May Portuguez Castro
ABSTRACT
Today's education is in accelerated digital transformation, mainly promoted by the crisis with COVID-19. Face-to-face courses have had to be switched to virtual mode without many educational institutions being fully prepared for this change, which causes problems, especially with the quality of the courses offered. Therefore, strategies should emerge to evaluate the use of Information Technologies (ICTs) in education. One of these methodologies is expert judgment, so this work aims to present an assessment of an e-learning entrepreneurship course conducted by nine experts at a university in Mexico to analyze whether the course proposal was appropriate to achieve students' learning objectives. The results obtained showed that the course activities are appropriate for fulfilling the proposed objectives and the structure and variety of content were suitable for fostering the entrepreneurial spirit in students. It is considered that educational institutions can use this strategy to evaluate courses before implementation by experienced professionals in the study taking into consideration the current requirements caused by COVID-19 and that will remain with its effects for a more prolonged period.
- Dahlan Nariman. 2021. Impact of the Interactive e-learning Instructions on Effectiveness of a Programming Course. In Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems. CISIS 2020, vol 1194, L. Barolli, A. Poniszewska-Maranda and T. Enokido, Eds. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50454-0_61Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Julio Cabero Almenara and J. Ruiz Palmero. 2017. Technologies of Information and Communication for inclusion: reformulating the “digital gap” [Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación para la inclusión: reformulando la brecha digital”]. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (IJERI), 9, 16-30. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6182959Google Scholar
- Marcela Gómez-Zermeño, Lorena Alemán de la Garza, May Portuguez Castro and Manuel Medina Labrador. 2019. Systematic Literature Review: Development And Use of Technologies in Education [Revisión sistemática de literatura: Desarrollo y uso de tecnologías en la educación]. In Educational innovation: research and trends [Innovación educativa: investigación y tendencias], María Soledad Ramírez Montoya and Ricardo Valenzuela González. Eds. Barcelona: Editorial Octaedro.Google Scholar
- Esteban Vázquez-Cano, Eloy López Meneses, Esther Fernández Márquez and Cristóbal Ballesteros Regaña. 2018. The New Virtual Environments Of Lifelong Learning (MOOC) And Their Educational Possibilities In Social And Educational Scenarios. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 53, 179-192. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i53.12Google Scholar
- Amelie Dorn, Eveline Wandl-Vogt, Anna Romano, Thomas Jekel, and Anna Gawin. 2020. Evaluating Effectiveness Of Innovative Education Formats For 21st Century Skills: The Example of DaVinciLab YouthHackathon Workshops 2019/2020. In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), October 21–23, 2020, Salamanca, Spain. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436671Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kiomi Matsumoto-Royo and María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya. 2020. Teaching and Assessment Strategies In A Practice-Based Teacher Education Program. Instrument Validation. In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), October 21– 23, 2020, Salamanca, Spain. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436557Google ScholarDigital Library
- May Portuguez Castro and Marcela Georgina Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Educational Innovation Supported by ICT to Identify Entrepreneurial Skills in Students in Higher Education. In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), October 21–23, 2020, Salamanca, Spain. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436556Google ScholarDigital Library
- María José Rodríguez-Conde, Susana Olmos-Migueláñez, Adriana Gamazo, José Carlos Sánchez-Prieto, and Joe O'Hara. 2020. Challenges in Evaluation in Education and Guidance: A Perspective from 2020. In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), October 21–23, 2020, Salamanca, Spain. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436715Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adriana Valencia Álvarez and Valenzuela González. 2017. Disruptive Innovation, Systematic Innovation and Continuous Improvement Processes… Do They Imply Different Competencies to Develop? In Educational innovation: Research, training, linking and visibility, María Soledad Ramírez Montoya and Ricardo Valenzuela González, Eds., Madrid: Síntesis, 2017.Google Scholar
- Neil Anderson, Kristina Potočnik and Jing Zhou. 2014. Innovation and Creativity in Organizations. A State-Of-The Science Review, Prospective Commentary, And Guiding Framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gabriele Faßauer. 2018. Linking Deviation with Innovation: Behavioral Effects Of Management Control Through The Lens Of A Theory Of Deviance. Journal of Management Control, 29, 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-018-00271-8Google ScholarCross Ref
- OCDE/CERI. 2010. Inspired by Technology, Driven by Pedagogy: A Systemic Approach To Technology-Based School Innovation. Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Manuel Baltodano and Marcela. Gómez Zermeño. 2017. Pedagogical, Curricular and Didactic Element Involved in The Creation Of An E-Learning Environment: The Case Of A Costa Rican University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18, 104-118. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340396Google ScholarCross Ref
- Esteban Vázquez-Cano, Eloy López Meneses and Alicia Jaén Martínez. 2017. A. The Group E-Portfolio to Improve Teaching Learning Process at University. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1221Google Scholar
- Mahmudul Hasan, Eijaz Khan and Noor Un Nabi. 2017. Entrepreneurial Education at University Level And Entrepreneurship Development. Education + Training, 59, 888-906. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2016-0020Google Scholar
- Siti Roffeei, Farra Yusop, and Yusniza Kamarulzaman. 2018. Determinants of Innovation Culture amongst Higher Education Students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(4), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.22452/mojem.vol5no4.1Google Scholar
- María José Alcalá del Olmo and José David Gutiérrez Sánchez. 2020. Sustainable Development as A Pedagogical Challenge For The 21st Century University. Anduli, 19, 59-80. DOI: https://10.12795/anduli.2020.i19.03Google Scholar
- Cheonjae Lee and Walter Timo de Vries. 2019. Sustaining a Culture of Excellence: Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Land Management. Sustainability, 11(12), 3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123280Google Scholar
- James Phelan. 2015. The Use of ELearning in Social Work Education. Social Work, 60(3), 257–264. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24881489Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shirley Cherry and Bethany Flora. 2017. Radiography Faculty Engaged in Online Education: Perceptions of Effectiveness, Satisfaction, And Technological Self-Efficacy. Radiologic Technology, 88, 249–262. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28298576/Google Scholar
- John Huss, Orly Sela and Shannon Eastep. 2015. A Case Study of Online Instructors and Their Quest for Greater Interactivity In Their Courses: Overcoming The Distance In Distance Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.5Google Scholar
- Laura Racovita-Szilagyi, Domingo Carbonero Muñoz and Mioara Diaconu. 2018. Challenges and Opportunities to Elearning In Social Work Education: Perspectives from Spain and the United States. European Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 836-849. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1461066Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mauro Marino-Jiménez 2016. E-Learning Design: Seven Essential Components For A Communication Course In The University Context. Revista Q, 10 (20), 24-51. https://doi.org/10.18566/revistaq.v10n20.a02Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pablo Rivera Vargas, Cristina Alonso Cano and Juana Sancho Gil. 2017. From Distance Education To E-Learning: Emergence, Evolution and Consolidation. Revista Educación y Tecnología, 10, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.18566/revistaq.v10n20.a02Google Scholar
- Lorena Alemán de la Garza, Marcela Gómez-Zermeño, Yoko Mochizuki and Éric Bruillard 2019. Rethinking Pedagoy. Exploring the Potential of Digital Technology In Achieving Quality Education. New Delhi: UNESCO MGIEP.Google Scholar
- May Portuguez Castro and M. Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Challenge Based Learning: Innovative Pedagogy for Sustainability through e-learning in Higher Education. Sustainability, 12(10), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104063Google Scholar
- Papia Bawa. 2016. Retention in Online Courses: Exploring Issues and Solutions—A Literature Review. SAGE Open, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777Google Scholar
- Valentina Arkorful and Nelly Abaidoo. 2015. The Role Of E-Learning, Advantages and Disadvantages Of Its Adoption In Higher Education. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(12), 29-44. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2014/December-2014/34.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Francisco García-Peñalvo and Antonio Seoane Pardo. An Updated Review of The Concept of Elearning Tenth Anniversary. Education in the Knowledge Society, 16(1), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161119144Google Scholar
- Jennifer Iriti, William Bickel, Christian Schunn and Mary Kei Stein. 2016. Maximizing Research and Development Resources: Identifying and Testing “Load-Bearing Conditions” For Educational Technology Innovations. Educational Technology Research & Development, 64, 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9409-2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Iván Claros, Ruth Cobos and César Collazos. 2016. An approach based on social network analysis applied to a collaborative learning experience. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(2), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2015.2453979Google ScholarCross Ref
- José López Islas. 2017. Institutional Indicators to Measure Innovation. In Educational Innovation: Research, Training, Linking And Visibility, María Soledad Ramírez Montoya and Jaime Ricardo Valenzuela González. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
- OCDE. 2016. Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Jennifer Lai and Matt Bower. 2019. How Is the Use of Technology in Education Evaluated? A Systematic Review. Computer & Education, 133, 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julio Cabero Almenara. 2013. The Application Of Expert Judgment As A Technique For Evaluating Information And Communication Technologies (ICT). Revista de Tecnología de Información y Comunicación en Educación, 7, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2015.27Google Scholar
- Robert Branch. 2009. Instructional Design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer Science Business Media, LLC.Google ScholarCross Ref
- May Portuguez Castro and Marcela Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Mentoring in Online Entrepreneurship Course: Systematization Of An Experience In Higher Education. Formación Universitaria, 13(6), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062020000600267Google Scholar
- Lewis, Aiken. 1985. Three Coeficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012Google ScholarCross Ref
- Luis Miguel Escurra Escurra, M. L. (1988). Cuantificación de la Validez de Contenido por Criterio de Jueces. Revista De Psicología, 6(1-2), 103-111.Google Scholar
- César Coll. 2004. Pedagogy and Curriculum. A Psychological Approach to The Development of The School Curriculum. Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
- Viviana Rodríguez Aranmendiz and Katherina Gallardo Córdova. 2019. Decisions In Evaluation: Postgraduate Virtual Environments, An Ex Post-Facto Study. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 19(59), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/59/06Google Scholar
- Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Teri Reed Roads and Shiva Haghighi. 2011. Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, Attitudes and Outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 425-435. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2011.6142996Google Scholar
- Valeria Cantú González, Leonardo Glasserman Morales and María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya. 2019. Metric Behavior On Evaluation Of Entrepreneurship Education. Investigación Bibliotecológica: Archivonomía, Bibliotecología E Información, 33 (79), 99-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2019.79.57902Google Scholar
- May Portuguez Castro and Marcela Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Being an entrepreneur post-COVID-19- Resilience in times of crisis: a systematic literature review. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, vol. forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeee-07-2020-0246Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Experts’ Judgment for Evaluation of an E-Learning Entrepreneurship Course in Higher Education
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Educational Innovation Supported by ICT to Identify Entrepreneurial Skills in Students in Higher Education
TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityIt is indisputable that society is facing a time of great change and uncertainty toward the future. The situation around the world due to contingency has generated disruptions in all fields, and education is no exception. The digital transformation of ...
The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education
Highlights- The concept and vision of Education 4.0 in higher education are presented.
- Four ...
AbstractTechnological progress and its rapid evolution have positively affected the industrial sector and different productive/service sectors. One of the service-sectors that have benefited the most has been Education. In this sector, the ...
Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted
Supporting the Needs of Higher Educational Learners, through the 'Postgraduate Pathways'
This paper offers a case study in Adaptive Personalised Learning for Postgraduates within Higher Education: What is already known about this topic: Current State of Higher Education within supporting postgraduate careers and transferable skills Raised ...
Comments