skip to main content
10.1145/3434780.3436556acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Educational Innovation Supported by ICT to Identify Entrepreneurial Skills in Students in Higher Education

Published:22 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

It is indisputable that society is facing a time of great change and uncertainty toward the future. The situation around the world due to contingency has generated disruptions in all fields, and education is no exception. The digital transformation of educational institutions has increased vertiginously at all levels of instruction. The current reality leads organizations to worry about finding a way to train people with relevant skills that allow them to deal with the challenges that lie ahead. So, universities play an important role in the development of competencies that equip their graduates not only to enter the labor market but also to generate new employment options through entrepreneurship that contributes to the solution of major global problems. The purpose of this document is to present a doctoral thesis project that contributes to educational innovation based on technologies that identify entrepreneurial skills in university students. This study followed a design-based research methodology in which different quantitative and qualitative instruments were applied to collect data supportive of the objectives that had been set. It was found that this project contributes by analyzing the students' profiles to identify and understand better their entrepreneurial skills and interests and strengthening them transversally throughout their careers through connection with the university entrepreneurial ecosystem. The results show it is possible to develop an e-learning educational model that can be scaled to other contexts and contribute to the development of an entrepreneurial spirit, a competency that is difficult for students to achieve.

References

  1. Lorena Alemán de la Garza, Marcela Georgina Gómez-Zermeño, Yoko Mochizuki, 2019. Rethinking pedagogy. Exploring the Potential of Digital Technology in Achieving Quality Education. New Delhi: UNESCO MGIEP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Manuel Baltodano and Marcela Georgina Gómez Zermeño. 2017. Pedagogical, curricular, and didactic elements involved in the creation of an e-learning environment: the case of a Costa Rican university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18, 4, 104-118. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya and Francisco José García-Peñalvo. 2018. Co-creation and open innovation: Systematic literature review. Comunicar,26, 54, 9-18. DOI:10.3916/C54-2018-01.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. European Commission (2020). Commission presents European Skills Agenda for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness, and resilience. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_1196Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Valeria Cantú González, Leonardo Glasserman Morales and María Soledad Ramírez Montoya. 2019. Comportamiento métrico sobre evaluación de la educación en emprendimiento. Investigación bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información, 33, 79, 99-117. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2019.79.57902Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. May 1 Castro, and Marcela Gómez Zermeño. 2019. Innovación educativa para el fortalecimiento del talento emprendedor: oportunidades para la educación superior. In XV Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa, November 15-18, 2019. Acapulco, Guerrero. http://www.comie.org.mx/congreso/memoriaelectronica/v15/doc/0371.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Salvador Alva Gómez. 2018. Prólogo. In M. Sánchez Mendiola & J. Escamilla de los Santos (Coord.), Perspectivas de la Innovación Educativa en universidades de México: Experiencias y reflexiones de la RIED 360 (pp-113-137). México: Imagia Comunicación.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. May Portuguez Castro and Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Mentoría en educación emprendedora: sistematización de una experiencia educativa en educación superior. Revista Formación Universitaria, 13, 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tecnológico de Monterrey. 2018. Modelo Educativo Tec 21. Retrieved from http://modelotec21.tec.mx/files/folletomodelotec21.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tecnológico de Monterrey. 2019. Plan 2030. Retrieved from https://plan2030.tec.mx/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Francisco José García-Peñalvo. 2020. Modelo de referencia para la enseñanza no presencial en universidades presenciales. Campus Virtuales, 9, 1, 41-56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lorena Alemán de la Garza, Marcela Georgina Gómez-Zermeño, María E. Parada and Paola Sainz. 2011. Estrategias extracurriculares para la enseñanza de la innovación. Nuevas formas de enseñar la innovación. Retrieved from https://alfakickstart.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/itesm-p-upsa-vf-estrategias-extracurriculares-para-la-ensec3b1anza-de-la-innovacic3b3n.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Enrique Rubio-Royo, Susan Cranfield Mckay, José Carlos Nelson-Santana, Ramiro N. Delgado Rodríguez, and Antonio. A. Occon-Carreras. 2018. Web knowledge turbine as a proposal for personal and professional self-organisation in complex times. Journal of Information Technology Research, 11, 1, 70-90. DOI:10.4018/JITR.2018010105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. May Portuguez Castro, and Marcela Georgina Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Being an entrepreneur post-COVID-19-Resilience in times of crisis: a systematic literature review. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. José Antonio Yañez Figueroa, María Soledad Ramírez Montoya, and Francisco García Peñalvo. 2017. Vinculación universidad-sociedad para la innovación educativa: los casos de laboratorios ciudadanos. En M.S. Ramírez Montoya & J.R. Valenzuela González (Eds.), Innovación educativa: Investigación, formación, vinculación y visibilidad (pp- 201-225). Madrid: Síntesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ángel Fidalgo-Blanco, María Luisa Sein-Echaluce, and Francisco García-Peñalvo. 2015. Epistemological and ontological spirals: From individual experience in educational innovation to the organisational knowledge in the university sector. Program: Electronic library and information systems, 49, 3, 266-288. DOI:10.1108/PROG-06-2014-0033.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitsuko Maena, and Yumiko Ono. 2019. Diffusion of lesson study as an educational innovation. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 21, 1, 46-60 https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-10-2018-0044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Adriana Valencia Álvarez, and Jaime Valenzuela González. 2017. Innovación disruptiva, innovación sistemática y procesos de mejora continua… ¿implican distintas competencias por desarrollar? En M.S. Ramírez Montoya & J.R. Valenzuela González (Eds.), Innovación educativa: Investigación, formación, vinculación y visibilidad (pp.71-82). Madrid: Síntesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Raina Khatri, Charles Henderson, Renée Cole, Jeffrey E. Froyd, Debra Friedrichsen, and Courtney Stanford. 2016. Designing for sustained adoption: A model of developing educational innovations for successful propagation. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12, 1, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010112Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sergio Reyes Angona, and Ingrid Hernández Muñoz. 2017. Comunicar la innovación: destinatarios, contenidos y propósitos. En M.S. Ramírez Montoya & J.R. Valenzuela González (Eds.), Innovación educativa: Investigación, formación, vinculación y visibilidad (pp-229-245). Madrid: Síntesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Julio Cabero Almenara, and Julio Ruiz Palmero (2017). Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación para la inclusión: reformulando la brecha digital International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (IJERI), 9, 16-30. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie6021323Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Marcela Georgina Gómez-Zermeño, Lorena Alemán de la Garza, May Portuguez Castro, and Manuel Medina Labrador, M. 2019. Revisión sistemática de literatura: Desarrollo y uso de tecnologías en la educación. En M.S. Ramírez Montoya & J.R. Valenzuela González, (Eds.), Innovación educativa: investigación y tendencias (pp. 197-222). Barcelona: Editorial Octaedro.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Esteban Vázquez-Cano, Eloy López Meneses, and Alicia Jaén Martínez. 2017. The group e-portfolio to improve teaching learning process at university. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13, 2, 65-76. DOI: 10.20368/1971-8829/1221. DOI: 10.20368/1971-8829/1221Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Esteban Vázquez-Cano, Eloy López Meneses, Esther Fernández Márquez, and Cristóbal Ballesteros Regaña. 2018. Los nuevos entornos virtuales de aprendizaje permanente (MOOC) y sus posibilidades educativas en ámbitos sociales y educativos. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación,53, 179-192. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i53.12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ángel Fidalgo Blanco, María Luisa Sein-Echaluce, and Francisco José García Peñalvo. 2017. Aprendizaje Basado en Retos en una asignatura académica universitaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Informática Educativa, 25, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.26754/cinaic.2019.0121Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Johan Malmqvist, Kamilla Radberg, and Ulrika Lundqvist. 2015. Comparative analysis of challenge-based learning experiences. In 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. May Portuguez Castro, and Marcela Georgina Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Challenge Based Learning: Innovative Pedagogy for Sustainability through e-learning in Higher Education. Sustainability, 12, 10, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104063Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kamilla Radberg, Urika Lundqvist, Johan Malmqvist, and Oskar Svensson. 2020. From CDIO to challenge-based learning experiences – expanding student learning as well as societal impact? European Journal of Engineering Education, 45, 1, 22-37. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1441265Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. John Huss, Orly Sela, and Shannon Eastep. 2015. A case study of online instructors and their quest for greater interactivity in their courses: Overcoming the distance in distance education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,40, 4, 72–86. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Shirley Cherry, and Bethany Flora. 2017. Radiography faculty engaged in online education: Perceptions of effectiveness, satisfaction, and technological self-efficacy. Radiologic Technology, 88, 3, 249–262. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28298576/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Laura Racovita-Szilagyi, Domingo Carbonero Muñoz, and Mioara Diaconu. 2018. Challenges and opportunities to eLearning in social work education: perspectives from Spain and the United States. European Journal of Social Work, 21, 6, 836-849. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1461066Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Mauro Marino-Jiménez. 2016. Diseño e-learning: siete componentes indispensables para una asignatura de Comunicación en el contexto universitario. Revista Q, 10, 20, 24-51. https://doi.org/10.18566/revistaq.v10n20.a02Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Francisco José García-Peñalvo, and Antonio Seoane Pardo. 2015. Una revisión actualizada del concepto de eLearning. Décimo Aniversario. Education in the Knowledge Society, 16, 1, 119-144. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161119144Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Dahlan Nariman. 2021. Impact of the Interactive e-learning Instructions on the Effectiveness of a Programming Course. In: Barolli L., Poniszewska-Maranda A., Enokido T. (eds) Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems. CISIS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing,vol 1194. Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Dwi Sulisworo, Ishafit Ishafit, and Kartika Fardausy. 2016. The development of a mobile learning application using Jigsaw technique. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 10, 3, 11-16. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v10i3.5268Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Abel García-González, María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, Luis Miguel Romero-Rodríguez, and José María Romero-Rodríguez. 2020. Validation of instruments to measure social entrepreneurship competence. The OpenSocialLab project. IEEE EDUCON 2020. Porto, Portugal. http://hdl.handle.net/11285/636121Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Martha de Jesús Beltrán Hernández de Galindo, María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya. 2019. Innovation in the instructional design of Open Mass Courses (MOOCs) to develop entrepreneurship competencies in energy sustainability. Education in the Knowledge Society,20, 5-15. DOI:10.14201/eks2019_20_a5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Don Scott-Kemmis. 2017. The role of VET in the entrepreneurial ecosystem.Adelaide: NCVER.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Gustav Hägg, and Agniezka Kurczewska. 2018. Connecting the dots: A discussion on key concepts in contemporary entrepreneurship education. Education + Training, 58, 7/8, 700-714. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2015-0115Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Sk. Mahmudul Hasan, Eijaz Ahmed Khan, and Noor Un Nab. 2017. Entrepreneurial education at the university level and entrepreneurship development. Education + Training, 59, 7/8, 888-906. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2016-0020Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin Lackéus, Mats Lundqvist, Karen Williams, K, and Johan Inden. 2020. The entrepreneurial employee in the public and private sectors. What, why, how. Luxemburgo: European Commission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Robi Bell, and Heather, H. 2016. An enterprise opportunity for entrepreneurial students: Student enterprise development and experience assessed through the student voice, Education + Training, 58, 7/8,751-765. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-12-2014-0150Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. David Kolb, 1984. Experiential learning, experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Rafael Alcaráz-Rodríguez, Mario Álvarez, and Marcia Villasana. 2014. Developing entrepreneurial competences in students in the life sciences: the Lifetech Ad-Venture program. On the Horizon, 22, 3, 182-191. https://doi.org/10.1108/oth-11-2013-0053Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Flavio Ferreira, and Camila Sierra Pinheiro. 2018. Circular Business Plan: entrepreneurship teaching instrument and development of the entrepreneurial profile. Gestao & Producao, 25,4, 854-865.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Giustina Secundo, Pasquale Del Vecchio, Giovanni Schiuma, and Guiseppina Passiante, 2017. Activating entrepreneurial learning processes for transforming university students' ideas into entrepreneurial practices. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23, 3, 465-485. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-12-2015-0315Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Martin Lackéus. 2015. Entrepreneurship in education: What, why, when, how.Paris: OECD Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Harold Tinoco-Giraldo, Eva María Torrecilla Sánchez, Francisco José García-Peñalvo. 2020. E-mentoring in higher education: a structured literature review and implications for future research. Sustainability, 12,4344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114344Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Francisco Liñán, Francisco Santos, and Jose Fernández. 2011. The influence of perceptions on potential entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7,373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Olawale Fatoki. 2014. An examination of the teaching methods for entrepreneurship at a South African university. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 23, 512-518. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p512Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Antonio Padilla-Meléndez, Manuel Fernández-Gámez, M., and Jesús Molina-Gómez, J. 2014. Feeling the risks: effects of the development of emotional competences with outdoor Training on the entrepreneurial intent of university students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10, 4, 1-24. DOI10.1007/s11365-014-0310-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Marian Buil, Juan Pedro Aznar, Jorge Galiana, and Alba Rocafort-Marco. 2016. An explanatory study of MBA students with regards to sustainability and ethics commitment. Sustainability, 8,1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030280Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Antonaci, A., Dagnino, F., Ott, M., Bellotti, F., Berta R., De Gloria, A., Lavagnino, E., Romero M., Usart, M. & Mayer, M. 2016. Gamified collaborative course in entrepreneurship: Focus on objectives and tools. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1276-1283.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Vaiva Zuzeviciute, Birute Praneviciene, Zaneta Simanaviciene, and Violeta Vasiliauskiene. 2017. Competence for sustainability: prevention of dis-balance in higher education: the case of cooperation while educating future law enforcement officers. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13, 4, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2017.13-4.10Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Eli Gimmon. 2014. Mentoring as practical training in higher education of entrepreneurship. Education + Training, 56, 8/9, 814-825. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-02-2014-0006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Sarah Robinson, Helle Neergaard, Lene Tanggaard, and Norris Krueger. 2016. New horizons in entrepreneurship education: from teacher-led to student-centered learning. Education + Training, 58, 7/8, 661-683. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2016-0048Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Ünal Çakiroğlu, and Seyfullah Gökoğlu, S. 2019. Development of fire safety behavioral skills via virtual reality. Computers & Education, 133, 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Tina Štemberger, and Majda Cencič. 2016. Design-based research: the way of developing and implementing. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 8,3, 180-189. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v8i3.621Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Leo Paul Dana, and Teresa Dana. 2005. Expanding the scope of methodologies used in entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2, 1, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijesb.2005.006071Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Janice Herrington, Susan McKenney, Thomas Reeves, and Ron Oliver. 2007. Design-based research and doctoral students: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2007: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 4089-4097). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Teri Reed Roads, and Shiva Haghighi. 2010. Development of an assessment instrument to examine outcomes of entrepreneurship education on engineering students. In IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2010.5673411Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Angela Shartrand, Teri Reed. 2016. The role of entrepreneurship program models and experiential activities on engineering student outcomes. Advances in Engineering Education, 5, 1, 1-27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Lorena Alemán de la Garza. 2016. Modelo de indicadores de calidad para cursos en línea, masivos y abiertos (MOOC): Caso de un MOOC para el desarrollo profesional docente.Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Oberta de Cataluña, Nuevo León, México.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Claudia López Cruz, and Yolanda Heredia Escorza, Y. 2017. Escala i: Marco de referencia para la evaluación de proyectos de innovación educativa. Monterrey: Tecnológico de Monterrey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. May Portuguez Castro, Carlos Ross Scheede, and Marcela Georgina Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Entrepreneur profile and entrepreneurship skills: Expert's analysis in the Mexican entrepreneurial ecosystem, In 2020 International Conference on Technology and Entrepreneurship - Virtual (ICTE-V), San Jose, CA, USA. doi: 10.1109/ICTE-V50708.2020.9114372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Robert Yin. 2007. Case study research. Design and Methods. California: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Julio Cabero Almenara and María del Carmen Llorente Cejudo. 2013. La aplicación del juicio de experto como técnica de evaluación de las Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (TIC). Revista de Tecnología de Información y Comunicación en Educación, 7, 2, 11-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. José Ignacio Ruiz. 2003. Metodología de la investigación cualitativa.Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. John Creswell, and Cheryl Poth. 2018. Quality inquiry & research design. Choosing among five approaches.New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Robert Johnson, and Patricia Kuby. 2012. Estadística Elemental. México: Cengage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. May Portuguez Castro, and Marcela Georgina Gómez Zermeño. 2020. TEC-PRENEUR: Curso-Taller en línea para fortalecer las habilidades de emprendimiento en educación superior. In 7mo Congreso Internacional de Innovación Educativa, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, N.L.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. May Portuguez Castro, 2020. Educational E-Learning Model for Identifying Entrepreneurial Skills in University Students within an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Ph.D. Dissertation. Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, N.L.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. May Portuguez Castro, and Marcela Georgina Gómez Zermeño. 2019. Desarrollo del talento joven emprendedor para la innovación y la generación de empleo. Monterrey: Publicación Anual 2019 de la Red de Conocimiento del Consejo Nuevo León.Retrieved from https://red.conl.mx/publicacion_2019.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Educational Innovation Supported by ICT to Identify Entrepreneurial Skills in Students in Higher Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
      October 2020
      1084 pages
      ISBN:9781450388504
      DOI:10.1145/3434780

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 January 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format