Skip to main content

Using Socially Deliberating Agents in Organized Settings

  • Conference paper
Engineering Societies in the Agents World VI (ESAW 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3963))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 342 Accesses

Abstract

Recently there is an increased interest in social agency and in designing and building agent organizations. In this paper we view an organization as a set of interrelated groups. Each group has an explicit structure in terms of positions and their interrelations. Agents in groups deliberate socially, distinguishing between their individual and group attitudes: Each agent is able to agree on and accept certain attitudes as attitudes of the groups it belongs. Acting as group member, an agent must be able to act on the basis of these group mental attitudes rather than on the basis of its individual beliefs and goals. This issue, although ultimately important, it has not given much attention in agent community. The objective of this paper is (a) to propose a generic design pattern for building agent organizations in which the constituting groups build and maintain their own group goals and beliefs according to their needs and the environmental conditions, (b) to present the functionality of social deliberating agents that act as group members in organized settings, and (c) to report on the development of a prototype system that comprises agents that implement such a kind of social deliberation.

This research is supported by the Pythagoras grant no. 1349 under the Operational Program for Education and Initial Training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chalupsky, H., Gil, Y., Knoblock, C.A., Lerman, K., Oh, J., Pynadath, D.V., Russ, T.A., Tambe, M.: Electric Elves: Agent Technology for Supporting Human Organizations. AI Magazine 23(2), 11–24 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen, J.: An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Teamwork. Nous 25, 487–512 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffman, R., Hayes, P., Ford, K.M.: The triples rule. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 62–65 (May/June 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carley, K.M., Gasser, L.: Computational Organization Theory. In: Weiss, G. (ed.) Mutliagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Engel, P.: Believing, Holding True, and Accepting. Philosophical Explorations I(2), 140–151 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Grosz, B.J., Kraus, S.: Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence 86, 269–357 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Grosz, B.J., Hunsberger, L.: The Dynamics of Intention in Collaborative Activity (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jennings, N.R.: Controlling cooperative problem solving in industrial multi-agent systems using joint intentions. Artificial Intelligence 75 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dunin-Keplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Evolution of Collective Commitment during Teamwork. Fundamenta Informaticae 56, 329–771 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Odell, J.J., Van Dyke Parunak, H., Fleischer, M.: The Role of Roles in Designing Effective Agent Organizations. In: Garcia, A.F., de Lucena, C.J.P., Zambonelli, F., Omicini, A., Castro, J. (eds.) Software Engineering for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS, vol. 2603. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Panzarasa, P., Jennings, N.R., Norman, T.J.: Formalizing Collaborative Decision-making and Practical Reasoning in Multi-Agent Systems. Journal of Logic and Computation 11(6), 1–63 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Partsakoulakis, I., Vouros, G.: Building common awareness in agent organizations. In: Proceeding of the AMKM workshop (AAMAS) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Partsakoulakis, I., Vouros, G.: Policies for Common Awareness in Organized Settings. In: Pěchouček, M., Petta, P., Varga, L.Z. (eds.) CEEMAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3690, pp. 564–567. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Partsakoulakis, I., Vouros, G.: Personal agents for Reliable Participation in Social Context. In: Proc. of the Coordination in Emergent Agent Societies workshop (ECAI), Spain (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pynadath, D., Tambe, M., Chauvat, N., Cavedon, L.: Towards team-oriented programming. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS, vol. 1757, pp. 233–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rescher, N.: The logic of commands. Routledge (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singh, M.P., Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Formal Methods in DAI: Logic-Based Representation and Reasoning. In: Weiss, G. (ed.) Mutliagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sycara, K., Decker, K., Pannu, A., Williamson, M., Zeng, D.: Distributed intelligent agents. IEEE Expert, Intelligent Systems and Applications 11(6), 36–45 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tambe, M.: Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 7 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tuomela, R.: Belief Versus Acceptance. Philosophical Explorations 2, 122–137 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tuomela, R., Tuomela, M.: Acting as a Group Member and Collective Commitment. Protosociology 18, 7–65 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tuomela, R.: Group Knowledge Analyzed. Episteme 1(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vouros, G., Partsakoulakis, I., Kourakos-Mavromichalis, V.: Realizing Human-Centred Systems via Socially Deliberating Agents. In: Proc. of the HCI International, vol. 4, pp. 1223–1227 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Cooperative problem solving. Journal of Logic and Computation 9, 563–592 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Brad Wray, K.: Collective Belief and Acceptance. Synthese 129, 319–333 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yen, J., Yin, J., Ioerger, T.R., Miller, M.S., Xu, D., Volz, A.: CAST: Collaborative Agents for Simulating Teamwork. In: Seventeenth Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 1135–1142 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, J., Patel, V.L., Johnson, K.A., Smith, J.W., Malin, J.: Designing Human-Centered Distributed Information Systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 42–47 (September/October 2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Partsakoulakis, I., Vouros, G. (2006). Using Socially Deliberating Agents in Organized Settings. In: Dikenelli, O., Gleizes, MP., Ricci, A. (eds) Engineering Societies in the Agents World VI. ESAW 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3963. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11759683_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11759683_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34451-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34452-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics