Paper Titles

Flow Mechanism of a Novel Active Micro-Rotor Mixer
p.1177

The Research of the Relationship of Cement Slurry Performance Development and Net Early Microscopic Structure
p.1184

3-D Modeling & Numerical Simulation of Friction Stir Welding Process
p.1189

Process Parametric Optimization of Submerged Arc Welding by Using Utility Based Taguchi Concept
p.1194

Methodology for the Objectification of Decisions in the Product Development
p.1199

A Size-Bed Wheelchair Design Manufacture with Scaled Prototype and Kinematic-Virtual Reality Model Simulation
p.1207

Wind Tunnel Analysis on Performance of H-Rotor VAWTs with NACA 64xx Blades
p.1213

Numerical Simulation Applied to Study the Effects of Fractal Tree-Liked Network Channel Designs on PEMFC Performance
p.1219

Hyperspectral Blind Unmixing and Multiple Target Detection Using Linear Mixture Model
p.1224

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 488-489Methodology for the Objectification of Decisions...

Methodology for the Objectification of Decisions in the Product Development

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to develop the best possible product enterprises have to consider multiple solutions during the product engineering process. In early phases of the product development process enterprises generally reduce the number of possible solutions by focusing only on a few solutions to minimize development time and costs. However, in the early phases enterprises are not able to make an objective choice for the best possible product, because of missing information. To evaluate multiple solutions and nevertheless develop a cost effective product the enterprises have the aim to simplify and to objectify the decision process especially in the early phases of the product development process. Therefore the enterprises need a methodology to enable objective decisions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Key Engineering Materials II

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

1199-1203

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.488-489.1199

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2012

Authors:

Frank Nehuis, Kai Schmidtchen, Carsten Stechert, Sven Schulze, Thomas Vietor, Uwe Dombrowski

Keywords:

Design Methodology, Lean Development, Lean Management, Methodical Evaluation, Set-Based Engineering

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

[1] U. Dombrowski, S. Hennersdorf, M. Palluck: Ganzheitliche Produktionssysteme - Aus der Herkunft für die Zukunft lernen. in ZWF - Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb Vol. 4 (2006), pp.172-177

DOI: 10.3139/104.060408

[2] C. Stechert, H.-J. Franke: Managing Requirements as the Core of Multi-Disciplinary Product Development. in CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 1(3), Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam (2009), pp.153-158

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2008.09.008

[3] C. Stechert, H,-J. Franke: Requirements Models for Collaborative Product Development. in Proc. of 19th CIRP Design Conference, Cranfield/UK (2009), pp.24-31

[4] U. Dombrowski, S. Schulze,T. Zahn: State of the Art - Lean Development. in 21st CIRP Design Conference, Daejeon, Korea (2011)

[5] J. M. Morgan, J. K. Liker: The Toyota Product Development System - Integrating People, Process, and Technology, New York (2006)

DOI: 10.4324/9781482293746

[6] A. Al-Ashaab, S. Howell, K. Usowisz, P. H. Anta, A. Gorka: Set-Based Concurrent Engineering Model for Automotive Electronic/Software Systems Development.in CIRP Design Conference, Cranfield, United Kingdom (2009)

[7] G. Schuh, M.Lenders, S. Schöning: Mit Lean Innovation zu mehr Erfolg - Ergebnisse der Erhebung. in Werkzeugmaschinenlabor WZL der RWTH, Aachen (2007)

[8] G. Pahl, W. Beitz, J. Feldhusen, K.-H. Grote: Engineering Design – A Systematic Approach, Ed. 7.Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (2007)

[9] K. Ehrlenspiel: Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit, Ed. 3. Carl Hanser Verlag, München Wien (2007)

DOI: 10.3139/9783446436275.fm

[10] C. Stechert, T. Vietor: Testing Against Requirements – A Systematic Approach for Identifying Reasonable Test Cases. in Proc. International Conference on Research into Design, Bangalore/ Indien (2011)

[11] M. Kennedy: Product Development for the lean Enterprise: Why Toyota's System is four times more productive and how you can implement it. The Oklea Press, Richmond (2003)

[12] K. Ehrlenspiel, A. Kiewert, U. Lindemann: Cost-Efficient Design, Ed. 6. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (2007)

[13] D. K. Sobek II, A. C. Ward, J. K. Liker: Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering. Sloan Management Review (1999), pp.67-83

[14] G. Schuh, G,W Eversheim, M. Jung, M. Lenders, S. Schöning: Lean Innovation - ein Widerspruch in sich?. in: C. Marxt, F. Hacklin (Ed.): Business Excellence in technologieorientierten Unternehmen. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (2008), pp.13-20

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73881-7_2

[15] C. Herrmann: Ganzheitliches Life Cycle Management - Nachhaltigkeit und Lebenszyklusorientierung in Unternehmen. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (2010)

[16] N. P. Suh: The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford (1990)

[17] H.-J. Franke, M. Deimel, S. Löffler: TRIZ im Kontext klassischer Kontruktionsmethodik. in: C. Gundlach, H. Nähler (Ed.): Innovation mit TRIZ: Konzepte, Werkzeuge, Praxisanwendungen. Symposien Verlag (2006)

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-446-42629-0_4

[18] A. Ward, J. Liker, J. J. Christiano, D. K. Sobek II: The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster. Sloan Management Review (1995), pp.43-61.

DOI: 10.1016/0024-6301(95)94310-u