skip to main content
10.1145/3587889.3587970acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicieaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Increased productivity through a production management model with Lean Six Sigma (LSS) in the glass industry

Published:09 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Peruvian glass industries' main problem is that they present constant problems in their production process, which negatively impacts their productivity. Therefore, this is due to the need for more implementation of continuous improvement methodologies in the organization. Therefore, this research sought to increase productivity by reducing waste and paralyzed orders in the production process due to poor maintenance of machinery and errors generated by the workforce. That is why it was proposed to implement an improvement model in production processes focused on solving labor and machinery problems using the Lean Six Sigma methodology through the steps of DMAIC, using tools such as TPM, BPM, and standardized work. As a result, after the implementation of the model, it was possible to increase productivity by more than 15%, reduce the percentage of waste by less than 4.5% and reduce the number of paralyzed orders in the production process by 10%.

References

  1. A. S. Patil, M. V. Pisal, and C. T. Suryavanshi, “Application of value stream mapping to enhance productivity by reducing manufacturing lead time in a manufacturing company: A case study,” J. Appl. Res. Technol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2021, doi: 10.22201/icat.24486736e.2021.19.1.1488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Z. T. Xiang and C. J. Feng, “Implementing total productive maintenance in a manufacturing small or medium-sized enterprise,” J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 152–175, 2021, doi: 10.3926/jiem.3286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Singh and R. Rathi, “A structured review of Lean Six Sigma in various industrial sectors,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 10, no. 2. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., pp. 622–664, May 29, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-03-2018-0018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. P. S. Parmar and T. N. Desai, “A systematic literature review on Sustainable Lean Six Sigma,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 429–461, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-08-2018-0092.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. P. S. Parmar and T. N. Desai, “Ranking the solutions of Sustainable Lean Six Sigma implementation in Indian manufacturing organization to overcome its barriers,” Int. J. Sustain. Eng., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.1080/19397038.2020.1813834.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Patel, D. A. Desai, B. E. Narkhede, K. Maddulety, and R. Raut, “Patel, S., Desai, D. A., Narkhede, B. E., Maddulety, K., & Raut, R. (2019). Lean Six Sigma: Literature review and implementation roadmap for manufacturing industries. International Journal of Business Excellence, 19(4), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJ,” Int. J. Bus. Excell., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 447–472, 2019, doi: 10.1504/IJBEX.2019.103461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. D. Makwana and G. S. Patange, “A methodical literature review on application of Lean & Six Sigma in various industries,” Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1. Taylor and Francis Ltd., pp. 107–121, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14484846.2019.1585225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. N. A. Panayiotou and K. E. Stergiou, “A systematic literature review of lean six sigma adoption in European organizations,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 264–292, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-07-2019-0084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. F. Parreño, M. T. Alonso, and R. Alvarez-Valdes, “Solving a large cutting problem in the glass manufacturing industry,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 287, no. 1, pp. 378–388, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. N. Yadav, K. Mathiyazhagan, and K. Kumar, “Application of Six Sigma to minimize the defects in glass manufacturing industry,” J. Adv. Manag. Res., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 594–624, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1108/JAMR-11-2018-0102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. G. V. Punna Rao, S. Nallusamy, P. S. Chakraborty, and S. Muralikrishna, “Study on productivity improvement in medium scale manufacturing industry by execution of lean tools,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Africa, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 193–207, 2020, doi: 10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/JERA.48.193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Uluskan and E. P. Oda, “A thorough Six Sigma DMAIC application for household appliance manufacturing systems: Oven door-panel alignment case,” TQM J., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1683–1714, 2020, doi: 10.1108/TQM-06-2019-0171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. K. Soundararajan and K. Janardhan Reddy, “Productivity and quality improvement through DMAIC in SME,” International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, vol. 31, no. 2. Inderscience Publishers, pp. 271–294, 2020, doi: 10.1504/IJPQM.2020.110027.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. L. Hardy, S. Kundu, and M. Latif, “– a caseProductivity and process performance in a manual trimming cell exploiting Lean Six Sigma (LSS) DMAIC study in laminated panel production,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., vol. ahead-of-p, no. ahead-of-print, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-07-2020-0242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. V. Gupta, R. Jain, M. L. Meena, and G. S. Dangayach, “Six-sigma application in tire-manufacturing company: a case study,” in Journal of Industrial Engineering International, vol. 14, no. 3, SpringerOpen, 2018, pp. 511–520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. B. Noori and M. Latifi, “Development of Six Sigma methodology to improve grinding processes: A change management approach,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 50–63, 2018, doi: 2021-05-15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. N. Jamil, H. Gholami, M. Z. M. Saman, D. Streimikiene, S. Sharif, and N. Zakuan, “DMAIC-based approach to sustainable value stream mapping: towards a sustainable manufacturing system,” Econ. Res. Istraz. , vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 331–360, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1715236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. K. Mishra, A. Sharma, M. Sachdeo, and K. Jayakrishna, “Development of sustainable value stream mapping (SVSM) for unit part manufacturing: A simulation approach,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 493–514, 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-04-2018-0036.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. Singh, H. Singh, A. Singh, and J. Singh, “Managing industrial operations by lean thinking using value stream mapping and six sigma in manufacturing unit: Case studies,” Manag. Decis., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1118–1148, 2020, doi: 10.1108/MD-04-2017-0332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. A. Dadashnejad and C. Valmohammadi, “Investigating the effect of value stream mapping on operational losses: a case study,” J. Eng. Des. Technol., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 478–500, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1108/JEDT-11-2017-0123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. S. Patil, M. V. Pisal, and C. T. Suryavanshi, “Application of value stream mapping to enhance productivity by reducing manufacturing lead time in a manufacturing company: A case study,” J. Appl. Res. Technol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2021, doi: 10.22201/icat.24486736e.2021.19.1.1488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. S. Singh, J. S. Khamba, and D. Singh, “Analysis and directions of OEE and its integration with different strategic tools,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng., vol. 235, no. 2, pp. 594–605, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0954408920952624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. P. Tsarouhas, “Reliability, availability and maintainability analysis of a bag production industry based on the six sigma DMAIC approach,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 237–263, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-09-2019-0101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. T. Bristogianni, F. Oikonomopoulou, C. J. De Lima, F. A. Veer, and R. Nijsse, “Structural cast glass components manufactured from waste glass: Diverting everyday discarded glass from the landfill to the building industry,” Heron, vol. 63, no. 1–2, pp. 57–102, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. A. C. Scheller, T. T. Sousa-Zomer, and P. A. Cauchick-Miguel, “Lean Six Sigma in developing countries: evidence from a large Brazilian manufacturing firm,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–22, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-09-2016-0047.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. F. H. Ho , “Analytical analysis for material efficiency practice: an exploratory study of Malaysia manufacturing cases,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1150, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1150/1/012006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. N. A. Panayiotou and K. E. Stergiou, “A systematic literature review of lean six sigma adoption in European organizations,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 264–292, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-07-2019-0084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. A. Adeodu, M. G. Kanakana-Katumba, and M. Rendani, “Implementation of lean six sigma for production process optimization in a paper production company,” J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 661–680, 2021, doi: 10.3926/jiem.3479.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. “IMPROVING SERVICE LEVEL PERFORMANCE BY IMPLEMENTING LEAN SIX SIGMA IN SMES OF THE GAMING PERIPHERALS INDUSTRY IN PERU: A CASE STUDY,” South African Journal of Industrial Engineering. (accessed Nov. 10, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. E. Figueroa-Rivera, A. Bautista-Gonzales, and J. Quiroz-Flores, “Increased productivity of storage and picking processes in a mass-consumption warehouse applying Lean Warehousing tools: A Research in Peru,” no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. D. L. Hardy, S. Kundu, and M. Latif, “Productivity and process performance in a manual trimming cell exploiting Lean Six Sigma (LSS) DMAIC – a case study in laminated panel production,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-07-2020-0242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S. Dutta and S. Jaipuria, “Reducing packaging material defects in beverage production line using Six Sigma methodology,” Int. J. Six Sigma Compet. Advant., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 59–82, 2020, doi: 10.1504/IJSSCA.2020.107477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Increased productivity through a production management model with Lean Six Sigma (LSS) in the glass industry

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIEAEU '23: Proceedings of the 2023 10th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications
      January 2023
      339 pages
      ISBN:9781450398527
      DOI:10.1145/3587889

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 June 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format