Abstract
Factors influencing data reproducibility of fission-track (FT)
thermochronology can be summarized into three main categories associated
with data acquisition steps. (1) Sample preparation involves mineral
separation, mounting, polishing and etching; (2) data revelation relates
to instrumentation (microscope, LAICPMS, etc.) and software settings;
and (3) execution depends on feature selection by the analyst. Previous
committee reports and studies (Hurford A.J. 1990; Ketcham et al. 2009;
Ketcham et al. 2015; Ketcham et al. 2018) have contributed significant
insights into the reproducibility of fission-track data by comparing
length and age measurements produced by several laboratories using their
own preparation and revelation procedures. A recent attempt to isolate
analyst-specific factors in length measurement using an image-based
approach (Tamer et al. 2019) found that when two analysts observe the
same feature and agree it is a valid track, measurement reproducibility
was very good, though impacted by etching. Dispersion of individual
length measurements was 0.7-1.0 µm (2 for weaker etching and 0.5-0.8
µm for stronger etching, but mean lengths were always within 0.1 µm of
each other. Where the analysts disagreed more significantly, however,
was in finding tracks and evaluating whether they were valid,
sufficiently clear, and sufficiently etched for measurement, which led
to differences of up to ~0.8 µm in mean track length.
This study builds on the image-based approach to encompass more aspects
of the measurement process and increase the number of analysts being
compared. We will look at confined track selection in greater detail,
and also study analyst decisions behind age determination, including the
selection of the region of interest for counting, and identification of
grain-surface features as tracks appropriate for counting. Reflected and
transmitted light image stacks for 41 grains and graticules are
available on a cloud platform for download from the following link:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1yUp4bqtEag5wc8CJNG0M20nKDidWCHnQ?usp=sharing.
Participants will carry out analyses of these images using their
preferred approach, e.g. suitable analytical software, manual
measurements or AI-based analysis. A temporary license for FastTracks
(v3.2) will be available for those who would like to participate but do
not have measurement software. To obtain the FastTracks (v3.2) with a
temporary license, please contact Ling Chung at
[email protected]. Analysts are asked to fill out a
questionnaire about their fission track experience, conduct track
density estimations, confined track length and Dpar measurements, and
especially provide comments on all grains being analyzed or skipped.
FastTracks users are asked to send the .xml files produced by the
software, while other participants are asked to submit the results using
a template. The results will be entirely anonymous unless the analyst
states otherwise. The deadline for…