Association between parity of mother and external dysmorphic features among newborns

 

Sunil O^1*, Trinesh Gowda M S²

 

Abstract              Background: Congenital anomalies are chief cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. The frequency of congenital anomalies worldwide is 3-5%, it varies from region to region and based on the socioeconomic and educational status of the nation. The congenital external dysmorphic features are associated with various maternal factors, parity of mother is one such factor that decides the outcome of the pregnancy. Aim and Objective: To identify and record the birth defects (external dysmorphism) among newborns delivered in district hospital attached to Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya for a period of one year and study the association between parity of mother and external dysmorphic features among newborn. Methodology: After obtaining written informed consent of the parent, newborn was examined for birth defects (visible external dysmorphic features) and the details was recorded in the self- designed proforma and findings/data was tabulated and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods to study the association between parity of mother and external dysmorphic features among newborn. Results and Conclusion: The prevalence rate of congenital anomalies in the present study was 3.4 %. Our results show a higher prevalence of malformations among multiparas (64.7 %). This study will form a guideline to conduct appropriate antenatal newborn screening to diagnose birth defects and also give feedback to the clinicians (obstetricians) to perform relevant antenatal investigations to prevent and detect the birth defects.

Keywords: Anomalies, Dysmorphism, Morbidity, Mortality

 

INTRODUCTION

Congenital anomalies can be defined as structural or functional anomalies that occur during intrauterine life and can be identified prenatally, at birth, or sometimes may only be detected later in infancy and childhood, such as hearing defects.¹ Serious birth defects can be lethal. For those who survive, these disorders can cause lifelong mental, physical, auditory or visual disabilities. Birth defects are a global problem, but their impact is particularly severe in middle and low income countries, where more than 94 % of the births with serious birth defects and 95 % of the deaths of these children occur.² It accounts for 8-15 % of perinatal deaths and 13-16 % of neonatal deaths in India.^3,4 The exact prevalence of Congenital anomalies varies in different areas and among different populations. Long-term survival of children with congenital anomalies is significantly lower than that for normal children.⁵ Despite of the high frequency of congenital anomalies the underlying causes for most remain obscure in 50 % of the cases. In 2010 congenital anomalies were estimated to be fifth largest cause of neonatal death.⁶ Around 40-60% of congenital anomalies are of unknown etiology, many are multi-factorial. Known factors are genetic, maternal, nutritional, behavioural, infectious and environmental.⁷ Preventive public health measures work to decrease the frequency of certain congenital anomalies through the removal of risk factors or the reinforcement of protective factors. Ensuring adolescent girls and mothers have a healthy diet, adequate dietary intake of vitamins and minerals, and particularly folic acid in adolescent girls and mothers, ensuring mothers avoid harmful substances, particularly alcohol and tobacco, eliminating environmental exposure to hazardous and teratogenic substances (such as heavy metals or pesticides) during pregnancy, increasing and strengthening education of health staff and others involved in promoting prevention of congenital anomalies and screening for infections, especially rubella, varicella, and syphilis, and consideration of treatment. Establishment of national capacity for surveillance and monitoring of common birth defects to make uniform policies and to allow for more robust evaluation of national interventions, such as fortification of the food supply with folic acid, iodine, vitamin D, vitamin A etc.^6,8 The congenital external dysmorphic features are associated with various maternal, fetal and environmental factors. Parity of mother is one such factor that decides the well being of the newborn outcome of the pregnancy.⁹ Peri-conception medical services assist women and their partners to attain optimal physical and mental health and well-being at the beginning of pregnancy to facilitate a normal pregnancy and delivery of a healthy infant. These include screening for the risk of genetic and teratogenic birth defects.¹⁰ Physicians, nurses and allied health professionals should be trained for early recognition of birth defects and knowing when to refer a patient for specialized treatment. Multidisciplinary approach is required for newborns with low birth weight for early detection and management of congenital anomalies.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Newborns delivered in the district hospital, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya for a period of 1 year were examined after obtaining written informed consent from parents, the newborn were examined for visible external dysmorphic feature and the details was recorded in the pre-designed proforma and findings/data was tabulated and analysed using appropriate statistical methods to study the association between parity of mother and the external dysmorphic features among newborn. Descriptive statistics comprising proportion and percentage was used to describe the data with graphical representation (bar diagrams, pie charts, line graph etc.). Photographs of the newborns with external birth defects/dysmorphism were taken for keeping record of the defect. Prior institutional ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya for conducting the study and examining the newborns.

 

RESULTS

This hospital based cross-sectional study was done at Tertiary Care Centre of Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya for a period of 1 year on live newborns. The population for study were selected by using simple random method keeping in view the operational feasibility, 502 live newborns were examined physically for external dysmorphic features.

Table 1: Total number of external dysmorphic features among newborn

During the study period, 502 live newborns were examined at the district hospital Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, of which 17 of the cases presented with external dysmorphic feature. The prevalence of the external dimorphism in the present study is 3.4%.

Figure 2: Association between parity of mother and external dysmorphism among newborns

The present study shows a higher prevalence of external dysmorphic features among neonates born to multiparas (64.7%). Among the multiparas, those with more than two previous childbirths had more association with external dysmorphic features (41.9%).

 

DISCUSSION

During the study period, 502 live newborns were examined of which 17 (3.4%) of the cases presented with external dysmorphic features, which is a consistent with the proportion of cases observed by other investigators around the globe (3-6%). Worldwide prevalence is 3-5% but varies from country to country. In the present study prevalence rate is relatively low compared to 8% reported in Pakistan and in hospital neonatal unit based study of countries like Nigeria that has 3.7%, in Taiwan 4.3% and higher than European countries, Oman 2.46% and of Bahrain 2.7%.¹⁰ Various studies shows conflicting results in the developing countries like India, One such studies conducted by Sarkar et al.¹¹ in Eastern India and Adnan et al.¹² in Peshawar, Pakistan showed a prevalence rate of 2.2 % and 2.9 %. The present study results show a higher prevalence of malformations among multiparas (64.7%). The result is consistent with this finding from other studies by Manal B et al.¹³ and Jawad S et al.¹⁴ where the prevalence of malformations among multiparas was 76% each. On the contrary, a study conducted in Bangladesh by Fateme K showed more prevalence in primigravidas (63.3%).¹⁵ Knowledge about the prevalence of congenital external dysmorphic features is useful to obtain baseline rates, documenting changes over time, and identifying clues to the etiology of conditions. This knowledge is also helpful to plan and assess antenatal screening for congenital anomalies, especially for high-risk populations.¹⁶

 

CONCLUSION

In the present study, out of the 502 newborn cases which were subjected for examination, 17 cases showed congenital external dysmorphism of various type. The prevalence rate in the present study was 3.4 %. The present study shows a higher prevalence of external dysmorphic features among neonates born to multiparas (64.7%). Among the multiparas, those with more than two previous childbirths had more association with external dysmorphic features (41.9%). This study will form guideline to conduct appropriate new born screening for birth defects and also give feedback to the obstetricians to perform relevant antenatal investigations to prevent and detect the birth defects and take appropriate measures in the perinatal period/childhood period, to help the child to grow into productive and healthy individuals for the nation.

 

REFERENCES

1. Congenital anomalies [Internet]. 2016 Sep 7 [cited 2021 Oct19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/congenital-anomalies
2. Arnold C, Christopher PH, Bernadette M. March of Dimes: Global report on birth defects. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation; 2006. 76 p.
3. Bhat BV, Ravikumara M. Perinatal mortality in India-Need for introspection. Indian J Matern Child Health [Internet]. 1996 [cited 2021 Nov 14]; 7: 31-3.
4. Agarwal SS, Singh U, Singh PS, Singh SS, Das V, Sharma A, et al. Prevalence and spectrum of congenital malformations in a prospective study at a teaching hospital. Indian J Med Res. 1991; 94: 413–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1774092/
5. Ambe JP, Madziga AG, Akpede GO, Mava Y. Pattern and outcome of congenital malformations in newborn babies in a Nigerian teaching hospital. West Afr J Med [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 May 10]; 29: 24-9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20496334/
6. Kalter H, Warkany J. Congenital malformations: etiologic factors and their role in prevention. N Engl J Med. 1983; 308: 424-33. Available from: DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198302243080804
7. Neonatal-perinatal database and birth defects surveillance: Report of the regional review meeting. New Delhi: WHO; 2014 Aug 19-21. 98 p.
8. Koumi MA, Banna EA, Lebda I. pattern of congenital anomalies in newborn: A hospital based study. Pediatr Rep. 2013 Feb 5; 5(1): 20-3 Available from: DOI: 10.4081/pr.2013.e5
9. Government of USA, Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and mortality weekly report [Internet].[Atlanta]: 1991 (cited 2021 Oct 15). available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00001910
10. Park K. Congenital malformations. In: Park K, editor. Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. Jabalpur: Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; 1997. 379-80.
11. Shatanik Sarkar, Chaitali Patra, Malay Kumar Dasgupta, Kaustav Nayek, Prasanta Ray Karmakar. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in neonates and associated risk factors in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. J Clin Neonatol. 2013 Jul; 2(3): 131-4. DOI: 10.4103/2249-4847.119998
12. Adnan Khan et al. Frequency of Congenital Anomalies in Newborns and Its Relation to Maternal Health in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan Int J Med Students. 2014 Nov-2015 Mar;3(1):19-23.
13. Manal B, Naoom MB, ALSaadi YI, Yassin BA, Matloob H Y. Congenital Anomalies among Newborns Admitted in Tertiary Hospital: Iraqi Experience. J Fac Med Baghdad. 2013; 55(2):106–10.
14. Jawad S, Cheema MR. Role of multiparity in birth defects. Prof Med J. 2017; 24(8):1241–4.
15. Fatema K, Begum F, Akter N, Zaman SM. Major Congenital Malformations among the Newborns in BSMMU Hospital. Bangla JOL. 2011; 40(1):7–12
16. Dastgiri S, Stone DH, Le-Ha C, Gilmour WH. Prevalence and secular trend of congenital anomalies in Glasgow. UK Arch Dis Child. 2002; 86: 257–26.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.