Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Relationship between dental calcification and skeletal maturation in a Peruvian sample

ABSTRACT

Objective:

the objective of the study was to determine the relationship between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturation in a Peruvian sample.

Methods:

panoramic, cephalometric and carpal radiographs of 78 patients (34 girls and 44 boys) between 7 and 17 years old (9.90 ± 2.5 years) were evaluated. Stages of tooth calcification of the mandibular canine, first premolar, second premolar, and second molar and the skeletal maturation with a hand-wrist and a cervical vertebrae method were assessed. The relationships between the stages were assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Additionally, the associations of mandibular and pubertal growth peak stages with tooth calcification were evaluated by Fisher’s exact test.

Results:

all teeth showed positive and statistically significant correlations, the highest correlation was between the mandibular second molar calcification stages with hand-wrist maturation stages (r = 0.758, p < 0.001) and with vertebrae cervical maturation stages (r = 0.605, p < 0.001). The pubertal growth spurt was found in the G stage of calcification of the second mandibular molar, and the mandibular growth peak was found in the F stage of calcification of the second molar.

Conclusion:

there was a positive relationship between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturation stages by hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae methods in the sample studied. Dental calcification stages of the second mandibular molar showed the highest positive correlation with the hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae stages.

Keywords:
Carpal; Cervical vertebrae; Tooth calcification; Skeletal maturation; Peruvian.

RESUMO

Objetivo:

o objetivo do presente estudo foi determinar a correlação entre o estágio de calcificação dentária e a maturação esquelética, em uma amostra de indivíduos peruanos.

Métodos:

radiografias panorâmicas, cefalométricas e carpais de 78 pacientes (34 meninas e 44 meninos) com idades entre 7 e 17 anos (média = 9,90 ± 2,5 anos) foram avaliadas. Nelas, avaliaram-se os estágios de calcificação dentária (canino, primeiro pré-molar, segundo pré-molar e segundo molar inferiores) e de maturação esquelética, pelas avaliações radiográficas da mão e punho e das vértebras cervicais. As correlações entre esses estágios foram avaliadas usando-se o coeficiente de correlação de Spearman. Adicionalmente, a associação entre os estágios em que ocorreram os picos de crescimento mandibular e de crescimento puberal e o grau de calcificação dentária foi avaliada pelo teste exato de Fisher.

Resultados:

todos os dentes demonstraram correlações positivas e estatisticamente significativas. A correlação mais elevada foi verificada entre o estágio de calcificação do segundo molar inferior e o estágio de maturação esquelética da mão e do punho (r= 0,758, p < 0,001) e o estágio de maturação das vértebras cervicais (r = 0,605, p < 0,001). O surto de crescimento puberal foi identificado no estágio G de calcificação do segundo molar inferior, e o pico de crescimento mandibular foi detectado no estágio F de calcificação do segundo molar.

Conclusão:

na amostra estudada, houve uma correlação positiva entre os estágios de calcificação dentária e os estágios de maturação esquelética avaliada nas radiografias de mão e punho e das vértebras cervicais. Os estágios de calcificação dentária do segundo molar inferior demonstraram a mais alta correlação positiva com os estágios de maturação da mão e punho e das vértebras cervicais.

Palavras-chave:
Radiografia carpal; Vertebras cervicais; Calcificação dentária; Maturação esquelética; Peruanos.

INTRODUCTION

The optimal effectiveness of using braces or orthopedics has been associated with skeletal maturation. Functional appliances have proved to be more effective when used at the peak of mandibular growth, rather than before.11 Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Aug;118(2):159-70.,22 Faltin KJ, Faltin RM, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Ghiozzi B, McNamara JA Jr. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy. Angle Orthod. 2003 June;73(3):221-30. Therefore, skeletal maturation has been assessed, typically by hand-wrist radiographs,33 Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982 Apr;52(2):88-112. later on lateral cephalometry44 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(3):119-29. and recently by evaluating the dental calcification of specific teeth on panoramic radiographs.55 Kumar S, Singla A, Sharma R, Virdi MS, Anupam A, Mittal B. Skeletal maturation evaluation using mandibular second molar calcification stages. Angle Orthod. 2012 May;82(3):501-6.,66 Goyal S, Goyal S, Gugnani N. Assessment of skeletal maturity using the permanent mandibular canine calcification stages J Orthod Res. 2014;2(1):11-6.

For a long time, the growth of the bones of the hand and wrist has been used to assess skeletal maturation,33 Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982 Apr;52(2):88-112.,77 Bjork A. Timing of interceptive orthodontic measures based on stages of maturation. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1972;48(1):61-74.

8 Grave K. The use of the hand and wrist radiograph in skeletal age assessment; and why skeletal age assessment is important. Aust Orthod J. 1994 Oct;13(3):196.
-99 Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Cameron N, Marshall WA, Healy MJR, Goldstein H. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 Method). London: Academic Press; 1983. The method described by Fishman33 Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982 Apr;52(2):88-112.,1010 Fishman LS. Maturational patterns and prediction during adolescence. Angle Orthod. 1987 July;57(3):178-93. seems to be the most appropriate method for assessing skeletal maturation.1111 Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Major PW. Use of skeletal maturation based on hand-wrist radiographic analysis as a predictor of facial growth: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(1):118-24. It considers eleven indicators of skeletal maturation, which cover the entire period of development. However, this method involves exposing the patient to additional radiographic imaging sessions, which is why several researchers1212 Lamparsky DG. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. J Anat. 1975;11(1):49-68.

13 O'Reilly MT, Yanniello GJ. Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae - A longitudinal cephalometric study. Angle Orthod. 1988;58(2):179-84.
-1414 Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):58-66. have developed indexes of skeletal maturation using the profile of cervical vertebrae bodies that appear on lateral radiographs of the skull, which are routinely used for diagnosis in orthodontics. Thus, after several studies,1515 Baccetti T. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002 Aug;72(4):316-23.

16 Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cameron CG, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment timing for rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod. 2001 Oct;71(5):343-50.

17 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002 Aug;72(4):316-23.
-1818 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebrae maturation method: Some need for clarification. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jan;123(1):19A-20A. Baccetti et al44 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(3):119-29. proposed a method for detecting the peak of mandibular growth by analyzing the second through fourth cervical vertebrae. Although the reproducibility was considered to be poor,1919 Gabriel DB, Southard KA, Qian F, Marshall SD, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Cervical vertebrae maturation method: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Oct;136(4):478.e1-7; discussion 478-80.,2020 Nestman TS, Marshall SD, Qian F, Holton N, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Cervical vertebrae maturation method morphologic criteria: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug;140(2):182-8. more recently, visual assessment of the stages with this method has shown acceptable reproducibility and accuracy.2121 Perinetti G, Caprioglio A, Contardo L. Visual assessment of the cervical vertebral maturation stages: a study of diagnostic accuracy and repeatability. Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov;84(6):951-6.

Dental development has been widely investigated as a potential indicator of skeletal maturation.2222 Chertkow S. Tooth mineralization as an indication of the pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod. 1980 Jan;77(1):79-91.

23 Chertkow S, Fatti P. The relationship between tooth mineralization and early radiographic evidence of the ulnar sesamoid. Angle Orthod. 1979 Oct;49(4):282-8.

24 Sierra AM. Assessment of dental and skeletal maturity. A new approach. Angle Orthod. 1987 July 57(3):194-208.

25 Anderson DL, Thompson GW, Popovich F. Interrelationships of dental maturity, skeletal maturity, height and weight from age 4 to 14 years. Growth. 1975 Dec;39(4):453-62.
-2626 Engström C, Engström H, Sagne S. Lower third molar development in relation to skeletal maturity and chronological age. Angle Orthod. 1983 Apr;53(2):97-106. Tooth development can be assessed by the stage of calcification,2727 Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973 May;45(2):211-27. and it is a very reliable method.2828 Baghdadi ZD, Pani SC. Accuracy of population-specific Demirjian curves in the estimation of dental age of Saudi children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Mar;22(2):125-31.,2929 Abesi F, Haghanifar S, Sajadi P, Valizadeh A, Khafri S. Assessment of dental maturity of children aged 7-15 years using Demirjian method in a selected Iranian population. J Dent (Shiraz). 2013 Dec;14(4):165-9. This method consists of the observation of dental calcification stages to determine the dental maturation of each tooth, while watching the progress of the formation of the crown and root on panoramic radiographs.

Previous studies3030 Khan RMS, Ijaz A. Correlation of dental calcification and skeletal maturity indicators. Annals. 2011;17(1):1.

31 Sachan K, Sharma VP, Tandon P. A correlative study of dental age and skeletal maturation. Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;22(6):882.

32 Heravi F, Imanimoghaddam M, RahimiH. Correlation between cervical vertebral and dental maturity in Iranian subjects. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2011;39(12):891-6.
-3333 Rózylo-Kalinowska I, Kolasa-Raczka A, Kalinowski P. Relationship between dental age according to Demirjian and cervical vertebrae maturity in Polish children. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(1):75-83. have evaluated the relationship between skeletal maturation stages and tooth calcification by comparing different methods in different populations. However, there have been no studies reported of this relationship in a sample of Peruvian children despite the fact that there may be differences in the racial background of these children that would need additional investigation. It is also necessary to clarify the discrepancies between the studies because currently it seems unclear55 Kumar S, Singla A, Sharma R, Virdi MS, Anupam A, Mittal B. Skeletal maturation evaluation using mandibular second molar calcification stages. Angle Orthod. 2012 May;82(3):501-6.,66 Goyal S, Goyal S, Gugnani N. Assessment of skeletal maturity using the permanent mandibular canine calcification stages J Orthod Res. 2014;2(1):11-6.,3434 Perinetti G, Contardo L, Gabrieli P, Baccetti T, Di Lenarda R. Diagnostic performance of dental maturity for identification of skeletal maturation phase. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(4):487-92.,3535 Surendran S, Thomas E. Tooth mineralization stages as a diagnostic tool for assessment of skeletal maturity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):7-14. as to which teeth have calcification stages more closely related to skeletal maturity stages, the pubertal growth spurt and the peak of mandibular growth, which could be clarified with measurements performed on the same patients on the same day.

The objective of the present study was to determine the relationships of dental calcification with skeletal maturation in a Peruvian sample. It was hypothesized that there is a positive relationship between dental calcification and skeletal maturation by the methods of hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae in the Peruvian sample studied.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study sample

The study was conducted with archived panoramic, cephalometric and carpal radiographs of 78 patients (34 girls and 44 boys) between 7 and 17 years old (9.90 ± 2.5 years) in a Stomatology Clinic of Trujillo-Peru (Table 1) who met the selection criteria. The sample was randomly selected using a simple random sample from a total of 702 radiographs (234 cephalometric, 234 panoramic and 234 hand-wrist) obtained from the same patients from 2008 until December 2013. The random selection was made according an excel function [=ALEATORIO.ENTRE(1,702)]. The sample size was calculated using the minor correlation found (0.310) between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturity indicators reported in a previous study.3636 Krailassiri S, Anuwongnukroh N, Dechkunakorn S. Relationships between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturity indicators in Thai individuals. Angle Orthod. 2002 Apr;72(2):155-66. A statistical power of 80% and a confidence level of 95% were considered. The minimum sample size was 64, however it was decided to increase this by 20% to improve representation.

Table 1
Description of the sample by sex and average age.

Selection criteria were: radiographs (panoramic, cephalometric and carpal radiographs) obtained on the same day and from the same patient, radiographs presenting clear anatomical details, and radiographs with no abnormal dental conditions such as impaction or transposition. The study protocol was approved by a Stomatology Permanent Research Committee of Peru.

Dental age

To determine the dental age four, left mandibular teeth were evaluated: canine, first premolar, second premolar, and second molar. Dental calcification stages were determined by the Demirjian method (DM),2727 Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973 May;45(2):211-27. and each stage was categorized from A to H (Table 2).

Table 2
Dental calcification stages using the Demirjian Index method.2727 Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973 May;45(2):211-27.

Skeletal maturation

Skeletal maturation was evaluated by two methods. The first method was analyzing the hand and wrist, which was performed assessing the six anatomical sites located in the thumb, third finger, fifth finger and radius, according to the parameters set by Fishman.33 Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982 Apr;52(2):88-112. The hand-wrist method of Fishman (HWMF) details eleven stages (Table 3).The second method was the analysis of the cervical vertebrae, which was performed in the lateral cephalometric radiograph and was analyzed from the second to the fourth cervical vertebrae, according to the stages proposed by Baccetti et al.44 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(3):119-29. The cervical vertebrae method (CVM) determine six stages (Table 4).

Table 3
Skeletal maturation indicators (SMI) by the hand-wrist method of Fishman.33 Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982 Apr;52(2):88-112.

Table 4
Definitions of cervical stages (CS) using the cervical vertebrae method.44 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(3):119-29.

Errors in the methods

An error of method intra/inter-operator was performed evaluating 10 panoramic radiographs, 10 cephalometric radiographs and 10 carpal radiographs. To determine the concordance in interrater and intrarater measurements, the second observation was after two weeks. Cohen’s unweighted kappa index was used, and the concordances were found to be substantial and almost perfect3737 Landis J, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-74. with values from 0.733 to 1.000.

Statistical analysis

Data was stored and processed in the Stata (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA) statistical package, version 12. To determine the relationships between the stages studied, Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used. In a second analysis, the skeletal maturation stages were categorized dichotomously as the absence and presence of the pubertal growth spurt in HWMF, considering as presence from the stage 5 to 733 Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982 Apr;52(2):88-112. and as absence the previous and subsequent stages. For the peak of mandibular growth in CVM, presence was considered to be on stages 3 to 444 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(3):119-29. and absence was considered to be the previous and subsequent stages. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the associations between dichotomized variables and the stages of dental calcification, showing the highest correlations. A significance level of 5% was considered.

RESULTS

Assessing the relationships of DM stages with HWMF and CVM stages by Spearman’s correlation coefficient, positive and statistically significant correlations were found in canines, premolars and second molars (p< 0.001). The strongest correlation between DM stages and HWMF stages was 0.758 and 0.748 with the second molar and second premolar respectively, while between DM stages and CVM stages, the strongest correlation was 0.605 for the same teeth (Table 5).

Table 5
Spearman’s correlations among HWMF, CVM and DM (n = 78).

In boys and girls separately, a positive and statistically significant correlation was also found in all of the cases (p< 0.001). In boys, the strongest correlation between the stages of DM and HWMF was 0.800 with the second molar; and between DM and CVM, it was 0.684 also with the mandibular second molar. In girls, the strongest correlation between DM and HWMF was 0.792 with the second molar, and between DM and CVM, the strongest correlation was 0.644 with the canine (Table 6).

Table 6
Spearman’s correlation among HWMF, CVM and DM by sex.

Statistically significant associations (p= 0.004) between the pubertal growth spurt and calcification stages of the second mandibular molar were found. A higher frequency of subjects in the pubertal spurt growth (HWMF) was found in the G stage. Statistically significant associations (p= 0.037) between mandibular growth peak (CVM) and the second mandibular molar calcification stages were also found. The highest frequency of subjects in mandibular growth peak occurred in approximately the F stage. No statistically significant associations (p> 0.05) between the pubertal growth spurt and calcification stages of the second mandibular premolar were found (Table 7).

Table 7
Associations between pubertal growth spurt/mandibular growth peak and DM stages of mandibular second molar and second premolar (teeth that showed higher correlation).

DISCUSSION

The simplification of orthodontic treatment has led to the identification of useful features from routine examination such as for panoramic radiography, which can be used to evaluate the dental calcification and the bone maturation. The present study evaluated the correlations between the stages of DM with the stages of HWMF and CVM in a sample of Peruvian subjects in order to identify if dental calcification is associated with pubertal growth and mandibular growth peak.

The results showed positive correlations consistent with findings reported by previous studies,3030 Khan RMS, Ijaz A. Correlation of dental calcification and skeletal maturity indicators. Annals. 2011;17(1):1.,3535 Surendran S, Thomas E. Tooth mineralization stages as a diagnostic tool for assessment of skeletal maturity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):7-14.,3838 Flores-Mir C, Burgess CA, Champney M, Jensen RJ, Pitcher MR, Major PW. Correlation of skeletal maturation stages determined by cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist evaluations. Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):1-5.,3939 Zurita C, Fuentes A. Correlation between results of lateral cervical radiograph and hand-wrist radiography in estimating bone age in girls. Chil J Radiol. 2009;15(1):39-45. however none of these studies assessed the correlations of the DM stages with the HWMF and CVM stages using the same sample at the same time like the present study. The evaluated subjects came from a coastal region from the north of Peru where the population is mostly mixed race with white phenotypic components of Mediterranean (Spanish, Portuguese and Italian) and native-American (Quechua) origin with a mainly swarthy and cinnamon-coloured skin. These characteristics belong to an ethnic group that is found throughout the country but mostly on the coast and less in the mountains and jungle.4040 Haak Sulmont D. Raza y etnicidad desde las encuestas sociales y de opinión: dime cuántos quieres encontrar y te diré qué preguntar. Lima: Universidad del Pacífico; 2010. [cited in: 2014 Aug 28]. Available from: http://alertacontraelracismo.pe/sites/default/files/Razayetnicidaddesdelasencuestassocialesdavidsulmont.pdf

High correlation between the stages of the HWMF and DM in the second molar and second premolar was found. Both boys and girls showed highly significant correlation with the second molar. Previous studies3030 Khan RMS, Ijaz A. Correlation of dental calcification and skeletal maturity indicators. Annals. 2011;17(1):1.,3131 Sachan K, Sharma VP, Tandon P. A correlative study of dental age and skeletal maturation. Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;22(6):882.,4141 Uysal T, Sari Z, Ramoglu SI, Basciftci FA. Relationships between dental and skeletal maturity in Turkish subjects. Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):657-64.,4242 Bagherpour A, Pousti M, Adelianfar E. Hand skeletal maturity and its correlation with mandibular dental development. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 July;6(3):e275-9. have also found that the stages of dental calcification of the lower second molar showed the strongest correlation with HWMF stages. Current studies55 Kumar S, Singla A, Sharma R, Virdi MS, Anupam A, Mittal B. Skeletal maturation evaluation using mandibular second molar calcification stages. Angle Orthod. 2012 May;82(3):501-6. suggest that the lower second molar could be a good reference for determining bone maturation. The use of HWMF has reinforced this finding because this method is considered among the most appropriate for assessing skeletal maturation,1111 Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Major PW. Use of skeletal maturation based on hand-wrist radiographic analysis as a predictor of facial growth: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(1):118-24. and it also has good reproducibility.4343 Mohammed RB, Kalyan VS, Tircouveluri S, Vegesna GC, Chirla A, Varma DM. The reliability of Fishman method of skeletal maturation for age estimation in children of South Indian population. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014 July;5(2):297-302. Using the second molar for the analysis of bone maturation might provide an advantage over other teeth because its development tends to continue for a longer period of time, and its apical closure generally extends until 16 years of age.4444 Balaraj BM, Nithin MD. Determination of adolescent ages 14-16 years by radiological study of permanent mandibular second molars. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010 Aug;17(6):329-32.

The strongest correlation between the stages of DM and CVM stages was found in the second molar and second premolar. However, when considering boys and girls separately, this finding was repeated only in boys but not in girls, where the highest correlation was with the first and second premolars. Different results have been reported in other populations.3333 Rózylo-Kalinowska I, Kolasa-Raczka A, Kalinowski P. Relationship between dental age according to Demirjian and cervical vertebrae maturity in Polish children. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(1):75-83.,4545 Chen J, Hu H, Guo J, Liu Z, Liu R, Li F, Zou S. Correlation between dental maturity and cervical vertebral maturity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Dec;110(6):777-83.,4646 Valizadeh S, Eil N, Ehsani S, Bakhshandeh H. Correlation between dental and cervical vertebral maturation in Iranian females. Iran J Radiol. 2013 Jan;10(1):1-7. In a population from eastern China4545 Chen J, Hu H, Guo J, Liu Z, Liu R, Li F, Zou S. Correlation between dental maturity and cervical vertebral maturity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Dec;110(6):777-83. high correlation between the stages of CVM and DM was found in the lower second molar in female subjects and in the lower canine in male subjects; in an Iranian female population4646 Valizadeh S, Eil N, Ehsani S, Bakhshandeh H. Correlation between dental and cervical vertebral maturation in Iranian females. Iran J Radiol. 2013 Jan;10(1):1-7. the strongest correlation with the lower lateral incisor was found; in a Polish sample3333 Rózylo-Kalinowska I, Kolasa-Raczka A, Kalinowski P. Relationship between dental age according to Demirjian and cervical vertebrae maturity in Polish children. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(1):75-83. it was found with the lower second premolars in female subjects and in the lower canines in male subjects. This discordance and variability in the correlations could be explained by the controversial reproducibility of CVM1919 Gabriel DB, Southard KA, Qian F, Marshall SD, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Cervical vertebrae maturation method: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Oct;136(4):478.e1-7; discussion 478-80.,2020 Nestman TS, Marshall SD, Qian F, Holton N, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Cervical vertebrae maturation method morphologic criteria: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug;140(2):182-8. or because of racial diversity among the studied populations.

Further exploratory analysis was performed to identify the stages of tooth calcification that corresponded to the peak of pubertal (for HWMF) or mandibular (for CVM) growth. For this analysis Fisher’s exact test was used because there was at least one expected frequency minor than five, needed for assessing associations4747 Agresti A. A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Statist Sci. 1992;7(1):131-53. between the qualitative variables generated and the stages of calcification of teeth that showed the highest correlations, the second molar and second premolar. Only significant association with the second molar was found.

The pubertal growth spurt was found in approximately the G stage in the second mandibular molar. The mandibular growth peak was found in approximately the F stage in the second mandibular molar, showing statistically significant associations in both cases. Although these stages include the acceleration, peak and deceleration phases, these results were in some agreement with those reported by Kumar et al.55 Kumar S, Singla A, Sharma R, Virdi MS, Anupam A, Mittal B. Skeletal maturation evaluation using mandibular second molar calcification stages. Angle Orthod. 2012 May;82(3):501-6., who found that stages F and G of the second molar corresponded to stages 3 and 4 of the cervical vertebrae method, as proposed by Hassel and Farman.14

For the present study, the skeletal maturation was analyzed into two categories, as the presence or absence pubertal and mandibular growth peak. This dichotomization was made because the correlation per se does not imply diagnostic accuracy. Similarly, Perinetti et al,3434 Perinetti G, Contardo L, Gabrieli P, Baccetti T, Di Lenarda R. Diagnostic performance of dental maturity for identification of skeletal maturation phase. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(4):487-92. in a cross-sectional study, evaluated the association between dental calcification and skeletal maturation categorizing the skeletal maturation into three categories: pre-pubertal, pubertal, and post-pubertal periods, indicating that the dental calcification was only useful for diagnosing pre-pubertal growth phase. Nevertheless, to demonstrate that dental calcification stages may be used as alternative indicators of skeletal maturation further studies that show sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and positive likelihood ratios in similar populations are necessary.

This study had the limitation that was a cross-sectional study unable to detect the pubertal peak and the mandibular growth peak. A longitudinal study recording statural heights33 Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982 Apr;52(2):88-112. or total mandibular lengths (Co-Gn)44 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(3):119-29. respectively should had been developed. Besides, data was analyzed through categorization of presence and absence of the peak of pubertal and mandibular growth, in order to help the analysis. Accurate identification of growth peak is of clinical importance because it determines whether an individual is suitable to undergo orthopedic or surgical treatment; thus, longitudinal studies that evaluate dental calcification are necessary.

In spite of the sample was systematically determined, it could be considered comparatively small, which could be another limitation, but actually it represented a careful selection over 6 years of archiving (2008-2013). In addition, we showed for first time, results in a Peruvian population with mestizo features which are similar to the rest of the country and even to other South American countries.4040 Haak Sulmont D. Raza y etnicidad desde las encuestas sociales y de opinión: dime cuántos quieres encontrar y te diré qué preguntar. Lima: Universidad del Pacífico; 2010. [cited in: 2014 Aug 28]. Available from: http://alertacontraelracismo.pe/sites/default/files/Razayetnicidaddesdelasencuestassocialesdavidsulmont.pdf

Identifying skeletal maturation with panoramic radiographs using only one teeth could facilitate decision by the orthodontist as a valid clinical complementary tool for determining the peak of pubertal and mandibular growth, which could reduce, but not replace, the need for carpal radiography. The findings of this study could also be useful for other research purposes.

CONCLUSION

A relationship between dental calcification stages of canine, first premolar, second premolar and second molar with the skeletal maturation stages by the methods of hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae in the Peruvian sample studied was found. The dental calcification stages of second molar and the second premolar showed the highest correlations. The pubertal spurt growth was associated with the G stage of the second mandibular molar, and the mandibular growth peak with the F stage.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Aug;118(2):159-70.
  • 2
    Faltin KJ, Faltin RM, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Ghiozzi B, McNamara JA Jr. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy. Angle Orthod. 2003 June;73(3):221-30.
  • 3
    Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982 Apr;52(2):88-112.
  • 4
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(3):119-29.
  • 5
    Kumar S, Singla A, Sharma R, Virdi MS, Anupam A, Mittal B. Skeletal maturation evaluation using mandibular second molar calcification stages. Angle Orthod. 2012 May;82(3):501-6.
  • 6
    Goyal S, Goyal S, Gugnani N. Assessment of skeletal maturity using the permanent mandibular canine calcification stages J Orthod Res. 2014;2(1):11-6.
  • 7
    Bjork A. Timing of interceptive orthodontic measures based on stages of maturation. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1972;48(1):61-74.
  • 8
    Grave K. The use of the hand and wrist radiograph in skeletal age assessment; and why skeletal age assessment is important. Aust Orthod J. 1994 Oct;13(3):196.
  • 9
    Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Cameron N, Marshall WA, Healy MJR, Goldstein H. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 Method). London: Academic Press; 1983.
  • 10
    Fishman LS. Maturational patterns and prediction during adolescence. Angle Orthod. 1987 July;57(3):178-93.
  • 11
    Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Major PW. Use of skeletal maturation based on hand-wrist radiographic analysis as a predictor of facial growth: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(1):118-24.
  • 12
    Lamparsky DG. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. J Anat. 1975;11(1):49-68.
  • 13
    O'Reilly MT, Yanniello GJ. Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae - A longitudinal cephalometric study. Angle Orthod. 1988;58(2):179-84.
  • 14
    Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):58-66.
  • 15
    Baccetti T. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002 Aug;72(4):316-23.
  • 16
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cameron CG, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment timing for rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod. 2001 Oct;71(5):343-50.
  • 17
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002 Aug;72(4):316-23.
  • 18
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebrae maturation method: Some need for clarification. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jan;123(1):19A-20A.
  • 19
    Gabriel DB, Southard KA, Qian F, Marshall SD, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Cervical vertebrae maturation method: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Oct;136(4):478.e1-7; discussion 478-80.
  • 20
    Nestman TS, Marshall SD, Qian F, Holton N, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Cervical vertebrae maturation method morphologic criteria: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug;140(2):182-8.
  • 21
    Perinetti G, Caprioglio A, Contardo L. Visual assessment of the cervical vertebral maturation stages: a study of diagnostic accuracy and repeatability. Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov;84(6):951-6.
  • 22
    Chertkow S. Tooth mineralization as an indication of the pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod. 1980 Jan;77(1):79-91.
  • 23
    Chertkow S, Fatti P. The relationship between tooth mineralization and early radiographic evidence of the ulnar sesamoid. Angle Orthod. 1979 Oct;49(4):282-8.
  • 24
    Sierra AM. Assessment of dental and skeletal maturity. A new approach. Angle Orthod. 1987 July 57(3):194-208.
  • 25
    Anderson DL, Thompson GW, Popovich F. Interrelationships of dental maturity, skeletal maturity, height and weight from age 4 to 14 years. Growth. 1975 Dec;39(4):453-62.
  • 26
    Engström C, Engström H, Sagne S. Lower third molar development in relation to skeletal maturity and chronological age. Angle Orthod. 1983 Apr;53(2):97-106.
  • 27
    Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973 May;45(2):211-27.
  • 28
    Baghdadi ZD, Pani SC. Accuracy of population-specific Demirjian curves in the estimation of dental age of Saudi children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Mar;22(2):125-31.
  • 29
    Abesi F, Haghanifar S, Sajadi P, Valizadeh A, Khafri S. Assessment of dental maturity of children aged 7-15 years using Demirjian method in a selected Iranian population. J Dent (Shiraz). 2013 Dec;14(4):165-9.
  • 30
    Khan RMS, Ijaz A. Correlation of dental calcification and skeletal maturity indicators. Annals. 2011;17(1):1.
  • 31
    Sachan K, Sharma VP, Tandon P. A correlative study of dental age and skeletal maturation. Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;22(6):882.
  • 32
    Heravi F, Imanimoghaddam M, RahimiH. Correlation between cervical vertebral and dental maturity in Iranian subjects. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2011;39(12):891-6.
  • 33
    Rózylo-Kalinowska I, Kolasa-Raczka A, Kalinowski P. Relationship between dental age according to Demirjian and cervical vertebrae maturity in Polish children. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(1):75-83.
  • 34
    Perinetti G, Contardo L, Gabrieli P, Baccetti T, Di Lenarda R. Diagnostic performance of dental maturity for identification of skeletal maturation phase. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(4):487-92.
  • 35
    Surendran S, Thomas E. Tooth mineralization stages as a diagnostic tool for assessment of skeletal maturity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):7-14.
  • 36
    Krailassiri S, Anuwongnukroh N, Dechkunakorn S. Relationships between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturity indicators in Thai individuals. Angle Orthod. 2002 Apr;72(2):155-66.
  • 37
    Landis J, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-74.
  • 38
    Flores-Mir C, Burgess CA, Champney M, Jensen RJ, Pitcher MR, Major PW. Correlation of skeletal maturation stages determined by cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist evaluations. Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):1-5.
  • 39
    Zurita C, Fuentes A. Correlation between results of lateral cervical radiograph and hand-wrist radiography in estimating bone age in girls. Chil J Radiol. 2009;15(1):39-45.
  • 40
    Haak Sulmont D. Raza y etnicidad desde las encuestas sociales y de opinión: dime cuántos quieres encontrar y te diré qué preguntar. Lima: Universidad del Pacífico; 2010. [cited in: 2014 Aug 28]. Available from: http://alertacontraelracismo.pe/sites/default/files/Razayetnicidaddesdelasencuestassocialesdavidsulmont.pdf
  • 41
    Uysal T, Sari Z, Ramoglu SI, Basciftci FA. Relationships between dental and skeletal maturity in Turkish subjects. Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):657-64.
  • 42
    Bagherpour A, Pousti M, Adelianfar E. Hand skeletal maturity and its correlation with mandibular dental development. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 July;6(3):e275-9.
  • 43
    Mohammed RB, Kalyan VS, Tircouveluri S, Vegesna GC, Chirla A, Varma DM. The reliability of Fishman method of skeletal maturation for age estimation in children of South Indian population. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014 July;5(2):297-302.
  • 44
    Balaraj BM, Nithin MD. Determination of adolescent ages 14-16 years by radiological study of permanent mandibular second molars. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010 Aug;17(6):329-32.
  • 45
    Chen J, Hu H, Guo J, Liu Z, Liu R, Li F, Zou S. Correlation between dental maturity and cervical vertebral maturity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Dec;110(6):777-83.
  • 46
    Valizadeh S, Eil N, Ehsani S, Bakhshandeh H. Correlation between dental and cervical vertebral maturation in Iranian females. Iran J Radiol. 2013 Jan;10(1):1-7.
  • 47
    Agresti A. A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Statist Sci. 1992;7(1):131-53.
  • »
    The authors report no commercial, proprietary or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    May-Jun 2017

History

  • Received
    06 Sept 2016
  • Accepted
    01 Dec 2016
Dental Press International Av. Luís Teixeira Mendes, 2712 , 87015-001 - Maringá - PR, Tel: (55 44) 3033-9818 - Maringá - PR - Brazil
E-mail: artigos@dentalpress.com.br