Next Article in Journal
Adrenocortical Carcinoma and CT Assessment of Therapy Response: The Value of Combining Multiple Criteria
Next Article in Special Issue
ImmunoPET in Multiple Myeloma—What? So What? Now What?
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-EGFR Therapy Induces EGF Secretion by Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts to Confer Colorectal Cancer Chemoresistance
Previous Article in Special Issue
FDG-PET/CT, a Promising Exam for Detecting High-Risk Myeloma Patients?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/cancers12061394
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma

by
Charles Mesguich
1,2,*,
Cyrille Hulin
3,
Axelle Lascaux
3,
Laurence Bordenave
1,
Gerald Marit
2 and
Elif Hindié
1
1
CHU Bordeaux, Nuclear Medicine Department, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
2
INSERM U1035, University of Bordeaux, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
3
CHU Bordeaux, Haematology, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(6), 1394; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061394
Submission received: 28 April 2020 / Revised: 25 May 2020 / Accepted: 26 May 2020 / Published: 28 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma Patients)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The field of multiple myeloma (MM) imaging has evolved. The International Myeloma Working Group recently recommended performing 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose glucose (18FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with the aim of staging MM patients at baseline and evaluating response to therapy. Novel oncological radiotracers such as 11C-Choline and 18F-Fluorocholine, have been studied in comparison with 18FDG, mostly in MM patients presenting with refractory disease or suspected relapse. Choline-based tracers may overcome some limitations of 18FDG, which include a lack of sensitivity in depicting skull lesions and the fact that 10% of MM patients are FDG-negative. The majority of MM lesions display a higher uptake of Choline than FDG. Also, in many situations, Choline may offer better lesion visualization, with a higher tumor to background ratio; however, various patterns of Choline and FDG uptake have been observed in MM and some limitations, notably as regards liver lesions, should be recognized. Overall, Choline may provide additional detection of up to 75% more lesions. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the potential role of Choline in multiple myeloma, as compared to FDG, encompassing Choline physiopathology as well as data from clinical studies.

1. Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) imaging has rapidly evolved during the past few years. Functional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose glucose (18FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are now recommended for baseline staging by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) [1]. Additionally, the IMWG recently recognized the prognostic value of 18FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of treatment response [2,3,4].
18F-Fluorocholine (FCH) and 11C-Choline are PET/CT radiopharmaceuticals that were initially developed for prostate cancer imaging [5]. Indeed, Choline PET/CT can help to locate anatomical sites of disease recurrence when there is biochemical suspicion of relapse. Choline PET/CT is also recommended for the staging of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma [6]. Choline-based tracers are emerging radiopharmaceuticals in the field of MM and could offer several advantages over 18FDG. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the potential role of Choline in MM, as compared to FDG, encompassing Choline physiopathology as well as data from clinical studies.

2. 18F-Choline and 11C-Choline Physiopathology

FCH and 11C-Choline have similar biodistributions [5]. Choline is a precursor to the synthesis of phospholipids [7]. It is internalized by the cell through a choline transporter and is then transformed into phosphocholine by a Choline Kinase. It is then coupled to diacylglycerol to form phosphatidylcholine, a major component of cell membranes; therefore, Choline is thought to reflect the intensity of cell membrane synthesis.
Choline can be labeled either with 11C or 18F. Even though 11C has the advantage of yielding a natural compound, the use of 11C-Choline is limited due to 11C short half-life of 20 minutes, which necessitates the presence of an on-site cyclotron. On the other hand, the longer half-life of 18F (110 min) allows FCH to be distributed to PET centers that are distant from the production site.
After injection, 11C-Choline is rapidly cleared from the blood and optimal tumor-to-background contrast is reached within 5–7 min [8,9]. Choline is mainly metabolized by the liver, the main organ for lipid metabolism. Intense uptake in the liver (mean SUVmax of 11.4) and pancreas (mean SUVmax of 7.8) is observed [10]. Moderate uptake is seen in the spleen, salivary glands, and lachrymal glands. Mild uptake can be observed in the small and large intestines, breasts, and testicles as well. Bone marrow uptake is usually low (mean SUVmax of 1.7) [10], similar to 18FDG (SUVmean of 1.7 at the lumbar spine [11]). There is no relevant uptake in the adult brain, except in the choroid plexus and the pineal gland. 11C-methyl-choline can be oxidized to betaine by choline oxidase, with detectable metabolites soon after radiotracer injection [12]. Due to Choline urinary excretion, there is also an intense activity in the kidneys and the bladder. FCH has the advantage of having less urinary excretion than 11C-Choline.
Malignant tumors can exhibit a high choline uptake due to their high rate of replication, implying a high turnover of the cell membrane. Besides cell replication, other metabolic pathways may be involved in choline uptake, as it seems not always related to the levels of Ki67 expression [13]. For example, Choline can be involved in the synthesis of acetylcholine and can also be metabolized to betaine [14]. Pathological Choline uptake is also not specific to cancer. Indeed, Choline uptake can be observed in cases of inflammatory conditions, as the monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation implies a high rate of cell membrane synthesis and lipogenesis. Hence, reactive lymph nodes including granulomatous disease can be a major cause of interpretation pitfalls [10].
The uptake of Choline by MM cells might be related to different mechanisms. First, choline uptake can be related to the rate of replication of clonal plasma cells. Second, choline uptake may be linked to lipogenesis, as fatty acids and lipids play an important role in the pathogenesis of MM cells. Lysophospholipid levels (lysophosphatidylcholine and lysophosphatidic acid) are indeed increased in MM patients compared to healthy subjects [15]. Fatty acid synthetase expression is also upregulated in myeloma cells, contributing to proliferation and survival [16]. In relapsed and in high-risk MM, phosphatidylcholine is downregulated and is thought to be hydrolyzed to form lipid messengers, responsible for tumor dissemination [17,18]. Hence, MM cells may exhibit different patterns of uptake depending on the patient’s previous exposure to MM drugs.

3. Choline PET/CT vs. 18FDG PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma

18FDG is a widely used PET radiotracer offering diagnostic and prognostic information in many hematological and solid cancers. It reflects the level of glycolytic activity of cancer cells, which is increased in about 90% of newly diagnosed MM [19]. 18FDG PET/CT offers a thorough evaluation of MM tumor burden at diagnosis and carries a powerful prognostic value at baseline and during therapy response assessment [20,21,22,23,24].
Bellow, we discuss the findings relating to the detection of focal bone lesions and extra-medullary disease by 18FDG and Choline PET/CT.

3.1. Focal Bone Lesion Detection

The comparison of Choline PET/CT and 18FDG PET/CT lesion detectability in MM has been performed in the past few years (Table 1). In a study conducted by Nanni and colleagues [25], 10 patients underwent both 11C-Choline and 18FDG PET/CT scans within one week. The settings were: evaluation after completion of initial therapy (n = 4), disease relapse (n = 4) and follow-up (n = 2). Six patients were positive on both examinations, with a total of 37 bone lesions detected on 11C-Choline PET/CT vs. 22 lesions on 18FDG PET/CT. Four patients had concordant negative findings. The last patient had only one lesion in the pelvis, which was 18FDG-positive but 11C-Choline negative. None of the patients had a positive 11C-Choline PET combined with a negative 18FDG PET. Choline intensity of uptake was globally superior to that of FDG, with a mean SUVmax of 5.0 vs. 3.8 respectively (p = 0.042); however, it is interesting to note that some lesions had a high 18FDG uptake but a low Choline uptake. Moreover, a mix of uptake patterns of MM lesions could be observed within the same patient.
In a second study by Cassou-Mounat et al. [26], 21 MM patients underwent FCH-PET/CT and FDG PET/CT within a median time of 7 days, for progression under treatment (n = 6) or suspected relapse (n = 15). Nineteen were biochemically confirmed. One patient was detected as positive for bone involvement by FCH-PET/CT only, while no patient was positive by FDG PET/CT only. After masked reading, the mean number of foci per patient was 4.6 for FDG vs. 8.1 for FCH (p < 0.001) with a total number of 69 lesions for FDG and 121 for FCH. Among the 69 FDG-positive lesions, 65 were also FCH-positive. The 56 foci that were FCH+/FDG- were predominantly located in the skull and the torso. The median SUVmax values for the FCH-detected lesions (3.8 and 5.7) were higher than for the FDG-detected lesions (3.0 and 4.5). Additionally, the tumor/background ratio of Choline was superior to that of FDG.
Overall, in relapsed/refractory MM, Choline PET/CT detects up to 75% more bone lesions than 18FDG PET/CT [25,26]. Choline also offers better visualization of MM lesions than FDG, which can contribute to a higher reading comfort but also higher inter-observer agreement. The low sensitivity of FDG for skull lesions is explained by the high glucose uptake in adjacent brain tissues (Figure 1). This limitation is overcome by Choline tracers (Figure 2). However, the high liver uptake of Choline may limit its sensitivity to depict lesions of surrounding bone areas such as the right costal grid.

3.2. Uptake Patterns of 18FDG and Choline-Based Tracers

A difference in uptake pattern between 18FDG and Choline can be observed among patients but also within the same patient (Figure 3) [25,26]. FDGhigh/Cholinelow uptake of MM lesions are relatively rare. One needs first to exclude false-positive findings of FDG, with for example recent fractures that can bring substantial inflammation leading to increased FDG uptake [26]. MM patients are prone to bone fractures, especially of the ribs and spine, as these patients are at higher risk of having osteoporosis [28]. FDGhigh/Cholinelow uptake can be seen in aggressive or “dedifferentiated” lesions [26]. This uptake pattern has already been documented in hepatocellular carcinoma and is a signature of aggressive disease [29]. The more frequently observed pattern of Cholinehigh/FDGlow uptake of MM lesions may have different causes. It may correspond to early lesions, as only a minority of these foci were accompanied by osteolytic changes on the corresponding CT images (35%) [26] (Figure 4). It may also reflect a more indolent form of the disease [26]. It was recently pointed out that about 10% of newly diagnosed MM patients, with bone lesions on MRI, are FDG-negative, which is linked to a lower expression of hexokinase-2 [19]. Another study showed that newly diagnosed MM patients with false-negative findings on FDG PET/CT had longer PFS than FDG-positive patients [30]; however, other mechanisms also appear to be involved in the uptake as FDG-negative patients with relapsed/refractory disease were found to have normal expression of Hexokinase-2 [31]. Finally, the use of dexamethasone as a treatment option can decrease FDG-uptake by promoting MM cell apoptosis and by lowering the inflammatory environment of MM cells. Overall, these results corroborate the recent findings of multiple, spatially separated clones that coexist in the same patient, carrying different genotypic mutations [32]. These clones can be individualized even in patients with negative minimal residual disease. This highlights the complementary role of whole-body imaging, and the possible advantage of using more than one tracer in some situations that remain to be defined. Whether these different patterns are linked to patient prognosis should also be investigated in prospective studies.
Although a good correlation can be observed between Choline uptake and plasma cell infiltration on BMB (R2 = 0.52) [27], the performance of Choline for the diagnosis of diffuse infiltration pattern has not yet been addressed. Studies prospectively comparing MRI and Choline PET/CT in that regard are warranted.

3.3. MYELOCHOL: A Prospective Pilot Study

The MYELOCHOL study is a prospective monocentric study that is aimed at comparing FCH and 18FDG PET/CT performance in newly diagnosed MM. Both of the previous studies performed have a common limitation [25,26]. Lesions were assessed without a pre-determined reference standard able to differentiate between true-positive and false-positive findings. MRI is the gold standard for bone marrow imaging [33], which makes it a good candidate for Choline PET/CT performance evaluation, as obtaining biopsy results for each lesion would not be feasible. Additionally, the performance Choline PET/CT is yet to be evaluated in a patient population that has not been exposed to MM drugs. The treatment of MM may indeed select clones that could behave differently from baseline [32].
The MYELOCHOL study plans to include 30 newly diagnosed MM patients (Haut-Lévêque Hospital, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France). All patients will undergo Whole-Body MRI, FCH, and 18FDG PET/CT with a maximal interval of 7 days between each imaging modality. Whole-Body MRI will be the standard of reference. Each imaging study will be read blindly by two nuclear medicine physicians with expertise in MM. A second step will include a comparative reading of each PET lesion with MRI findings, to determine if the lesion is a true positive or a false positive. In case of a Choline-positive lesion not found on MRI, a multidisciplinary team, composed of nuclear medicine, radiology, and hematology physicians, will come to a consensus as to whether the lesion can be related to MM. Study enrollment started in September 2019 and is currently ongoing.

3.4. Extra-Medullary Disease

Multiple myeloma patients with extra-medullary disease (EMD) have a worse prognosis [34]. Extra-medullary lesions develop in any soft tissue and should be differentiated from soft tissue lesions expanding from adjacent bones (“breakout lesion”) [35]. In line with what was found for bone lesions, Choline uptake within EMD can either be higher or lower than FDG-uptake [25,26]. The detectability of liver EMD lesions may be hampered due to the high physiological choline uptake by the liver. Moreover, benign hepatic lesions such as nodular hyperplasia may mimic MM EMD [6]. Generally, caution must be taken when diagnosing EMD with Choline or FDG, as inflammatory or neoplastic processes are known confounders for both tracers [10,36].

3.5. Therapy Response Assessment

The value of Choline PET/CT for response assessment in MM has not yet been explored. The IMPETUS criteria have been defined for harmonizing 18FDG PET/CT readings with the use of the Deauville five-point scale [37]. This scale implies the use of liver uptake as a reference above which a lesion could be considered positive after treatment; however, Choline-specific criteria will have to be elaborated for response evaluation, mainly because of the markedly intense liver uptake of this tracer.
The main features of Choline PET/CT and FDG PET/CT are summarized in Table 2

4. 11. C-Choline PET/CT vs. 11C-Methionine PET/CT and Other PET Tracers

Lapa and colleagues investigated the detectability rate of 11C-Choline compared to 11C-Methionine [27]. Nineteen pre-treated patients received both PET/CT scans within a median time of 10 days. No reference standard was used. Fifteen patients had positive findings, with only one patient with a methionine positive PET/CT but negative choline PET/CT. Choline and Methionine detected an equal number of lesions in 11/19 patients while Methionine detected more lesions in 8/19 patients. Seven patients had disseminated disease (>50 FL) that was identified by both tracers in four patients. In the remaining three patients with disseminated disease on Methionine PET/CT, Choline PET/CT only identified a total number of four lesions. The uptake of Methionine was superior to that of Choline with a median SUVmax of 9.3 (3.5–39) vs. 5.7 (3.5–14.6), respectively. A better tumor/background ratio was also observed with 11C-Methionine (18.7 vs. 8.8, p = 0.0001). Although 11C-Methionine appears to yield better results than 11C-Choline, its availability is currently limited, considering the difficulties related to the short half-life of carbon-11.
Besides FDG, Choline, or Methionine, other radiotracers are of potential interest, with especially radiopharmaceuticals that can be used for disease imaging and treatment as well, constituting important theranostic applications [38], such as radiolabeled agents targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), the chemokine receptor CXCR4 [39] or radiolabeled CD38-targeting antibodies [40,41]. A cluster of differentiation CD38 is highly expressed on myeloma cells. Daratumumab is the first fully human monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 for the treatment of MM. It improves the depth and duration of response in combination with other antimyeloma agents [42,43]. Daratumumab has been successfully labeled with 89Zr and 64Cu with promising immuno-PET imaging results in pre-clinical studies but also recently in small in-human studies [40,41]. CD38-targeted radioimmunotherapy has also been investigated preclinically [44,45]. The rate of patients with high CD38 expression will determine how many of them could beneficiate from anti-CD38 immuno-PET imaging and possibly CD38-targeted-immunoradiotherapy.

5. Conclusions

In multiple myeloma, PET/CT performed with Choline-based tracers may offer several advantages over 18FDG PET/CT, showing better detectability of focal bone lesions; however, the diagnostic performance of Choline PET/CT should be further explored in larger prospective studies, which should be designed with a reference standard. These data are required before clinical routine implementation can take place. Studies focusing on the prognostic value of Choline PET/CT and its value as regards treatment response evaluation are also warranted.

