Skip to main content

Salt Tolerance Of Some Potential Forage Grasses From Cholistan Desert Of Pakistan

  • Conference paper
Ecophysiology of High Salinity Tolerant Plants

Part of the book series: Tasks for Vegetation Science ((TAVS,volume 40))

Cholistan desert located in the southeast of the Punjab province, Pakistan, covering an area of 25,800 km2 is a part of Greater Thar desert. The soil types characteristically include: sand dunes, sandy soils with patches of non-saline non-sodic loamy soils and sodic clayey soils. Vegetation structure and density are greatly influenced by the rainfall. During low rainfall years even drinking water gets scarce and both the plant and animal communities are adversely affected. Biodiversity assessment survey was carried out during 1997–98. The dominant species of the lesser Cholistan among grasses were Aristida adscensionis, Ochthochloa compressa, Lasiurus scindicus, Cymbopogon jwarancusa, Cenchrus biflorus, Sporobolus ioclados and Aeluropus lagopoides, whereas that of Greater Cholistan Aeluropus lagopoides, Aristida adscensionis, Cenchrus biflorus, Cenchrus pennesetiformis, Cymbopogon jwarancusa, Lasiurus scindicus, Panicum antidotale and Panicum turgidum. Like other deserts, the major problem in the area is the scarcity of good quality water. The subsoil water in most places of Cholistan is brackish and unfit for normal plant growth. It is highly probable that by adopting biological approach the vast area of Cholistan can be economically exploited. Salinity tolerance of four potential forage grass species, Cenchrus pennesetiformis, Panicum turgidum, Pennisetum divisum and Leptochloa fusca, including one highly tolerant exotic grass species Puccinellia distans was assessed after 6 weeks growth at four salinity treatments, 2.4 (control), 8, 16 and 24 dS m−1. Shoot biomass production in Leptochloa fusca and Puccinellia distans was not affected by any of the salinity levels and these grasses had greater shoot fresh and dry matter than the other species at all salinity treatments. Pennisetum divisum was the worst affected, whereas Cenchrus pennesetiformis and Panicum turgidum were intermediate in biomass production. Every species showed a specific accumulation pattern for different ions (Na², Cl−, K² and Ca2²) in the shoots or roots. Levels of leaf monosaccharides (glucose ² fructose) were similar in Cenchrus pennesetiformis and Panicum turgidum under both control and salt treatments. Leptochloa fusca accumulated lesser amounts of monosaccharides, although its monosaccharides doubled in the salt treatment. Disaccharides (sucrose), in the leaves of Cenchrus pennesetiformis, decreased markedly due to the addition of salts in the rooting medium. Trisaccharides (raffinose) were very low in relation to monosaccharides and disaccharides. In another experiment six accessions of Panicum antidotale, eight of Cenchrus ciliaris and one of Lasiurus scindicus from Cholistan were examined for-salinity tolerance under five NaCl levels viz. 1.25 (control), 10, 15, 20 and 25 dS m−1. Although significant reduction in growth attributes of all accessions was recorded, accessions KS 1/2 and Local-2 of Cenchrus ciliaris, LS 3/6 of Lasiurus scindicus, and KS 1/1 of Panicum antidotale were superior to the other accessions in all growth parameters measured. In conclusion, these accessions could be directly used on the salt affected soils of Cholistan using subsoil brackish water irrigation. Grasses like Panicum turgidum, P. antidotale and Lasiurus scindicus though moderately salt tolerant, could be grown on sandy soils with irrigation with moderately saline subsoil water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

5. Literature Cited

  • Ashraf, M. & Bokhari, M.H. 1987. Biological approach for economic utilization of the Cholistan desert. Biologia 33: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, M., McNeilly, T. & Bradshaw, A.D. 1986. The potential for evaluation of salt (NaCl) tolerance in seven grass species. New Phytologist 103: 299–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bor, N.L. 1941. Indian Forest Records. New Series Botany, vol. II Common grasses of the United Provinces. New Dehli: Government of India Press. 220 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, T.A. 1982. Poaceae, vol.143. In: E. Nasir & S.I. Ali, (Eds.), Flora of Pakistan. National Herbarium (Steward Collection). Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Agricultural Research Council. 680 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downton, W.J.S. 1977. Photosynthesis in salt stressed grapevines. Australian Journal Plant Physiology 4: 183–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Shourbagy, M.N. & Koshk, H.T. 1975. Sodium Cl− effects on the sugar metabolism of several plants. Phytochemistry 17: 101–108.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, T.J., Troke, P.F. & Yeo, A.R. 1977. The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Annual Review Plant Physiology 28: 89–121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, J., Hughes, L. & Wyn Jones, R.G. 1981. Low molecular weight carbohydrates in some salt stressed plants. Physiology Plant 31: 149–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenway, H. & Munns, R.A. 1980. Mechanism of salt tolerance in non-Halophytes. Annual Review Plant Physiology 31: 149–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, F. 1983. Field and Laboratory Manual of Plant Ecology. Islamabad, Pakistan National Academy of Higher Education. University Grants Commission. 422 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, S.S. 1992. Pakistan Manual of plant Ecology. Islamabad, Pakistan: National Book Foundation. 376 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalal-ud-Din & Farooq, M. 1975. Soil variation in relation to forest management in Lalsohanra irrigated plantation. Pakistan Journal Forestry 25: 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A.S. 1963. The Desert. New York, New York: Time-life International. 160 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, E.V. & Nieman, R.H. 1978. Physiology of plant tolerance to salinity. In: G.A. Jung (Ed.), Crop tolerance to suboptimal land conditions. CSSA & SSA (Eds.), Crop tolerance to suboptimal land conditions. Madison, Wisconsin:Soil Science Society of America. 277–299 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, K.A., Aslam, Z. & Naqvi, M. 1986. Kallar Grass-A Plant for Saline Land. 93 pp.Faisalabad, Pakistan: The Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad, S., Akbar, M. & Neue, H.U. 1987. Effect of Na/Ca and N/K ratios in saline culture solution on the growth and mineral nutrition of rice (Oryza sativaL.). Plant Soil 104: 57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzaffar, M. 1997. Atlas of Pakistan Survey of Pakistan. Murree Road Rawalpindi, Pakistan, Director Map Publication.143 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A.R., Arshad, M. & Shafiq, M. 1989. Perenial Grass Germplasm of Cholistan Desert and Its Phytosociology. Bahawalpur, Pakistan: CHIDS, Islamia University. 84 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinburg, R., Lerner, H.R. & Poljakoff-Mayber, A. 1984. Changes in growth and water soluble solute concentrations inSorghum bicolorstressed with sodium and potassium salts. Physiology Plant 62: 472–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyn Jones, R.G., Gorham, J. & McDonnell, E. 1984. Organic and Nonorganic Solute Contgents as Selection Criteria for Salt Tolerance in Triticeae. In: R.C. Staples & G.H. Toenniessen (Eds.), Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Strategies for Crop Improvement. New York: Wiley Interscience. 189–203 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ashraf, M., Hameed, M., Arshad, M., Ashraf, Y., Akhtar, K. (2008). Salt Tolerance Of Some Potential Forage Grasses From Cholistan Desert Of Pakistan. In: Khan, M.A., Weber, D.J. (eds) Ecophysiology of High Salinity Tolerant Plants. Tasks for Vegetation Science, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4018-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics