Keywords
- Science Education
- Science Teacher
- Content Knowledge
- Pedagogical Content Knowledge
- Teacher Education Program
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Birman, B.F., Desimone, L., Porter, A.C., & Garet, M.S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28–33.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
Crawford, B.A., & Cullin, M.J. (2002). Engaging prospective science teachers in building, Testing, and teaching about models. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. New Orleans.
De Jong, O., & van Driel, J.H. (2001). Developing preservice teachers’ content knowledge and PCK of models and modelling. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. St. Louis.
Duit, R., & Glynn, S. (1996). Mental modelling. In G. Welford, J. Osborne & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe: Current issues and themes (pp. 166–176). London: Falmer.
Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge — The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gilbert, J., & Boulter, C. (1995). Stretching models too far. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Gilbert, J., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations, Part 1: Horses for courses? International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 83–97.
Harrison, A.G. (2001). Models and PCK: Their relevance for practicing and pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. St. Louis.
Hashweh, M.Z. (1986). Toward an explanation of conceptual change. European Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 229–249.
Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: an exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 541–562.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2002a). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–387.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2002b). Science teachers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273–1292.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2002c). Philosophy of chemistry in university chemical education; The case of models and modelling. Foundations of Chemistry, 4(3), 213–240.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J.K. (2003a). Investigating teachers’ ideas about models and modelling: some issues of authenticity. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association. Noordwijkerhout. The Netherlands.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J.K. (2003b). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386.
Loughran, J.J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through papers. Research in Science Education, 31, 289–307.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Munby, H., Russel, T., & Martin, A.K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th ed.) (pp. 877–904). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harward Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Sprinthall, N.A., Reiman, A.J., & Thies-Sprinthall, L. (1996). Teacher professional development. In J. Sikula, T.J. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Macmillan.
Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers’ knowledge of models and modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1141–1153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Justi, R., van Driel, J.H. (2005). Developing Science Teachers’ Knowledge on Models and Modelling. In: Beijaard, D., Meijer, P.C., Morine-Dershimer, G., Tillema, H. (eds) Teacher Professional Development in Changing Conditions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3699-X_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3699-X_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3700-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3699-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)