#MeToo, Discursive Injustice, and Shifting Social Norms: A Linguistic Case Study of Commonwealth v. William Henry Cosby Jr.
Abstract
This paper explores the effect of the #MeToo movement on sexual assault discourse and social norms in legal discourse in the United States through a case study of Commonwealth v. William Henry Cosby Jr., a trial that occurred both before and after the emergence of the movement. Specifically, to what extent did #MeToo affect sexual assault culture and discussions around it in legal settings? Using Kukla’s (2014) theoretical framework of Discursive Injustice (DI) in order to analyze portions of Commonwealth v. Cosby, I observe the level of performative power the complainant in the trial, Andrea Constand, is able to express and the frequency with which her expression is limited by other actors, namely defense lawyers. I find that the largest changes in aggressiveness and frequency of DI between the 2017 and 2018 portions of the trial occur during juxtapositions between Constand and “victim” stereotypes of sexual assault. This shift suggests a larger social change in community conventions regarding stereotypes and expectations of sexual assault survivors. This paper augments the growing literatures on the impact of the #MeToo movement on sexual assault culture and DI as a theory of linguistic and social power.
Cite as: Izes, JLL 10 (2021), 48–72, DOI: 10.14762/jll.2021.048
Keywords
#MeToo, sexual assault, discursive injustice, courtroom language
Author Biography
Amanda Izes
Master of Arts Candidate in Hofstra University Forensic Linguistics Program
References
- Court of Common Pleas in the County of Montgomery, Pennsylvania. Transcript of Commonwealth v. William Henry Cosby Jr. April 2018. Available at montcopa.org/2312/Commonwealth-v-William-Henry-Cosby-Jr (accessed 4 June 2021).
- Court of Common Pleas in the County of Montgomery, Pennsylvania. Transcript of Commonwealth v. William Henry Cosby Jr. June 2017. Available at montcopa.org/2312/Commonwealth-v-William-Henry-Cosby-Jr (accessed 4 June 2021).
- Court of Common Pleas in the County of Montgomery, Pennsylvania. Police Criminal Complaint of Commonwealth v. William Henry Cosby Jr. December 2015. Available at montcopa.org/2312/Commonwealth-v-William-Henry-Cosby-Jr (accessed 4 June 2021).
- Conley, John M. & O’Barr, William M. (2005). Just Words: Language and Power. Chicago: University of Chicago.
- Ehrlich, Susan (2001). ‘I didn’t yell… I didn’t scream’: Complainant’s ineffectual agency or strategic agency. In Ehrlich (Ed.) Representing Rape, 94–120. London/New York: Routledge.
- Gunlogson, Christine (2008). A Question of Commitment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics. 22(1). 101–136. DOI: 10.1075/bjl.22.06gun.
- Hawbaker, KT (2018). #MeToo: A Timeline of Events. Chicago Tribune. (5 December, 2018).
- Hildebrand-Edgar, Nicole & Ehrlich, Susan (2017). “She Was Quite Capable of Asserting Herself”: Pow-erful Speech Styles and Assessments of Credibility in a Sexual Assault Trial. Language and Law. 4(2). 89–107.
- Hornsby, Jennifer & Langton, Rae (1998). Free Speech and Illocution. Legal Theory, 4(1), 21–37. DOI: 10.1017/S1352325200000902.
- Kukla, Rebecca (2014). Performative Force, Convention, and Discursive Injustice. Hypatia, 29(2). 440–457. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01316.x.
- Seales, Rebecca (2018, May 12). What has #MeToo actually changed? BBC News. Available at bbc.com/news/world-44045291 (accessed 4 June 2021).
- Stuart, Shannon M., McKimmie, Blake M. & Masser, Barbara M. (2016). Rape Perpetrators on Trial: The Effect of Sexual Assault-Related Schemas on Attributions of Blame. Journal of Interpersonal Vio-lence, 34(2), 310–336. DOI: 10.1177/0886260516640777.
- US Legal (n. d.). Sexual Assault Law and Legal Definition. Available at definitions.uslegal.com/s/sexual-assault (accessed 4 December 2018).