Skip to main content

Facilitative root interactions in intercrops

  • Chapter
Root Physiology: from Gene to Function

Part of the book series: Plant Ecophysiology ((KLEC,volume 4))

Abstract

Facilitation takes place when plants ameliorate the environment of their neighbours, and increase their growth and survival. Facilitation occurs in natural ecosystems as well as in agroecosystems. We discuss examples of facilitative root interactions in intercropped agroecosystems; including nitrogen transfer between legumes and non-leguminous plants, exploitation of the soil via mycorrhizal fungi and soil-plant processes which alter the mobilisation of plant growth resources such as through exudation of amino acids, extra-cellular enzymes, acidification, competition-induced modification of root architecture, exudation of growth stimulating substances, and biofumigation. Facilitative root interactions are most likely to be of importance in nutrient poor soils and in low-input agroecosystems due to critical interspecific competition for plant growth factors. However, studies from more intensified cropping systems using chemical and mechanical inputs also show that facilitative interactions definitely can be of significance. It is concluded that a better understanding of the mechanisms behind facilitative interactions may allow us to benefit more from these phenomena in agriculture and environmental management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott M L and Fraley L J 1991 A review: Radiotracer methods to determine root distribution. Env. Exp. Bot. 31, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri M A 1999 The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 74, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen M K, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P and Jensen E S 2004 Biomass production, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and inorganic N use in dual and tri-component annual intercrops. Plant Soil, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anil L, Park R H P and Miller F A 1998 Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass Forage Sci. 53, 301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper J L and Townsend C R 1990 Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge 945 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellostas N M, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Andersen M K and Jensen E S 2004 Early interference dynamics in intercrops of pea, barley and oilseed rape. Biol. Agria Hortic. 21, 337–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brussaard L, Kuyper T W and De Goede R G M 2001 On the relationships between nematodes, mycorrhizal fungi and plants: functional composition of species and plant performance. Plant Soil 232, 155–165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway R M 1995 Positive interactions among plants. Bot Rev. 61, 306–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassman K G 1999 Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential., soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5952–5959.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choesin D N and Boerner R E J 1991 Allyl isothiocyanate release and the allelopathic potential of Brassica napus (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot 78, 1083–1090.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly J, Goma H C and Rahim K 2001 The information content of indicators in intercropping research. Agr. Ecosyst Environ. 87, 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crews T E and Peoples M B 2004 Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen: ecological tradeoffs and human needs. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 102, 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dakora F D 2003 Defining new roles for plant and rhizobial molecules in sole and mixed plant cultures involving symbiotic legumes. New Phytol. 158, 39–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit C T and Van den Bergh J P 1965 Competition between herbage plants. Neth. J. Agr. Sci. 13, 212–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRuijter F J, Venn B W and VanOijen M 1996 A comparison of soil core sampling and minirhizotrons to quantify root development of field-grown potatoes. Plant Soil 182, 301–312.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doll H, Holm U and Søgaard B 1995 Effect of crop density on competition by wheat and barley with Agrostemma githago and other weeds. Weed Res. 35, 391–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J, O’Connor G E, Turner G L, Coventry D R, Fettell N A, Ma-honey J, Armstrong E L and Walsgott D N 1989 N2 fixation and its value to soil N increase in lupin, field pea and other legumes in south-eastern Australia. Aust J. Agric. Res. 40, 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis R and Read D J 1994 The contributions of mycorrhizal fungi to the determination of plant community structure. Plant Soil 159, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita K, Ofosu-Budu K G and Ogata S 1992 Biological nitrogen fixation in mixed legume-cereal cropping systems. Plant Soil 141, 155–175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fusseder A, Kraus M and Beck E 1988 Reassessment of root competition for P of field-grown maize in pure and mixed cropping. Plant Soil 106, 299–301.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • George S J, Kumar B M, Wahid P A and Kamalam N V 1996 Root competition for phosphorus between the tree and herbaceous components of silvopastoral systems in Kerala, India. Plant Soil 179, 189–196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giller K E, Ormesher J and Awah F M 1991 Nitrogen transfer from Phaseolus bean to intercropped maize measured using N15-Enrichment and N15-isotope dilution methods. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 339–346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson A-C and Andren O 1987 Root dynamics in barley, lucerne and meadow fescue investigated with a mini-rhizotron technique. Plant Soil 103, 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P and Jensen E S 2001a Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping. Field Crop. Res. 70, 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P and Jensen E S 2001b Temporal and spatial distribution of roots and competition for nitrogen in pea-barley intercrops — a field study employing P-32 technique. Plant Soil 236, 63–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P and Jensen E S 2003 The comparison of nitrogen use and leaching in sole cropped versus intercropped pea and barley. Nutr, Cycl. Agroecosys. 65, 289–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He X H, Critchley C and Bledsoe C 2003 Nitrogen transfer within and between plants through common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs). Crit. Rev. Plant. 22, 531–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogh-Jensen H and Schjoerring J K 1997 Interactions between white clover and ryegrass under contrasting nitrogen availability: N2 fixation, N fertilizer recovery, N transfer and water use efficiency. Plant Soil 197, 187–199.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogh-Jensen H and Schjoerring J K 2000 Below-ground nitrogen transfer between different grassland species: Direct quantification by 15N leaf feeding compared with indirect dilution of soil 15N. Plant Soil 227, 171–183.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogh-Jensen H and Schjoerring J K 2001 Rhizodeposition of nitrogen by red clover, white clover and ryegrass leys. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 439–448.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ikram A, Jensen E S and Jakobsen 1994 No significant transfer of N and P from Pueraria phaseoloides to Hevea braziliensis via hyphal links of arbuscular mycorrhiza. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 1541–1547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Israel D W and Jackson W A 1978 The influence of nitrogen nutrition on ion uptake and translocation by leguminous plants. In Mineral Nutrition of Legumes in Tropical and Subtropical Soils. Eds. C S Andrew. and E J Kamprath., pp. 113–129. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izaurralde R C, Mcgill W B and Juma N G 1992 Nitrogen-fixation efficiency, interspecies N transfer and root-growth hi barley-field pea intercrop on a black chernozemic soil. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual conference of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 13: 11–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs E, Atsmon D and Kafkafi U 1970 A convenient method placing radioactive substances in soil for studies of root development. Agron. J. 62, 303–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen I 1994 Research approaches to study the functioning of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas in the field. Plant Soil 159, 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen E S 1997 The role of grain legume N2 fixation in the nitrogen cycling of temperate cropping systems. D.Sc. Thesis. Risø National Laboratory. R-885(EN). 86 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen E S 1996a Barley uptake of N deposited in the rhizosphere of associated field pea. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 159–168.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen E S 1996b Compared cycling in a soil-plant system of pea and barley residue nitrogen. Plant Soil 182, 13–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen E S 1996c Grain yield, symbiotic N2-fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 182, 25–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen E S 1996d Rhizodeposition of N by pea and barley and its effect on soil N dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 65–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen E S and Hauggaard-Nielsen H 2003 How can increased use of biological N2 fixation in agriculture benefit the environment? Plant Soil 252, 177–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen E S and Sorensen L H 1988 Uptake of soil nitrogen by soybean as influenced by symbiotic N2 fixation or fertilizer nitrogen supply. Soil Biol. Biochem. 20, 921–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen A and Jensen E S 1996 Transfer of N and P from intact or decomposing roots of pea to barley interconnected by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 73–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen A, Jakobsen I and Jensen E S 1992 Hyphal transport of 15N-labelled nitrogen by a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and its effect on depletion of inorganic soil N. New Phytol. 122, 281–288.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen F V, Jensen E S and Schjoerring J K 1999 Dinitrogen fixation in white clover grown in pure stand and mixture with ryegrass estimated by the immobilized 15N isotope dilution method. Plant Soil 208, 293–305.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan D F, Peoples M B, Chalk P M and Herridge D F 2002a Quantifying below-ground nitrogen of legumes. 2. A comparison of 15N and non isotopic methods. Plant Soil 239, 277–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan W D F, Peoples M B and Herridge D F 2002b Quantifying below-ground nitrogen of legumes. 1. Optimising procedures for 15N shoot-labelling. Plant Soil 245, 327–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkegaard J A, Howe G N and Mele P M 1999 Enhanced accumulation of mineral-N following canola. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 39, 587–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham M B, Grecu S J and Kanemasu E T 1998 Comparison of minirhizotrons and the soil-water-depletion method to determine maize and soybean root length and depth. Eur. J. Agron. 8, 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K and Goh K M 2000 Crop residues and management practices: Effects on soil quality, soil nitrogen dynamics, crop yield, and nitrogen recovery. Adv. Agron. 68, 197–319.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H, Chapin F S and Pons T L 1998 Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H, Juniper D, Cawthray G R, Veneklaas E J and Martinez-Ferri E 2002 The pattern of carboxylate exudation in Banksia grandis (Proteaceae) is affected by the form of phosphate added to the soil. Plant Soil 238, 111–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard S F, Freney J R and Simpson J R 1985 Assessing nitrogen transfer from legumes to associated grasses. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 575–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Tang C, Rengel Z and Zhang F 2003 Chickpea facilitates phosphorus uptake by intercropped wheat from an organic phosphorus source. Plant Soil 248, 297–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Sicun Y, Xiaolin L, Zhang F and Peter C 1999 Interspecific complementary and competitive interactions between intercropped maize and faba-bean. Plant Soil, 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman M and Dyck E 1993 Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecol. Appl. 3, 92–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie-Dawson L A, Atkinson D 1991 Methodology for the study of roots in field experiments and the interpretation of results. In Plant Root Growth, an ecological. perspective. D Atkinson Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Special. Publ. Brit. Ecol. Soc. 10, 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner P, Neumann G, Kania A, Weiskopf L and Lieberei R 2002 Spatial and temporal dynamics of the microbial community structure in the rhizosphere of cluster roots of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Soil 246, 167–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martensson AM, Rydberg I and Vestberg M 1998 Potential to improve transfer of N in intercropped systems by optimising host-endophyte combinations. Plant Soil 205, 57–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin M P L D, Snaydon R W and Drennan D S H 1982 Lithium as a nonradioactiye tracer for roots of intercropped species. Plant Soil 64, 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matson P A, Parton W J, Power A G and Swift M J 1997 Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277, 504–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer J, Buegger F, Jensen E S, Schloter M and Hess J 2003 Residual nitrogen contribution from grain legumes to succeeding wheat and rape and related microbial process. Plant Soil 255, 541–554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McConnaughay K D M and Bazzaz F A 1992 The occupation and fragmentation of space: consequences of neighbouring roots. Funct. Ecol. 6, 704–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan M and Willey R W 1980a Sorghum-pigeon pea intercropping and the effects of plant population density 1. Growth and yield. Science 95, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan M and Willey R W 1980b Sorghum-pigeon pea intercropping and the effects of plant population density 2. Resource use Science 95, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofori F and Stern W R 1987 Cereal-legume intercropping systems. Adv. Agron. 41, 41–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z 2002 Genetic control of root exudation. Plant Soil 245, 59–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ries S K, Wert V, Sweeley C C and Leavitt R A 1977 Triacontanol: A new naturally occurring plant growth regulator. Science 195, 1339–1341.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger A and Marschner P 2003 2-Phenylethylisothiocyanate concentration and microbial community composition in the rhizosphere of canola. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 445–452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar M and Kirkegaard J A 1998 Biofumigation potential of brassicas-II. Effect of environment and ontogeny on glucosi-nolate production and implications for screening. Plant Soil 201, 91–101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger P F and Jakobsen I 1999 Direct measurement of arbuscular mycorrhizal phosphorus uptake into field-grown winter wheat. Agron. J. 91, 998–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger P F, Spliid N H and Jakobsen I 2001 Fungicide application and phosphorus uptake by hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi into field-grown peas. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1231–1237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Rengel Z, Tang C and Zhang F 2003 Role of phosphorus nutrition in development of cluster roots and release of carboxylates in soil-grown Lupinus albus. Plant Soil 248, 199–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B J and Kirkegaard J A 2002 In vitro inhibition of soil microorganisms by 2-phenylethyl isothiocyanate. Plant Pathol. 51, 585–593.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Søgaard B and Doll H 1992 A positive allelopathic effect of corn cockle, Agrostemma githago, on wheat, Triticum aestivum. Can. J. Bot 70, 1916–1918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar J C and Jungk A 1987 Phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere and its relation to the depletion of soil organic phosphorous. Biol. Fert. Soils 3, 199–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tofinga M P, Paolini R and Snaydon R W 1993 A study of root and shoot interactions between cereals and peas in mixtures. Science 120, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toro F J, Martin-Closas L and Pelacho A M 2003 Jamonates promote cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var capitata L.) root and shoot development. Plant Soil 255, 77–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trannin W S, Urquiaga S, Guerra G, Ibijbijen J and Cadisch G 2000 Interspecies competition and N transfer in a tropical. grass-legume mixture. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual conference of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 32, 441–448.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trenbath B R 1976 Plant interactions in mixed crop communities. In Multiple Cropping. Eds, R I Papendick, P A Sanchez, and G B Triplett. pp. 129–169. ASA Special Publication No. 27, ASA, SSSA, CSSA, Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenbath B R 1993 Intercropping for the management of pests and diseases. Field Crop. Res. 34, 381–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenbath B R 1999 Multispecies cropping systems in India — Predictions of their productivity, stability, resilience and ecological sustainability. Agroforest. Syst. 45, 81–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Krift T A J, Kuikman P J, Moller F and Berendse F 2001 Plant species and nutritional-mediated control over rhizodeposition and root decomposition. Plant Soil 228, 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer J H 1989 The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 237 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer J H 1995 The ecological basis of alternative agriculture. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26, 201–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kessel C, Singleton P W and Hoben H J 1985 Enhanced N-transfer from soybean to maize by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi. Plant Physiol 79, 562–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veneklaas E J, Stevens J, Cawthray G R, Turner S, Grigg A M and Lambers H 2003 Chickpea and white lupin rhizosphere carboxylates vary with soil properties and enhance phosphorus uptake. Plant Soil 248, 187–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker T S, Bais H P, Grotewold E and Vivanco J M 2003 Root exudation and rhizosphere biology. Plant Physiol. 132, 44–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wamberg C, Christensen S, Jakobsen I, Muller A K and Sorensen S J 2003 The mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus intraradices) affects microbial activity in the rhizosphere of pea plants (Pisum sativum). Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 1349–1357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward K J, Klepper B, Rickman R W and Allmaras R R 1978 Quantitative estimaion of living wheat-root lenghts in soil cores. Agron. J. 70, 675–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterer J G, Vessey J K, Stobbe E H and Soper R J 1994 Yield and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in a pea mustard intercrop as influenced by N fertilizer addition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 447–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willey R W 1979a Intercropping — Its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field. Crop. Abstr. 32, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey R W 1979b Intercropping — Its importance and research needs. Part 2. Agronomy and research approaches. Field. Crop. Abstr. 32, 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan F, Schubert S and Mengel K 1996 Soil pH changes during legume growth and application of plant material. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual conference of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 23, 236–242.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Q, Li X L, Ai W D and Christie P 2003 Bi-directional transfer of phosphorus between red clover and perennial ryegrass via arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphal links. Eur. J. Soil. Biol. 39, 47–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F and Li L 2003 Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhance crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant Soil 248, 305–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hans Lambers Timothy D. Colmer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Jensen, E. (2005). Facilitative root interactions in intercrops. In: Lambers, H., Colmer, T.D. (eds) Root Physiology: from Gene to Function. Plant Ecophysiology, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4099-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics