Phenylisoxazole-3/5-Carbaldehyde Isonicotinylhydrazone Derivatives: Synthesis, Characterization, and Antitubercular Activity

Carrasco, Fernando; Hernández, Wilfredo; Chupayo, Oscar; Sheen, Patricia; Zimic, Mirko; Coronel, Jorge; Álvarez, Celedonio M.; Ferrero, Sergio; Oramas-Royo, Sandra; Spodine, Evgenia; Rodilla, Jesus M.; Dávalos, Juan Z.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6014093

Journal of Chemistry

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6014093 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6014093

Phenylisoxazole-3/5-Carbaldehyde Isonicotinylhydrazone Derivatives: Synthesis, Characterization, and Antitubercular Activity

Fernando Carrasco,^1,2Wilfredo Hernández,¹Oscar Chupayo,³Patricia Sheen,⁴Mirko Zimic,⁴Jorge Coronel,⁴Celedonio M. Álvarez,⁵Sergio Ferrero,⁵Sandra Oramas-Royo,⁶Evgenia Spodine,⁷Jesus M. Rodilla,⁸and Juan Z. Dávalos⁹

Academic Editor: Marcelino Maneiro

Received05 May 2021

Accepted22 Sept 2021

Published31 Oct 2021

Abstract

Eight new phenylisoxazole isoniazid derivatives, 3-(2′-fluorophenyl)isoxazole-5-carbaldehyde isonicotinylhydrazone (1), 3-(2′-methoxyphenyl)isoxazole-5-carbaldehyde isonicotinylhydrazone (2), 3-(2′-chlorophenyl)isoxazole-5-carbaldehyde isonicotinylhydrazone (3), 3-(3′-clorophenyl)isoxazole-5-carbaldehyde isonicotinylhydrazone (4), 3-(4′-bromophenyl)isoxazole-5-carbaldehyde isonicotinylhydrazone (5), 5-(4′-methoxiphenyl)isoxazole-3-carbaldehyde isonicotinylhydrazone (6), 5-(4′-methylphenyl)isoxazole-3-carbaldehyde isonicotinylhydrazone (7), and 5-(4′-clorophenyl)isoxazole-3-carbaldehyde isonicotinylhydrazone (8), have been synthesized and characterized by FT-IR, ¹H-NMR, ¹³C-NMR, and mass spectral data. The 2D NMR (¹H-¹H NOESY) analysis of 1 and 2 confirmed that these compounds in acetone-d₆ are in the trans(E) isomeric form. This evidence is supported by computational calculations which were performed for compounds 1–8, using DFT/B3LYP level with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set. The in vitro antituberculous activity of all the synthesized compounds was determined against the Mycobacterium tuberculosis standard strains: sensitive H37Rv (ATCC-27294) and resistant TB DM97. All the compounds exhibited moderate bioactivity (MIC = 0.34–0.41 μM) with respect to the isoniazid drug (MIC = 0.91 μM) against the H37Rv sensitive strain. Compounds 6 (X = 4′-OCH₃) and 7 (X = 4′-CH₃) with MIC values of 12.41 and 13.06 μM, respectively, were about two times more cytotoxic, compared with isoniazid, against the resistant strain TB DM97.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health problem in the world; it is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The presence of this bacterium in the body, as well as the inappropriate treatment of this disease, is one of the causes of millions of deaths in the world. In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported 10 million new TB cases and more than a million deaths [1]. The emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR), extensively drug resistant (XDR), and totally drug resistant (TDR) tuberculosis has attracted considerable attention from researchers to develop novel anti-TB agents with fewer side effects and shorter duration of treatment [2–4].

The isoniazid, pyridine-4-carbohydrazide, C₅H₄NCONHNH₂, is a prodrug clinically used for the treatment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection [5, 6]. There is evidence that its mechanism of action requires in vivo activation of this prodrug (INH). The active form produces various reactive species, which have as an intracellular target the reductase of the fatty acid transporter protein, in order to inhibit the synthesis of mycolic acid, from the M. tuberculosis cell wall [6, 7].

It is well known that the N-acetyltransferases (NATs) have been implicated in the resistance developed by “isoniazid, one of the first-line drugs in TB treatment” [1], due to the enzymatic acetylation of its primary amino group to form N-acetyl INH [2, 8–12]. In this sense, one of the benefits of isoniazid is obtaining a broad spectrum of novel isoniazid derivatives by condensing the terminal amine group (-NH₂) with the carbonyl group (-C=O) from aldehydes or ketones to produce new compounds with functional groups of the acylhydrazone type (∼CH=NH-NH-C=O∼) [13, 14] that can act as bidentate ligands (N,O) and coordinate to transition metals to obtain bis-chelate complexes [15, 16]. These acylhydrazone derivatives emerge as an alternative to block the acetylation of INH [9, 10].

In recent years, the isoniazid derivatives with phenyl, pyridyl, amidoether, dibenzofuran, and carvone fragments have been investigated since they exhibit wide spectrum of pharmacological applications, such us antitubercular [17–20], antimicrobial [21, 22], antileishmanial [23], antifungal [24], and anticancer [23, 25–27] activities.

The isoniazid-derived Schiff base compounds, with aromatic or aliphatic moiety, were tested for their antitubercular activity against M. tuberculosis H37Rv. It was found that the compound N²-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexylidenyl isonicotinic acid hydrazide was more active (MIC₉₀ value of 0.025 μg/mL) than the other prepared compounds against M. tuberculosis Erdman strain. Besides, the compound N²-(2-benzyloxy)benzylidenyl isonicotinic acid hydrazide showed acceptable activity (MIC₉₀ = 0.06 μg/mL) assayed in this same strain compared with the MIC value found for INH (0.03–0.06 μg/mL) [10]. On the other hand, the compound N′-cyclohexylidenepyridine-4-carbohydrazide was slightly more active (MIC = 0.03 μg/mL) than isoniazid (MIC = 0.03–0.05 μg/mL) against M. tuberculosis H37Rv. These results indicate that these derivatives from isoniazid can be considered as potential antitubercular agents [9, 28]. In this sense, the compound (E)-4-(4-((2-isonicotinoylhydrazono)methyl)phenoxy)-3-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,5-oxadiazole 2-oxide containing heterocyclic fragments (O,N) bound to the pyridine-4-carboxyhydrazide group was found to be very active against the Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and MDR-TB strains with MIC₉₀ values of 1.03 and 7.0 μM, respectively [29]. Moreover, the compound (E)-6-((2-isonicotinoylhydrazono)-methyl)benzo[c]-oxadiazole-1-oxide [1, 2, 5] containing the benzofuroxan derivative bound to the pyridine-4-carbohydrazide group showed remarkable inhibitory activity against the active and nonreplicating M. tuberculosis strains with MIC₉₀ values of 1.10 and 6.62 μM, respectively [30]. Furthermore, it has been shown that compounds ethyl 4-methyl-2-[(E)-2-[1-(pyridin-2-yl)ethylidene]hydrazin-1-yl]-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxylate and ethyl 2-[(E)-2-[(2-hydroxyphenyl)methylidene]hydrazin-1-yl]-4-methyl-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxylate display noticeable inhibitory activity against M. tuberculosis H₃₇Rv with MIC₈₀ values of 12.50 and 25 μM, respectively [31].

Recently, we have reported in vitro antimicrobial studies of indole-3-carbaldehyde semicarbazone derivatives against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The results demonstrated that compounds 2-((5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazine carboxamide and 2-((5-chloro-1H-indol-3-yl) methylene)hydrazine carboxamide were moderately active against Staphylococcus aureus (MIC = 100 and 150 μg/mL, respectively) and Bacillus subtilis (MIC = 100 and 150 μg/mL, respectively) relative to tetracycline (antimicrobial drug) [32]. Continuing with our research on new heterocyclic compounds with potential biological activity, we herein describe the synthesis and spectral characterization of eight new phenylisoxazole isoniazid derivatives. All the prepared compounds were tested for their in vitro antitubercular activity against the Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains: H37Rv (ATCC-27294) and TB DM97.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Instrumentation

All the chemicals used in this work were purchased from Merck and Sigma-Aldrich. The M. tuberculosis strains, susceptible H37Rv (ATCC 27294) and resistant wild type MDR (DM97), were obtained from Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Susceptibility tests were performed in duplicate (two plates) using the tetrazolium microplate assay (TEMA), whose salt is 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide [20, 33–35]. Isoniazid was used as a reference drug [8, 19, 33].

All melting points were measured on a Büchi melting point B-545 apparatus. The infrared spectra were recorded using a Nicolet iS10 FT IR spectrometer, Mass spectra were recorded on the high-resolution mass spectrometers: Waters-Quattro Premier XE^TM tandem quadrupole and VG Micromass ZAB-2F, using methanol as the sample dissolution medium. The values of molecular ions are reported as ESI⁺ ([M+H]⁺, [M+Na]⁺) or ESI⁻ ([M-H]⁻). The NMR spectra were recorded in deuterated dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO-d₆) or deuterated acetone (CD₃COCD₃) with an Agilent NMR spectrometer (500 MHz for ¹H and 126 MHz for ¹³C) or a Bruker AVANCE^TM NMR spectrometer (400 or 600 MHz for ¹H and 100 or 150 MHz for ¹³C) using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal reference. The chemical shifts values were reported in parts per million (δ, ppm) from internal standard TMS.

2.2. Experimental Procedures

2.2.1. Synthesis of the Phenylisoxazole-3/5-Carbaldehyde Isonicotinylhydrazone Derivatives (1–8)

(1) General Method. Isoniazid (0.137 g, 1 mmol) dissolved in 24 mL of a hot methanol-water mixture (v/v, 10 : 2) was added dropwise to a solution of the phenylisoxazole 3/5-carbaldehyde derivative (1 mmol) in 20 mL of methanol during 20 minutes. Then 0.2 mL of glacial acetic acid (catalyst) was added to the solution. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux condition for 3 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuum. The solid product obtained after a slow evaporation was filtered and recrystallized from a methanol-DMSO mixture (v/v, 1 : 1) to obtain the corresponding phenylisoxazole-3/5-carbaldehyde isonicotinylhydrazone derivatives in pure form.

(2) 3-(2′-Fluorophenyl)Isoxazole-5-Carbaldehyde Isonicotinylhydrazone (1). White solid. Yield: 0.225 g (73%). m. p. 230–232°C. FT-IR (ν, cm⁻¹): 3211.45 (N-H), 3052.61(C_ar-H), 1653.36 (C = O), 1531.94 (C = N). ESI-MS: m/z 309.105 [M − H]⁻ (Cal. for C₁₆H₁₁FN₄O₂: 310.283 g/mol). ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, Acetone-d₆, ppm): δ 11.61 (s, 1H, =N-NH), 8.80 (d, 2H, J = 5.1 Hz, H-2´´, H-6´´), 8.72 (s, 1H, CH = N), 8.02 (s, 1H, H-6′), 7.84 (br, 2H, H-3´´, H-5´´), 7.60 (d, 1H, J = 6.4 Hz, H-4′), 7.41–7.34 (m, 2H, H-3, H-5), 7.26 (s, 1H, H-4). ¹³C-NMR (126 MHz, Acetone-d₆, ppm): δ 150.61, 121.20 (C-2´´, C-6´´; C-3´´, C-5´´, Pyr), 132.40, 129.15/129.17, 124.94/124.97, 116.36/116.53 (C-4′, C-6′, C-5′, C-3′, Ph), 104.31/104.24 (C-4, isoxazole ring), 135.62 (CH = N).

(3) 3-(2′-Methoxyphenyl)Isoxazole-5-Carbaldehyde Isonicotinylhydrazone (2). White solid. Yield: 0.252 g (78,3%). m. p. 202–204°C. FT-IR (ν, cm⁻¹): 3201.32 (N-H), 3042.47 (C_ar-H), 1663.09 (C = O), 1540.73 (C = N). ESI-MS: m/z 321.084 [M − H]⁻ (Cal. for C₁₇H₁₄N₄O₃: 322.318 g/mol). ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, Acetone-d₆, ppm): δ 11.55 (s, 1H, =N-NH), 8.80 (d d, 2H, J = 5.8 Hz, H-2´´, H-6´´), 8.68 (s, 1H, CH = N), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz, H-6′), 7.86 (br, 2H, H-3´´, H-5´´), 7.50 (t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4′), 7.32 (s, 1H, H-4), 7.21 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-3′), 7.08 (t, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz, H-5′), 3.43 (s, 3H, -OCH₃). ¹³C-NMR (126 MHz, Acetone-d₆, ppm): δ 150.59, 121.23 (C-2´´, C-6´´; C-3´´, C-5´´, Pyr), 157.46, 131.67, 128.92, 120.71, 117.24, 111.91 (C-2′, C-4′, C-6′, C-5′, C-1′, C-3′, Ph), 160.24, 105.45 (C-3, C-4, isoxazole ring), 136.07 (CH = N), 55.19 (-OCH₃).

(4) 3-(2′-Chlorophenyl)Isoxazole-5-Carbaldehyde Isonicotinylhydrazone (3). White solid. Yield: 0.212 g (65%). m. p. 212–214°C. FT-IR (ν, cm⁻¹): 3159.74 (N-H), 3020.30 (C_ar-H), 1654.74 (C = O), 1541.09 (C = N). ESI-MS: m/z 327.065 [M + H]⁺, 349.046 [M + Na]⁺ (Cal. for C₁₆H₁₁N₄O₂³⁵Cl: 326.253 g/mol), m/z 329.063 [M + H]⁺ (Cal. for C₁₆H₁₁N₄O₂³⁷Cl: 328.250 g/mol). ¹H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆, ppm): δ 12.48 (s, 1H, =N-NH), 8.82 (d, 2H, J = 5.0 Hz, H-2´´, H-6´´), 8.57 (s, 1H, CH = N), 7.84 (d, 2H, J = 5 Hz, H-3´´, H-5´´), 7.76 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz, H-6′), 7.67 (d, 1H, J = 6.6 Hz, H-3′), 7.57 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz, H-5′), 7.51 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz, H-4′), 7.40 (s, 1H, H-4). ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆, ppm): δ 150.94, 140.33, 122.03 (C-2´´, C-6´´; C-4´´; C-3´´, C-5´´, Pyr), 132.34, 131.61, 130.92, 128.24, 127.71 (C-1′, C-5´; C-6′, C-3′, C-4′, C-2′, Ph), 165.55, 161.52, 106.85 (C-5, C-3, C-4, isoxazole ring), 136.12 (CH = N).

(5) 3-(3′-Chlorophenyl)Isoxazole-5-Carbaldehyde Isonicotinylhydrazone (4). White solid. Yield: 0.268 g (65%). m. p. 200–202°C. FT-IR (ν, cm⁻¹): 3506.43, 3118.28 (N-H), 2996.75 (C_ar-H), 1673.85 (C = O), 1546.15 (C=N). ESI-MS: m/z 325.04 [M − H]⁻ (Cal. for C₁₆H₁₁N₄O₂³⁵Cl: 326.25 g/mol), m/z 326.97 [M − H]⁻ (Cal. for C₁₆H₁₁N₄O₂³⁷Cl: 328.25 g/mol). ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆, ppm): δ 12.46 (br, 1H, =N-NH), 8.82 (d, 2H, J = 6.0 Hz, H-2´´, H-6´´), 8.56 (s, 1H, CH = N), 8.03 (s, 1H, H-2′), 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-6′), 7.85 (d, 2H, J = 6.0 Hz, H-3´´, H-5´´), 7.68 (s, 1H, H-4), 7.62–7.57 (m, 2H, H-4′, H-5′). ¹³C-NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d₆, ppm): δ 150.95, 140.34, 122.02 (C-2´´, C-6´´; C-4´´; C-3´´, C-5´´, Pyr), 134.45, 131.63, 130.86, 130.48, 126.94, 125.79 (C-5´, C-1′, C-3′, C-6′, C-4′, C-2′, Ph), 166.41, 161.85, 104.03 (C-5, C-3, C-4, isoxazole ring), 162.58 (C = O), 136.07 (CH = N).

(6) 3-(4′-Bromophenyl)Isoxazole-5-Carbaldehyde Isonicotinylhydrazone (5). White solid. Yield: 0.267 g (72%). m. p. 261–263°C. FT-IR (ν, cm⁻¹): 3446.08, 3181.48 (N-H), 1677.65 (C = O), 1587.09 (C = N). ESI-MS: m/z 369.114 [M − H]⁻ (Cal. for C₁₆H₁₁N₄O₂⁷⁹Br: 370.203 g/mol), m/z 371.112 [M − H]⁻ (Cal. for C₁₆H₁₁N₄O₂⁸¹Br: 372.201 g/mol). ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆, ppm): δ 12.44 (br, 1H, =N-NH), 8.82 (d, 2H, J = 6.0 Hz, H-2´´, H-6´´), 8.55 (s, 1H, CH = N), 7.91 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, H-2′, H-6′), 7.84 (d, 2H, J = 6.0 Hz, H-3´´, H-5´´), 7.61 (s, 1H, H-4), 7.74 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, H-3′, H-5′).

(7) 5-(4′-Methoxyphenyl)Isoxazole-3-Carbaldehyde Isonicotinylhydrazone (6). White solid. Yield: 0.255 g (79%). m. p. 212–214°C. FT-IR (ν, cm⁻¹): 3308.24, 3108.83 (N-H), 1669.66 (C = O), 1544.86 (C = N). ESI-MS: m/z 323.113 [M + H]⁺, 345.097 [M + Na]⁺ (Cal. for C₁₇H₁₄N₄O₃: 322.318 g/mol). ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆, ppm): δ 12.36 (s, 1H, =N-NH), 8.81 (d, 2H, J = 5.5 Hz, H-2´´, H-6´´), 8.53 (s, 1H, CH = N), 7.91 (d, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz, H-2′, H-6′), 7.83 (d, 2H, J = 5.5 Hz, H3´´, H-5´´), 7.26 (s, 1H, H-4), 7.08 (d, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz, H-3′, H-5′), 3.81 (s, 3H, -OCH₃). ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆, ppm): δ 150.49, 140.0, 121.57 (C-2´´, C-6´´; C-4´´; C-3´´, C-5´´, Pyr), 161.08, 127.60, 119.06, 114.57 (C-4´; C-2′, C-6´; C-1´; C-3′, C-5′, Ph), 169.90, 160.74, 95.82 (C-5, C-3, C-4, isoxazole ring), 161.98 (C = O), 138.90 (CH = N), 55.40 (-OCH₃).

(8) 5-(4′-Methylphenyl)Isoxazole-3-Carbaldehyde Isonicotinylhydrazone (7). White solid. Yield: 0.279 g (91%). m. p. 209–211°C. FT-IR (ν, cm⁻¹): 3313.95, 3115.03 (N-H), 1670.61 (C = O), 1541.61 (C = N). ESI-MS: m/z 305.097 [M − H]⁻ (Cal. for C₁₇H₁₄N₄O₂: 306.319 g/mol). ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, Acetone-d₆, ppm): δ 11.55 (s, 1H, =N-NH), 8.80 (d, 2H, J = 5.1 Hz, H-2´´, H-6´´), 8.61 (s, 1H, CH = N), 7.90–7.87 (m, 4H, H-2′, H-6´; H-3´´, H-5´´), 7.40 (d, 2H, J = 9.0 Hz, H-3′, H-5′), 7.19 (s, 1H, H-4), 2.42 (s, 3H, CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (126 MHz, Acetone-d₆, ppm): δ 150.59, 140.93, 121.25 (C-2´´, C-6´´; C-4´´; C-3´´, C-5´´, Pyr), 140.93, 129.78, 125.79 (C-4´; C-3′, C-5´; C-2′, C-6′, Ph), 96.15 (C-4, isoxazole ring), 138.73 (CH = N), 20.51 (CH₃).

(9) 5-(4′-Chlorophenyl)Isoxazole-3-Carbaldehyde Isonicotinylhydrazone (8). White solid. Yield: 0.268 g (82%). m. p. 222–224°C. FT-IR (ν, cm⁻¹): 3447.15, 3224.99, 3112.73 (N-H), 1672.46 (C = O), 1554.16 (C = N). ESI-MS: m/z 349.046 [M + Na]⁺ (Cal. for C₁₆H₁₁N₄O₂³⁵ClNa: 348.741 g/mol), m/z 351.045 [M + Na]⁺ (Cal. for C₁₆H₁₁N₄O₂³⁷ClNa: 350.740 g/mol). ¹H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆, ppm): δ 12.44 (s, 1H, =N-NH), 8.82 (d, 2H, J = 5.3 Hz, H-2´´, H-6´´), 8.57 (s, 1H, CH = N), 8.02 (d, 2H J = 8.3 Hz, H-2′, H-6′), 7.84 (d, 2H, J = 5.3 Hz, H-3´´, H-5´´), 7.62 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz, H-3′, H-5′), 7.52 (s, 1H, H-4). ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆, ppm): δ 150.93, 140.47, 122.04 (C-2´´, C-6´´; C-4´´; C-3´´, C-5´´, Pyr), 135.91, 129.86, 128.15, 125.70 (C-4´; C-3′, C-5´; C-2′, C-6′, C-1′, Ph), 169.19, 161.43, 98.50 (C-5, C-3, C-4, isoxazole ring), 162.53 (C = O), 139.11 (CH = N).

2.2.2. Antimycobacterial Assay

The in vitro antituberculous activity of compounds 1–8 was tested against strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, H37Rv and DM97. The used method was tetrazolium microplate assay (TEMA). Drug concentration ranges were from 32 to 0.125 μg/mL dissolved in Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with OADC medium. Plates were sealed with Ziploc bags and incubated at 37°C for five days. After addition of tetrazolium-Tween 80 solution and incubating for 24 h, the results were observed. A yellow color in the well was interpreted as no growth and a purple color was scored as growth. The detailed procedure is found in the reviewed literature [20]. The MIC value was defined as the lowest drug concentration, which prevents the visible growth of a bacterium or bacteria.

2.2.3. Computational Methodology

The quantum chemical calculations were carried out using the Gaussian 09 package [36]. The geometries of compounds 1–8 under investigation were optimized by using density functional theory (DFT), with the Becke 3-parameter and Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) functional [37–40] and the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set without symmetric restrictions. The results of the harmonic vibrational frequency were also calculated at the same level to verify that the derived structures correspond to local minima of the potential energy surface (see Supplementary Figure 1 in Supplementary Materials). The computed energies and enthalpies for the most stable conformers were obtained in both gas and liquid (acetone and DMSO) phases. For the last case, the continuous polarizable model (PCM) was used [40]. The population of conformers was determined from their Boltzmann distribution [37].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization

The phenylisoxazole-3/5-carbaldehyde isonicotinylhydrazone derivatives 1–8 were obtained in satisfactory yields (65–91%) by refluxing isoniazid with the respective phenylisoxazole-3/5-carbaldehyde derivative in methanol, according to literature [41], as shown in Scheme 1. All the synthesized compounds were characterized by FT-IR, mass, 1D NMR (¹H- and ¹³C-NMR), and 2D (¹H-¹H COSY, ¹H-¹H NOESY, ¹H-¹³C HSQC and ¹H-¹³C HMBC) spectral analyses. Spectroscopic data obtained for compounds 1–8 confirmed the proposed structures. All these compounds were purified by recrystallization using a methanol-DMSO (v/v, 1 : 1) mixture. In the ¹³C-NMR spectra recorded in acetone-d₆ for 1, 2, and 7, the signal of the carbonyl group (C=O) was not observed, due to the fact that these compounds were only slightly soluble in acetone-d₆. The signals of the ¹³C-NMR spectrum of compound 5 were not recorded, due to its low solubility in DMSO-d₆

(a)

(b)

3.2. FT-IR Spectral Analysis

In the IR spectra of the studied compounds 1–8 (see Supplementary Figures 3, 10, 17, 21, 25, 27, 33, and 40 in Supplementary Materials), the less intense broad bands around 3108–3506 cm⁻¹ are assigned to ν(N-H) vibrations of the NHCO group [2, 15, 21]. The intense absorption bands of the carbonyl group (CO) were observed in the 1653–1677 cm⁻¹ region [17, 21]. These ν(CO) vibrations, found in all the compounds, confirm the presence of the keto tautomer in the solid state, in agreement with the stretching frequencies of the carbonyl group found for other compounds derived from semicarbazones with indole fragments [32]. The strong absorption bands corresponding to the imine C=N group appeared at 1531–1587 cm⁻¹ [17, 30]. For 5 and 8, the absorption bands of the C=N group were shifted to higher frequencies (45 and 12 cm⁻¹, respectively) with respect to (C=N) stretching vibrations of 7 (X = 4′-CH₃). These results indicate that the ν(C=N) vibrations of compounds 5 and 8 were affected by the presence of the bromo and chloro substituents in the para position, respectively, of the phenyl ring.

3.3. Mass Spectra

The ESI mass spectra display molecular ion peaks corresponding to the fragments [M+H]⁺, [M+Na]⁺, or [M−H]⁻ for the synthesized compounds 1–8 (see Supplementary Figures 2, 9, 16, 20, 24, and 39 in Supplementary Materials). The mass data obtained for all the synthesized compounds are shown in Table 1. Figures 1 and 2 show the molecular ion peaks found for compounds 6 (323.113 [M+H]⁺) and 7 (305.097 [M−H]⁻), respectively. Mass spectra of compounds 3, 4, and 8 displayed two molecular ion peaks m/z at 327.065/329.063 [M+H]⁺, 325.039/326.977 [M−H]⁻, and 349.046/351.045 [M+Na]⁺, respectively. These results reveal the presence of the ³⁵Cl and ³⁷Cl isotopes. On the other hand, 5 gives two molecular ion peaks at 369.114/371.112 [M−H]⁻ due to the presence of the ⁷⁹Br and ⁸¹Br isotopes [42].

3.4. NMR Spectra

The characterization of a novel series of the phenylisoxazole-3/5-carbaldehyde isonicotinylhydrazone derivatives 1–8 was performed by using the 1D NMR (¹H- and ¹³C-NMR) and 2D (¹H-¹H COSY, ¹H-¹H NOESY, ¹H-¹³C HSQC, and ¹H-¹³C HMBC) spectra, recorded in acetone-d₆/DMSO-d₆ (see Supplementary Figures 4–8, 11–15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 26, 28–32, 34–38, 41, and 42 in Supplementary Materials).

The ¹H-NMR spectra of all the synthesized compounds showed a singlet in the region δ = 12.48–11.55 and 8.72–8.53 ppm, for the amide (-CONH-) and imine (–HC = N-) protons, respectively. These results are similar to the chemical shifts found for other isoniazid derivatives [15, 17, 30]. The signal of the -CH isoxazole aromatic proton was observed as a singlet at δ = 7.68–7.19 [41, 43]. Moreover, the signals of the pyridine C-H proton appeared at δ = 8.82–7.83, and these chemical shifts are in agreement with those found for other isoniazid derivatives [44].

For compounds 1 and 3, the CH=N proton signals bound to the isoxazole phenyl group were affected by the presence of the fluoro and chloro substituents in the C-2′ positions of the aromatic ring, respectively. These signals are deshielded 0.4 and 0.25 ppm, for 1 and 3, respectively, with respect to the imine proton of the compound N′-(4-(dimethylamino)benzylidene)isonicotinoylhydrazone monohydrate [45]. For compounds 1 (X = 2′-F), 2 (X = 2′-OCH₃), and 3 (X = 2′-Cl), the CONH proton signals are shielded 0.15 ppm and 0.21 ppm for 1 and 2, respectively, and deshielded 0.72 ppm (for 3) with respect to the chemical shift of the compound Nˈ-(4-(dimethylamino)benzylidene)isonicotinoylhydrazone monohydrate [45].

The signals of the CH protons of the isoxazole ring of compounds 1 (X = 2′-F), 2 (X = 2′-OCH₃), 3 (X = 2′-Cl), 4 (X = 3′-Cl), and 5 (X = 4′-Br) are deshielded 0.53, 0.59, 0.67, 0.95, and 0.88 ppm, respectively, with respect to the compound 3-bromo-N-(3-phenyl-5-isoxazolyl)propanamide [46].

For compounds 2 and 3, the aromatic proton signals in positions C-3′ are shifted upfield (0.12 ppm for 2) and downfield (0.34 ppm for 3), while the aromatic proton signals in positions C-4′ are shifted 0.34 and 0.35 ppm downfield for 2 and 3, respectively, with respect to the unsubstituted phenyl moiety [47]. Besides, for 4, the aromatic proton signals in positions C-2′ and C-4′ are shifted downfield 0.42 and 0.46–0.41 ppm, respectively, while for 5 they are shifted downfield for the protons in positions C-2′ and C-6´ (0.30 ppm) and C-3′ and C-5´ (0.41 ppm), with respect to the unsubstituted phenyl moiety [47]. With respect to compounds 6 and 8, the aromatic proton signals of the phenyl fragment were affected by the presence of the methoxy and chloro substituents in the C-4′ positions. These signals are shifted upfield (0.25 ppm for 6) and downfield (0.29 ppm for 8) for the protons in positions C-3′ and C-5′, while the protons in positions C-2′ and C-6′ are shifted downfield (0.30 ppm and 0.41 ppm for 6 and 8, respectively), with respect to the unsubstituted phenyl moiety [47].

On the other hand, for compounds 6 (X = 4′-OCH₃), 7 (X = 4′-CH₃), and 8 (X = 4′-Cl), the CH=N proton signals are deshielded 0.21, 0.29, and 0.25 ppm, respectively, while the CONH proton signals are deshielded (0.6 and 0.68 ppm for 6 and 8, respectively) and shielded (0.21 ppm for 7) with respect the compound Nˈ-(4-(dimethylamino)benzylidene)isonicotinoylhydrazone monohydrate [45]. Besides, the signals of the CH proton of the isoxazole ring are deshielded 0.53, 0.46, and 0.79 ppm, respectively, with respect to the compound 3-bromo-N-(3-phenyl-5-isoxazolyl)propanamide [46].

In the ¹³C-NMR spectra of compounds 1–4 and 6–8, the pyridine aromatic carbons appeared at δ = 150.95–150.49 (C-2´´, C-6´´) and 122.04–121.20 (C-3´´, C-5´´). For compounds 3, 4, 6, and 8, the chemical shifts of the C-4´´ carbon appeared in the range of 140.47–140.0 ppm. These results are in agreement with the resonance lines of the pyridine carbons found for other derivatives from isoniazid and isoniazid hydrazones [48, 49]. For compounds 1–4 and 6–8, the resonance lines observed at 139.11–135.62 ppm were assigned to the azomethine carbons. This evidence confirms the formation of the hydrazones in these compounds [45]. For compounds 1, 2, and 3, the signals of the C-4 isoxazole aromatic carbons observed at δ = 106.85–104.31 were affected by the presence of the fluoro, methoxy, and chloro substituents in the C-2′ positions of the phenyl fragment bound to the isoxazole ring. These signals shifted downfield 3.61, 4.75, and 6.15 ppm, respectively, relative to dihydrocurcumin isoxazole, with the unsubstituted isoxazole moiety [50]. However, the signals of the C-4 isoxazole carbon of 6 (X = 4′-OCH₃), 7 (X = 4′-CH₃), and 8 (X = 4′-Cl), found at the range of 98.50–95.82 ppm, were shifted upfield 4.88, 4.55, and 2.2 ppm with respect to the unsubstituted isoxazole moiety found for other isoxazole derivatives [50].

The signals of the C-3′ phenyl aromatic carbons observed at 116.45, 111.91, and 130.92 ppm for 1, 2, and 3, respectively, were affected by the presence of the fluoro, methoxy, and chloro substituents in the C-2′ positions of the phenyl fragments. These signals shifted upfield 10.63 and 15.17 ppm for 1 and 2, respectively, and downfield 3.84 ppm for 3 with respect to the compound 3-[4-(methylthio) phenyl]-5-phenylisoxazole with the meta carbon of the unsubstituted phenyl group [51]. Besides, the signals of the C-3′ and C-5′ aromatic carbons of the phenyl fragment in 6 (X = 4′-OCH₃) and 8 (X = 4′-Cl) found at 114.57 and 129.86 ppm were shifted upfield 12.51 ppm and downfield 2.78 ppm with respect to the unsubstituted phenyl group found for other isoxazole derivatives [51].

The two-dimensional ¹H-¹H NOESY spectra recorded in acetone-d₆ for compounds 1 and 2 (Figure 3) show coupling between the amide proton (-CONH) and the imine proton (-CH=N) and also between the H-3´´ pyridine proton and the amide proton (-CONH). These results are in agreement with the trans(E) configurational isomer found for other acylhydrazone derivatives [17, 37].

3.5. DFT Calculations

The geometry of the studied molecules was identified as Z/E isomers, with respect to the C=N bond, and cis/trans conformers compared to the CONH amide group [52]. The computed energies, enthalpies, and population of the thermodynamically stable conformers are described in Table 1. The most stable configurations in all the studied molecules 1–8, in both gas and liquid phases, are considered as E isomers, with dihedral angles Φ (Figure 4) close to 180°. These results indicate the planar arrangement of these conformers. Φ is defined by O − C9 − C10 = N2 and N1 − C9 − C10 = N2 bonds for 1 to 5 and 6 to 8, respectively.

In the gas phase, the most stable molecule is a cis(E) conformer with a population between 82 and 93%, while the population of the trans(E) conformers is between 7 and 17%. In the liquid phase (acetone and DMSO), the conformational configuration changes, and the most stable molecule is the trans(E) conformer with a population between 54 and 96%, while the population of cis(E) conformers is from 4 to 46%. This behavior has been observed in the geometrical configurations of other hydrazone derivatives [37].

For all the compounds, in both the gas and liquid phases, the population of cis and trans(Z) conformers (described as “others” in Table 2) is minimal, since it is less than 2% of the total conformational population (see Supplementary Table 1 in Supplementary Materials). All of them display a considerable high enthalpy difference relative to the corresponding most stable one (greater than 2.5 kJmol⁻¹).

It is interesting to mention that DFT optimized geometries in all the synthesized compounds are in good agreement with two-dimensional ¹H-¹H NOESY NMR results, particularly for 1 (see Supplementary Information) and 2 (Figure 3).

3.6. Antimycobacterial Assays

The in vitro anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis activity of the isoniazid derivatives 1–8 was investigated against the standard strains of sensitive H37Rv (ATCC-27294) and resistant TB DM97. The values of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), expressed in μM, were determined, using the microplate susceptibility test (method TEMA). In these assays, the tetrazolium salt and the isoniazid antibiotic were used as growth indicator and reference drug, respectively [20, 34, 35]. These antitubercular tests were performed in duplicate (two plates), and the MIC values found in both plates yielded the same values.

As can be seen in Table 3, all the tested compounds 1–8 were demonstrated to be more active (MIC = 0.34–0.41 uM) than the isoniazid drug (INH, MIC = 0. 91 μM) (Figure 5(a)) against the strain sensitive H37Rv [8, 33]. Compound 5 (MIC = 0.34 μΜ) was slightly more cytotoxic than the other tested compounds in this studied strain. Probably, the presence of the bromo substituent group at position C-4 of the phenyl fragment plays an important role in the cytotoxicity of 5. Thus, these results indicate that the presence of the isoxazole group bound to the phenyl ring with different substituent groups improves the antitubercular activity with respect to the cytotoxicity of the reference drug isoniazid.

Compounds 2 (X = 2′-OCH₃), 3 (X = 2′-Cl), and 4 (X = 3′-Cl) were slightly more cytotoxic (MIC = 24.82, 24.48, and 24.48 μM, respectively) than the reference drug (MIC = 29.17 μM) (Figure 5(b)) against the resistant TB DM97 strain. However, 5 (the most active against the sensitive H37Rv strain) showed low cytotoxicity (MIC = >86.21 μM) in this studied strain. On the other hand, compounds 6 and 7 with MIC values of 12.41 and 13.06 μM, respectively, were about 2 times more cytotoxic than the reference drug. These results indicate that the cytotoxicity in this studied strain increased due to the presence of the OCH₃ and CH₃ substituent groups in the C-4′ position of phenyl fragment. With respect to 8, the presence of the chloro substituent group at the C-4′ position of the phenyl ring was not relevant in the antitubercular activity (MIC = >97.94 μM).

(a)

(b)

4. Conclusions

In the present study, eight isoniazid derivatives with different substituents were synthesized, characterized, and evaluated for their antitubercular activity. The two-dimensional ¹H-¹H NOESY NMR (in acetone-d₆) spectra revealed that 1 and 2 in solution have a trans(E) isomeric form. This was confirmed by DFT calculations (at B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory) carried out in both the gas and liquid (DMSO and acetone) phases. The results of the anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis activity showed that compounds 1–8, with different substituents on the phenyl fragment, exhibited moderate bioactivity (MIC = 0.34–0.41 μM) with respect to the isoniazid drug (MIC = 0.91 μM) against the sensitive H37Rv strain. On the other hand, compounds 6 (X = 4′-OCH₃) and 7 (X = 4′-CH₃), with MIC values of 12.41 and 13.06 uM, respectively, were about two times more cytotoxic compared to the isoniazid against the resistant TB DM97 strain. Among the tested derivatives, 6 and 7 could represent good candidates as antitubercular agents, since they exhibited good MIC values against the resistant TB DM97 strain.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article, except for the computational results, which are found in Supplementary Materials (Table S1). These data will be available upon request to bona fide researchers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

W. H. and F. C. acknowledge Universidad de Lima Scientific Research Institute for the financial support to carry out this research work. E. S. thanks Financiamiento Basal para Centros Científicos y Tecnológicos de Excelencia, AFB10008. J. Z. D. thanks Consejo Superior de Investigación Científica (CSIC, Spain). S. O. thanks Ministerio de Ciencias, Innovación y Universidades (MICINN (RTI2018-094356-B-C21)) and Cabildo de Tenerife (Agustín de Betancourt Program).

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: computational results at B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) for synthesized compounds 1 to 8. Relative enthalpies (ΔH) of stable conformers and their equilibrium molar fractions (populations). Compounds 1–5 and 8: mass spectra. Compounds 1–8: linear correlation of vibrational frequencies—¹H-NMR spectra—infrared spectra. Compounds 1–4 and 6–8: ¹³C-NMR spectra. Compounds 1, 2, 6, and 7: two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy (¹H-¹H COSY)—two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy (¹H-¹³C HSQC). Compound 1: two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy (¹H-¹H NOESY). Compounds 2, 6, and 7: two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy (¹H-¹³C HMBC). Compound 6:DEPT 45/90 spectrum. (Supplementary Materials)

References

Global Tuberculosis Report 2020, Licence: C C BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2020, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131.
W. Eldehna, M. Fares, M. Abdel-Aziz, and H. Abdel-Aziz, “Design, synthesis and antitubercular activity of certain nicotinic acid hydrazides,” Molecules, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 8800–8815, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Goldman, K. V. Plumley, and B. Laughon, “The evolution of extensively drug resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB): history, status and issues for global control,” Infectious Disorders—Drug Targets, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 73–91, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. F. D. S. Fernandes, C. Man Chin, and J. L. dos Santos, “Advances in drug discovery of new antitubercular multidrug-resistant Compounds,” Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 51, pp. 1–17, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. onyebujoh, A. Zumla, I. Ribeiro et al., “Treatment of tuberculosis: present status and future prospects,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 857–865, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Coll, “Fármacos con actividad frente a Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Enfermedades Infecciosas Microbiología Clínica, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 474–480, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Timmins and V. Deretic, “Mechanisms of action of isoniazid,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1220–1227, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Nayak, J. Ramprasad, and U. Dalimba, “New INH-pyrazole analogs: design, synthesis and evaluation of antitubercular and antibacterial activity,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 25, no. 23, pp. 5540–5545, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Hearn and M. H. Cynamon, “Design and synthesis of antituberculars: preparation and evaluation against Mycobacterium tuberculosis of an isoniazid schiff base,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 185–191, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Hearn, M. H. Cynamon, M. F. Chen et al., “Preparation and antitubercular activities in vitro and in vivo of novel schiff bases of isoniazid,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 4169–4178, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. B. Arun, A. Madhavan, B. Abraham et al., “Acetylation of isoniazid is a novel mechanism of isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 65, no. 1, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. N. Unissa, S. Sukumar, and L. E. Hanna, “The role of N-acetyl transferases on isoniazid resistance from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and human: anin silico approach,” Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 255–264, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Ł. Popiołek, “Hydrazide–hydrazones as potential antimicrobial agents: overview of the literature since 2010,” Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 287–301, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Rollas and S. Küçükgüzel, “Biological activities of hydrazone derivatives,” Molecules, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1910–1939, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Ramadevi, R. Singh, A. Prajapati, S. Gupta, and D. Chakraborty, “Cu(II) complexes of isoniazid schiff bases: DNA/BSA binding and cytotoxicity studies on A549 cell line,” Advances in Chemistry, vol. 2014, pp. 1–14, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Habala, S. Varényi, A. Bilková et al., “Antimicrobial activity and urease inhibition of schiff bases derived from isoniazid and fluorinated benzaldehydes and of their copper(II) complexes,” Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1–14, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Martins, S. Santos, C. Ventura et al., “Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel isoniazid derivatives with potent antitubercular activity,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 81, pp. 119–138, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Cocco, C. Congiu, V. Onnis, M. C. Pusceddu, M. L. Schivo, and A. De Logu, “Synthesis and antimicrobacterial activity of some isonicotinoyhydrazones,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 34, pp. 1071–1076, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kumar, G. Khare, B. Beena et al., “Novel isoniazid-amidoether derivatives: synthesis, characterization and antimycobacterial activity evaluation,” MedChemComm, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 131–137, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Barrera Tomas, G. E. Tomas Chota, P. Fuentes Bonilla, M. A. Inocente Camones, and J. C. Santiago Contreras, “Synthesis of acyl-hydrazone from usnic acid and isoniazid and its anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis activity,” Revista Colombiana de Química, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 17–21, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Judge, B. Narasimhan, M. Ahuja et al., “Isonicotinic acid hydrazide derivatives: synthesis, antimicrobial activity, and QSAR studies,” Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1451–1470, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Ruchita, D. Pathak, S. Mathur, and M. Abhishek, “Novel isonicotinic acid analogs: synthesis, characterization, antibacterial and antimycobacterial (in vitro and in vivo) activity against sensitive and resistant strains,” Current Bioactive Compounds, vol. 13, no. 999, pp. 1–12, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Amim, G. S. S. Firmino, and A. C. P. D. Rego, “Cytotoxicity and leishmanicidal activity of isoniazid-derived hydrazones and 2-pyrazineformamide thiosemicarbazones,” Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 769–777, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. de Aguiar, C. Vládia Silva, and F. de Farias, “Synthesis and in vitro antifungal activity of isoniazid-derived hydrazones against Coccidioides posadasii,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 98, pp. 1–5, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Mashooq, I. Muzaffar, A. Abdullah, and S. Faiyaz, “Carvone schiff base of isoniazid as a novel antitumor agent: nanoemulsion development and pharmacokinetic evaluation,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 203, pp. 111–119, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
F. A. R. Rodrigues, A. Oliveira, and B. Cavalcanti, “Biological evaluation of isoniazid derivatives as an anticancer class,” Scientia Pharmaceutica, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kumar, D. Malhotra, R. Sharma, E. Sausville, and M. Malhotra, “Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of isoniazid analogues as potent anticancer agents,” Pharmacologyonline, vol. 3, pp. 337–343, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
C. M. da Silva, D. L. da Silva, L. V. Modolo et al., “Schiff bases: a short review of their antimicrobial activities,” Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. F. D. S. Fernandes, P. C. de Souza, L. B. Marino et al., “Synthesis and biological activity of furoxan derivatives against Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 123, pp. 523–531, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. F. dos Santos Fernandes, P. C. de Souza, E. Moreno-Viguri et al., “Design, synthesis, and characterization of N-oxide-containing heterocycles with in vivo sterilizing antitubercular activity,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 60, no. 20, pp. 8647–8660, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Makan, R. Kankanala, and A. Prakash, “2-(2-Hidrazinyl)thiazole derivatives: design, synthesis and in vitro antimycobacterial studies,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 69, pp. 564–576, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Carrasco, W. Hernández, O. Chupayo et al., “Indole-3-carbaldehyde semicarbazone derivatives: synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activities,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2020, Article ID 7157281, 9 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Coelho, D. Machado, I. Couto et al., “Enhancement of antibiotic activity by efflux inhibitors against multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from Brazil,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 26, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. G. Franzblau, R. S. Witzig, J. C. McLaughlin et al., “Rapid, low-technology mic determination with clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates by using the microplate alamar blue assay,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 362–366, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Caviedes, J. Delgado, and R. H. Gilman, “Tetrazolium microplate assay as a rapid and inexpensive colorimetric method for determination of antibiotic susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1873-1874, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. C. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, and H. B. Schlegel, Gaussian 09,” Revision A.02, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009.
P. F. M. Oliveira, B. Guidetti, A. Chamayou et al., “Mechanochemical synthesis and biological evaluation of novel isoniazid derivatives with potent antitubercular activity,” Molecules, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1–27, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. P. da Silva, F. Hallwass, A. G. da Silva et al., “Intermolecular interaction of thiosemicarbazone derivatives to solvents and a potential aedes aegypti target,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1093, pp. 219–227, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. Shutalev, A. A. Fesenko, A. N. Yankov, V. A. Tafeenko, and V. V. Chernyshev, “14-Membered cyclic bis-semicarbazones: stereoselective synthesis and structural features,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1150, pp. 349–357, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. K. Venkatachalam, G. K. Pierens, and D. C. Reutens, “Synthesis NMR structural characterization and molecular modeling of substituted thiosemicarbazones and semicarbazones using DFT calculations to prove the syn/anti isomer formation,” Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 98–105, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Hussain, E. Yousif, A. Ahmed, and A. Altaie, “Synthesis and characterization of schiff’s bases of sulfamethoxazole,” Organic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–4, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Holdsworth, “Mass spectra of organic compounds containing bromine and chlorine,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 59, no. 9, p. 780, 1982.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. F. O. Bomfim Filho, R. S. Barbosa, A. E. Burgos, B. L. Rodrigues, and L. R. Teixeira, “New isoxazole(3,5)substituted thiosemicarbazone: synthesis, crystal structure and spectroscopic studies of the binding mode to protein and calf thymus DNA,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1150, pp. 44–54, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. O. Rodrigues, J. B. Cantos, C. R. M. D’Oca et al., “Synthesis and antimycobacterial activity of isoniazid derivatives from renewable fatty acids,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 6910–6914, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yong, E. Mainsah, S. J. Ntum, and P. Ndifon, “Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial studies of some isoniazid-derived schiff bases,” International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tatte, S. Kurashige, and A. Shiozawa, “Isoxazole derivatives as centrally acting muscle relaxants. I. Synthesis and activity of 5-(3-aminopropyl)amino-3-phenylisoxazole derivatives,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1634–1642, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Hernández, F. Carrasco, J. Paz et al., “Synthesis and characterization of new palladium (II) thiosemicarbazone complexes and their cyotoxic activity against various human tumor cell lines,” Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications, vol. 2013, Article ID 524701, 12 pages, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Rizvi, M. Khan, A. Jabeen, H. Siddiqui, and M. I. Choudhary, “Studies on isoniazid derivatives through a medicinal chemistry approach for the identification of new inhibitors of urease and inflammatory markers,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 6738–6714, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Vavríková, S. Polanc, and M. Kocevar, “New series of isoniazid hydrazones linked with electron-withdrawing substituents,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 5902–5909, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Changtam, P. Hongmanee, and A. Suksamrarn, “Isoxazole analogs of curcuminoids with highly potent multidrug-resistant antimycobacterial activity,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 4446–4457, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Karabasanagouda, A. Airody, and M. Girisha, “Synthesis of some new pyrazolines and isoxazoles carring 4-methylthiophenyl moiety as potential analgesic and anti-inflammatory agents,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 48B, pp. 430–437, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Palla, G. Predieri, P. Domiano, C. Vignali, and W. Turner, “Conformational behaviour and/isomerization of -acyl and -aroylhydrazones,” Tetrahedron, vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 3649–3654, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Fernando Carrasco et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

947

Downloads

636

Citations