Skip to main content
Log in

Fixed response thresholds and the regulation of division of labor in insect societies

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We introduce a simple mathematical model of regulation of division of labor in insect societies based on fixed-response thresholds. Individuals with different thresholds respond differently to task-associated stimuli. Low-threshold individuals become involved at a lower level of stimulus than high-threshold individuals. We show that this simple model can account for experimental observations of Wilson (1984), extend the model to more complicated situations, explore its properties, and study under what conditions it can account for temporal polyethism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bak, P. (1997). How Nature Works, New York: Copernicus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckers, R., J.-L. Deneubourg, S. Goss and J. M. Pasteels (1990). Collective decision making through food recruitment. Insectes Soc. 37, 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boch, R., D. A. Shearer and B. C. Stone (1962). Identification of iso-amyl acetate as an active component in the sting pheromone of the honey bee. Nature 195, 1018–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau, E., G. Theraulaz and J.-L. Deneubourg (1996). Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B263, 1565–1569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau, E., G. Theraulaz, J.-L. Deneubourg, S. Aron and S. Camazine (1997). Self-organization in social insects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 188–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breed, M. D., G. E. Robinson and R. E. Page (1990). Division of labour during honey bee colony defense. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27, 395–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabi, P. (1986). Division of labor in the ant Pheidole dentata: the role of colony demography and behavioral flexibility, PhD dissertation, Boston University, Boston, MA, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabi, P. (1988). Behavioral flexibility in Hymenoptera: a re-examination of the concept of caste, in Advances in Myrmecology, J. C. Trager (Ed.), Leiden: Brill Press, pp. 237–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderone, N. W. and R. E. Page (1988). Genotypic variability in age polyethism and task specialization in the honey bee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22, 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderone, N. W. and R. E. Page. 1991. The evolutionary genetics of division of labor in colonies of the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Amer. Nat. 138, 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderone, N. W. and R. E. Page (1996). Temporal polyethism and behavioral canalization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Anim. Behav. 51, 631–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, N. F. and B. Hölldobler (1983). Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants. Science 222, 1027–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrétien, L. (1996). Organisation spatiale du matériel provenant de l’excavation du nid chez Messor barbarus et des cadavres d’ouvriéres chez Lasius niger (Hymenopterae: Formicidae). PhD Thesis, Département de Biologie Animale, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. M. and W. C. Rothenbuler (1978). Laboratory test of the response to an alarm chemical, isopentyl acetate, by Apis mellifera. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 71, 906–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourg, J.-L., S. Aron, S. Goss and J. M. Pasteels (1989). The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the Argentine ant. J. Insect Behav. 2, 719–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourg, J.-L. and N. R. Franks (1995). Collective control without explicit coding: the case of communal nest excavation. J. Insect Behav. 8, 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourg, J.-L. and S. Goss (1989). Collective patterns and decision-making. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1, 295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourg, J.-L., S. Goss, J. M. Pasteels, D. Fresneau and J.-P. Lachaud (1987). Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies (II): learning in foraging and division of labour, in From Individual to Collective Behaviour in Social Insects, J. M. Pasteels and J.-L. Deneubourg (Eds), Experientia Supplementum 54, 177–196.

  • Detrain, C. and J. M. Pasteels (1991). Caste differences in behavioral thresholds as a basis for polyethism during food recruitment in the ant Pheidole pallidula (Nyl.) (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae). J. Insect Behav. 4, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detrain, C. and J. M. Pasteels (1992). Caste polyethism and collective defense in the ant Pheidole pallidula: the outcome of quantitative differences in recruitment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29, 405–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detrain, C., J. M. Pasteels and J.-L. Deneubourg (1988). Polyéthisme dans le tracé et le suivi de la piste chez Pheidole pallidula (Formicidae). Actes Coll. Ins. Soc. 4, 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R. and A. B. Sendova-Franks (1992). Brood sorting by ants: distributing the workload over the work surface. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R. and C. M. N. Tofts (1994). Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers. Anim. Behav. 48, 470–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R., C. M. N. Tofts and A. B. Sendova-Franks (1997). Studies of division of labour: neither physics nor stamp collecting. Anim. Behav. 53, 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumhoff, P. C. and J. Baker (1988). A genetic component to division of labour within honey bee colonies. Nature 333, 358–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. M. (1986). The dynamics of the daily round of the harvester ant colony. Anim. Behav. 34, 1402–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. M. (1987). Group-level dynamics in harvester ants: young colonies and the role of patrolling. Anim. Behav. 35, 833–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. M. (1989). Dynamics of task-switching in harvester ants. Anim. Behav. 38, 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. M. (1996). The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 380, 121–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. M., B. C. Goodwin and L. E. H. Trainor (1992). A parallel distributed model of the behaviour of ant colonies. J. Theor. Biol. 156, 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z. Y. and G. E. Robinson (1992). Honeybee colony integration: worker-worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 11726–11729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaisson, P., D. Fresneau and J.-P. Lachaud (1988). Individual traits of social behaviour in ants. In Interindividual Behavioral Variability in Social Insects, R. L. Jeanne (Ed.), pp. 1–51. Boulder, CO, Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne, R. L. (1986). The evolution of the organization of work in social insects. Monit. Zool. Ital. 20, 119–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne, R. L. (1991). Polyethism, in The Social Biology of Wasps, K. G. Ross and R. W. Matthews (Eds), Cornell, Ithaca, NY: Comstock, pp. 389–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne, R. L. (1996). Regulation of nest construction behaviour in Polybia occidentalis. Anim. Behav. 52, 473–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne, R. L., N. M. Williams and B. S. Yandell (1992). Age polyethism and defense in a tropical social wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Insect Behav. 5, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, L. (1995). Parasites, worker polymorphism, and queen number in social insects. Am. Nat. 145, 842–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, A. (1979). Le comportement alimentaire et la division du travail chez la fourmi Lasius niger. Bull. Biol. France and Belgique 113, 79–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, A. (1987). Factors determining polyethism in social insects, in From Individual to Collective Behaviour in Social Insects, J. M. Pasteels and J.-L. Deneubourg (Eds), Experientia Supplementum 54, 219–241.

  • Lindauer, M. (1952). Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat. Z. Vgl. Physiol. 34, 299–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangel, M. (1995). Social interactions, nonlinear dynamics and task allocation in groups. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, R. (1990). Communication and Concurrency, New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, G. and E. O. Wilson (1978). Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacala, S. W., D. M. Gordon and H. C. J. Godfray (1996). Effects of social group size on information transfer and task allocation. Evol. Ecol. 10, 127–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, R. E. and S. D. Mitchell (1990). Self-organization and adaptation in insect societies. A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (Eds), Phil. Sci. Assoc., 2, 289–298.

  • Page, R. E. and G. E. Robinson (1991). The genetics of division of labour in honey bee colonies. Adv. Ins. Physiol. 23, 117–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passera, L., E. Roncin, B. Kaufmann and L. Keller (1996). Increased soldier production in ant colonies exposed to intraspecific competition. Nature 379, 630–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plowright, R. C. and C. M. S. Plowright (1988). Elitism in social insects: a positive feedback model, in Interindividual Behavioral Variability in Social Insects, R. L. Jeanne (Ed), Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 419–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. E. (1987a). Modulation of alarm pheromone perception in the honey bee: evidence for division of labour based on hormonally regulated response thresholds. J. Comp. Physiol. A160, 613–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. E. (1987b). Regulation of honey bee age polyethism by juvenile hormone. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20, 329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. E. (1992). Regulation of division of labour in insect societies. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 37, 637–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. E. and R. E. Page (1988). Genetic determination of guarding and undertaking in honey-bee colonies. Nature 333, 356–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. E., R. E. Page and Z.-Y. Huang (1994). Temporal polyethism in social insects is a developmental process. Anim. Behav. 48, 467–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, S. K. and S. N. Beshers (1997). Division of labour and “foraging for work”: simulating reality versus the reality of simulations. Anim. Behav. 53, 214–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, B. (1997). Modalités de la recherche et de la récolte alimentaire chez la fourmi Ectatomma ruidum Roger: flexibilités individuelle et collective, PhD dissertation, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D. (1982). Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11, 287–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D. (1989). Social foraging in honey bees: hownectar foragers assess their colony’s nutritional status. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24, 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D. (1992). The tremble dance of the honey bee: message and meanings. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31, 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendova-Franks, A. B. and N. R. Franks (1993). Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (a study of temporal polyethism: experimental). Bull. Math. Biol. 55, 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendova-Franks, A. B. and N. R. Franks (1994). Social resilience in individual worker ants and its role in division of labour. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B256, 305–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendova-Franks, A. B. and N. R. Franks (1995a). Spatial relationships within the nests of the ant Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.) and their implications for the division of labour. Anim. Behav. 50, 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendova-Franks, A. B. and N. R. Franks (1995b). Division of labour in a crisis: task allocation during colony emigration in the ant Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36, 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, R. J. and R. E. Page (1991). Genetic component to division of labor among workers of a leptothoracine ants. Naturwiss. 78, 375–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theraulaz G., S. Goss, J. Gervet and J.-L. Deneubourg (1991). Task differentiation in Polistes wasp colonies: a model for self-organizing groups of robots, in From Animals to Animats, J.-A. Meyer and S. W. Wilson (Eds), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books, pp. 346–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tofts, C. (1993). Algorithms for task allocation in ants (A study of temporal polyethism: theory). Bull. Math. Biol. 55, 891–918.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tofts, C. and N. R. Franks (1992). Doing the right thing: ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 346–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traniello, J. F. A. and R. B. Rosengaus (1997). Ecology, evolution and division of labour in social insects. Anim. Behav. 53, 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Blom, J. (1993). Individual differentiation in behaviour of honey bee workers (Apis mellifera L.). Insectes Soc. 40, 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M.-J. (1981). Intragroup selection and the evolution of insect societies, in Natural Selection and Social Behaviour, R. D. Alexander and D. W. Tinkle (Eds), New York: Chiron Press, pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. E. and H. F. Nijhout (1981). Soldier determination in ants: new role for juvenile hormone. Science 213, 361–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1976). Behavioral discretization and the number of castes in an ant species. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1980). Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). I. The overall pattern in A. sexdens. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7, 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1983a). Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). III. Ergonomic resiliency in foraging by A. cephalotes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1983b). Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). IV. Colony ontogeny of A. cephalotes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14, 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). The relation between caste ratios and division of labour in the ant genus Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16, 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1985). Between-caste aversion as a basis for division of labour in the ant Pheidole pubiventris (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17, 35–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. and B. Hölldobler (1988). Dense heterarchies and mass communications as the basis of organization in ant colonies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 65–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withers, G. S., S. E. Fahrbach and G. E. Robinson (1993). Selective neuroanatomical plasticity and division of labour in the honeybee. Nature 364, 238–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G. & Deneubourg, JL. Fixed response thresholds and the regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Bull. Math. Biol. 60, 753–807 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1998.0041

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1998.0041

Keywords

Navigation