ABSTRACT
The flow experience-performance link is commonly found weak in virtual environments (VEs). The weak association model (WAM) suggests that distraction caused by disjointed features may be associated with the weak association. People characterized by field independent (FI) or field dependent (FD) cognitive style have different abilities in handling sustained attention, thus they may perform differently in the flow-performance link. To explore the role of the field dependence-independence (FDI) construct on the flow-performance link in virtual reality (VR), we developed a VR experimental environment, based on which two empirical studies were performed. Study 1 revealed FD individuals have higher dispersion degree of fixations and showed a weaker flow-performance link. Next, we provide visual cues that utilize distractors to achieve more task-oriented attention. Study 2 found it helps strengthen the task performance, as well as the flow-performance link of FD individuals without increasing distraction. This paper helps draw conclusions on the effects of human diversity on the flow-performance link in VEs and found ways to design a VR system according to individual characteristics.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- Bruce J Avolio, Ralph A Alexander, Gerald V Barrett, and Harvey L Sterns. 1981. Designing a measure of visual selective attention to assess individual differences in information processing. Applied Psychological Measurement 5, 1 (1981), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168100500105Google ScholarCross Ref
- Melanie Baran and Mark Chignell. 2006. Differences in cognitive ability and preference mediate effects of interruptions on simulated driving performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 50. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2008–2011. https://doi.org/10.1037/e577712012-063Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yulong Bian, Chenglei Yang, Fengqiang Gao, Huiyu Li, Shisheng Zhou, Hanchao Li, Xiaowen Sun, and Xiangxu Meng. 2016. A framework for physiological indicators of flow in VR games: construction and preliminary evaluation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 20, 5 (2016), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0953-5Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yulong Bian, Chenglei Yang, Chao Zhou, Juan Liu, Wei Gai, Xiangxu Meng, Feng Tian, and Chia Shen. 2018. Exploring the weak association between flow experience and performance in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173975Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yulong Bian, Chao Zhou, Yeqing Chen, Yanshuai Zhao, Juan Liu, Chenglei Yang, and Xiangxu Meng. 2019. Explore the Weak Association between Flow and Performance Based on a Visual Search Task Paradigm in Virtual Reality. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 852–853.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John K Burton, D Michael Moore, and Glen A Holmes. 1995. Hypermedia concepts and research: An overview. Computers in human behavior 11, 3-4 (1995), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(95)80004-rGoogle Scholar
- Robert L Cardy and Jerard F Kehoe. 1984. Rater selective attention ability and appraisal effectiveness: The effect of a cognitive style on the accuracy of differentiation among ratees.Journal of Applied Psychology 69, 4 (1984), 589. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.69.4.589Google Scholar
- Wesley C Clapp and Adam Gazzaley. 2012. Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging. Neurobiology of aging 33, 1 (2012), 134–148.Google Scholar
- Henry T Clark III and Kreig D Roof. 1988. Field dependence and strategy use. Perceptual and Motor Skills 66, 1 (1988), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1988.66.1.303Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mihaly Czikszentmihalyi. 1990. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.Google Scholar
- Engeser and Stefan. 2012. Advances in Flow Research ||. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1Google Scholar
- Stefan Engeser and Falko Rheinberg. 2008. Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation & Emotion 32, 3 (2008), p.158–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4Google Scholar
- Elizabeth Allan Flynn, Kenneth N. Barker, J. Tyrone Gibson, Robert E. Pearson, Bruce A. Berger, and Leo A. Smith. 1999. Impact of interruptions and distractions on dispensing errors in an ambulatory care pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm 56, 13 (1999), 1319–1325. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/56.13.1319Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wei Gai, Chenglei Yang, Yulong Bian, Chia Shen, Xiangxu Meng, Lu Wang, Juan Liu, Mingda Dong, Chengjie Niu, and Cheng Lin. 2017. Supporting easy physical-to-virtual creation of mobile vr maze games: a new genre. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5016–5028. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025494Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kenneth M Goldstein. 1978. Cognitive style: Five approaches and relevant research.Google Scholar
- Anthony A Greco and Chris McClung. 1979. Interaction between attention directing and cogntiive style. ECTJ 27, 2 (1979), 97–102.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M Adelina Guisande, M Fernanda Páramo, Carolina Tinajero, and Leandro S Almeida. 2007. Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema 19, 4 (2007), 572–577.Google Scholar
- David Hecht and Miriam Reiner. [n.d.]. Field Dependency and the Sense of Object-Presence in Haptic Virtual Environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10, 2 ([n. d.]), 243–251.Google Scholar
- Shiwei Jia, Qian Zhan, and Shouxin Li. 2014. Field dependence–independence modulates the efficiency of filtering out irrelevant information in a visual working memory task. Neuroscience 278(2014), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.075Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eric J Jolly and Richard Reardon. 1985. Cognitive differentiation, automaticity, and interruptions of automatized behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 11, 3 (1985), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167285113006Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maria Kozhevnikov. 2007. Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style.Psychological bulletin 133, 3 (2007), 464. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464Google Scholar
- Marc Lambooij, Marten Fortuin, Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, Bruce JW Evans, and Ingrid Heynderickx. 2011. Susceptibility to visual discomfort of 3-D displays by visual performance measures. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 21, 12(2011), 1913–1923. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcsvt.2011.2157193Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc Lambooij, MJ Murdoch, Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, and Ingrid Heynderickx. 2013. The impact of video characteristics and subtitles on visual comfort of 3D TV. Displays 34, 1 (2013), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2012.09.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eun-Cheol Lee, Yong-Hun Cho, and In-Kwon Lee. 2019. Simulating Water Resistance in a Virtual Underwater Experience Using a Visual Motion Delay Effect. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 259–266.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Danielle Lottridge and Mark Chignell. 2007. Driving under the influence of phones: The importance of cognitive ability and cognitive style on interruption-related performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 51. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1393–1397. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9962Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pedro Macizo, Teresa Bajo, 2006. Memoria operativa y control ejecutivo: procesos inhibitorios en tareas de actualización y generación aleatoria. Psicothema 18, 1 (2006), 112–116.Google Scholar
- Richard E. Mayer and Laura J. Massa. 2003. Three Facets of Visual and Verbal Learners: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Style, and Learning Preference. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, 4 (2003), 833–841. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.833Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frank P. Mckenna, JOHN DUNCAN, and IVAN D. BROWN. 2007. Cognitive abilities and safety on the road: a re-examination of individual differences in dichotic listening and search for embedded figures. Ergonomics 29, 5 (2007), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138608968300Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hilkka L Meys and Penelope M Sanderson. 2013. The effect of individual differences on how people handle interruptions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 57. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 868–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571188Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oltman. 1971. Children’s Embedded Figures Test. (1971), 360–360.Google Scholar
- Philip K Oltman, Evelyn Raskin, and Herman A Witkin. 1971. Group embedded figures test. Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, CA. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06471-000Google Scholar
- George E Raptis, Christos Fidas, and Nikolaos Avouris. 2018. Effects of mixed-reality on players’ behaviour and immersion in a cultural tourism game: A cognitive processing perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 114 (2018), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.02.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- George E Raptis, Christos A Fidas, and Nikolaos M Avouris. 2016. Differences of field dependent/independent gamers on cultural heritage playing: Preliminary findings of an eye–tracking study. In Euro-Mediterranean Conference. Springer, 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48974-2_22Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard Riding and Indra Cheema. 1991. Cognitive styles—an overview and integration. Educational psychology 11, 3-4 (1991), 193–215.Google Scholar
- Paulette Rozencwajg. 1991. Analysis of problem solving strategies on the Kohs Block Design Test. European Journal of Psychology of Education 6, 1 (1991), 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173149Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beatriz Sousa Santos, Paulo Dias, Angela Pimentel, Jan-Willem Baggerman, Carlos Ferreira, Samuel Silva, and Joaquim Madeira. 2009. Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study. Multimedia tools and applications 41, 1 (2009), 161.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hitesh Nidhi Sharma, Sultan A Alharthi, Igor Dolgov, and Zachary O Toups. 2017. A framework supporting selecting space to make place in spatial mixed reality play. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 83–100.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah Sharples, Sue Cobb, Amanda Moody, and John R Wilson. 2008. Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays 29, 2 (2008), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.005Google ScholarCross Ref
- Penelope Sweetser and Peta Wyeth. 2005. GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games. Comput. Entertain. 3, 3 (July 2005), 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077253Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elias Tsakanikos. 2006. Associative learning and perceptual style: Are associated events perceived analytically or as a whole?Personality and Individual Differences 40, 3 (2006), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.014Google Scholar
- Li-Jun Wang, Xin Wang, and Ming-Zhang Ren. 2003. Field-dependent-independent cognitive style in solving dynamics problems. Psychological reports 92, 3 (2003), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3.867Google Scholar
- Herman A Witkin and Donald R Goodenough. 1977. Field dependence and interpersonal behavior.Psychological bulletin 84, 4 (1977), 661. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.84.4.661Google Scholar
- Herman A Witkin and Donald R Goodenough. 1981. Cognitive styles: essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence.Psychological issues51(1981), 1–141.Google Scholar
- Herman A. Witkin, Donald R. Goodenough, and Philip K. Oltman. 1979. Psychological differentiation: Current status.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 37, 7 (1979), 1127–1145.Google Scholar
- Li-fang Zhang. 2004. Field-dependence/independence: cognitive style or perceptual ability?—-validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and individual differences 37, 6 (2004), 1295–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.12.015Google Scholar
Recommendations
Performance, Simulator Sickness, and Immersion of a Ball-Sorting Task in Virtual and Augmented Realities
Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Design and InteractionAbstractVirtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) can be defined by the amount of virtual elements displayed to a human’s senses: VR is completely synthetic and AR is partially synthetic. This paper compares VR and AR systems for variations of three ...
Extending Virtual Reality Display Wall Environments Using Augmented Reality
SUI '19: Symposium on Spatial User InteractionTwo major form factors for virtual reality are head-mounted displays and large display environments such as CAVE®and the LCD-based successor CAVE2®. Each of these has distinct advantages and limitations based on how they’re used. This work explores ...
Speed reading on virtual reality and augmented reality
AbstractMany virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) applications in education require speed reading. The current study aimed to explore whether the reading performance on VR and AR is different from that on traditional desktop display,...
Highlights- We explored performance of speed reading on virtual and augmented reality.
- ...
Comments