Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akrich M (1992) The de-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker WE, Law J (eds). Shaping Technology/Building Society. The MIT Press, Cambridge,Massachusetts; pp. 205–224.
Bodker S (1991) Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Bodker S (1996) Applying activity theory to video analysis. In: Nardi BA (ed.). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, London; pp. 147–174.
Brosveet J, Sorensen KH (2000) Fishing for fun and profit? National domestication of multimedia: the case of Norway. The Information Society, 16: 263–276.
Carroll JM, Kellogg WA, Rosson MB (1991) The task-artifact cycle. In: Carroll JM (ed.). Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; pp. 74–102.
Carroll J, Howard S, Peck J, Murphy J (2002a) “No” to a free mobile: when adoption is not enough. In: Wenn A, McGrath M, Burstein F (eds). Proceedings of the Thirteenth Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS). Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia; pp. 899–910.
Carroll J, Howard S, Vetere F, Peck J, Murphy J (2002b) Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people. In: Sprague RH (ed.). Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, Maui, Hawaii.
Churchill EF, Wakeford N (2002) Framing mobile collaborations and mobile technologies. In: Brown B, Green N, Harper R (eds). Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age. Springer, London; pp. 154–179.
Engestrom Y (1987) Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Orienta-Konsultit Helsinki.
Engestrom Y (1993) Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: the case of primary care medical practice. In: Chaiklin S, Lave J (eds). Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; pp. 64–103.
Geisler C (2003) When management becomes personal: an activity-theoretic analysis of palm technologies. In: Bazerman C, Russell DR (eds). Writing Selves/Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives [e-book]. http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies, Fort Collins, Colorado; pp. 125–158.
Halloran J, Rogers Y, Scaife M (2002) Taking the “no” out of lotus notes: activity theory, groupware, and student groupwork. In: Stahl G (ed.). Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community — Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (Boulder,Colorado, USA 7-11 January). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey; pp. 169–178.
Kaptelinin V (1996) Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction. In: Nardi BA (ed.). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, London; pp. 103–116.
Kuutti K (1996) Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In:Nardi BA (ed.). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, London; pp.17–44.
Leont’ev AN (1978) Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
MacKenzie D, Wajcman J (eds) (1985) The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator Got its Hum. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Nardi BA (1996) Activity theory and human-computer interaction. In: Nardi BA (ed.). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, London; pp. 7–16.
Sears A, Arora R (2002) Data entry for mobile devices: an empirical comparison of novice performance with jot and graffiti. Interacting with Computers, 14: 413–433.
Suchman L (2002) Practice-based design of information systems: notes from the hyperdeveloped world. The Information Society, 18: 139–144.
Turner P, Turner S (2001) A web of contradictions. Interacting with Computers, 14: 1–14.
Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, London.
Waycott J (2002) Reading with new tools: an evaluation of personal digital assistants as tools for reading course materials. ALT-J, 10: 38–50.
Waycott J, Kukulska-Hulme A (2003) Student’s experiences with PDAs for reading course materials. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7: 30–43.
Wertsch JV (1998) Mind as Action. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Hamill and Lasen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Waycott, J. (2005). Appropriating Tools and Shaping Activities: The Use of PDAs in the Workplace. In: Hamill, L., Lasen, A., Diaper, D. (eds) Mobile World. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-204-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-204-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-825-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-204-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)