Next Article in Journal
Effect of Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. ex Kunth in a Murine Model of Metabolic Syndrome
Next Article in Special Issue
Direct and Indirect Effects of Essential Oils for Sustainable Crop Protection
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Neuroprotective Potential of Bunchosia armeniaca (Cav.) DC against Lipopolysaccharide Induced Alzheimer’s Disease in Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Production of Insecticidal Compounds from Persea indica
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antifungal and Herbicidal Potential of Piper Essential Oils from the Peruvian Amazonia

by
Liliana Ruiz-Vásquez
1,2,*,
Lastenia Ruiz Mesia
1,
Henrry Denny Caballero Ceferino
1,
Wilfredo Ruiz Mesia
1,
Maria Fe Andrés
3,
Carmen Elisa Díaz
4 and
Azucena Gonzalez-Coloma
3,*
1
Laboratorio de Productos Naturales Antiparasitarios de la Amazonia, Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales, Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana (UNAP), Iquitos 16002, Peru
2
Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana (UNAP), Iquitos 16000, Peru
3
Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias, CSIC, 28006 Madrid, Spain
4
Instituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiología, CSIC, 38206 La Laguna, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(14), 1793; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141793
Submission received: 30 May 2022 / Revised: 2 July 2022 / Accepted: 3 July 2022 / Published: 7 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Compounds: A Bio-Agent for Plant Protection)

Abstract

:
The chemical composition of essential oils (EOs) from ten Peruvian Piper species (Piper coruscans, Pc; P. tuberculatum, Pt; P. casapiense, Pcs; P. obliquum, Po; P. dumosum, Pd; P. anonifolium, Pa; P. reticulatum, Pr; P. soledadense, Ps; P. sancti-felicis, Psf and P. mituense, Pm) has been studied, along with their antifungal and phytotoxic activities. These EOs contained β-bisabolene/nerolidol (Pc), β-bisabolene/δ-cadinene/caryophyllene (Pt), caryophyllene oxide (Pcs), bicyclogermacrene/10-epi-Elemol (Po), bicyclogermacrene/germacrene-D/apiol (Pd), caryophyllene/germacrene-D (Pa), germacrene-D (Pr), limonene/apiol (Ps), apiol (Psf), and apiol/bicyclogermacrene (Pm) as major components, and some are described here for the first time (Ps, Pcs, Pm). A composition-based dendrogram of these Piper species showed four major groups (G1: Pc and Pt, G2: Pcs, Po, Pd, Pa, and Pr, G3: Ps, and G4: Psf and Pm). The spore germination effects (Aspergillus niger, Botrytis cinerea, and Alternaria alternate) and phytotoxicity (Lolium perenne and Lactuca sativa) of these EOs were studied. Most of these Piper essential oils showed important activity against phytopathogenic fungi (except G1), especially against B. cinerea. Similarly, most of the essential oils were phytotoxic against L. perenne (except G1), with P. sancti-felicis (G4), P. casapiense (G2), and P. reticulatum (G2) being the most effective. Caryophyllene oxide, β-caryophyllene, β-pinene, limonene, α-humulene, and apiol were evaluated against B. cinerea, with the most effective compounds being β-pinene, apiol, and limonene. This work demonstrates the species-dependent potential of essential oils from Peruvian Piper species as fungicidal and herbicidal agents.

1. Introduction

Diseases caused by plant pathogens significantly contribute to annual loss in crop yield worldwide [1]. The application of chemical pesticides may be an important component and effective control method of these plant diseases, both representing a serious threat to public health and the environment while also causing resistance in pathogens [2,3,4,5,6].
In plants, essential oils (EOs) play a protective role against herbivores, phytopathogenic fungi, and weeds. Essential oils also represent a new class of crop protectants due to their volatility and low toxicity to the environment and have been proposed as an alternative to synthetic pesticides [3,7,8,9]. Additionally, the probabilities of creating new resistant pathogens by using essential oils as biopesticide agents are low, since their constituents can act as synergists [10].
The Piperaceae family has approximately eight genera and 3000 species [11]. The genus Piper is found in tropical and subtropical areas, and in America, there are approximately 700 species [12,13], with 324 species located in Peru [14,15]. This genus is an important source of essential oils and secondary metabolites, which have significant plant protection effects [16], including allelopathic/phytotoxic [14,17,18], antifungal [19,20], insecticidal, nematicidal, and antifeedant [10,21].
Piper EOs are characterized by the presence of monoterpene hydrocarbons (e.g., α-pinene, myrcene, limonene, α-terpinene), oxygenated monoterpenoids (e.g., linalool, 1,8-cineole, terpinen-4-ol, borneol), sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (e.g., β-caryophyllene, α-humulene, germacrene D, bicyclogermacrene, α-cubebene), oxygenated sesquiterpenoids (e.g., spathulenol, (E)-nerolidol, caryophyllene oxide, α-cadinol, epi-α-bisabolol), and phenylpropanoids (safrole, dillapiol, myristicin, elemicin, apiol, eugenol), among others [14,22,23,24]. Furthermore, Piper essential oils have been described as being insect antifeedant, acaricidal, nematicidal, and herbicidal agents [10,21]. Therefore, Piper essential oils are a promising source of new potential biopesticide ingredients.
As part of an ongoing project on the bioprospection of Peruvian Piper species for their biopesticidal potential, ten species native to the Peruvian Amazonian region (P. coruscans, P. tuberculatum, P. casapiense, P. obliquum, P. dumosum, P. anonifolium, P. reticulatum, P. soledadense, P. sancti-felicis, and P. mituense) have been extracted by hydrodistillation to study the chemical composition of their EOs by GC-MS, along with their fungicidal activity against phytopathogens (Aspergillus niger, Botrytis cinerea, and Alternaria alternate) and their phytotoxic effects (against Lolium perenne and Lactuca sativa) to assess their potential applications in phytopathogen and/or weed control.

2. Results

2.1. Essential Oil Composition

The chemical compositions of the essential oils are shown in Table 1 and the structures of their main components in Figure 1. The major identified compounds of the EOs were β-bisabolene (33.4%), nerolidol (10.2%), caryophyllene (8.0%), (+)-β-selinene (4.9%), and α-bisabolol (4.8%) for Piper coruscans; β-bisabolene (40.2%), δ-cadinene (9.8%), caryophyllene (9.7%), germacrene-D (5.0%), and nerolidol (4.5%) for P. tuberculatum; caryophyllene oxide (10.2%), and caryophyllene (4.7%) for P. casapiense; bicyclogermacrene (7.9%), 10-epi-Elemol (7.3%), caryophyllene (6.3%), α-pinene (6.0%), β-pinene (5.1%), β-selinenol (4.9%), α-eudesmol (4.5%), and camphene (4.4%) for P. oblicuum; bicyclogermacrene (16.5%), germacrene-D (10.4%), apiol (8.9%), caryophyllene (6.8%), β-pinene (6.3%), α-cubebene (5.9%), and β-elemene (4.5%) for P. dumosum; caryophyllene (11.3%), germacrene-D (9.6%), α-humulene (6.6%), δ-cadinene (6.6%), and (-)-β-copaene (5.8%) for P. anonifolium; germacrene-D (12.6%), bicyclogermacrene (8.1%), δ-cadinene (6.0%), copaene (4.6%), and caryophyllene (4.5%) for P. reticulatum; limonene (38.5%), apiol (15.0%), caryophyllene oxide (8.4%), eudesma-3,7-(11)-diene and copaene (5.8%) for P. soledadense; apiol (76.1%), and caryophyllene (4.1%) for P. sancti-felicis and apiol (51.6%), bicyclogermacrene (9.0%), germacrene-D (6.7%), and myristicin (4.6%) for P. mituense.
The overall composition of these oils is shown in Table 2. Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons were dominant in all EOs except for P. sancti-felicis and P. mituense, which were characterized by phenylpropanoids, and P. soledadense, which was characterized by monoterpene hydrocarbons.
A dendrogram based on the composition of the Piper species (Figure 2) showed four groups: (G1) P. coruscans (Pc) and P. tuberculatum (Pt), characterized by the presence of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons; (G2) P. casapiense (Pcs), P. obliquum (Po), P. dumosum (Pd), P. anonifolium (Pa), and P. reticulatum (Pr), characterized by sesquiterpenes; (G3) P. soledadense (Ps), with monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes; and (G4) P. sancti-felicis (Psf) and P. mituense (Pm), characterized by phenylpropanoids.

2.2. Fungicidal Activity

The antifungal activity (spore germination inhibition) of the Piper essential oils against Aspergillus niger, Botrytis cinerea, and Alternaria alternate is shown in Table 3. B. cinerea was the fungal species most susceptible to the action of Piper essential oils. The antifungal activity showed a pattern in accordance with the grouped EOs. P. coruscans and P. tuberculatum (G1) were not active. P. casapiense (G2), P. obliquum (G2), P. dumosum (G2), P. anonifolium (G2), and P. reticulatum (G2) were only active against B. cinerea with varying potencies, with P. obliquum and P. anonifolium being the most effective. P. soledadense (G3) inhibited the spore germination of A. niger and B. cinerea. P. sancti-felicis (G4) oil was active against all three fungal species with moderate effects, and P. mituense (G4) only acted on B. cinerea, probably due to the lower concentration in apiol of this oil.
Among the Piper oils components tested against B. cinerea (β-pinene, limonene, α-humulene, β-caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide and apiol), β-pinene showed strong antifungal activity (CI50 = 3.48 µg/mL, 2.69–4.50 95% CL), followed by apiol (CI50 = 16.17 µg/mL, 10.74–24.34 95% CL) and limonene (CI50 = 34.70 µg/mL, 24.38–49.4 95% CL), with effective doses similar to the positive control (thymol, CI50 = 19.54 µg/mL, 22.94–15.74 95% CL) for apiol.

2.3. Phytotoxic Activity

The essential oils were tested for phytotoxic effects on Lactuca sativa (dicotyledonous) and Lolium perenne (monocotyledonous) plants. The phytotoxic activity did not follow the grouping pattern observed for the antifungal effects. P. sancti-felicis (G4), P. casapiense (G2), P. mituense (G4), and P. reticulatum (G2), effectively inhibited germination, leaf and root growth of L. perenne (>50%, Figure 3). P. anonifolium (G2), P. obliquum (G2), P. dumosum (G2), and P. soledadense (G3) inhibited leaf growth (>50%), followed by P. tuberculatum (G1) with a 50% inhibition.
P. sancti-felicis, P. casapiense, P. reticulatum, and P. mituense effectively inhibited the root growth of L. sativa (data not shown). P. soledadense reduced the root growth of L. sativa (data not shown). These results show strong selective herbicidal potential of the EOs tested against monocotyledonous plants.

3. Discussion

Piper essential oils present a wide variety of chemical compounds with important biological activities that may be of interest in agriculture, medicine, and food industries, among others. These oils play an important role in the defense of the plant against pests, and many studies have reported activities as insecticidal, antifeedants, phytotoxic and antifungal [10,19,20,21,25,26,27,28].
The essential oils from some of the Piper species described here have been previously reported to show quantitative and qualitative chemical variations that can be attributed to environmental factors (such as weather, soil, sunlight, temperature, and humidity) [13,29,30]. Among the essential oils studied here, four groups have been identified according to their compositions (G1–G4):
(G1) P. coruscans (Pc) and P. tuberculatum (Pt). P. coruscans EO had β-bisabolene (33.4%) and nerolidol (10.2%) as the main components, while this species collected in Ecuador contained β-caryophyllene (24.1–25.0%), α-humulene (11.6–12.0%), and caryophyllene oxide (9.3–10.9%) [31]. The EO from P. tuberculatum studied here showed β-bisabolene (40.2%) as the main component followed by δ-cadinene (9.8%), caryophyllene (9.7%), germacrene-D (5.0%), nerolidol (4.5%), copaene (4.2%), and β-elemene (3.3%). This Piper species (Pt) EO has been previously reported for plants collected from different locations. Pt collected in Venezuela gave an EO with α-farnesene (6.2%), humulene epoxide II (6.0%), 2-pentadecanone (4.1%), β-eudesmol (4.4%), 2-tridecanone (4.3%), ledane (3.6%), (E,E)-farnesylacetone (3.6%), and α-cadinol (2.9%) [32], while EOs from the Brazilian Amazonia or Mato Grosso regions had either (E)-caryophyllene (30.1%) [19] or myristicin (15.5%), dillapiole (13.8%), α-guaiene (13.0%), 9-epi-E-cariofilene (7.1%), and trans-4-muurola(14)-5-diene (9.9%) [33].
(G2) P. casapiense (Pcs), P. obliquum (Po), P. dumosum (Pd), P. anonifolium (Pa), and P. reticulatum (Pr): P. casapiense (Pcs), is reported here for the first time. The EO from P. obliquum had bicyclogermacrene (7.9%), 10-epi-Elemol (7.3%), caryophyllene (6.3%), and α-pinene (6.0%). However, the Po essential oil of Ecuadorian origin contained safrole (45.9%), γ-terpinene (17.1%), and terpinolene (11.5%) [34], while an EO from Panama had β-caryophyllene (27.6%), spathulenol (10.6%), and caryophyllene oxide as main components (8.3%) [35]. P. dumosum contained bicyclogermacrene (16.5%) and germacrene-D (10.4%). Similarly, the EO from Pd plants collected in the Brazilian Amazonia had bicyclogermacrene (16.2%), β-caryophyllene (15.9%), β-pinene (16.0%), and α-pinene (12.1%) [36] as the main components. The EO from P. anonifolium studied here contained caryophyllene (11.3%), germacrene-D (9.6%), δ-cadinene (6.6%), α-humulene (6.6%), and neoalloocimene (5.5%), while a previously reported EO from the Brazilian Pará was composed of selin-11-en-4-β-α-ol (20.0%), β-selinene (12.7%), α-selinene (11.9%), and α-pinene (8.8%) [37]. Furthermore, the EOs from seven Brazilian Amazonian populations of Pa showed two different chemotypes, one rich in α-pinene (40.9–53.1%)/β-pinene (17.2–22.9%), and one rich in α-eudesmol (33.5%)/ishwarane (19.1%) [38]. The EO from P. reticulatum studied here contained the phenylpropanoid apiol as the main component (15.0%) while β-elemene (24.6%) and β-caryophyllene (16.7%) were abundant in a Pr oil from the northern region of Brazil [39].
(G3) P. soledadense (Ps) is reported here for the first time.
(G4) P. sancti-felicis (Psf) and P. mituense (Pm). The EO from P. sancti-felicis and P. mituense (Pm reported here for the first time) contained the phenylpropanoid apiol as the main component (76.1% and 51.6%, respectively). δ-3-carene (35.3%) and limonene (27.1%) were the main components of the EO from P. sancti-felicis collected in Choco, Colombia [21,25].
The essential oils studied here have shown important activities against phytopathogenic fungi (G2-4). Essential oils from the genus Piper have been reported to have a wide range of biological properties [10,11,14,21,40], including fungicidal effects [35,38,39]. Specifically, among the species studied here, the essential oils of P. tuberculatum (rich in α- and β-pinene 17–27%, (E)-β-ocimene 14% and β-caryophyllene 32.1%) [41], and P. anonifolium (with selin-11-en-4α-ol 20.0%, β-selinene 12.7%, and α-selinene 11.9%) showed strong antifungal activity against Cladosporium cladosporioides and C. sphaerospermum [37].
The composition-based grouping of the EOs overlapped with the antifungal activity, suggesting that the presence of bicyclogermacrene, 10-epi-Elemol, germacrene-D, caryophyllene, limonene, β-pinene, and/or apiol could be responsible for significant antifungal effects. Among the oil components tested against B. cinerea (β-pinene, limonene, α-humulene, β-caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide, and apiol), β-pinene, limonene, and apiol showed strong antifungal activity. Therefore, β-pinene could contribute to the activity of Po and Pd EOs, while apiol and limonene could explain the effect of Ps, Psf, and Pm oils. β-caryophyllene (inactive) could be a synergist.
(S)-Limonene has reported antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Penicillium digitatum and Asperigallus niger [42]. Apiol showed strong activity against Botrytis cinerea [43], Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, A. fumigatus, and A. parasiticus [44], Botryodiplodia theobromae and Colletotrichum acutatum [45,46]. The antifungal activity of apiol has been attributed to the presence of two electron-donating methoxy groups [47]. Caryophyllene oxide was active against Fusarium solani [48] and caryophyllene was active against Rhizoctonia solani and Helminthosporium oryzae [49], but in this work did not inhibit B. cinerea spore germination.
Most of the essential oils tested here (P. sancti-felicis, P. mituense, P. casapiense, P. reticulatum, P. anonifolium, P. obliquum, P. dumosum, and P. soledadense) were phytotoxic to the monocotyledonous Lolium perenne, and this activity did not overlap with the composition-based groups, suggesting a multi-component phytotoxic action. This is the first report on the phytotoxic effects of these species, except for an EO from P. sancti-felicis that was not active and did not contain apiol [21]. EOs from other Piper species, including P. hispidinervum rich in safrole [10], P. dilatatum rich in apiol, and P. divaricatum rich in eugenol and methyleugenol [21], have been reported as being phytotoxic, suggesting that the presence of phenylpropanoids played an important role in their activity.
Among the main compounds present in the Piper oils studied here, α-pinene, β-pinene, and limonene have been reported to have phytotoxic effects against the germination and seedling growth of several plant species [50], apiol inhibited the growth of Lemna paucicostata and was toxic against Festuca rubra and Agrostis stolonifera (monocot plants) [43], and caryophyllene inhibited the germination and seedling growth of Brassica campestris and Raphanus sativus [51] and the seed germination and root growth of Echinochloa crusgalli, Lolium perenne, Amaranthus retroflexus, and Digitaria sanguinalis [52].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Essential Oil Extraction

The aerial parts of the plants (leaves, stems, and flowers) of the selected Piperaceae species were collected in Iquitos, Loreto Department, Peru in different seasons. The taxonomic identification was carried out at the Herbarium Amazonense of the National University of the Peruvian Amazon, Iquitos, Peru. A voucher for each species has been deposited in the herbarium. All the plants were permitted for collection (Regional Management Resolution number 035-2021-GRL-GGR-GRDFFS). The EOs extraction was performed by hydrodistillation using the dried aerial parts of the plants. The EOs were separated by decantation and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. All investigated Piper species contained essential oils that range from 0.078 to 1.26% based on dry weight (Table 4).

4.2. Gas Chromatography Analysis

Essential oils were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) on a Shimadzu 2010 and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) equipped with a mass spectrometer Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010-Ultra Mass Detector (electron ionization, 70 eV, Kyoto, Japan). The carrier gas was helium. The capillary column was a Teknokroma TRB (95%) dimethyl (5%) dimethylpolysiloxane (30 m × 0.25 mm ID and 0.25 µm phase thickness). Working conditions were as follows: injector temperature, 300 °C; column temperature 70–290 °C, for 6 min, staying at 290 °C for 15 min, temperature of the transfer line connected to the mass spectrometer, 250 °C, and ionization source temperature 250 °C. The identification of compounds was performed with standard terpenes analyzed under the same conditions and by comparison of the mass spectra with those available in the library Wiley Mass Spectral Database (Wiley 275 Mass Spectra Database, 2001), while relative area% has been used for quantification of all the peaks obtained in the chromatograms. The mass spectra and Kovats retention indexes obtained were compared with the literature reported [53,54].

4.3. Spore Germination Inhibition Assay

The fungal species Aspergillus niger, Alternaria alternata, and Botrytis cinerea came from the fungal collection of Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias-CSIC, Madrid, Spain where they are maintained. The antifungal activity of the essential oils was determined using a modified spore germination inhibition growth assay [55]. The essential oils (800, 400, 200, 100, and 50 µg/mL), and pure compounds (100, 500, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.125, and 1.56 µg/mL) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 1% and evaluated at the final concentrations indicated. The spore suspensions were 7.5 × 105 cells/mL in NaCl 0.9% for A. niger and 1 × 107 cells/mL in distilled water for B. cinerea and A. alternate. Amphotericin B (5 µg/mL) was used as a positive control.
The samples and spore suspensions (4 replicates) were placed on 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h (28 °C for A. niger and 25 °C for B. cinerea). After the incubation process, 25 uL of an MTT (5 mg/mL) plus menadione (1 mM) solution in RMPIMOPS were added, the plates were incubated again for 3 h, the medium was removed, 200 µL of acidic isopropanol (95% isopropanol and 5% 1 M HCl) was added, and the plates were incubated for another 30 min. The absorbance was read at 490 nm in an Elisa reader. The IC50 values (the effective dose to give 50% inhibition) were calculated by a regression curve of % spore germination inhibition on log dose.
The pure compounds β-pinene, limonene, α-humulene, β-caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide, and apiol were from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.4. Phytotoxic Activity

These experiments were conducted with Lactuca sativa, and Lolium perenne seeds (40 seeds/test) in 12-well microplates, as described previously [56]. The essential oils were tested at initial concentrations of 0.2 mg/mL (final concentration in the well), respectively. Juglone (Sigma) was included as positive control (0.1 mg/mL), resulting in 100% germination inhibition. Germination was monitored for six (L. sativa) or seven days (L. perenne), and the root length (25 plants randomly selected and digitalized) was measured (ImageJ, http//rsb.info. nih.gov./ij/; accessed on 20 February 2021) at the end of the experiment. A nonparametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on root/leaf length data [10,21].

4.5. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using STATGRAPHICS Centurion XIX (https://www.statgraphics.com, accessed on 2 July 2022).
The variability of the chemical composition of each oil was assessed based on relative concentration data (% composition values for each species) subjected to cluster analysis (Farthest Neighbor Method, Squared Euclidean). The groups were chosen with a distance >2.

5. Conclusions

This work demonstrates the species-dependent potential of essential oils from Peruvian Piper species as fungicidal and herbicidal agents based on their composition. A dendrogram based on the composition of the Piper species showed four groups: (G1) P. coruscans (Pc) and P. tuberculatum (Pt), characterized by the presence of sesquiteterpene hydrocarbons; (G2) P. casapiense (Pcs), P. obliquum (Po), P. dumosum (Pd), P. anonifolium (Pa) and P. reticulatum (Pr), characterized by sesquiterpenes; (G3) P. soledadense (Ps), with monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes; and (G4) P. sancti-felicis (Psf) and P. mituense (Pm), characterized by phenylpropanoids. The essential oils in G2-4 showed important activity against Botrytis cinereal and were phytotoxic against Lolium perenne.
Considering the composition-based grouping of the EOs, we can conclude that the presence of bicyclogermacrene, 10-epi-Elemol, germacrene-D, caryophyllene, limonene, β-pinene, and/or apiol could be responsible for significant antifungal and herbicidal effects. β-pinene, apiol, and limonene showed antifungal activity, but not caryophyllene, suggesting that this compound could be a synergist.
These findings have important implications for the development of a Piper germplasm bank and the domestication of selected species to grant a sustainable biomass source for the production of essential oils with biopesticidal activity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.R.-V. and A.G.-C.; funding acquisition, L.R.-V. and A.G.-C.; investigation, A.G.-C., L.R.-V., L.R.M., C.E.D. and M.F.A.; methodology, L.R.-V., W.R.M., H.D.C.C., A.G.-C. and L.R.M.; writing—original draft, L.R.-V., A.G.-C. and M.F.A.; writing—review and editing, A.G.-C. and L.R.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been financed by grants FONDECYT-CONCYTEC basic investigation (N° 433-2019-FONDECYT), Peru and PID2019-106222RB-C31/SRA (State Research Agency, Spain 10.13039/501100011033).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge R. Muñoz for his technical support in GC-MS analysis and the seed company Semillas Fitó (https://www.semillasfito.com, accessed on 2 July 2022) for kindly supplying Lactuca sativa seeds.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAO—News Article: New Standards to Curb the Global Spread of Plant Pests and Diseases. 2020. Available online: http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/1187738/icode/ (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  2. Bonner, M.R.; Alavanja, M.C.R. Pesticides, human health, and food security. Food Energy Secur. 2017, 6, 89–93. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arraiza, M.P.; González-Coloma, A.; Andres, M.F.; Berrocal-Lobo, M.; Domínguez-Núñez, J.A.; Da Costa Jr., A.C.; Navarro-Rocha, J.; Calderón-Guerrero, C. Antifungal Effect of Essential Oils. Potential of Essential Oils. 2018. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/potential-of-essential-oils/antifungal-effect-of-essential-oils (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  4. Choopayak, C.; Woranoot, K.; Naree, P.; Kongbangkerd, A.; Wongkrajang, K.; Buaruaeng, R. Phytotoxic effects of Piper betle L. extracts on germination of Eclipta prostrata L. and Chloris barbata Sw. weeds. Int. J. Sci. 2015, 12, 11–24. [Google Scholar]
  5. Valadares, A.C.F.; Alves, C.C.F.; Alves, J.M.; De Deus, I.P.B.; De Oliveira Filho, J.G.; Dos Santos, T.C.L.; Dias, H.J.; Crotti, A.E.M.; Miranda, M.L.D. Essential oils from Piper aduncum inflorescences and leaves: Chemical composition and antifungal activity against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciências 2018, 90, 2691–2699. [Google Scholar]
  6. Marques, A.M.; Kaplan, M.A.C. Active metabolites of the genus Piper against Aedes aegypti: Natural alternative sources for dengue vector control. Univ. Sci. 2015, 20, 61–82. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ríos, J.L. Chapter 1—Essential Oils: What They Are and How the Terms Are Used and Defined. In Essential Oils in Food Preservation, Flavor and Safety; Preedy, V.R., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2016; pp. 3–10. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124166417000018 (accessed on 25 July 2021).
  8. Soković, M.D.; Glamočlija, J.M.; Ćirić, A.D. Natural Products from Plants and Fungi as Fungicides. Fungicides—Showcases of Integrated Plant Disease Management from Around the World; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013; Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/44743 (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  9. Abd El-Gawad, A.M. Chemical constituents, antioxidant and potential allelopathic effect of the essential oil from the aerial parts of Cullen plicata. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 80, 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  10. Andrés, M.F.; Rossa, G.E.; Cassel, E.; Vargas, R.M.F.; Santana, O.; Díaz, C.E.; González-Coloma, A. Biocidal effects of Piper hispidinervum (Piperaceae) essential oil and synergism among its main components. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 109, 1086–1092. [Google Scholar]
  11. Oyemitan, I.A. African Medicinal Spices of Genus Piper. In Medicinal Spices and Vegetables from Africa; Kuete, V., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 581–597. Available online: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128092866000273 (accessed on 20 January 2022).
  12. Jaramillo, M.A.; Manos, P.S. Phylogeny and patterns of floral diversity in the genus Piper (Piperaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2001, 88, 706–716. [Google Scholar]
  13. Da Silva, J.K.; da Trindade, R.; Alves, N.S.; Figueiredo, P.L.; Maia, J.G.S.; Setzer, W.N. Essential Oils from Neotropical Piper Species and Their Biological Activities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2571. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751174/ (accessed on 20 January 2021).
  14. Takeara, R.; Gonçalves, R.; Santos Ayres, V.F.; dos Guimarães, A.C. Biological Properties of Essential Oils from the Piper Species of Brazil: A Review. Aromatic and Medicinal Plants—Back to Nature. 2017. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/aromatic-and-medicinal-plants-back-to-nature/biological-properties-of-essential-oils-from-the-piper-species-of-brazil-a-review (accessed on 20 January 2022).
  15. León, B. Piperaceae endémicas del Perú. Rev. Peru. Biol. 2013, 13, 492s–563s. [Google Scholar]
  16. Abdullah, N.A.; Zain, W.Z.W.M.; Hamid, H.A.; Ramli, N.W. Essential oil from Piperaceae as a potential for biopesticide agents: A review. Food Res. 2020, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nascimento, J.C.; do Paula, V.F.; David, J.M.; David, J.P. Occurrence, biological activities and 13C NMR data of amides from Piper (Piperaceae). Quím. Nova 2012, 35, 2288–2311. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vega Gomez, M.C.; Rolón, M.; Coronel, C.; Pereira Carneiro, J.N.; Lucas dos Santos, A.T.; Almeida-Bezerra, J.W.; de Menezes, S.A.; da Silva, L.E.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Amaral, W.D.; et al. Antiparasitic effect of essential oils obtained from two species of Piper L. native to the Atlantic forest. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 32, 101958. [Google Scholar]
  19. Almeida, C.A.; Azevedo, M.M.B.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Roseo de Oliveira, M.; Rodrigues, I.A.; Bizzo, H.R.; Gama, P.E.; Alviano, D.S.; Alviano, C.S. Piper Essen-tial Oils Inhibit Rhizopus oryzae Growth, Biofilm Formation, and Rhizopuspepsin Activity. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 2018, 5295619. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30073039/ (accessed on 15 December 2021).
  20. Zacaroni, L.M.; Cardoso, M.G.; Souza, P.E.; Pimentel, F.A.; Guimarães, L.G.d.L.; Salgado, A.P.S.P. Potencial fungitóxico do óleo essencial de Piper hispidinervum (pimenta longa) sobre os fungos fitopatogênicos Bipolaris sorokiniana, Fusarium oxysporum e Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Acta Amaz. 2009, 39, 193–197. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jaramillo-Colorado, B.E.; Pino-Benitez, N.; González-Coloma, A. Volatile composition and biocidal (antifeedant and phytotoxic) activity of the essential oils of four Piperaceae species from Choco-Colombia. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 138, 111463. [Google Scholar]
  22. Parmar, V.S.; Jain, S.C.; Bisht, K.S.; Jain, R.; Taneja, P.; Jha, A.; Tyagi, O.D.; Prasad, A.K.; Wengel, J.; Olsen, C.; et al. Phytochemistry of the genus Piper. Phytochem. 1997, 46, 597–673. [Google Scholar]
  23. Silva, J.; Silva, N.; Santana, J.; Andrade, E.; Maia, J.G.; Setzer, W. Phenylpropanoid-rich Essential Oils of Piper Species from the Amazon and their Antifungal and Anti-cholinesterase Activities. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 1907. [Google Scholar]
  24. Paz, R.F.; Guimarães, E.F.; Ramos, C.S. The occurrence of phenylpropanoids in the saps of six Piper species (Piperaceae) from Brazil. Gayana Botánica 2017, 74, 236–239. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jaramillo Colorado, B.; Julio-Torres, J.; Duarte Restrepo, E.; Gonzalez Coloma, A.; Julio-Torres, L.F. Estudio comparativo de la composición volátil y las actividades biológicas del aceite esencial de Piper marginatum Jacq Colombiano. Boletín Latinoam. Caribe Plantas Med. Aromáticas 2015, 14, 343–354. [Google Scholar]
  26. Andriana, Y.; Xuan, T.D.; Quy, T.N.; Tran, H.D.; Le, Q.T. Biological Activities and Chemical Constituents of Essential Oils from Piper cubeba Bojer and Piper nigrum L. Molecules 2019, 24, 1876. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lima, R.K.; Cardoso, M.G.; Moraes, J.C.; Melo, B.A.; Rodrigues, V.G.; Guimarães, P.L. Insecticidal Activity of Long-pepper essential oil (Piper hispidinervum C. DC.) on fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Acta Amaz. 2009, 39, 377–382. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ahmad, N.; Fazal, H.; Abbasi, B.H.; Farooq, S.; Ali, M.; Khan, M.A. Biological role of Piper nigrum L. (Black pepper): A review. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2 (Suppl. S3), S1945–S1953. [Google Scholar]
  29. Maia, J.G.S.; Andrade, E.H.A. Database of the Amazon aromatic plants and their essential oils. Quím. Nova 2009, 32, 595–622. [Google Scholar]
  30. De Almeida, R.R.P.; Souto, R.N.P.; Bastos, C.N.; da Silva, M.H.L.; Maia, J.G.S. Chemical variation in Piper aduncum and biological properties of its dillapiole-rich essential oil. Chem. Biodivers 2009, 6, 1427–1434. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gilardoni, G.; Matute, Y.; Ramírez, J. Chemical and Enantioselective Analysis of the Leaf Essential Oil from Piper coruscans Kunth (Piperaceae), a Costal and Amazonian Native Species of Ecuador. Plants 2020, 9, 791. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ordaz González, G.; D’Armas, H.; Yáñez, D.; Moreno Morales, S. Chemical composition of essential oils from leaves of Helicteres guazumifolia (Sterculiaceae), Piper tuberculatum (Piperaceae), Scoparia dulcis (Arecaceae) and Solanum subinerme (Solanaceae) from Sucre, Venezuela. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2011, 59, 585–595. [Google Scholar]
  33. Krinski, D.; Foerster, L.A. Toxicity of essential oils from leaves of Piperaceae species in rice stalk stink bug eggs, Tibraca limbativentris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Ciênc Agrotecnol. 2016, 40, 676–687. [Google Scholar]
  34. Guerrini, A.; Sacchetti, G.; Rossi, D.; Paganetto, G.; Muzzoli, M.; Andreotti, E.; Tognolini, M.; Maldonado, M.E.; Bruni, R. Bioactivities of Piper aduncum L. and Piper obliquum Ruiz & Pavon (Piperaceae) essential oils from Eastern Ecuador. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009, 27, 39–48. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mundina, M.; Vila, R.; Tomi, F.; Gupta, M.P.; Adzet, T.; Casanova, J.; Cañigueral, S. Leaf essential oils of three Panamanian Piper species. Phytochemistry 1998, 47, 1277–1282. [Google Scholar]
  36. Facundo, V.A.; Ferreira, S.A.; de Morais, S.M. Essential Oils of Piper dumosum Rudge and Piper aleyreanum C.DC (Piperaceae) from Brazilian Amazonian Forest. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2007, 19, 165–166. [Google Scholar]
  37. Da Silva, J.K.R.; Pinto, L.C.; Burbano, R.M.R.; Montenegro, R.C.; Guimarães, E.F.; Andrade, E.H.A.; Maia, J.G.S. Essential oils of Amazon Piper species and their cytotoxic, antifungal, antioxidant and anti-cholinesterase activities. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 58, 55–60. [Google Scholar]
  38. Andrade, E.; Ribeiro, A.; Franklin Guimarães, E.; Maia, J. Essential Oil Composition of Piper anonofolium (Kunth) C. DC. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2005, 8, 289–294. [Google Scholar]
  39. Luz, A.I.R.; Zoghbi, M.d.G.B.; Maia, J.G.S. Os Óleos Essenciais de Piper reticulatum L. e P. crassinervium H. B. K. Acta Amaz. 2003, 33, 341–344. [Google Scholar]
  40. Qin, W.; Huang, S.; Li, C.; Chen, S.; Peng, Z. Biological activity of the essential oil from the leaves of Piper sarmentosum Roxb. (Piperaceae) and its chemical constituents on Brontispa longissima (Gestro) (Coleoptera: Hispidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2010, 96, 132–139. [Google Scholar]
