Skip to main content
Log in

How Do the Attitudes and Beliefs of Older People and Healthcare Professionals Impact on the Use of Multi-Compartment Compliance Aids?

A Qualitative Study Using Grounded Theory

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Low adherence of older people to multiple medicine regimens is of widespread concern, and multi-compartment compliance aids are frequently supplied to older people in an attempt to improve their ability to take all their medicines at home. However, the evidence base for the use of such aids is very limited, and there is some evidence that they are used inappropriately.

Objective: We aimed to determine how the attitudes and beliefs of older people and healthcare professionals impacted on the use of multi-compartment compliance aids by older people living at home.

Method: This was a qualitative study using grounded theory. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 older people (mean age 82 [range 72–92] years) living independently in the community and receiving primary healthcare from two health service organizations in a large northern UK city. We then interviewed 17 healthcare professionals working in primary, secondary or intermediate care and involved in the provision of multi-compartment compliance aids.

Results: Maintaining independence and remaining in control was important for all the older people interviewed, and professionals supported the view that this influenced patients’ attitudes towards using their aid. Some patients saw the aids as helping to maintain independence, others as casting doubt on their independence. The aids were often issued without discussion with the patient. The patients largely agreed that the aids did not help with memory problems and that the decision to issue an aid could be seen as paternalistic. A minority of patients had difficulties using the aids.

Conclusions: Careful multi-disciplinary assessment of older people is required before a compliance aid is provided. The views of the older person must be considered and respected. Further research is required to produce an evidence base for the use of such aids in this group of people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, et al. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (2): CD000011

    Google Scholar 

  2. Degli Esposti L, Degli Esposti E, Valpiani G, et al. A retrospective, population-based analysis of persistence with antihypertensive drug therapy in primary care practice in Italy. Clin Ther 2002; 24: 1347–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nunney JM. How do the attitudes and beliefs of healthcare professionals and older people impact on the appropriate use of multicompartment compliance aids by older people living at home [PhD dissertation]. Leeds: University of Leeds, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heneghan C, Glasziou P, Perera R. Reminder packaging for improving adherence to self-administered long-term medications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (1): CD005025

    Google Scholar 

  5. Connor J, Rafter N, Rodgers A. Do fixed-dose combination pills or unit-of-use packaging improve adherence? A systematic review. Bull World Health Org 2004; 82: 935–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nunney J, Raynor D. How are multicompartment compliance aids used in primary care? Pharm J 2001; 267: 784–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lowe Raynor Lowe CJ, Raynor DK. Intentional non-adherence in elderly patients: fact or fiction? [abstract]. Pharm J 2000; 265: R19

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kairuz T, Bye L, Birdsall R, et al. Identifying compliance issues with prescription medicines among older people. Drugs Aging 2008; 25: 153–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Medicines adherence: involving patients in decisions about prescribed medicines and supporting adherence. London: NICE, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  10. Corlett AJ. Aids to compliance with medication. BMJ 1996; 313: 926–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rivers P. Compliance aids: do they work? Drugs Aging 1992; 2: 103–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker R. Which medication compliance device? Pharm J 1992; 249: 605–8

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  14. The Stationary Office. Mental Capacity Act 2005: Code of Practice (2007 final edition). London: TSO, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dearnley C. A reflection on the use of semi-structured interviews. Nurse Res 2005; 13: 19–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Becker LA, Glanz K, Sobel E, et al. A randomised trial of special packaging of hypertensive medication. J Fam Pract 1986; 22: 357–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee J, Grace K, Allen J. Effect of a pharmacy care program on medication adherence and persistence, blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. JAMA 2006; 296: 2563–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peterson G, McLean S, Millingen K. A randomised trial of strategies to improve patient compliance with anti-convulsant therapy. Epilepsia 1984; 25: 412–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Simmons D, Upjohn M, Gamble G. Can medication packaging improve glycemic control and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 153–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacelon CS. Older adults and autonomy in acute care. J Geront Nurs 2004; 30: 29–36

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lothian K, Philip I. Maintaining the dignity and autonomy of older people in the healthcare setting. BMJ 2001; 322: 668–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Rashed SA, Wright DJ, Roebuck N, et al. The value of inpatient pharmaceutical counselling to elderly patients prior to discharge. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 54: 657–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith L, McGowan L, Moss-Barclay C, et al. An investigation of hospital generated pharmaceutical care when patients are discharged from hospital. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 44: 163–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nunney J, Raynor DK. Mind the gap: how compliance aids increase the distance between patients and their medicines [abstract]. Int J Pharm Pract 2001; 9: R46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hughes CM, Goldie R. “I just take what I am given”. Drugs Aging 2009; 26: 505–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dowell J, Hudson H. A qualitative study of medication-taking behaviour in primary care. Fam Pract 1997; 14: 369–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Atkin PA, Finnegan TP, Ogle SJ, et al. Functional ability of patients to manage medication packaging: a survey of geriatric patients. Age Ageing 1994; 23: 113–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nikolaus T, Kruse W, Bach M, et al. Elderly patients’ problems with medication. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 49: 255–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gould ON, McDonald-Miszczak L, King B, et al. Meta-cognition and medication adherence: how do older adults remember? Exp Aging Res 1997; 23: 315–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Branin J. The role of memory strategies in medication adherence among the elderly. Home Health Care Services Q 2001; 20: 1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Goulbourne MS, Rubinstein MH. Dispensed medicines of different shape, colour and package: are patients confused? [abstract]. Pharm J 1989; 30: R24

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gatti ME, Jacobson KL, Gazmararian JA, et al. Relationships between beliefs about medications and adherence. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2009; 66: 657–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Horne R, Weinman J. Patients’ beliefs about medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47: 555–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chew-Graham CA, May CR, Perry MS. Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals. Fam Pract 2002; 19: 285–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gould N, Todd L, Irvine-Meek J. Adherence devices in a community sample: how are pillboxes used? Can Pharm J 2009; 142: 28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study. This research formed part of a PhD study undertaken by JN whilst employed by University of Leeds. The authors would like to thank all the older people and healthcare professionals who freely gave their time and made this research possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David K. Raynor.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nunney, J., Raynor, D.K., Knapp, P. et al. How Do the Attitudes and Beliefs of Older People and Healthcare Professionals Impact on the Use of Multi-Compartment Compliance Aids?. Drugs Aging 28, 403–414 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2165/11587180-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11587180-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation