Minireview
Regulation of Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling

https://doi.org/10.1006/mcbr.2001.0301Get rights and content

Abstract

Members of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) family are potent regulators of multiple cellular functions, including cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, organization, and death. Yet the signaling pathways underpinning a wide array of biological activities of TGF-β appear to be deceptively simple. At every step from TGF-β secretion to activation of its target genes, the activity of TGF-β is regulated tightly, both positively and negatively. Biologically active TGF-β is cleaved from a precursor protein (latent form) and multiple process factors control the levels of active TGF-β. The efficient secretion, correct folding and deposition to the extracellular matrices require the cosecretion of latent TGF-β binding proteins (LTBPs). Once activated, TGF-β ligand signals through a heteromeric receptor complex of two distinct type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors TβRI and TβRII. Many factors appear to influence the formation of the active ligand–receptor complex. The relative orientation of TβRI and TβRII in the ligand–receptor complex is critical for activation: through TβRI, the activated ligand–receptor complex directly binds and phosphorylates downstream intracellular substrates, called Smads. Inhibitory Smads, Smad6 and 7, can antagonize this process. The phosphorylation of Smads leads to the formation of complexes which translocate to the nucleus. Other signaling systems can modulate the activity of the Smads: e.g., ras activity can prevent Smad complexes from entering the nucleus and specific ubiquitin ligases can target Smad for degradation. In the nucleus, the Smad complexes associate with other transcription activators or suppressors to regulate gene expression, either positively or negatively. The combined effects of the positive and/or negative TGF-β controlled gene expression together with the endogenous protein set of the target cell are responsible for the multiplicity of biological functions.

References (109)

  • K. Miyazono et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1988)
  • J. Saharinen et al.

    Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.

    (1999)
  • K. Miyazono et al.

    J Biol. Chem.

    (1992)
  • N.O. Fortunel et al.

    Blood

    (2000)
  • S.E. Crawford et al.

    Cell

    (1998)
  • J.S. Munger et al.

    Cell

    (1999)
  • C. Soo et al.

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (2000)
  • M.D. O'Connor-McCourt et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1987)
  • J.J. Lysiak et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • A.M. Weaver et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • C. Fabrizi et al.

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1999)
  • L. Umans et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • D.J. Webb et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1996)
  • L. Umans et al.

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (1999)
  • H.Y. Lin et al.

    Cell

    (1992)
  • P. Franzen et al.

    Cell

    (1993)
  • J.L. Wrana et al.

    Cell

    (1992)
  • M. Laiho et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1991)
  • R.H. Chen et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • R.H. Chen et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1994)
  • R.G. Wells et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • T. Okadome et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1994)
  • H.J. Zhu et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • H.J. Zhu et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • X.H. Feng et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1996)
  • M. Huse et al.

    Cell

    (1999)
  • B.R. Stockwell et al.

    Chem. Biol.

    (1998)
  • F. Lopez-Casillas et al.

    Cell

    (1991)
  • X.F. Wang et al.

    Cell

    (1991)
  • Z. Yan et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • H.Y. Lin et al.

    Trends Cell Biol.

    (1993)
  • S. Cheifetz et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1992)
  • A. Letamendia et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • A. Lux et al.

    J Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • N.P. Barbara et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • J.L. Wrana

    Cell

    (2000)
  • T. Tsukazaki et al.

    Cell

    (1998)
  • A.E. Wurmser et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • C. Dong et al.

    Mol. Cell

    (2000)
  • H. Hayashi et al.

    Cell

    (1997)
  • H.J. Zhu et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • M. Landstrom et al.

    Curr. Biol.

    (2000)
  • Y. Shi et al.

    Cell

    (1998)
  • E. Labbe et al.

    Mol. Cell

    (1998)
  • S. Zhou et al.

    Mol. Cell

    (1998)
  • A. Hata et al.

    Cell

    (2000)
  • C.Y. Yeo et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • Y. Sano et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • H. Hanafusa et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • J. Massague

    Annu. Rev. Biochem.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (97)

    • SPSB1, a novel negative regulator of the transforming growth factor-β signaling pathway targeting the type II receptor

      2015, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      TGF-β signaling is tightly regulated at multiple levels both in and outside the target cells (1): both Lap and Ltbp facilitate secretion of TGF-β while retaining it in its inactive form at the basal state (14, 15); secreted molecules, such as decorin, bind directly to TGF-β ligands and neutralize their biological activity (16, 17); the transmembrane protein BAMBI sequesters ligand from binding to TβRI (18); Dapper2 promotes TβRI degradation (19); Fkbp12 blocks TβRI phosphorylation (20); TmepaI sequesters R-Smads from TβRI kinase activation (21); the E3 ubiquitin ligase Smurf1 degrades R-Smads (22) and Smad7-associated TβRI (23); and Smad7 directly competes with Smad2/3 for binding to TβRI (24). The negative regulator Smad7 is itself negatively regulated by Arkadia through ubiquitination and degradation (1). In the nucleus, transcriptional suppressors negatively regulate the transcriptional activity of the Smad complexes (25).

    • Soft-focused extracorporeal shock waves increase the expression of tendon-specific markers and the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines in an adherent culture model of primary human tendon cells

      2014, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particular, it has been found that mechanical forces regulate the expression of SCX through activation of a TGFβ/Smad-mediated pathway, which acts to maintain the integrity of the ECM. Transforming growth factor β is known to be involved in other phases of tissue healing, such as cell proliferation, cell viability and stimulation of collagen production (Zhu and Burgess 2001). Growth factors are among the most important molecules involved in the healing process, but their specific actions are not well characterized.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +61-3-93413104. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text