Skip to main content

Interest-Based Negotiation as an Extension of Monotonic Bargaining in 3APL

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4088))

Abstract

Reframing is a sub-type of interest-based negotiation strategy that enhances bargaining by allowing the negotiators to ask for the underlying goal of the negotiation and propose alternative plan(s) which may entail a deal on alternative issues. This paper (i) presents a negotiation protocol that support both alternate offers monotonic bargaining and reframing and (ii) gives a fully computational and reproducible specification of bargaining and reframing capable negotiation agents using the 3APL agent language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chirico, U.: JIP Prolog: Java Internet Prolog

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dastani, M., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Meyer, J.-J.: Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Platforms and Applications. In: Programming multi-agent systems in 3APL, pp. 10–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dastani, M., Ham, J.v., Dignum, F.: Communication for goal directed agents. In: Huget, M.-P. (ed.) Communication in Multiagent Systems - Agent Communication Languages and Conversation Policies. LNCS, pp. 239–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Datani, M., de Boer, F., dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J.: Programming agent deliberation: An approach illustrated using the 3apl language. In: Proceedings of The Second Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2003), pp. 97–104 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. International Journal of robotics and Autonomous Systems 3-4(24), 159–182 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Optimal negotiation strategies for agents with incomplete information. In: ATAL 2001, Seattle, US, pp. 53–68 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher, R., Ury, W.: Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving. Penguin Books, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parson, S., Sierra, C., Wooldridge, M.: Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods, and challenges. Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 2(10), 199–215 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahwan, I.: Interest-based Negotiation in Multi-Agent Systems. PhD thesis, Department of Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S., Jennings, N., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, L.: Argumentation based negotiation. Knowledge Engineering Review 18(4), 343–375 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rouchier, J.: Reimplementation of a multi-agent model aimed at sustaining experimental economic research: the case of simulations with emerging speculation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6(4) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sim, K.M.: A market-driven model for designing negotiation agents. Computationnal Intelligence 4(18), 618–637 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Vitteau, B., Huget, M.P.: Modularity in interaction protocols. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 291–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Winoto, P., McCalla, G., Vassileva, J.: Non-monotonic-offers bargaining protocol. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 1072–1079 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pasquier, P., Dignum, F., Rahwan, I., Sonenberg, L. (2006). Interest-Based Negotiation as an Extension of Monotonic Bargaining in 3APL. In: Shi, ZZ., Sadananda, R. (eds) Agent Computing and Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4088. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11802372_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11802372_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36707-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36860-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics