Abstract
We have shown that the sp (3, ℝ) algebra and its subalgebras are S.G.A.'s for various collective models and that the decomposition of the shell-model space into irreducible sp(3, ℝ) subspaces provides a practical means to realize collective states microscopically. The programme is not yet complete, however. In particular, one would like to extend the calculations to higher levels of truncation, perform calculations with realistic two-nucleon interactions rather than phenomenological potentials, and investigate the effects of the sp(3, ℝ) breaking spin-orbit and tensor forces. All of these things can be done. What is important, from a general shell-model point of view, is that one now has a well-defined procedure for augmenting any shell-model space, to admit the possible development of collective dynamics, by the addition of those states which one has identified as being necessary for that purpose. Finally, by realizing collective states on many-particle (shell-model) state space in this way one is enabled to exploit the much larger algebra of all many-particle observables to probe the currents and other dynamical properties of collective states which the collective models, in themselves, are powerless to predict.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S. Tomonaga, Prog. Theor. Phys. 13 (1955) 467, 482
J.P. Elliott, Proc. Roy. Soc. A245 (1958) 128.
S. Goshen and H.J. Lipkin, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 6 (1959) 301.
S. Goshen and H.J. Lipkin, in “Spectroscopic and Group Theoretical Methods in Physics” ed. F. Block (North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1968).
A. Bohr, Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd. 26 (1952) no.14
A. Bohr, “Rotational States of Atomic Nuclei” (Ejnar Munksgaard Forlag, Copenhagen, 1954)
A. Bohr and B.R. Mottelson, in “Beta-and Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy” ed. K. Siegbahn (North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1954).
H. Ui, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44 (1970) 153.
O.L. Weaver, L.C. Biedenharn and R.Y. Cusson, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 77 (1973) 250.
M. Moshinsky and C. Quesne, Journ. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 1772; cf. also talk by P. Kramers.
R. Godement, Seminaire Cartan (Paris, 1958).
G. Rosensteel and D.J. Rowe, Int. Journ. of Theor. Phys.16 (1977)63.
G. Rosensteel and D.J. Rowe, Int. Journ. of Theor. Phys. 15 (1976)453.
C. Itzykson, Commun. Math. Phys. 4 (1967) 92.
I.M. Gelfand and M. Graev, Izv. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Mat. 17 (1953) 189; english translation, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 2 (1956) 147.
O.L. Weaver and L.C. Biedenharn, Nucl. Phys. A185 (1972) 1.
G.W. Mackey, “Induced Representations of Groups and Quantum Mechanics”, Benjamin, New York, 1968.
G. Rosensteel and D.J. Rowe, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 104 (1977) 134.
D.J. Rowe, Nucl. Phys. A152 (1970) 273.
F.M. Villars, Nucl. Phys. 3 (1957) 240; Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 7 (1957) 185.
P. Gulshani and D.J. Rowe, Can. Journ. Phys. 54 (1976) 970.
G. Rosensteel and D.J. Rowe, Ann. Phys. 96 (1976) 1.
R.Y. Cusson, Nucl. Phys. A114 (1968) 289
O.L. Weaver, R.Y. Cusson and L.C. Biedenharn, Ann.Phys.(N.Y.) 102 (1976) 493.
G. Rosensteel and D.J. Rowe, Phys. Rev. Letters 38 (1977) 10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Springer-Verlag
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rowe, D.J., Rosensteel, G. (1978). The nuclear collective model and the symplectic group. In: Kramer, P., Rieckers, A. (eds) Group Theoretical Methods in Physics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 79. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-08848-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-08848-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-08848-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35813-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive