ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Brief Report
Revised

‘The long tail of Covid-19’ - The detection of a prolonged inflammatory response after a SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic and mildly affected patients

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
* Equal contributors
PUBLISHED 08 Jan 2021
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the UCL Child Health gateway.

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

This article is included in the Coronavirus collection.

Abstract

‘Long Covid’, or medical complications associated with post SARS-CoV-2 infection, is a significant post-viral complication that is being more and more commonly reported in patients. Therefore, there is an increasing need to understand the disease mechanisms, identify drug targets and inflammatory processes associated with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. To address this need, we created a targeted mass spectrometry based multiplexed panel of 96 immune response associated proteins. We applied the multiplex assay to a cohort of serum samples from asymptomatic and moderately affected patients. All patients had tested positive for a SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR and were determined to be subsequently positive for antibodies. Even 40-60 days post-viral infection, we observed a significant remaining inflammatory response in all patients. Proteins that were still affected were associated with the anti-inflammatory response and mitochondrial stress. This indicates that biochemical and inflammatory pathways within the body can remain perturbed long after SARS-CoV-2 infections have subsided even in asymptomatic and moderately affected patients.

Keywords

Sars-CoV-2, mass spectrometry, inflammation, biomarker, proteomics

Revised Amendments from Version 1

Figure references have been corrected. Additional method information has been added. A brief mention is included of some of the pathways that the proteins in the multiplex assay are attributed to. An additional reference has been included and parts of the results section better clarified.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Paul Skipp
See the authors' detailed response to the review by William J. griffiths

Introduction

As more and more people are recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection, one of the growing concerns is the increasing reports of the post viral fatigue symptoms or ‘long Covid’. This phenomenon is defined as not recovering for several weeks or months following the start of symptoms and whereby patients present with chronic and recurrent fatigue for weeks and even many months after a SARS-CoV-2 infection1,2. Understanding the effects and complications of ‘long Covid’, and then managing it, is the next challenge for public health services. Currently the UK is increasing its testing capacity for virus detection and antibody detection, but there still remains a gap in the understanding and diagnosis of long Covid.

Work has been performed to characterise the inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in relation to disease severity3. There has been controversy as to whether severity is associated with a hyperinflammatory cytokine storm or failure of host protective immunity that results in unrestrained viral dissemination and organ injury. What has made addressing this question challenging has been the lack of diagnostic tools to evaluate immune function in Covid-19 infections. There are sets of simple but expensive immunoassay panels that are commercially available to look at known key inflammatory proteins such as cytokine panels; however, these only give information on known pathways and limit discovery of novel or less defined inflammatory responses. Targeted proteomics using mass spectrometry can also quantitate multiple diagnostic proteins without use of antibodies. Proteins can be easily added or removed from a panel thereby providing a custom tailored approach. This is ideal in addressing the need for evaluating less understood or defined immune response pathways. Novel assays for virus detection have been already developed using targeted mass spectrometry4,5 but there are no assays available yet to look at the symptoms for the diagnosis or understanding of ‘long Covid’.

From a previous study (unpublished reports) we developed a custom targeted mass spectrometry based assay panel that looks at up to 96 pro- and anti-inflammatory associated proteins (Figure 1a; see Table 1 on protocols.io6). Some of the pathways relevant to the proteins included in the multiplex include upstream regulation of cytokine and glucocorticoid expression; calpain activation; aging associated T-cell production and heat shock protein mediated immunostimulatory ‘danger signals’ for the innate and adaptive immune systems. Our hypothesis was long Covid symptoms could be related to a lingering ‘tail’ and an abnormal inflammatory response to an infection, by a type of virus the body has not seen before. We applied this assay to a cohort of samples taken from healthcare workers who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR and were either asymptomatic or had only a mild infection. Samples were taken at least 40–45 days post infection and demonstrated a positive antibody test. We compared these with serum from healthcare workers with a negative antibody test, no reported infection and no positive PCR test.

3efff8a8-2479-4dc5-b3e0-89f91f3838ad_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Multivariate analysis of post infection serum inflammation profile.

a) Representative overlaid chromatogram of the multiplex inflammation panel. Protein identifiers indicated by name and followed by first three amino acids of the peptide. b) Principle component analysis score plot of 10 SARS-Cov-2 infected patients >40 days post infection and 10 negative controls.

Methods

Ethical statement

Samples were identified from the Health Research Authority approved project Co-Stars (Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust COSTARS, IRAS 282713, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04380896, registered May 8th 2020) and all participants provided informed written consent.

Samples

A pilot group of 10 positive and 10 negative samples covering a broad age range was selected as proof of principle for this assay. The negative group was 60% female with an age-range of 21–57, median 38 years. The positive group was 69% female, with an age range 31–66 and median age of 44 years. Of the positive patients, seven were asymptomatic and six had loss of taste/smell or had abnormal taste/smell. None were admitted to hospital or reported other symptoms.

Multiplex assay

The detailed method for the multiplex assay is published and available at protocols.io6. Briefly, yeast enolase internal standard was added to serum samples. Proteins were precipitated and trypsin digested to peptides. Peptides were desalted, separated by reverse phase chromatography over a 16 min acetonitrile gradient and analysed on a Waters Aquity UPLC system coupled to a Xevo TQ-S mass spectrometer.

Analysis

Raw data was acquired using MassLynx v 4.1 in multiple reaction monitoring mode. Raw files were processed using Skyline v 19. Protein-Peptide sequences were obtained from www.uniprot.org and settings optimised using custom synthesised peptides (Genscript USA). Peak intensity data were normalised to a spiked internal standard protein yeast enolase (Sigma, UK). Normalised data were exported to Microsoft Excel and analysed using SIMCA v 15 (Umetrics, Sweden) for multivariate analysis and Graphpad prism v 6 was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A representative overlaid chromatogram of the proteins included in the multiplex assay is show in Figure 1a. Multivariate analysis of all inflammatory proteins measured in the control and SARS-CoV-2 positive patients is shown in Figure1b. The score plot that shows the first two principal components indicates a clear separation of the positive and negative samples indicating the serum immune profile from people infected with SARS-CoV-2 is still significantly affected even 40 days post-infection. Univariate analysis revealed six proteins (Figure 2) from the entire multiplex panel were significantly altered. The majority of these proteins are either anti-inflammatory or associated with the stress response. Two proteins originate from the mitochondria, peroxiredoxin 3 (PRDX3) and carbamoyl phosphate synthase (CPS1). PRDX3 is a known antioxidant. Its increase in serum of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 is likely indicative of continued mitochondrial stress response. CPS1 is a major mitochondrial urea cycle enzyme in hepatocytes. Serum CPS1 originates from the bile duct and is usually rapidly cleared by peripheral blood mononuclear cells7. It is possible that basal levels of CPS1 in serum are reduced in patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 due to increased circulation and activity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

3efff8a8-2479-4dc5-b3e0-89f91f3838ad_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Altered proteins in post infection serum.

Proteins significantly affected (p< 0.001) by non-parametric statistical analysis in the serum of >40 day post SARS-Cov-2 infected healthcare workers **** p<0.0001, ***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.01.

N-Myc downstream regulated gene 1 (NDRG1) is a cytosolic protein with many biological functions8. Its role in the immune response is undefined but deficiency of NDRG1 affects the differentiation process of macrophages9 and maturation of mast cells10. Collagen triple helix repeat containing 1 (CTHRC1) is anti-inflammatory and promotes wound healing by recruiting M2 macrophages and regulating the TGF-β and Notch pathways11. This increase of CTHRC1 indicates tissue damage has occurred even in moderately affected patients.

Cystatin C is a protease inhibitor and extracellular levels are used as a biomarker for disease prognosis in cancer, cardiovascular disease, and inflammatory lung disorders12. In mice serum cystatin C is controlled by the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL10 of which increasing levels suppress cystatin C expression12. A longitudinal study looking at immune mediators show IL10 levels are significantly elevated in only severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection at four weeks post infection and are not affected at four weeks in mild cases13. This would corroborate with what we observe for cystatin C as the mild patients have increased cystatin C that is not being suppressed by higher IL10 levels. We also observe a slight reduction in serum progranulin. Progranulin plays a fundamental role in the immune response which is better defined within its role in neurodegenerative disorders14 but the relevance of serum progranulin is not fully understood. It appears to have a pro-inflammatory role in adipocytes in diabetes15 and an anti-inflammatory protective role in the vascular endothelium against inflammatory reactions16.

Conclusions

Remarkably, even in patients who have suffered from an asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection, after 40 days post-infection they still exhibit a significantly raised group of biomarkers involved in inflammation and the stress response. This initial data using a custom designed inflammatory marker panel applied to mildly affected patients identifies potential drug targets, provides insight into the post infection inflammatory response. This approach using targeted proteomic technology has potential for application on further well-defined sample cohorts to understand what is abnormal about post infection inflammatory response in ‘long covid’ patients.

Data availability

Underlying data

ProteomeXchange: Underlying mass spectrometry data on ProteomeXchange. Accession number PXD022159.

Underlying mass spectrometry data is also available on PanoramaWeb at https://panoramaweb.org/x1eZmn.url.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 19 Nov 2020
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Doykov I, Hällqvist J, Gilmour KC et al. ‘The long tail of Covid-19’ - The detection of a prolonged inflammatory response after a SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic and mildly affected patients [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] F1000Research 2021, 9:1349 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27287.2)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 08 Jan 2021
Revised
Views
6
Cite
Reviewer Report 15 Jan 2021
Paul Skipp, Centre for Proteomics Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK 
Approved
VIEWS 6
No ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Skipp P. Reviewer Report For: ‘The long tail of Covid-19’ - The detection of a prolonged inflammatory response after a SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic and mildly affected patients [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2021, 9:1349 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.32778.r76956)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 19 Nov 2020
Views
36
Cite
Reviewer Report 16 Dec 2020
Paul Skipp, Centre for Proteomics Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK 
Approved
VIEWS 36
The authors present valuable preliminary data investigating inflammatory signatures in patients previously infected with SARS-CoV2, 40 days after a positive diagnosis. Using a comprehensive mass spectrometry based multiplexed panel of 96 proteins associated with immune response, the study provides clear ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Skipp P. Reviewer Report For: ‘The long tail of Covid-19’ - The detection of a prolonged inflammatory response after a SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic and mildly affected patients [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2021, 9:1349 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.30151.r75167)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 08 Jan 2021
    Wendy Heywood, Translational Mass Spectrometry Research Group, University College London, London, UK
    08 Jan 2021
    Author Response
    Many thanks for taking the time to review our brief report. We have made all the suggested corrections including rewording and expanding of some comments as well as added additional ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 08 Jan 2021
    Wendy Heywood, Translational Mass Spectrometry Research Group, University College London, London, UK
    08 Jan 2021
    Author Response
    Many thanks for taking the time to review our brief report. We have made all the suggested corrections including rewording and expanding of some comments as well as added additional ... Continue reading
Views
32
Cite
Reviewer Report 07 Dec 2020
William J. griffiths, Institute of Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK;  Swansea University, Swansea, UK 
Approved
VIEWS 32
This is an interesting study looking at a panel of inflammation-related protein signatures in a small cohort of patients 40+ days post infection. The authors see some changes in inflammatory proteins even this far after infection.

The ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
griffiths WJ. Reviewer Report For: ‘The long tail of Covid-19’ - The detection of a prolonged inflammatory response after a SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic and mildly affected patients [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2021, 9:1349 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.30151.r75166)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 08 Jan 2021
    Wendy Heywood, Translational Mass Spectrometry Research Group, University College London, London, UK
    08 Jan 2021
    Author Response
    Many thanks for reviewing our brief report. Additional information about how proteins were normalised has been included and the figure reference has been corrected in the results.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 08 Jan 2021
    Wendy Heywood, Translational Mass Spectrometry Research Group, University College London, London, UK
    08 Jan 2021
    Author Response
    Many thanks for reviewing our brief report. Additional information about how proteins were normalised has been included and the figure reference has been corrected in the results.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 19 Nov 2020
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.