Summary
In this paper, we have mentioned six ways in which a theory can contribute to research and we suggest that this list can be used as criteria for evaluating a theory. We have described how one such perspective, APOS Theory, is being used in an organized way by members of RUMEC and others to conduct research and develop curriculum. We have shown how observing students’ success in making or not making mental constructions proposed by the theory and using such observations to analyze data can organize our thinking about learning mathematical concepts, provide explanations of student difficulties and predict success or failure in understanding a mathematical concept. There is a wide range of mathematical concepts to which APOS Theory can and has been applied and this theory is used as a language for communication of ideas about learning. We have also seen how the theory is grounded in data, and has been used as a vehicle for building a community of researchers. Yet its use is not restricted to members of that community. Finally, we point to an annotated bibliography (McDonald, 2000), which presents further details about this theory and its use in research in undergraduate mathematics education.
Unaffiliated
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D. and Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education II, CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 6, 1–32.
Asiala, M., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., Morics, S. and Oktac, A. (1997). Student understanding of cosets, normality and quotient groups. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(3), 241–309.
Baker, B., Cooley, L. and Trigueros, M. (2000). A Calculus graphing schema. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 557–578.
Clark, J., Cordero, P., Cottrill, J., Czarnocha, B., DeVries, D. J., St. John, D., Tolias G. and Vidakovic, D. (1997). Constructing a schema: The case of the chain rule. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(4), 345–364.
Cottrill, J. (1999). Students’ understanding of the concept of chain rule in first year calculus and the relation to their understanding of composition of functions. Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, pp. 95–126. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McDonald, M.A.(2000).http://galois.oxy.edu/mickey/APOSbib.html.
McDonald, M. A., Mathews, D. and Strobel, K. (2000). Understanding sequences: A tale of two objects. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education IV, CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 8, 77–102.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1–94.
Piaget, J. and Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the History of Science, New York: Columbia University Press.
Tall, D. and Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151–169.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dubinsky, E., Mcdonald, M.A. (2001). APOS: A Constructivist Theory of Learning in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Research. In: Holton, D., Artigue, M., Kirchgräber, U., Hillel, J., Niss, M., Schoenfeld, A. (eds) The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level. New ICMI Study Series, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7191-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47231-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive