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, and Ingrid Heynderickx. 2013. The impact of video characteristics and subtitles on visual comfort of 3D TV. Displays 34, 1 (2013), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2012.09.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Eun-Cheol Lee, Yong-Hun Cho, and In-Kwon Lee. 2019. Simulating Water Resistance in a Virtual Underwater Experience Using a Visual Motion Delay Effect. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 259–266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Danielle Lottridge and Mark Chignell. 2007. Driving under the influence of phones: The importance of cognitive ability and cognitive style on interruption-related performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 51. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1393–1397. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9962Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Pedro Macizo, Teresa Bajo, 2006. Memoria operativa y control ejecutivo: procesos inhibitorios en tareas de actualización y generación aleatoria. Psicothema 18, 1 (2006), 112–116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Richard E. Mayer and Laura J. Massa. 2003. Three Facets of Visual and Verbal Learners: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Style, and Learning Preference. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, 4 (2003), 833–841. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.833Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Frank P. Mckenna, JOHN DUNCAN, and IVAN D. BROWN. 2007. Cognitive abilities and safety on the road: a re-examination of individual differences in dichotic listening and search for embedded figures. Ergonomics 29, 5 (2007), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138608968300Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Hilkka L Meys and Penelope M Sanderson. 2013. The effect of individual differences on how people handle interruptions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 57. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 868–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571188Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Oltman. 1971. Children’s Embedded Figures Test. (1971), 360–360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Philip K Oltman, Evelyn Raskin, and Herman A Witkin. 1971. Group embedded figures test. Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, CA. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06471-000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. George E Raptis, Christos Fidas, and Nikolaos Avouris. 2018. Effects of mixed-reality on players’ behaviour and immersion in a cultural tourism game: A cognitive processing perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 114 (2018), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.02.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. George E Raptis, Christos A Fidas, and Nikolaos M Avouris. 2016. Differences of field dependent/independent gamers on cultural heritage playing: Preliminary findings of an eye–tracking study. In Euro-Mediterranean Conference. Springer, 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48974-2_22Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Richard Riding and Indra Cheema. 1991. Cognitive styles—an overview and integration. Educational psychology 11, 3-4 (1991), 193–215.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Paulette Rozencwajg. 1991. Analysis of problem solving strategies on the Kohs Block Design Test. European Journal of Psychology of Education 6, 1 (1991), 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173149Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Beatriz Sousa Santos, Paulo Dias, Angela Pimentel, Jan-Willem Baggerman, Carlos Ferreira, Samuel Silva, and Joaquim Madeira. 2009. Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study. Multimedia tools and applications 41, 1 (2009), 161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Hitesh Nidhi Sharma, Sultan A Alharthi, Igor Dolgov, and Zachary O Toups. 2017. A framework supporting selecting space to make place in spatial mixed reality play. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 83–100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Sarah Sharples, Sue Cobb, Amanda Moody, and John R Wilson. 2008. Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays 29, 2 (2008), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Penelope Sweetser and Peta Wyeth. 2005. GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games. Comput. Entertain. 3, 3 (July 2005), 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077253Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Elias Tsakanikos. 2006. Associative learning and perceptual style: Are associated events perceived analytically or as a whole?Personality and Individual Differences 40, 3 (2006), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Li-Jun Wang, Xin Wang, and Ming-Zhang Ren. 2003. Field-dependent-independent cognitive style in solving dynamics problems. Psychological reports 92, 3 (2003), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3.867Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Herman A Witkin and Donald R Goodenough. 1977. Field dependence and interpersonal behavior.Psychological bulletin 84, 4 (1977), 661. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.84.4.661Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Herman A Witkin and Donald R Goodenough. 1981. Cognitive styles: essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence.Psychological issues51(1981), 1–141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Herman A. Witkin, Donald R. Goodenough, and Philip K. Oltman. 1979. Psychological differentiation: Current status.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 37, 7 (1979), 1127–1145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Li-fang Zhang. 2004. Field-dependence/independence: cognitive style or perceptual ability?—-validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and individual differences 37, 6 (2004), 1295–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.12.015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    I3D '20: Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games
    May 2020
    156 pages
    ISBN:9781450375894
    DOI:10.1145/3384382

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 May 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate148of485submissions,31%

    Upcoming Conference

    I3D '24
    Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games
    May 8 - 10, 2024
    Philadelphia , PA , USA

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format