Author Contributions

Original draft preparation C.M., G.M., and E.H.; review and editing, C.M., G.M., E.H., L.B., C.H., and A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported in part by grants from the French National Agency for Research called “Investissements d’Avenir” IRON Labex n◦ ANR-11-LABX-0018-01, and from INCa-DGOS-Inserm_12558 (SIRIC ILIAD). We would like to sincerely thank Constantin Lapa and Malte Kircher for kindly providing additional data regarding the study they co-authored.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rajkumar, S.V.; Dimopoulos, M.A.; Palumbo, A.; Blade, J.; Merlini, G.; Mateos, M.V.; Kumar, S.; Hillengass, J.; Kastritis, E.; Richardson, P.; et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, e538–e548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cavo, M.; Terpos, E.; Nanni, C.; Moreau, P.; Lentzsch, S.; Zweegman, S.; Hillengass, J.; Engelhardt, M.; Usmani, S.Z.; Vesole, D.H.; et al. Role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: A consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, e206–e217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hillengass, J.; Usmani, S.; Rajkumar, S.V.; Durie, B.G.M.; Mateos, M.V.; Lonial, S.; Joao, C.; Anderson, K.C.; Garcia-Sanz, R.; Riva, E.; et al. International myeloma working group consensus recommendations on imaging in monoclonal plasma cell disorders. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, e302–e312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Correction to Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: e302-12. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, e346. [CrossRef]
  5. DeGrado, T.R.; Coleman, R.E.; Wang, S.; Baldwin, S.W.; Orr, M.D.; Robertson, C.N.; Polascik, T.J.; Price, D.T. Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled choline as an oncologic tracer for positron emission tomography: Initial findings in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Talbot, J.N.; Fartoux, L.; Balogova, S.; Nataf, V.; Kerrou, K.; Gutman, F.; Huchet, V.; Ancel, D.; Grange, J.D.; Rosmorduc, O. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with PET/CT: A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorocholine and 18F-FDG in patients with cirrhosis or chronic liver disease. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 1699–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zeisel, S.H. Dietary choline: Biochemistry, physiology, and pharmacology. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1981, 1, 95–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pieterman, R.M.; Que, T.H.; Elsinga, P.H.; Pruim, J.; van Putten, J.W.; Willemsen, A.T.; Vaalburg, W.; Groen, H.J. Comparison of (11)C-choline and (18)F-FDG PET in primary diagnosis and staging of patients with thoracic cancer. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2002, 43, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  9. Torizuka, T.; Kanno, T.; Futatsubashi, M.; Okada, H.; Yoshikawa, E.; Nakamura, F.; Takekuma, M.; Maeda, M.; Ouchi, Y. Imaging of gynecologic tumors: Comparison of (11)C-choline PET with (18)F-FDG PET. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2003, 44, 1051–1056. [Google Scholar]
  10. Calabria, F.; Chiaravalloti, A.; Ciccio, C.; Gangemi, V.; Gulla, D.; Rocca, F.; Gallo, G.; Cascini, G.L.; Schillaci, O. PET/CT with (18)F-choline: Physiological whole bio-distribution in male and female subjects and diagnostic pitfalls on 1000 prostate cancer patients: (18)F-choline PET/CT bio-distribution and pitfalls. A southern Italian experience. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2017, 51, 40–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shen, G.; Liang, M.; Su, M.; Kuang, A. Physiological uptake of 18F-FDG in the vertebral bone marrow in healthy adults on PET/CT imaging. Acta Radiol. 2018, 59, 1487–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Roivainen, A.; Forsback, S.; Gronroos, T.; Lehikoinen, P.; Kahkonen, M.; Sutinen, E.; Minn, H. Blood metabolism of [methyl-11C]choline; implications for in vivo imaging with positron emission tomography. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 2000, 27, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Breeuwsma, A.J.; Pruim, J.; Jongen, M.M.; Suurmeijer, A.J.; Vaalburg, W.; Nijman, R.J.; de Jong, I.J. In vivo uptake of [11C]choline does not correlate with cell proliferation in human prostate cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2005, 32, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Utriainen, M.; Komu, M.; Vuorinen, V.; Lehikoinen, P.; Sonninen, P.; Kurki, T.; Utriainen, T.; Roivainen, A.; Kalimo, H.; Minn, H. Evaluation of brain tumor metabolism with [11C]choline PET and 1H-MRS. J. Neurooncol. 2003, 62, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sasagawa, T.; Okita, M.; Murakami, J.; Kato, T.; Watanabe, A. Abnormal serum lysophospholipids in multiple myeloma patients. Lipids 1999, 34, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rizzieri, D.; Paul, B.; Kang, Y. Metabolic alterations and the potential for targeting metabolic pathways in the treatment of multiple myeloma. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2019, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mohamed, A.; Collins, J.; Jiang, H.; Molendijk, J.; Stoll, T.; Torta, F.; Wenk, M.R.; Bird, R.J.; Marlton, P.; Mollee, P.; et al. Concurrent lipidomics and proteomics on malignant plasma cells from multiple myeloma patients: Probing the lipid metabolome. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hanna, V.S.; Hafez, E.A.A. Synopsis of arachidonic acid metabolism: A review. J. Adv. Res. 2018, 11, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rasche, L.; Angtuaco, E.; McDonald, J.E.; Buros, A.; Stein, C.; Pawlyn, C.; Thanendrarajan, S.; Schinke, C.; Samant, R.; Yaccoby, S.; et al. Low expression of hexokinase-2 is associated with false-negative FDG-positron emission tomography in multiple myeloma. Blood 2017, 130, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zamagni, E.; Nanni, C.; Patriarca, F.; Englaro, E.; Castellucci, P.; Geatti, O.; Tosi, P.; Tacchetti, P.; Cangini, D.; Perrone, G.; et al. A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2007, 92, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bartel, T.B.; Haessler, J.; Brown, T.L.; Shaughnessy, J.D., Jr.; van Rhee, F.; Anaissie, E.; Alpe, T.; Angtuaco, E.; Walker, R.; Epstein, J.; et al. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Blood 2009, 114, 2068–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zamagni, E.; Patriarca, F.; Nanni, C.; Zannetti, B.; Englaro, E.; Pezzi, A.; Tacchetti, P.; Buttignol, S.; Perrone, G.; Brioli, A.; et al. Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood 2011, 118, 5989–5995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Usmani, S.Z.; Mitchell, A.; Waheed, S.; Crowley, J.; Hoering, A.; Petty, N.; Brown, T.; Bartel, T.; Anaissie, E.; van Rhee, F.; et al. Prognostic implications of serial 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography in multiple myeloma treated with total therapy 3. Blood 2013, 121, 1819–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Moreau, P.; Attal, M.; Caillot, D.; Macro, M.; Karlin, L.; Garderet, L.; Facon, T.; Benboubker, L.; Escoffre-Barbe, M.; Stoppa, A.M.; et al. Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography at Diagnosis and Before Maintenance Therapy in Symptomatic Patients With Multiple Myeloma Included in the IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Results of the IMAJEM Study. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 2911–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nanni, C.; Zamagni, E.; Cavo, M.; Rubello, D.; Tacchetti, P.; Pettinato, C.; Farsad, M.; Castellucci, P.; Ambrosini, V.; Montini, G.C.; et al. 11C-choline vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing bone involvement in patients with multiple myeloma. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2007, 5, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Cassou-Mounat, T.; Balogova, S.; Nataf, V.; Calzada, M.; Huchet, V.; Kerrou, K.; Devaux, J.Y.; Mohty, M.; Talbot, J.N.; Garderet, L. 18F-fluorocholine versus 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for PET/CT imaging in patients with suspected relapsing or progressive multiple myeloma: A pilot study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2016, 43, 1995–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lapa, C.; Kircher, M.; Da Via, M.; Schreder, M.; Rasche, L.; Kortum, K.M.; Einsele, H.; Buck, A.K.; Hanscheid, H.; Samnick, S. Comparison of 11C-Choline and 11C-Methionine PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2019, 44, 620–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rosko, A.E.; Hade, E.M.; Li, W.; Ing, S.; Jackson, R.D.; Paskett, E.D.; Naughton, M.J. Bone Health and Survival in Women With Multiple Myeloma. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2018, 18, 597–602 e591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Castilla-Lievre, M.A.; Franco, D.; Gervais, P.; Kuhnast, B.; Agostini, H.; Marthey, L.; Desarnaud, S.; Helal, B.O. Diagnostic value of combining (1)(1)C-choline and (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma. E Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2016, 43, 852–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abe, Y.; Ikeda, S.; Kitadate, A.; Narita, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Miura, D.; Takeuchi, M.; O’Uchi, E.; O’Uchi, T.; Matsue, K. Low hexokinase-2 expression-associated false-negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT as a potential prognostic predictor in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 1345–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kircher, S.; Stolzenburg, A.; Kortum, K.M.; Kircher, M.; Da Via, M.; Samnick, S.; Buck, A.K.; Einsele, H.; Rosenwald, A.; Lapa, C. Hexokinase-2 Expression in (11)C-Methionine-Positive, (18)F-FDG-Negative Multiple Myeloma. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rasche, L.; Alapat, D.; Kumar, M.; Gershner, G.; McDonald, J.; Wardell, C.P.; Samant, R.; Van Hemert, R.; Epstein, J.; Williams, A.F.; et al. Combination of flow cytometry and functional imaging for monitoring of residual disease in myeloma. Leukemia 2019, 33, 1713–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zamagni, E.; Tacchetti, P.; Cavo, M. Imaging in multiple myeloma: How? When? Blood 2019, 133, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Usmani, S.Z.; Heuck, C.; Mitchell, A.; Szymonifka, J.; Nair, B.; Hoering, A.; Alsayed, Y.; Waheed, S.; Haider, S.; Restrepo, A.; et al. Extramedullary disease portends poor prognosis in multiple myeloma and is over-represented in high-risk disease even in the era of novel agents. Haematologica 2012, 97, 1761–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sevcikova, S.; Minarik, J.; Stork, M.; Jelinek, T.; Pour, L.; Hajek, R. Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma - controversies and future directions. Blood Rev. 2019, 36, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mesguich, C.; Fardanesh, R.; Tanenbaum, L.; Chari, A.; Jagannath, S.; Kostakoglu, L. State of the art imaging of multiple myeloma: Comparative review of FDG PET/CT imaging in various clinical settings. Eur. J. Radiol 2014, 83, 2203–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nanni, C.; Versari, A.; Chauvie, S.; Bertone, E.; Bianchi, A.; Rensi, M.; Bello, M.; Gallamini, A.; Patriarca, F.; Gay, F.; et al. Interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (IMPeTUs): Final results. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe). Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 45, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mesguich, C.; Zanotti-Fregonara, P.; Hindie, E. New Perspectives Offered by Nuclear Medicine for the Imaging and Therapy of Multiple Myeloma. Theranostics 2016, 6, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lapa, C.; Herrmann, K.; Schirbel, A.; Hanscheid, H.; Luckerath, K.; Schottelius, M.; Kircher, M.; Werner, R.A.; Schreder, M.; Samnick, S.; et al. CXCR4-directed endoradiotherapy induces high response rates in extramedullary relapsed Multiple Myeloma. Theranostics 2017, 7, 1589–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ulaner, G.A.; Sobol, N.B.; O’Donoghue, J.A.; Kirov, A.S.; Riedl, C.C.; Min, R.; Smith, E.; Carter, L.M.; Lyashchenko, S.K.; Lewis, J.S.; et al. CD38-targeted Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma: From Xenograft Models to First-in-Human Imaging. Radiology 2020, 295, 606–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Caserta, E.; Chea, J.; Minnix, M.; Poku, E.K.; Viola, D.; Vonderfecht, S.; Yazaki, P.; Crow, D.; Khalife, J.; Sanchez, J.F.; et al. Copper 64-labeled daratumumab as a PET/CT imaging tracer for multiple myeloma. Blood 2018, 131, 741–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Dimopoulos, M.A.; Oriol, A.; Nahi, H.; San-Miguel, J.; Bahlis, N.J.; Usmani, S.Z.; Rabin, N.; Orlowski, R.Z.; Komarnicki, M.; Suzuki, K.; et al. Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1319–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Palumbo, A.; Chanan-Khan, A.; Weisel, K.; Nooka, A.K.; Masszi, T.; Beksac, M.; Spicka, I.; Hungria, V.; Munder, M.; Mateos, M.V.; et al. Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 754–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Green, D.J.; Orgun, N.N.; Jones, J.C.; Hylarides, M.D.; Pagel, J.M.; Hamlin, D.K.; Wilbur, D.S.; Lin, Y.; Fisher, D.R.; Kenoyer, A.L.; et al. A preclinical model of CD38-pretargeted radioimmunotherapy for plasma cell malignancies. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 1179–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Teiluf, K.; Seidl, C.; Blechert, B.; Gaertner, F.C.; Gilbertz, K.P.; Fernandez, V.; Bassermann, F.; Endell, J.; Boxhammer, R.; Leclair, S.; et al. alpha-Radioimmunotherapy with (2)(1)(3)Bi-anti-CD38 immunoconjugates is effective in a mouse model of human multiple myeloma. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 4692–4703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cancers 12 01394 g001 550
Figure 1. A 65-year-old male with a light chain multiple myeloma (MM). 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose glucose (18FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (left panel) and 18F-Choline PET/CT (right panel) were performed with a 4-day interval. 18F-Choline PET/CT axial image of the skull shows an intense uptake of a skull base lesion. Because of the intense surrounding cerebral uptake on 18FDG PET/CT, the lesion is more difficult to individualize. Clinical examination at baseline identified the presence of diplopia and left ptosis, which disappeared a few days after induction chemotherapy was started.
Figure 1. A 65-year-old male with a light chain multiple myeloma (MM). 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose glucose (18FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (left panel) and 18F-Choline PET/CT (right panel) were performed with a 4-day interval. 18F-Choline PET/CT axial image of the skull shows an intense uptake of a skull base lesion. Because of the intense surrounding cerebral uptake on 18FDG PET/CT, the lesion is more difficult to individualize. Clinical examination at baseline identified the presence of diplopia and left ptosis, which disappeared a few days after induction chemotherapy was started.
Cancers 12 01394 g001
Cancers 12 01394 g002 550
Figure 2. A 60-year-old female with IgG lambda smoldering multiple myeloma. An osteolytic lesion of the skull was found on a follow-up CT. 18F-Choline PET/CT was ordered to further characterize this lesion and search for additional bone lesions. 18F-Choline PET/CT axial image of the skull shows a moderate uptake of an occipital osteolytic lesion (A). Additional focal uptake of 18F-Choline was seen in the left femur, corresponding to a bone marrow lesion with no bone structural changes on CT (B).
Figure 2. A 60-year-old female with IgG lambda smoldering multiple myeloma. An osteolytic lesion of the skull was found on a follow-up CT. 18F-Choline PET/CT was ordered to further characterize this lesion and search for additional bone lesions. 18F-Choline PET/CT axial image of the skull shows a moderate uptake of an occipital osteolytic lesion (A). Additional focal uptake of 18F-Choline was seen in the left femur, corresponding to a bone marrow lesion with no bone structural changes on CT (B).
Cancers 12 01394 g002
Cancers 12 01394 g003 550
Figure 3. A 72-year-old male with light chain multiple myeloma. 18FDG PET/CT (left panel) and 18F-Choline PET/CT (right panel) were performed with a 5-day-interval. Different uptake patterns are seen in this patient. Lesion exhibiting high choline uptake but low FDG uptake can be seen in the left femur (A). In contrast, however, a lesion with high FDG uptake but low Choline uptake can be seen in the posterior arch of the left 6th rib (B) corresponding to an osteolytic lesion on CT (central panel).
Figure 3. A 72-year-old male with light chain multiple myeloma. 18FDG PET/CT (left panel) and 18F-Choline PET/CT (right panel) were performed with a 5-day-interval. Different uptake patterns are seen in this patient. Lesion exhibiting high choline uptake but low FDG uptake can be seen in the left femur (A). In contrast, however, a lesion with high FDG uptake but low Choline uptake can be seen in the posterior arch of the left 6th rib (B) corresponding to an osteolytic lesion on CT (central panel).
Cancers 12 01394 g003
Cancers 12 01394 g004a 550Cancers 12 01394 g004b 550
Figure 4. A 56-year-old female with IgG kappa MM. 18FDG PET/CT (left panel) and 18F-Choline PET/CT (right panel) were performed with a 3-day-interval. An axial PET/CT image of the pelvis shows a focal uptake of 18F-Choline within the right ischium without a corresponding uptake on 18FDG PET/CT. The corresponding axial CT image (central panel) shows no clear-cut structural changes (A). A focal lesion of the right femur exhibits a high uptake of 18F-Choline. This lesion exhibits only a faint uptake on 18FDG PET/CT (left panel) and is not visible on CT (central panel) (B).
Figure 4. A 56-year-old female with IgG kappa MM. 18FDG PET/CT (left panel) and 18F-Choline PET/CT (right panel) were performed with a 3-day-interval. An axial PET/CT image of the pelvis shows a focal uptake of 18F-Choline within the right ischium without a corresponding uptake on 18FDG PET/CT. The corresponding axial CT image (central panel) shows no clear-cut structural changes (A). A focal lesion of the right femur exhibits a high uptake of 18F-Choline. This lesion exhibits only a faint uptake on 18FDG PET/CT (left panel) and is not visible on CT (central panel) (B).
Cancers 12 01394 g004aCancers 12 01394 g004b
Table
Table 1. Characteristics and main results of studies exploring the use of 11C-Choline or 18F-Choline in multiple myeloma.
Table 1. Characteristics and main results of studies exploring the use of 11C-Choline or 18F-Choline in multiple myeloma.
ReferencesNumber of PatientsStudy DesignTime of ImagingIndex TestCholine Administered ActivityCholine PET Scanning Time Post-InjectionReference TestNumber of Bone FL on Choline PET/CT (Matched/
Unmatched)		Number of Bone FL on FDG- or MTH PET/CT (Matched/
Unmatched)		Number of EMD foci on Choline PET/CT (Matched/
Unmatched)		Number of EMD foci on FDG- or MTH PET/CT (Matched/
Unmatched)		Mean or Median (range) SUVmax of Choline PET Mean or Median (range) SUVmax of FDG- or MTH PET
Nanni et al. (2007) [25]10RetrospectiveRelapse or f/up post treatment11C-Choline
18F-FDG		5.3 MBq/kg5 min.None37 (21/16)22 (21/1)3 (2/1)1 (1/0)5.0 (NS)3.8 (NS)
Cassou-Mounat et al. (2016) [26]21RetrospectiveRelapse or Progression18F-Choline
18F-FDG		3 MBq/kg10–20 min.None121 (65/56)69 (65/4)3 (3/3)3 (3/3)3.8-5.7 (1.6–16)3-4.5 (1.6–20.6)
Lapa et al. (2019) [27]19RetrospectiveProgression or f/up post-treatment11C-Choline
11C-MTH		719 ± 86 MBq5 min.None91* (91/0)
>50: 4 patients		112 ** (87/25)
>50: 7 patients		005.7 (3.5–14.6)9.3 (3.5–30.9)
MTH: Methionine; FL: Focal bone Lesion; EMD: Extra-Medullary-Disease; NS: Not Specified *91 FL were found in 15 patients. The remaining four patients had innumerable FL (>50) which were all matched by MTH PET/CT. ** 112 FL were found in 12 patients. The remaining 7 patients had innumerable FL (>50) with 3 of them having less than 3 lesions on Choline PET/CT.
Table
Table 2. Comparative table of the main characteristics of 18F-Choline or 11C-Choline PET/CT vs. 18FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma.
Table 2. Comparative table of the main characteristics of 18F-Choline or 11C-Choline PET/CT vs. 18FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma.
Characteristics18F or 11C Choline PET/CT18FDG PET/CT
Cost>18FDG<18F or 11C Choline
Availability<18FDGWidely available
Delay between injection
and acquisition		5–20 min (shorter than with 18FDG)60 min.
Tumor/Background ratio>18FDG<18F or 11C Choline
Detectability of MM lesionsUp to 70% more lesions than 18FDG10% of MM are 18FDG-negative
Areas of impaired detection-FL of right lower ribs: “liver shadowing”
-Liver EMD		Skull FL: “brain shadowing”
Effect of Dexamethasone on uptakeUnknownImpaired uptake
Correlation with bone marrow infiltrationGood (R2 = 0.52)Moderate (R2 = 0.36)
False-positive findingsGranulomatosis, neoplasia, inflammatory processesNeoplasia, inflammatory processes, granulomatosis
Prognostic valueUnknownProved in multiple studies at baseline and during therapy response assessment
Interpretation criteriaUndefinedIMPETUS criteria
MM: Multiple Myeloma; FL: Focal Lesion; EMD: Extra-Medullary Disease; IMPETUS: Italian Myeloma Criteria for PET Use.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mesguich, C.; Hulin, C.; Lascaux, A.; Bordenave, L.; Marit, G.; Hindié, E. Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma. Cancers 2020, 12, 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061394

AMA Style

Mesguich C, Hulin C, Lascaux A, Bordenave L, Marit G, Hindié E. Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma. Cancers. 2020; 12(6):1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061394

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mesguich, Charles, Cyrille Hulin, Axelle Lascaux, Laurence Bordenave, Gerald Marit, and Elif Hindié. 2020. "Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma" Cancers 12, no. 6: 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061394

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop