Skip to main content

Exploring Congruence Between Organizational Structure and Task Performance: A Simulation Approach

  • Conference paper
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3913))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Reorganization of the structure of an organization is a crucial issue in multi-agent systems that operate in an open, dynamic environment. Ideally, autonomous agents must be able to evaluate and decide the most appropriate organization given the environment conditions. That is, there is a need for dynamic reorganization of coordination structures. In this paper, we describe how simulation studies could help to determine whether and how reorganization should take place, and present a simulation scenario that can be used to evaluate the congruence, or fit, between organizational structure and task performance. Preliminary results using a simulation environment illustrate how one can explore triggers for reorganization and compare strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barber, K.S., Martin, C.E.: Dynamic reorganization of decision-making groups. In: Proceedings of the 5th Autonomous Agents, pp. 513–520. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Carley, K., Gasser, L.: Computational organization theory. In: Weiss, G. (ed.) Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 299–330. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cavedon, L., Sonenberg, L.: On social commitments, roles and preferred goals. In: Proceedings of the 1998 International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS 1998), July 1998, pp. 80–87 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collier, N.: Repast: An extensible framework for agent simulation (2003), http://repast.sourceforge.net

  5. Diedrich, F.J., Entin, E.E., Hutchins, S.G., Hocevar, S.P., Rubineau, B., MacMillan, J.: When do organizations need to change (part i)? coping with incongruence. In: Proc. of Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dignum, V.: A Model for Organizational Interaction: based on Agents, founded in Logic. Utrecht University, PhD Thesis (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dignum, V., Dignum, F., Sonenberg, L.: Towards dynamic organization of agent societies. In: Vouros, G. (ed.) Workshop on Coordination in Emergent Agent Societies, ECAI 2004, pp. 70–78 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dignum, V., Dignum, F., Furtado, V., Melo, A., Sonenberg, L.: Towards a Simulation Tool for Evaluating Dynamic Reorganization of Agents Societies. In: Proc. of WS. on Socially Inspired Computing, AISB Convention (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Donaldson, L.: The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Entin, E.E., Diedrich, F.J., Kleinman, D.L., Kemple, W.G., Hocevar, S.G., Rubineau, B., Serfaty, D.: When do organizations need to change (part ii)? incongruence in action. In: Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Entin, E.E., Serfaty, D.: Adaptive team coordination. Journal of Human Factors 41, 321–325 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Evans, J.: Strategic flexibility for high technology manoeuvres: A conceptual framework. Journal of Management Studies 28(1), 69–89 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O.: A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi Agent Systems, pp. 128–135. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Glasser, N., Morignot, P.: The reorganization of societies of autonomous agents. In: Boman, M., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1997. LNCS, vol. 1237, pp. 98–111. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hannebauer, M.: Autonomous Dynamic Reconfiguration in Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS, vol. 2427. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Horling, B., Lesser, V.: A Survey of Multi-Agent Organizational Paradigms. Computer Science Technical Report 04-45, University of Massachusetts (May 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jennings, N.R., Sycara, K., Wooldridge, M.: A roadmap of agent research and development. JAAMAS 1(1), 7–38 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miles, S., Joy, M., Luck, M.: Towards a methodology for coordination mechanism selection in open systems. In: Petta, P., Tolksdorf, R., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) ESAW 2002. LNCS, vol. 2577, pp. 241–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Nair, R., Tambe, M., Marsella, S.: Role allocation and reallocation in multiagent teams: Towards a practical analysis. In: AAMAS 2003, pp. 552–559. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. So, Y., Durfee, E.: An organizational self-design model for organizational change. In: AAAI-1993 Workshop on AI and Theories of Groups and Organizations: Conceptual and Empirical Research, pp. 8–15 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, R., Naveh, I.: Simulating organizational decision-making usinga cognitively realistic model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 7(3) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tambe, M.: Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (7), 83–124 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tidhar, G., Sonenberg, L.: Engineering organization-oriented systems. In: Hexmoor, H. (ed.) Proc. of Workshop on Autonomy, Delegation and Control: From Inter-Agent to Organizations and Institutions, AAMAS (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Sonenberg, L. (2006). Exploring Congruence Between Organizational Structure and Task Performance: A Simulation Approach. In: Boissier, O., et al. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems. AAMAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3913. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11775331_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11775331_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35173-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35176-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics