Journal of Prosthodontic Research
Online ISSN : 1883-9207
Print ISSN : 1883-1958
ISSN-L : 1883-1958
Original articles
Restoration’s thickness and bonding tooth substrate are determining factors in minimally invasive adhesive dentistry
Giovanni Tommaso Rocca Borja BaldrichCarlo Massimo SarattiLuis Maria DelgadoMiguel RoigRene DaherIvo Krejci
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2021 Volume 65 Issue 3 Pages 407-414

Details
Abstract

Purpose To explore fracture strength and failure behaviour of minimally invasive CAD-CAM composite resin overlay restorations.

Methods Eighty bi- and tri-layer cylindrical overlay model including the restoration bonded over bovine tooth dentin (Groups D) and enamel-dentin (Groups E) were assembled (diameter 9 mm). Restorations were milled from CAD-CAM composite resin blocks (Brilliant Crios, Coltène/Whaledent AG) in different thicknesses (0.5mm, 1mm, 1.5mm, 2mm) and equally distributed in four Groups D and four Groups E (n=10). All specimens were submitted to an Hertzian load-to-failure contact test with spherical indenter. Critical loads were recorded in Newton and data were analysed using Kruskal–Wallis test for multiple and Mann-Whitney test for 2-samples comparisons (p < 0.05). Fragments were examined using SEM. The stress distribution for specimens with restorations of 0.5 mm and 2 mm was also investigated with FEA.

Results For all specimens, the mean static loads in Newton increased with an increase in restoration thickness. On contrary, restorations with the same thickness displayed higher resistance values when bonded over enamel than dentin, except for the 2-mm thick restorations. A damage competition was detected between cone/median cracks originating at the loading contact area of the restorations and radial cracks beginning at their inner surface, with the former prevailing in restorations bonded on enamel and the latter being dominant for restorations bonded on dentin.

Conclusions For bonded ultra-thin resin composite restorations (0.5 mm to 1.5 mm) enamel as bonding substrate assures higher critical loads to fracture than dentin. This influence gradually decreases as restoration thickened.

Content from these authors
© 2021 Japan Prosthodontic Society

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows users to distribute and copy the material in any format as long as credit is given to the Japan Prosthodontic Society. It should be noted however, that the material cannot be used for commercial purposes.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top