skip to main content
10.1145/3486011.3486455acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis of teaching work culture oriented to the development of entrepreneurship skills

Published:20 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This proposal explores the competencies developed by a group of 30 professors from a private non-for-profit university in Mexico after being part of a training course oriented towards entrepreneurship development guided by collaborative methodologies. The research approach consists of a case study in which the following 21st-century competencies were analyzed as categories: creativity, innovation, initiative, critical thinking, and problem-solving. Semi-structured interviews and participant observation in a focus group were used as instruments to collect information. In this group of teachers, it was found that the collaborative strategies fostered teamwork and self-reflection and the interest in developing these skills to collaborate with the development of students towards new needs. It is considered that integrating entrepreneurship training strategies helps teachers to build the necessary competencies for the requirements of society. Still, higher education institutions must maintain this teacher training process to incorporate them into their daily practice.

References

  1. Susana Sastre-Merino, José Luis Martín-Núñez, and Amparo Verdú-Vázquez. 2020. Research-based learning with future educators through collaborative learning. In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), October 21–23, 2020, Salamanca, Spain. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436598Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, María Isabel Loaiza-Aguirre, Alexandra Zúñiga-Ojeda, May Portuguez-Castro. 2021. Characterization of the Teaching Profile within the Framework of Education 4.0. Future Internet, 13(4): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13040091Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ricardo Sánchez Puentes. 2014. Enseñar a investigar. Una didáctica nueva de la investigación en ciencias sociales y humanísticas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. María Lorena Ballesteros-Ibarra, Martín Alonso Mercado-Varela, Nancy Janett García-Vázquez and Leonardo David Glasserman-Morales. 2020. Experiences of Teacher Professional Learning in Moocs: Teachers from Sonora, Mexico Who Participated in the Key Learning Collection. Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia, 13(3), 79-102. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2020.25099Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Florencia Gomez, Ann-Kathrin Schindler, Hilda Borko, and Jonathan Osborne. 2018. Learning from Professional Development: A Case Study of the Challenges of Enacting Productive Science Discourse in the Classroom. Professional Development in Education, 44(5), 721-737. https:/doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1423368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ángel Fidalgo-Blanco, María Luisa Sein-Echaluce, and Francisco García-Peñalvo.2015. Epistemological and ontological spirals: From individual experience in educational innovation to the organisational knowledge in the university sector. Program: Electronic library and information systems, 49, 3, 266-288.DOI:10.1108/PROG-06-2014-0033.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ángel Fidalgo-Blanco, María Luisa Sein-Echaluce, Francisco Javier García-Peñalvo. 2019. Enhancing the Main Characteristics of Active Methodologies:A Case with Micro Flip Teaching and Teamwork. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(1), 341-351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ángel Fidalgo-Blanco, María Luisa Sein-Echaluce, Francisco Javier García-Peñalvo & Miguel Conde-González. 2015. Using Learning Analytics to improve teamwork assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 149-156. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.050Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. May Portuguez Castro, and Marcela Georgina Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Challenge Based Learning: Innovative Pedagogy for Sustainability through e-learning in Higher Education. Sustainability, 12, 10, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104063. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104063Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tecnológico de Monterrey. 2019. Tec21 Model. Retrieved from https://tec.mx/es/modelo-tec21Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gloria Lazo-Quintanilla, Nancy Aceves-Campos, María Ruiz-Cantisani, María Elena Dieck-Assad, and Leopoldo Cárdenas-Barrón. 2018. Students learn and develop competences through challenge and real problems. In IISE Annual Conference and Expo May, 2018, Loews Royal Pacific Resort Orlando, United States, 5 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ji Kim, Dae Soo, Chang-Soo Sung, and Jo Park. 2018. The Role Of Problem-Solving Ability on Innovative Behavior and Opportunity Recognition in University Students. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(4), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-018-0085-4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. May Portuguez Castro, Carlos Ross Scheede and Marcela Georgina Gómez Zermeño. 2019. The Impact of Higher Education on Entrepreneurship and the Innovation Ecosystem: A case study in Mexico. Sustainability, 11(20), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205597Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, Lucy Andrade-Vargas, Diana Rivera-Rogel and May Portuguez-Castro. 2021. Trends for the Future of Education Programs for Professional Development. Sustainability, 13(13):7244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137244Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Fei Wang. 2017. Innovation of College Students and the Entrepreneurship Education Model Based on Comprehensive Social Participation. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech, 28(1), 1674-1679. https://www.teknoscienze.com/tks_issue/vol_281Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Paola Ascencio, Leonardo David Glasserman Morales and Jordi Quintana. 2019. Digital competencies: Reality of student entry into college life. Digital Education Review, 36, 68-84. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/30516Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Luis Sobrado Fernández and Elena Fernández Rey. 2010. Competencias Emprendedoras y Desarrollo del Espíritu Empresarial en los Centros Educativos. Educación XX1, 13(1), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.13.1.275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. José Manuel Sáez López and José María Ruiz Ruiz. 2012. Didactic Methodology and Educational Technology in the Development of Cognitive Competencies: Application in University Context. Profesorado, 16(3), 373-391. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/43435Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Valeria Cantú González, Leonardo Glasserman Morales and María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya. 2019. Metric Behavior on Entrepreneurship Education Assessment. Library Research: Archival, Library, And Information Science, 33(79), 99-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2019.79.57902Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ruth Montes-Martínez and María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya. 2020. Training in Entrepreneurship Competences, Challenges for Educational Institutions: Systematic Literature Review. In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'20), October 21-23, 2020, Salamanca, Spain. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436621Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sholomo Maital and Ella Barzani. 2019. Can universities foster students' intent to become entrepreneurs? Retrieved from https://www.neaman.org.il/EN/Can-universities-foster-students-intent-to-become-entrepreneursGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hai-Bo Zhu, Kun Zhang and US Ogbodo. 2017. Review on Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Chinese Universities during 2010-2015. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5939-5948. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01042aGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Javier Fombona Cadavieco, Marco Iglesias Martínez and Inés Lozano Cabezas. 2016. Collaborative Work in Higher Education: A Professional Competence for Future Teachers. Campinas, 27(135), 519-538. https://doi.org/10.1590/es0101-73302016147914Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Huei Chen Lee and Margaret Blanchard. 2018. Why Teach With PBL? Motivational Factors Underlying Middle and High School Teachers' Use of Problem-Based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1719Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jane Kirkby, Lucas Walsh and Anne Keary. 2018. A Case Study of The Generation and Benefits of a Community of Practice and its Impact on the Professional Identity of Early Childhood Teachers. Professional Development in Education, 45(2), 264-275. https:/doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1449003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Jhon Creswell. 2007. Qualitative inquiry research design. Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed). California: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Teamlabs (2019). Innovation and Entrepreneurship Campus. Retrieved from https://www.teamlabs.es/esGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Robert Stake. 2005). Case study research. California: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Robert Yin. 2007. Case study research. Design and Methods. California: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Marilyn Binkley, Ola Erstad, Joan Herman, Senta Raizen, Martin Ripley, May Miller-Ricci and Mike Rumble. 2012. Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In: Griffin P., McGaw B., Care E. (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Dordrecht: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Sandra Varela-Ordorica and Jaime Ricardo Valenzuela González. 2020. Use of Information and Communication Technologies as a Transversal Competence in Initial Teacher Education. Revista Electrónica Educare, 24(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.24-1.10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Julio Contreras-Velásquez, Sandra Wilches-Duran, Modesto Graterol-Rivas and María Bautista-Sandoval. 2017. Higher Education and Training in Interdisciplinary Entrepreneurship: A Study Case. Formación universitaria, 10(3), 11-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062017000300003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Tomás Vargas-Halabí, Ronald Mora-Esquivel and Berman Siles. 2017. Intrapreneurial competencies: development and validation of a measurement scale. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(1), 86-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Gloria Jiménez Marín, Rodrigo Elías Zambrano and Carmen Silva Robles. 2014. Teaching Innovation and its Application to the EHEA: Entrepreneurship, ICT, and University. Historia y Comunicación Social, 19, 187-196. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2014.v19.45125Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Silvia Olivares Olivares. 2016. Developing Critical Thinking: Deciding What to Believe. In J. Valenzuela (Comp). Transversal Competencies for a Knowledge-Based Society. (p. 185). México: CENAGE Learning Editores.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Katherina Gallardo Córdova. 2016. Solving problems: pathways to structured, original and creative thinking. Developing critical thinking: deciding what to believe. In J. Valenzuela (comp). Transversal competencies for a knowledge-based society. (p. 122). México: CENAGE Learning Editores.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Analysis of teaching work culture oriented to the development of entrepreneurship skills
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            TEEM'21: Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21)
            October 2021
            823 pages
            ISBN:9781450390668
            DOI:10.1145/3486011
            • Editors:
            • Marc Alier,
            • David Fonseca

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 December 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format