Open Access
Research (Published online: 06-11-2020)
7. Analysis of the benefits and production challenges of working donkeys in smallholder farming systems in Kenya
Mary Gichure, Joshua Onono, Raphael Wahome and Peter Gathura
Veterinary World, 13(11): 2346-2352

Mary Gichure: Department of Animal Sciences, Chuka University, P.O Box 109-60400 Chuka, Kenya.
Joshua Onono: Department of Public Health, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Nairobi, P.O. BOX 29053-00625, Kangemi, Kenya.
Raphael Wahome: Department of Animal Production, University of Nairobi, P.O. BOX 29053-00625, Kangemi, Kenya.
Peter Gathura: Department of Public Health, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Nairobi, P.O. BOX 29053-00625, Kangemi, Kenya.

doi: www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.2346-2352

Share this article on [Facebook] [LinkedIn]

Article history: Received: 25-06-2020, Accepted: 05-10-2020, Published online: 06-11-2020

Corresponding author: Mary Gichure

E-mail: marygichure@gmail.com

Citation: Gichure M, Onono J, Wahome R, Gathura P (2020) Analysis of the benefits and production challenges of working donkeys in smallholder farming systems in Kenya, Veterinary World, 13(11): 2346-2352.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to determine the benefits of keeping donkeys and associated production challenges under a smallholder farming system in Kenya.

Materials and Methods: A descriptive study was conducted with smallholder farmers keeping donkeys in 13 administrative locations in Kirinyaga County. Data were collected using a questionnaire guide in 13 focus group discussions (FGDs) using participatory epidemiological methods. The FGDs comprised 8-12 participants who were donkey owners. Data were collected through listing, pair-wise ranking, and probing on the benefits of keeping donkeys, challenges faced by working donkeys and the common diseases that affect donkeys in these farms. Data analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric method to test whether median ranks were significantly different. Other farm level data were also collected using the structured questionnaire and these were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods.

Results: The identified benefits included income obtained from the use of donkeys in transportation (Z=5.80) and manure production (Z=3.47), which enabled the farmers to participate in trade activities and improve crop farming. The identified challenges included theft for slaughter (Z=5.99), disease incidence (Z=3.03), road accidents (Z=2.83), and malicious cutting (Z=2.32). Some of the diseases identified were tetanus (Z=5.35), hoof problems (Z=4.55), helminthiases (Z=3.10), and mange (Z=2.24). Participants ranked diseases based on their effects on work output for the donkeys, reducing productivity and often causing death. Addressing these production challenges would optimize donkey use among smallholder farmers.

Conclusion: The results presented can be important for policymakers and extension agents regarding the health and welfare of donkeys kept under similar settings.

Keywords: benefits and challenges, income, livelihoods, working donkeys.