  41. Navickiene, H.M.D.; Morandim, A.d.A.; Alécio, A.C.; Regasini, L.O.; Bergamo, D.C.B.; Telascrea, M.; Cavalheiro, A.J.; Lopes, M.N.; Bolzani, V.D.S.; Furlan, M.; et al. Composition and antifungal activity of essential oils from Piper aduncum, Piper arboreum and Piper tuberculatum. Quím. Nova 2006, 29, 467–470. [Google Scholar]
  42. Marei, G.I.K.H.; Abdel Rasoul, M.A.; Abdelgaleil, S.A.M. Comparative antifungal activities and biochemical effects of monoterpenes on plant pathogenic fungi. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2012, 103, 56–61. [Google Scholar]
  43. Meepagala, K.M.; Sturtz, G.; Wedge, D.E.; Schrader, K.K.; Duke, S.O. Phytotoxic and antifungal compounds from two Apiaceae species, Lomatium californicum and Ligusticum hultenii, rich sources of Z-ligustilide and apiol, respectively. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 1567–1578. [Google Scholar]
  44. Razzaghi-Abyaneh, M.; Yoshinari, T.; Shams-Ghahfarokhi, M.; Rezaee, M.B.; Nagasawa, H.; Sakuda, S. Dillapiol and Apiol as Specific Inhibitors of the Biosynthesis of Aflatoxin G1 in Aspergillus parasiticus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2007, 71, 2329–2332. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tabassum, A.; Akram, S.; Mushtaq, M. Chapter 11—Apiole. In A Centum of Valuable Plant Bioactives; Mushtaq, M., Anwar, F., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 233–259. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128229231000200 (accessed on 2 May 2022).
  46. Pineda, R.; Vizcaíno, S.; García, C.M.; Gil, J.H.; Durango, D.L. Antifungal activity of extracts, essential oil and constituents from Petroselinum crispum against Colletotrichum acutatum. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín 2018, 71, 8563–8572. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pineda, M.R.; Vizcaíno, P.S.; García, P.C.M.; Gil, G.J.H.; Durango, R.D.L. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of Piper auritum Kunth and Piper holtonii C. DC. against phytopathogenic fungi. Chilean J. Agric. Res. 2012, 72, 507–515. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lopez Rodilla, J.; Tinoco, M.; Morais, J.; Giménez Mariño, C.; Cabrera, R.; Martín-Benito, D.; Castillo, L.; Gonzalez-Coloma, A. Laurus novocanariensis essential oil: Seasonal variation and valorization. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2008, 36, 167–176. [Google Scholar]
  49. Jassal, K.; Kaushal, S.; Rashmi; Rani, R. Antifungal potential of guava (Psidium guajava) leaves essential oil, major compounds: Beta-caryophyllene and caryophyllene oxide. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2021, 54, 2034–2050. [Google Scholar]
  50. Graña, E.; Díaz-Tielas, C.; Sánchez-Moreiras, A.; Reigosa Roger, M. Mode of Action of Monoterpenes in Plant-Plant Interactions. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2012, 8, 80–89. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang, R.; Peng, S.; Zeng, R.; Ding, L.W.; Xu, Z.F. Cloning, expression and wounding induction of β-caryophyllene synthase gene from Mikania micrantha HBK and allelopathic potential of β-caryophyllene. Allelopath. J. 2009, 24, 35–44. [Google Scholar]
  52. Araniti, F.; Sánchez-Moreiras, A.M.; Graña, E.; Reigosa, M.J.; Abenavoli, M.R. Terpenoid trans-caryophyllene inhibits weed germination and induces plant water status alteration and oxidative damage in adult Arabidopsis. Plant Biol Stuttg. 2017, 19, 79–89. [Google Scholar]
  53. Davies, N.W. Gas chromatographic retention indices of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes on methyl silicon and Carbowax 20M phases. J. Chromatogr. A 1990, 503, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  54. Adams, R. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Quadrupole Mass Spectroscopy. Carol Stream. 2005, 16, 65–120. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sainz, P.; Andrés, M.F.; Martínez-Díaz, R.A.; Bailén, M.; Navarro-Rocha, J.; Díaz, C.E.; González-Coloma, A. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of Artemisia pedemontana subsp. assoana Essential Oils and Hydrolate. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 558. [Google Scholar]
  56. Santana, O.; Fe Andrés, M.; Sanz, J.; Errahmani, N.; Abdeslam, L.; González-Coloma, A. Valorization of essential oils from Moroccan aromatic plants. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 1109–1114. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Main components of Piper essential oils.
Figure 1. Main components of Piper essential oils.
Plants 11 01793 g001
Figure 2. Dendrogram (Farthest Neighbor Method, Squared Euclidean) generated from cluster analysis of GC–MS data of ten Piper species from Peru. P. coruscans (Pc), P. tuberculatum (Pt), P. casapiense (Pcs), P. obliquum (Po), P. dumosum (Pd), P. anonifolium (Pa), P. reticulatum (Pr), P. soledadense (Ps), P. sancti-felicis (Psf), and P. mituense (Pm).
Figure 2. Dendrogram (Farthest Neighbor Method, Squared Euclidean) generated from cluster analysis of GC–MS data of ten Piper species from Peru. P. coruscans (Pc), P. tuberculatum (Pt), P. casapiense (Pcs), P. obliquum (Po), P. dumosum (Pd), P. anonifolium (Pa), P. reticulatum (Pr), P. soledadense (Ps), P. sancti-felicis (Psf), and P. mituense (Pm).
Plants 11 01793 g002
Figure 3. Phytotoxic effects (% inhibition) of the Piper EOs on Lolium perenne, seed germination, and root and leaf growth. Bars represent the average relative values ± standard error (n = 25 plants measured). * Significantly different from the control (p < 0.05), Fisher’s least significant differences test (LSD).
Figure 3. Phytotoxic effects (% inhibition) of the Piper EOs on Lolium perenne, seed germination, and root and leaf growth. Bars represent the average relative values ± standard error (n = 25 plants measured). * Significantly different from the control (p < 0.05), Fisher’s least significant differences test (LSD).
Plants 11 01793 g003
Table 1. Chemical composition of the essential oils from Piper coruscans (Pc), P. tuberculatum (Pt), P. casapiense (Pcs), P. obliquum (Po), P. dumosum (Pd), P. anonifolium (Pa), P. reticulatum (Pr), P. soledadense (Ps), P. sancti-felicis (Psf), and P. mituense (Pm).
Table 1. Chemical composition of the essential oils from Piper coruscans (Pc), P. tuberculatum (Pt), P. casapiense (Pcs), P. obliquum (Po), P. dumosum (Pd), P. anonifolium (Pa), P. reticulatum (Pr), P. soledadense (Ps), P. sancti-felicis (Psf), and P. mituense (Pm).
CompoundsR TRIC% Area
PcPtPcsPoPdPaPrPsPsfPm
α-Pinene3.829370.5 6.02.00.7 1.90.40.3
Camphene4.03950 4.40.4
β-Pinene4.429821.2 5.16.31.3 3.00.50.4
