Keywords
Biofloc, Probiotic Frequency, Survival Rate
Biofloc, Probiotic Frequency, Survival Rate
Feed is one of the important agro-inputs in aquaculture production system that contributes to approximately 40–60% of production cost1,2 and it has direct effect on the growth rate of the fish3–6. The aquaculture activity is commonly produced waste, for example, feed remains and feces which changes into ammonia and nitrite once the oxygen level is low. In the closed culture system the concentrations of ammonia (NH3) and nitrite (NO2) are increasing rapidly and would be toxic to organisms7,8.
According to Asaduzzaman et al.9 and De Schryver et al.10 the intensive application of commercial feed in the aquaculture causes environmental pollution and increases the possibility of the disease outbreak. Therefore, the water quality management is crucial in the aquaculture system. The objective of water quality management is to provide the comfortable environment and meet the optimum requirements for cultured organisms11. According to Gunadi and Hafsaridewi12 the microbial activities can be used to improve water quality and reduce the burden of contamination by fish farming waste. Therefore, the heterotrophic bacteria have promising potency to be applied in the utilization of waste ammonia in the fish culture. Beside, these bacteria are formed as a floc (clumps) in the cultures media; hence it can be used as an alternative feed source for cultured fish13. Biofloc has abilities to suppress the toxic compounds such as ammonia and harmful bacteria (pathogenic) so that the cultured organisms grow well14. Application of biofloc in the cultures system has been reported by several researchers, for example, in the culture of channel catfish14,15, in the South American catfish Rhamdia quelen16, in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus17,18, Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis19, and in the cultured system of the shrimps Litopenaeus vannamei and Penaeus monodon11,20. However, application of biofloc on African catfish Clarias gariepinus cultures has never been reported previously.
African catfish is the popular species for aquaculture business in Southeast Asian countries21. This species has several advantages, for example, resistance to diseases and handling stress and high growth rate22, thus accounting for its commercial importance worldwide23. Nowadays, the fish farmer fed a commercial diet for African catfish. The protein requirement for African catfish ranges from 25% to 40%, lipid 9.5 to 10%, carbohydrates 15 to 30%, vitamins 0.25 to 0.40%, and minerals 1.0%1, with energy level of 2000 cal/g to 3000 cal/g24. In addition, the application of probiotic into African catfish diet has been reported by several researchers, for example, Al-Dohail et al.25, Ige26, and Dennis and Uchenna27. However, application of probiotic combing with biofloc has never been reported previously. Hence, the aim of the study was to evaluate the growth performance and feed utilization of African catfish fed experimental diet reared in the biofloc cultured system and enhanced with probiotic.
The research was conducted from June 2016 to August 2016 at Aquaculture Technology Laboratory, Faculty of Fishery and Marine Sciences, Riau University, Indonesia. The experiments were carried out within the ethical guidelines provided by the research institution and national or international regulations.
The completely random design (CRD) method was used in this study. The tested treatment was the frequency of probiotics application (bacteria inoculation), namely, at 5-day interval (treatment A), 10-day interval (treatment B), and 15-day interval (treatment C). The treatment was conducted at three replications. The experimental fish was maintained in the canvas tank (vol. 2000 L) at stocking density of 1000 fishes and reared for 60 days.
The biofloc was cultured in the nine canvas tanks with a volume of 2000 L. Each tank was filled with water up to a water level of 100 cm or equivalent to 2000 L. Biofloc culture was done by mixing the probiotic (Bacillus sp.) 10 mL and molasses 200 mL L-1 of water and then mixed into the cultures fish tanks and aerated continuously for 7 days to grow the floc.
The catfish larvae were stocked at the density of 1000 fish tank-1 with average weight 1.12±0.05 g and average total length 4.42±0.09 cm. The application of 10 mL inoculants bacteria with density of Bacillus sp. about 5×1010 colony forming units (CFU) was performed according to respective treatment, that is, 5-day, 10-day, and 15-day intervals. The experimental catfish feed was a commercial diet with 38% crude protein, crude lipid 5%, and crude fiber 6%, mineral mix 13%, and 13% moisture contents. The fish were fed twice a day at satiation. The weight gain of fish was measured every 12 -days for 60 days.
The weight gain was calculated as follows: W = Wt – Wo, where W is weight gain (g), Wt is the weight of the fish at the end of experiment (g), and Wo is the weight of fish at the start of experiment (g). The daily growth rate, survival rates, and feed utilization were calculated based on Muchlisin et al.28,29 The main water quality parameters such as dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and temperature were measured using a digital water checker (YSI-550 A, ASTM, Alla, France) at 6-day intervals, while total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) was measured every 6 days using spectrophotometric method30.
The ANOVA test showed that the treatment had a significant effect on the weight gain (WG), specific growth rate and survival rate (SGR), feed efficiency (FE), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P<0.05). The study showed that the highest weight gain and specific growth rate were recorded at treatment A; these values were different significantly from other treatments. A similar trend was also found in the survival rate (SR) where the highest survival rate was recorded in treatment A, but this value was not different significantly from treatment C (Table 1). The highest feed efficiency and lower feed conversion ratio were also found in fish with application of probiotic into biofloc system at 5-day intervals (treatment A). However, these values were not different significantly from treatment C (probiotic application at 15-day intervals). In addition, the water temperature ranges from 29.50°C to 29.62°C, dissolved oxygen rages from 3.64 mg L-1 to 3.88 mg L-1, and pH ranges from 6.93 to 7.02. In addition, the ammonia (NH3) content ranged from 0.292 mg L-1 to 0.411 mg L-1 and nitrite content ranged from 0.08 mg L-1 to 0.09 mg L-1. Therefore, there were no significant differences regarding water quality among the treatments; however, the quality in treatment A was slightly better compared to two other treatments (Table 2). The data showing the total length, body weight and total feed consumed by fish at every experiment can be found in Dataset 1.
The study showed that the growth performance, survival rate, and feed utilization of African catfish were the highest in the application of probiotic into the biofloc system at 5-day intervals. This was presumably due to the fact that the applications of probiotics every 5-days can maintain the density of bacteria at suitable forms and effectively decompose organic materials well. This is indicated by lower ammonium (NH3) content in treatment A. According to Widanarni31 the application of biofloc into culture system can improve water quality and reduce the burden of contamination of fish culture waste in the surrounding waters. In addition Irianto32 stated that Bacillus sp. can improve the quality of the cultured media by decomposing organic materials, suppress the growth of pathogenic, and balance the microbial and had a positive effect on fish health and growth.
Besides maintaining the water quality, biofloc is also playing an important role as alternative natural feed for cultured fish. This is because the biofloc contains crude protein that reached 48–53%33,34 and therefore the Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) in treatment A was 0.90 (below 1.00) and the feed efficiency was higher than 100%. This is because of beside fed on the commercial diet the fish was also fed on floc that contain planktons. This value is better than fish fed on commercial diet without application of biofluc33,35,36. According to Azim34 the nutritional quality of biofloc was appropriate at least for herbivorous and omnivorous fish species. In this case, the African catfish is categorized as omnivorous feeding habits35,37.
It is clear that biofloc contributed to the growth and production of cultured organism as shown in this study. The basic principle of this technology is using the heterotrophic bacteria to manage the C: N ratio in the water media33,38,39. However, biofloc not only contains the bacteria, but also is composed of other microorganisms including microalgae and zooplanktons as food for farmed fish or shrimps33. According to Crab et al.40 biofloc can be consumed and digested well by the shrimp and therefore possibly substitute for artificial commercial feed. Hence, application of biofloc into cultured system can increase feed efficiency up to 13%39. For example, for feed efficiency of African catfish fed a commercial diet without biofloc was 89.83 %33; it was increased up to 110.86% when the biofloc was applied as shown in this study.
In addition, according to Avnimelech38, the addition of molasses as a source of carbon in aquaculture system can improve the C/N ratio waters and will further reduce inorganic nitrogen in the waters through increased growth of heterotrophic bacteria, where the heterotrophic bacteria will form a floc which can be fed by fish as feed source. Furthermore the C: N ratio of >10: 1 in the fish farming system is the optimum ratio to enhance the biofloc production and minimize the ammonia regeneration 39.
The application of probiotic bacteria with different frequencies in the biofloc system had the significant effect on the growth performance, survival rate, and feed utilization of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). The higher growth performance and best feed utilization were recorded in the application of probiotic into biofloc system at 5-day intervals.
Dataset 1: The total length, body weight and total feed consumed by fish at every experiment. 10.5256/f1000research.12438.d17498041
This study was supported by the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (Ristekdikti) of the Republic of Indonesia through the competitive grants scheme (Contract number: 430/UN.19.5.1.3/LT/2016).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
The authors thank the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia for supporting this study through the competitive grants scheme 2016 Contract number: 430/UN.19.5.1.3/LT/2016. The appreciation goes to all of our students who helped the authors during experiments in the laboratory.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Animal Physiology, Fish nutrition, Fish Immunology
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 22 Aug 17 |
read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)