www.journalonsurgery.org

Case Report

Open Access, Volume 2

A Novel Application of Anterior Chamber Cells and Aqueous Humor Cytokines Analysis in Uveitis-Glaucoma-Hyphema (UGH) Syndrome: A Case Report

Xiujuan Du2,3; Xiuyan Zhang2,3; Fang Sha2,3; Dongmei Liu2,3; Yan Liu2,3; Haifeng Ji4; Jike Song1,3; Hongsheng Bi2,3*

1Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 16369#, Jingshi Road, Jinan 250014, P. R. China.
2Affiliated Eye Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 48#, Yingxiongshan Road, Jinan 250002, P. R. China.
3Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Prevention and Therapy of Ocular diseases; Shandong Academy of Eye disease Prevention and Therapy, No. 48#, Yingxiongshan Road, Jinan, 250002, P. R. China.
4Yulin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 131#, South Xinjian Road, Yulin 719000, P. R. China.

Abstract

Background: Uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema (UGH) syndrome could be identified by clinical history and detailed ophthalmologic examination. In order to better understand the pathological processes of UGH syndrome, we introduced findings of enhanced red blood cells (RBCs) and inflammatory factors expression in a case of an UGH syndrome.

Case presentation: A 51-year-old male was presented to the eye clinic due to right reduced visual acuity, eye redness and pain. There was a history of implantation of intraocular lens (IOL) 8 years ago in the right eye. Ophthalmic examination revealed the best corrected visual acuity of 60/100 (0.25/-1.25×7), intraocular pressure (IOP) of 39.7 mmHg, and under natural pupils, the IOL remained centered. After full mydriasis of the right eye, slit lamp examination showed that the superior temporal haptic of the IOL was located outside the anterior capsule, and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) showed the contact and continuous mechanical chaffing between IOL and iris. But, in this case report, there was no typical anterior chamber (AC) hemorrhages under the slit lamp, so we performed aqueous humor (AH) cytokines and AC cells analysis. AH smear showed RBCs, which confirmed that the AC cells seen under slit lamp were RBCs. Flow cytometry cell-based assay showed a significantly elevated concentrations of interleukins 6, 8 (IL-6, IL-8), adhesion molecules (vascular cell adhesion molecule, VCAM), and basic fibroblast growth factors. The existing IOL was readjusted. After the surgery, the patient had resolution of AC inflammation. Uncorrected visual acuity of the right eye was 20/20. The IOL was described as centered in-the-bag and UBM showed there was no contact between IOL and the posterior surface of the iris. The IOP was 16mmHg OD without IOP lowering medications.

Conclusions: AH cytokines and AC cells analysis can effectively assist in the differential diagnosis and treatment of UGH syndrome and provides laboratory basis.

Keywords: Bladder cancer; Machine learning; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Prediction model.

Abbreviations: UGH: Uveitis-Glaucoma-Hyphema; RBCs: Red Blood Cells; IOL: Intraocular Lens; IOP: Intraocular Pressure; UBM: Ultrasound Biomicroscopy; AC: Anterior Chamber; AH: Aqueous Humor; IL-6: Interleukins 6; IL-8: Interleukins 8; VCAM: Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule; BFGF: Basic Fibroblast Growth Factors.

Manuscript Information: Received: Sep 02, 2022; Accepted: Sep 22, 2022; Published: Sep 29, 2022

Correspondance: Hongsheng Bi, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Prevention and Therapy of Ocular diseases; Shandong Academy of Eye disease Prevention and Therapy, No. 48#, Yingxiongshan Road, Jinan, 250002, P. R. China. Email: hongshengbi1@163.com

Citation: Du X, Zhang X, Sha F, Liu D, Hongsheng B, et al. A Novel Application of Anterior Chamber Cells and Aqueous Humor Cytokines Analysis in Uveitis-Glaucoma-Hyphema (UGH) Syndrome: A Case Report. J Surgery. 2022; 2(2): 1055.

Copyright: © Hongsheng B 2022. Content published in the journal follows creative common attribution license.

Introduction

Uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema (UGH) syndrome is a triad characterized by recurrent episodes of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), anterior chamber (AC) hemorrhages, AC inflammation, and blurred vision. UGH syndrome or Ellingson’s syndrome was first described in 1978, and it is generally associated with contact between a malpositioned AC intraocular lens (IOL) and the iris or ciliary body, leading to mechanical tissue trauma [1,2]. UGH syndrome is a severe complication of cataract extraction and a cause for blurry vision weeks to months after surgery. Currently, with the upgrades in lens design, surgical techniques, and the IOL is implanted into the capsular bag, minimizing the possibility of the IOL contacting the uvea and reducing the incidence of UGH syndrome (from 2.2-3 to 0.4-1.2%) [3-5].

In the report, we present an application of aqueous humor (AH) cytokines and AC cells analysis in a case of an UGH. Ethical approval for this study was provided by the Ethics Committee of affiliated eye hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and written informed consent was obtained from the patient. The study and data collection conformed with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this study.

Case presentation

Participants

A 51-year-old male was presented to the affiliated ophthalmic hospital of Shandong university of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China in June 2021 due to right reduced visual acuity, eye redness and pain that had repeatedly appeared in the past 8 years, and the symptoms were aggravated for 2 days. The patient reported that he had undergone uneventful phacoemulsification with implantation of a posterior chamber in-the-bag ReSTOR multifocal lenses (model SN6AD1, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) in his right eye in 2013 at his local hospital, 8 years before presentation. The patient repeatedly presented with decrease of visual acuity, eye redness in the right eye after surgery. He was diagnosed as uveitis at other hospitals and the symptoms improved slightly after hormone treatment. Six years later (2019 year), a cataract surgery was performed on his left eye. A history of head injury caused by tricycle for 19 years was reported.

Ocular examinations

After careful review of his medical history, a series of detailed ophthalmic examinations were conducted. The visual acuity of 40/100 and the best corrected visual acuity was 60/100 (-0.25/1.25×7) in the right eye. The visual acuity of the left eye was 20/20. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 39.7 mmHg OD and 13 mmHg OS.

Slit lamp examination in the right eye showed a clear cornea, diffuse pigmented keratic precipitates, flare in AC (++) and under natural pupils, the IOL remained centered. The pupils were round of about 3.5 mm in diameter and pupillary margin organized membrane. He was found to have 2+ AC cells and his AC showed no evidence of hypopyon or hyphema on OD (Figure 1A, B). Slit lamp did not detect any abnormality in the left eye (Figure 1C). Gonioscopy further revealed all the AC angles were open and pigmentation in the trabecular meshwork of the two eyes, with OD

Figure 1: Slit lamp and gonioscopy. Corneal photography using tangentially applied slit lamp beam. (A): Cornea transparency, 2+ AC flare, 2+ AC cells, pupillary margin organized membrane (white arrow), unclear iris texture, and the IOL remained centered. (B): Diffuse pigmented keratic precipitates (KP, black arrow). (C): The IOL of the left eye remained centered, without any intraocular inflammation, and the iris texture is clear. (D-E): All the AC angles were open and pigmentation in the trabecular meshwork of the two eyes (black arrow), with OD and II OS. (June 09, 2021).

Figure 2: (A): Fundus photography. Funduscopic examination revealed clear fundus, ruddy retina and no hemorrhage in vitreous cavity, a cup disc ratio of 0.5 in the right eye, and the optic disc was normal in the left eye. (June 09, 2021). (B): B-scan ultrasound. B-scan ultrasound showed an inhomogeneous weak dough-like echoes in the vitreous cavity of the right eye. (June 09, 2021). (C): The central visual field of the right eye was defective, and the left eye was approximately normal. (June 08, 2021).

and II OS (Figure 1D, E). Funduscopic examination revealed a vertical cup disc ratio of 0.5 in the right eye. There was no abnormality in the left eye (Figure 2A). B-scan ultrasound showed an inhomogeneous weak dough like echoes throughout the vitreous cavity of the right eye (Figure 2B). Automated visual field examination showed the arcuate scotomas in the superior quadrant in right eye. Left eye was approximately normal (Figure 2C). Considering that the patient has undergone IOL implantation, a possible diagnosis of UGH syndrome was proposed. After dilation of the pupil, we double checked the eyes by slit lamp (Figure 3). The superior temporal haptic of the right IOL was located outside the anterior capsule bag, and the inferior nasal haptic of the IOL was located in-the-bag.

Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) showed the chafing between the IOL and the posterior surface of the iris at 10-o’clock position (Figure 4A). Chafing of the posterior iris by the IOL haptic almost confirmed the diagnosis of UGH syndrome. It was also necessary to confirm that the AC cells seen under slit lamp were red blood cells (RBCs).


Figure 3: (A): Slit lamp photograph showing the anterior capsule of the lens was not round (white arrow), and the diameter was much greater than the diameter of IOL optical zone. The anterior capsule was defective from 8:30 to 11:00 o’clock position. The superior temporal haptic of the IOL was located outside the capsular bag and the haptic was distorted. The inferior nasal haptic of the IOL was located in-the-bag. At the 12 o’clock position, the IOL was located above the residual capsule and cortex (yellow arrow). (B): The left IOL was centered in the bag. (June 09, 2021).


Figure 4: (A): UBM demonstrates the superior temporal IOL tilted forward and the IOL haptic in contact with the iris at 10-o’clock position. (B): There was no contact between the IOL of the left eye and the posterior surface of the iris. (June 09, 2021).

Surgery and AH Analysis

Considering that the patient was implanted with multifocal IOL and most of the lens capsule was complete. The optimal treatment modality is to rotate the existing IOL and adjust it into the capsule bag to remove the chafing between IOL and iris. AH samples (100 to 150 μl) were collected at the beginning of the surgery. Before making the incision, a paracentesis was carried out at the limbal region using a 1 ml graduated syringe. No bleeding and contact with peripheral tissue during puncture. AC cells were detected by AH smear (Giemsa stain). The specific operation is as Kalogeropoulos CD’s description [6]. The RBCs in the AH were identified (Figure 5). Cytokines were detected by flow cytometry cell-based assay. Our findings showed a significantly elevated concentrations of interleukins 6, 8 (IL-6, IL-8), adhesion molecules (vascular cell adhesion molecule, VCAM), and basic fibroblast growth factors (BFGF) (Table 1). The AC RBCs, AH cytokines, high IOP, and dynamic interactions between IOL and iris determine a diagnosis of UGH syndrome.

Figure 5: AH smear. A-B: The red blood cells in the AH were identified (×400) (June 10, 2021).

Table 1: The levels of different cytokines in the aqueous humor.
Cytokine Result Unit Reference range
BFGF 10.1↑ pg/ml <1.0
VCAM 1923.9↑ pg/ml 200-1000
IL-8 47.9↑ pg/ml 0-20.0

#BFGF: basic fibroblast growth factors; VCAM: vascular cell adhesion molecule; IL-6: interleukins 6; IL-8: interleukins 6.

Follow-up

The patient had resolution of AC inflammation after surgery (Figure 6A, B). UCVA was 20/20 OD. The IOL was described as centered in-the-bag and UBM showed there was no contact between IOL and the posterior surface of the iris (Figure 6C). The IOP was 16mmHg OD without IOP lowering medications.

Figure 6: Ophthalmic examinations of the patient after surgery. (A): Slit lamp showed regression of AC inflammation. (B): The IOL was described as centered in-the-bag. At the 12 o’clock position, the IOL was located below the capsule (yellow arrow). (C): UBM showed there was no contact between IOL and the posterior surface of the iris. (August 12, 2021).

Discussion and conclusions

UGH syndrome is usually an iatrogenic disease. It was initially described in 1978 as a complication of intraocular friction caused by first generation AC IOL [7]. It has also been found more recently in subjects submitted to cataract surgery and IOL implantation (either in the sulcus or in-the-bag) [8]. It is noteworthy that a UGH syndrome could occur even the IOL remained centered without dislocation in the state of small pupil. Generally, the clinical signs and symptoms of these patients were frequently mild in this situation. In this case report, under natural pupils, slit lamp shows that the IOL remained centered. After full mydriasis, the dislocation of the haptic of the IOL can be seen. The cause of UGH syndrome in-the-bag IOL is due to large capsulorhexis, the haptics were not in the capsular bag. The persistent mechanical chaffing between IOL and iris leads to the spread of iris pigment and the disruption of blood-aqueous barrier, resulting in the triad of intraocular inflammatory reaction, elevated IOP and AC hemorrhages. Cytokines trigger and boosts the inflammatory responses in which complement and fibrin enter the eye and are activated by the surface of the IOL [9]. In our case study, this was evidenced by the organized membrane of the pupil margin. Elevated IOP can be caused by direct mechanical injury, with clogging of the trabecular meshwork by pigment or scarring, or by the inflammatory reaction itself.

For ocular lesions with inflammatory compound, the analysis of cytokines in AH has become extremely attractive for research [10-13]. However, the expression of inflammatory cytokines in UGH syndrome has not been reported previously. In this case report, IL-6, IL-8, VCAM and BFGF concentrations were significantly elevated. BFGF is a member of a family of heparin-bind- ing growth factors. It is found in normal tissue associated with heparan sulfate on the cell surface or extracellular matrix. It has been shown that BFGF accelerates the rate of wound closure by increasing cell proliferation, promoting tissue angiogenesis, and inhibiting myofibroblast differentiation [14]. Gallego-Muñoz et al [15].showed that upon adding TGF-β1 and BFGF to the culture medium of human corneal fibroblasts, the cellular proliferation process is strengthened and the myofibroblast differentiation and cellular migration are remarkably reduced, with TGF-β1 treatment alone comparison. In addition, at sites of inflammation, BFGF is released and upregulated by the action of proteases and hepa- rinases [16]. The increased levels of BFGF are directly related to the formation of pupillary margin organized membrane, and the increased levels of BFGF also indicates the presence of inflammatory reaction. VCAM an endothelial receptor belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily is associated with the disruption of the blood-ocular barrier [17]. IL-6 is an interleukin that acts as a proinflammatory cytokine. It is secreted by macrophages, monocytes and T and B cells to stimulate an immune response during tissue damage. Previous investigations suggested that IL-6 mediates the inflammatory processes and immune responses in many eye diseases such as, Behcet’s disease [18], and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma [19]. IL-6 is involved in vascular hyperpermeability and endothelial barrier dysfunction [20,21]. This suggests a possible involvement of elevated IL-6 levels in the active intraocular inflammation and break down of the blood–aqueous barrier. IL8 is an important neutrophil chemotactic factor, which plays a key role in the defense mechanism through its effects on neutrophil activities [19,22]. Previous studies of inflammatory eye disease [23,24] have showed that increased levels of IL-6 and IL-8 were associated with intraocular inflammation. We found similar changes among these cytokines in the samples from current UGH patients in the present study. The increased levels of the IL-6, 8 and BFGF suggested active intraocular inflammation.

The treatment of UGH syndrome depends on the clinical signs, symptoms, and disease severity, and to a lesser extent on the type and position of IOL. In the mild-to-moderate cases, treatment with a combination of anti-inflammatory and anti-glaucoma medications might be sufficient. However, for recurrent patients, the fundamental treatment is to eliminate the persistent mechanical chaffing between IOL and iris and/or ciliary body. For advanced cases, surgical intervention may be the only option, usually with a complete IOL repositioning or exchange [25-27]. The technologies of IOL repositioning depends strongly on the severity of ad- hesion formation between the IOL and the capsular bag. In future cataract surgery, it is very important to implant IOL in the capsular bag, not ciliary sulcus, with circumferential overlapping of the appropriately-sized anterior capsule over the optic edges of IOL to reduce UGH morbidity [28]. In conclusion, medical history, a necessary UBM, along with a proper assessment of the IOL position were necessary for early diagnosis of UGH. AH cytokines and AC cells analysis, may offer more useful information for correct diagnosis of UGH and provide the corresponding laboratory basis [29-31].

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study complied with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval was not required for the reason that this was a single case report.

Consent for publication: The written consent obtained from the patient for any personal or clinical details along with any identifying images to publish in this report. The copy of the written consent form is available for review by the journal Editor.

Availability of data and materials All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Competing Interest: All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding: This study was supported by the Shandong Tradition- al Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Development Plan Project (2021Q096, 2019-0251), Shandong Medical and Health Development Plan Project (2019ws566) and National Key Research and Development Project (2019YFC1710200).

Authors’ contributions: Xiujuan Du and Xiuyan Zhang were the major contributors to the drafting of the manuscript. Fang Sha and Haifeng Ji collected the ophthalmological data. Dongmei Liu and Yan Liu interpreted the ophthalmological data. The correspondence authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments: Not Applicable.

References

  1. A YAK, A F Charles J Pavlin, B RC, A F David S Rootman. Uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome after handmade, anterior chamber lens implantation. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 1997; 23(9): 1414-7
  2. Ellingson, Thomas F. The uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome associated with the Mark VIII anterior chamber lens implant. American Intra-Ocular Implant Society Journal. 1978; 4(2): 50-3.
  3. Badakere SV, Senthil S, Turaga K, Garg P. Uveitis-glaucoma-hyphaema syndrome with in-thebag placement of intraocular lens. BMJ Case Reports. 2016; 2016: bcr2015213745.
  4. Foroozan R, Tabas JG, Moster ML. Recurrent microhyphema despite intracapsular fixation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2003; 29(8): 1632.
  5. Apple DJ, Mamalis N, Loftfield K, Googe JM, Olson RJ. Complications of intraocular lenses. A historical and histopathological review. Survey of Ophthalmology. 1984; 29(1): 1–54.
  6. Kalogeropoulos C, Malamou-Mitsi V, Asproudis I, Psilas K. The contribution of aqueous humor cytology in the differential diagnosis of anterior uvea inflammations. Ocular Immunology & Inflammation. 2004; 12(3): 215–25
  7. Zvi G, Erez T, Asaf A. Uveitis-Glaucoma-hyphema Syndrome. Nepalese journal of ophthalmology: A biannual peer-reviewed academic journal of the Nepal Ophthalmic Society: NEPJOPH. 2016; 8(1): 99.
  8. Hou A, Hasbrook M, Crandall D. A Case of Uveitis-Hyphema-Glaucoma Syndrome Due to EX-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device Implantation. Journal of Glaucoma. 2019; 28(10): e159–61.
  9. Chu AJ. Tissue factor mediates inflammation. Archives of Biochemistry & Biophysics. 2005; 440(2): 123–32.
  10. Chua J, Vania M, Cheung C, Ang M, Wong TT. Expression profile of inflammatory cytokines in aqueous from glaucomatous eyes. Molecular Vision. 2012; 18(45–47): 431.
  11. Borkenstein A, Faschinger C, Maier R, Weger M, Theisl A, et al. Measurement of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, Fas ligand, interleukin-1α, and interleukin-1β in the aqueous humor of patients with open angle glaucoma using multiplex bead analysis. Molecular Vision. 2013; 19: 2306–11.
  12. Hautala N, Glumoff V, Hautala T, Vainio O. IL-2 may possess neuroprotective properties in glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2012; 90(3): e246–7.
  13. Gramlich OW, Beck S, von Thun Und Hohenstein-Blaul N, Boehm N, Ziegler A, et al. Enhanced Insight into the Autoimmune Component of Glaucoma: IgG Autoantibody Accumulation and Pro-Inflammatory Conditions in Human Glaucomatous Retina. Plos One. 2013; 8(2): e57557.
  14. Song QH, Klepeis VE, Nugent MA, Trinkausrandall V. TGF-beta1 regulates TGF-beta1 and FGF-2 mRNA expression during fibroblast wound healing. Mol Pathol. 2002; 55(3): 164-76.
  15. Gallego-Muñoz P, Ibares-Frías L, Garrote JA, Valsero-Blanco M. C, CantalapiedraRodríguez R., et al. uman corneal fibroblast migration and extracellular matrix synthesis during stromal repair: Role played by platelet-derived growth factor-BB, basic fibroblast growth factor, and transforming growth factor-1. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2018; 12(2): e737-e746.
  16. Bikfalvi A, Klein S, Pintucci G, Rifkin DB. Biological roles of fibroblast growth factor-2. Endocrine Reviews. 1997; 18(1): 26.
  17. Mestre L, Iñigo PM, Mecha M, Correa FG, Guaza C. Anandamide inhibits Theiler’s virus induced VCAM-1 in brain endothelial cells and reduces leukocyte transmigration in a model of blood brain barrier by activation of CB1 receptors. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2011; 8(1): 102.
  18. Shunsei, Hirohata, Hirotoshi, Kikuchi. Changes in Biomarkers Focused on Differences in Disease Course or Treatment in Patients with Neuro-Behcet’s Disease. Internal Medicine. 2012; 51(24): 3359-65.
  19. Zenkel M, Lewczuk P, Jünemann A, Kruse FE, Naumann G, Schl?Tzer-Schrehardt U. Proinflammatory cytokines are involved in the initiation of the abnormal matrix process in pseudoexfoliation syndrome/glaucoma. American Journal of Pathology. 2010; 176(6): 2868–79.
  20. Campbell IL, Abraham CR, Masliah E, Kemper P, Inglis JD, Oldstone MB, Mucke L. Neurologic disease induced in transgenic mice by cerebral overexpression of interleukin 6. Proceedings of the National Academy of ences of the United States of America. 1993; 90(21): 10061-5.
  21. Maruo N, Morita I, Shirao M, Murota S. IL-6 increases endothelial permeability in vitro. Endocrinology. 1992; 131(2): 710–4.
  22. Ghasemi H, Ghazanfari T, Yaraee R, Faghihzadeh S, Hassan ZM. Roles of IL-8 in ocular inflammations: a review. Ocular Immunology & Inflammation. 2011; 19(6): 401–12.
  23. Curnow SJ, Falciani F, Durrani OM, Cheung C, Murray PI. Multiplex Bead Immunoassay Analysis of Aqueous Humor Reveals Distinct Cytokine Profiles In Uveitis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2005; 46(11): 4251–9.
  24. Li J, Ang M, Cheung C, Vania M, Chee SP. Aqueous Cytokine Changes Associated with Posner-Schlossman Syndrome with and without Human Cytomegalovirus. Plos One. 2012; 7(9): e44453.
  25. Singh H, Modabber M, Safran SG, Ahmed II. Laser iridotomy to treat uveitis-glaucomahyphema syndrome secondary to reverse pupillary block in sulcus-placed intraocular lenses: Case series. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2015; 41(10): 2215-23.
  26. Sousa DC, Leal I, Faria MY, Pinto LA. A Rare Manifestation of Uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema Syndrome. Journal of current glaucoma practice. 2016; 10(2): 76–8.
  27. Zhang L, Hood CT, Vrabec JP, Cullen AL, Parrish EA, Moroi SE. Mechanisms for in-the-bag uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2014; 40(3): 490–2.
  28. Wintle R, Austin M. Pigment dispersion with elevated intraocular pressure after AcrySof intraocular lens implantation in the ciliary sulcus. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2001; 27(4): 642–4.
  29. Piette S, Canlas O, Tran HV, Ishikawa H, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in uveitis-glaucoma- hyphema syndrome. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2002; 133(6): 839-41.
  30. Lima BR, Pichi F, Hayden BC, Lowder CY. Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in Chronic Pseudophakic Ocular Inflammation Associated With Misplaced Intraocular Lens Haptics. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014; 157(4): 813-817.e1.
  31. Wu N, Zhang H, Chen B, Ding W. A novel application of B-ultrasonography at various head positions in the diagnosis of untypical uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema (UGH) syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(2): e13891.