Limonene5.2210290.2 1.23.50.20.238.50.40.7
γ-Terpinene5.741060 1.9 0.70.5
cis-Limonene oxide7.211133 2.1
D-Carvone9.601244 2.5
(-)-cis-β-Elemene11.721339 0.62.61.0 1.0
α-Cubebene12.0313520.3 1.10.35.94.01.22.3 1.9
Copaene12.6113781.44.20.71.22.24.44.65.80.61.9
β-bourbonene12.8213880.6 0.4 0.7
(-)-β-Copaene12.901391 5.8 3.1
β-Elemene12.9313931.13.3 0.64.50.62.5 2.1
α-Gurjunene13.371413 1.30.3
Caryophyllene13.6114248.09.74.76.36.811.34.5 4.12.9
(-)-β-Copaene isomer13.7914321.00.5 0.70.80.51.91.5 0.2
(+)-Aromadendrene14.021443 1.11.20.3
α-Humulene14.3514581.22.12.52.11.36.61.6 1.80.5
Neoalloocimene14.511466 0.50.85.5 0.3
α-Amorphene14.7714781.80.8 0.61.1 0.2
Eudesma-3,7-(11)-diene14.781479 0.71.4 4.05.8
Germacrene-D14.9114844.05.01.03.510.49.612.6 1.66.7
(+)-β-Selinene15.0514914.90.6 0.40.52.6
trans-α-Bergamotene15.071492 4.3 1.4
107/93/121/189/133/79/81/91/109/14715.2214983.51.3
Bicyclogermacrene15.241500 2.27.916.5 8.1 9.0
161/105/81/204/119/162/134/91/159/13115.321503 9.2
β-Bisabolene15.44150933.440.2
γ-Cadinene15.5915161.3 0.61.50.3 2.51.8
Myristicin15.671520 3.7 1.0 4.6
δ-Cadinene15.7615253.59.82.14.13.36.66.0 1.4
cis-Calamenene15.761525 1.8
1,4-Cadinadiene16.011537 2.1 0.8 1.0
10-epi-Elemol16.3115510.3 7.3
Nerolidol16.52156110.24.5 0.6 1.4 0.6
119/205/91/105/93/159/43/107/147/7916.931581 0.5 6.3 0.94.9 0.7
Caryophyllene oxide17.0615872.02.610.20.40.64.41.28.41.9
Guaiol17.3216001.6 2.93.10.9 0.9
Humulene epoxide17.591614 3.80.3 0.9 2.30.8
Apiol17.831626 15.0 76.151.6
α-Eudesmol18.011635 4.5
Muurola-4,9-diene18.041637 2.5
τ-Cadinol18.201645 2.1
τ-Muurolol18.2016450.81.3 3.10.6 1.6 0.8
Muurolol18.2816490.4 1.31.0
105/93/91/161/119/79/133/159/81/7718.301650 1.1
Muurola-4,9-diene18.321651 3.3
β-Selinenol18.4116550.5 4.9
95/121/161/204/43/109/105/81/164/10818.461658 1.67.70.6
Neointermedeol18.481659 2.9 0.5
α-Cadinol18.531661 1.9 1.60.3
Bulnesol18.7216711.7 2.3
Apiol isomer18.911681 8.9 0.7 5.3
α-Bisabolol18.9816844.8
93/91/79/133/105/119/107/189/81/6719.491711 17.0
93/133/91/105/79/107/119/77/106/12121.131798 22.6
93/133/91/105/79/107/119/77/106/12121.551821 5.4
RT, retention time (minutes). RIC, retention index on Teknokroma TRB (95%) dimethyl (5%) dimethylpolysiloxane (30 m × 0.25 mm ID and 0.25 µm phase thickness) column.
Table 2. Overall composition (percent by chemical class) of the essential oils from Piper coruscans (Pc), P. tuberculatum (Pt), P. casapiense (Pcs), P. obliquum (Po), P. dumosum (Pd), P. anonifolium (Pa), P. reticulatum (Pr), P. soledadense (Ps), P. sancti-felicis (Psf), and P. mituense (Pm).
Table 2. Overall composition (percent by chemical class) of the essential oils from Piper coruscans (Pc), P. tuberculatum (Pt), P. casapiense (Pcs), P. obliquum (Po), P. dumosum (Pd), P. anonifolium (Pa), P. reticulatum (Pr), P. soledadense (Ps), P. sancti-felicis (Psf), and P. mituense (Pm).
Chemical ClassTotal (%)
PcPtPcsPoPdPaPrPsPsfPm
Monoterpene hydrocarbons1.90.00.016.714.12.20.245.52.01.9
Oxygenated monoterpenes0.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.50.00.0
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons62.576.216.733.558.459.955.322.19.528.8
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes12.16.816.925.92.17.25.514.93.01.3
Phenylpropanoids0.00.00.00.012.60.016.70.076.161.5
Others3.51.847.714.51.414.70.94.90.01.0
Total80.084.881.390.688.684.078.689.990.694.5
Table 3. Antifungal activity (% spore germination) against Aspergillus niger, Botrytis cinerea, and Alternaria alternate.
Table 3. Antifungal activity (% spore germination) against Aspergillus niger, Botrytis cinerea, and Alternaria alternate.
SpeciesDosePercent Spore Germination
(µg/mL)Aspergillus nigerBotrytis cinereaAlternaria alternate
P. coruscans80050 ± 551 ± 1059 ± 9
CI50 a>800>800>800
P. tuberculatum80077 ± 357 ± 987 ± 5
CI50 a>800>800>800
P. casapiense80058 ± 324 ± 366 ± 4
CI50 a>800143.29 (115.1–178.3)>800
P. obliquum80036 ± 315 ± 247 ± 5
CI50 a>800104.85 (84.9–129.4)>800
P. dumosum80045 ± 228 ± 352 ± 5
CI50 a>800331.8 (282.6–389.4)>800
P. anonifolium80062 ± 822 ± 359 ± 5
CI50 a>800110.16 (87.5–138.6)>800
P. reticulatum80035 ± 326 ± 134 ± 4
CI50 a>800143.8 (104.3–198.4)>800
P. soledadense80024 ± 215 ± 134 ± 5
CI50 a298.5 (234.5–379.9)129.9 (80.5–209.5)>800
P. sancti-felicis80025 ± 125 ± 324 ± 1
CI50 a410.3 (371.0–454.6)202.7 (163.6–251.2)317.2 (260.5–386.2)
P. mituense80039 ± 619 ± 132 ± 2
CI50 a>800191.4 (143.5–255.1)>800
ThymolCI50 a67.3 (63.0–71.7)19.54 (22.94–15.74)6.34 (17.68–2.04)
a Dose needed to inhibit 50% of spore germination and 95% confidence limits (CL).
Table 4. List of the plant species used and their origin (experimental field locations in Iquitos, Peru, and UTM coordinates), dry weight and essential oils yield.
Table 4. List of the plant species used and their origin (experimental field locations in Iquitos, Peru, and UTM coordinates), dry weight and essential oils yield.
Voucher NumberPlant SpeciesOrigin, (UTM Coordinates)Dry Weight (gr)Essential Oils Yield (%)
039849P. coruscansMazán District,589.130.47
710990; 9619525
036367P. sancti-felicisPunchana District,458.030.88
695305; 9587673
041044P. casapienseMazán District,422.690.13
711556; 9623266
027690P. obliquumMazán District,1239.670.13
711396; 9623398
042381P. anonifoliumMazán District,1246.350.10
711399; 9623398
020115P. tuberculatumMazán District,565.390.13
710947; 9619547
040311P. dumosumSan Juan Bautista District, 675962; 95592371102.490.078
042127P. reticulatumSan Juan Bautista District, 676047; 9559417766.391.26
033308P. soledadenseSan Juan Bautista District, 675915; 9559216442.230.54
041473P. mituenseSan Juan Bautista District, 676010; 9559392393.760.11
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruiz-Vásquez, L.; Ruiz Mesia, L.; Caballero Ceferino, H.D.; Ruiz Mesia, W.; Andrés, M.F.; Díaz, C.E.; Gonzalez-Coloma, A. Antifungal and Herbicidal Potential of Piper Essential Oils from the Peruvian Amazonia. Plants 2022, 11, 1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141793

AMA Style

Ruiz-Vásquez L, Ruiz Mesia L, Caballero Ceferino HD, Ruiz Mesia W, Andrés MF, Díaz CE, Gonzalez-Coloma A. Antifungal and Herbicidal Potential of Piper Essential Oils from the Peruvian Amazonia. Plants. 2022; 11(14):1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141793

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruiz-Vásquez, Liliana, Lastenia Ruiz Mesia, Henrry Denny Caballero Ceferino, Wilfredo Ruiz Mesia, Maria Fe Andrés, Carmen Elisa Díaz, and Azucena Gonzalez-Coloma. 2022. "Antifungal and Herbicidal Potential of Piper Essential Oils from the Peruvian Amazonia" Plants 11, no. 14: 1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141793

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop